1 University of Wisconsin- Madison Adam Fiedler, Tami Lasseter, Erin McElroy, and Lenny Sheps- Graduate Students Judith Burstyn, Charles Casey, Lloyd Smith,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Toward Better Research: Cross-Threads Nick Feamster, Alex Gray, Charles Isbell College of Computing Georgia Tech.
Advertisements

How to Finish Your Thesis/Dissertation?. Deciding to Go to Graduate School Without a powerful drive, the full-time effort and unflagging perseverance.
PURPOSE OF GRADUATE SCHOOL Ghana Technology University College.
The Assessment Imperative: A Work in Progress A Focus on Competencies Ricky W. Griffin, Interim Dean Mays Business School Texas A&M University.
Overview of Dissertation Process EdD Instructional Leadership for Nurse Educators Dr. Natalie Adams.
MS Program Learning Outcomes. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Measures and CriteriaAssessment Schedule 1. Demonstrate knowledge of broad and specialty.
Cleveland State University ESC 720 Research Communications Dissertation Proposals Dan Simon 1.
Research as inquiry Models, approaches and conceptions Vicky Davies 1Based on a presentation by L Norton March 2013.
The School of Education University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill George W. Noblit Robert J. Helfenbein.
Univ of Wisconsin-Madison Neuroscience Training Program CID Leadership Committee Faculty: Vaishali Bakshi, PhD Assistant Professor of Psychiatry Mary Behan,
The PhD Viva Steve Schneider 21 June This session Context on the nature of the PhD viva Two demonstration mini vivas Discussion and questions.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Ph.D. growth and development (recruiting, marketing, etc.) Srinivas Akella, Min Shin, Jing Xiao 9/4/20091CS Retreat.
Providing Opportunities for Scholarship and Research Contribution to the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate (CID) Contribution to the Carnegie Initiative.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
Fall Graduate Seminar CHEM 691 Welcome Address from GPD.
Advances research methods and proposal writing Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology. September 2008.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
On Being a Successful Graduate Student
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Writing the Honors Thesis A Quick Guide to Long-term Success.
PhD Program Learning Outcomes. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Measures and CriteriaAssessment Schedule 1. Demonstrate knowledge of broad and specialty.
Mechanical Engineering 1 Graduate Programs Degree Programs –Master of Engineering or M.E. (thesis option) –Master of Science or M.S. (non-thesis option)
College of Natural and Applied Sciences Master of Science in Environmental Science Master of Science in Environmental Science Degree 21 Faculty: From CNAS,
1 C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs Bob Smallwood, University of.
Providing Opportunities for Scholarship and Research Department of Chemistry Howard University Washington, D.C.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Arizona State University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Science Education Mathematics Education Language and Literacy.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Georgetown University Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience (IPN)
Indiana University School of Education Luise P. McCarty, Associate Dean for Graduate Studies; Associate Professor of Philosophy of Education J. Debora.
Evaluating and Improving Doctoral Education: The Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate Robyn Gdula Gorka Peris May 4, 2004.
The Mathematics Department of the University of Southern California Francis Bonahon, Professor and Acting Chair Asher Shamam, Graduate Student.
STRATEGIES TO ACHIEVE GOALS SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Graduate Program in Neuroscience University of Minnesota Bill Engeland Neil Schmitzer-Torbert Ginger Seybold.
Introduction to the Graduate Academic Program in the Department of Physics and Astronomy Collin Broholm Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins.
The Gradual Life and the Personal Hair Dressing Degree.
College of Natural and Applied Sciences Master of Science in Biology Master of Science in Biology Degree 8 Faculty: From CNAS, WERI & Marine Lab 8 Faculty:
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
How to Succeed in Graduate School: The Hidden Curriculum Orientation 2015.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Mary Roberts Student Learning Support Service Learning and Teaching Strategy Committee Grant Research and Enquiry Skill Project: Undergraduate Research.
Department of Engineering Management, Information & Systems Systems Engineering Program Proposed PhD with a Major in Systems Engineering Jerrell Stracener,
FACULTY ROLES & STUDENT SUCCESS. Faculty Roles in: Program level learning outcomes Curriculum mapping Assessment of student learning Student success.
1 University of Wisconsin- Madison Adam Fiedler, Tami Lasseter, Erin McElroy, and Lenny Sheps- Graduate Students Judith Burstyn, Charles Casey, Lloyd Smith,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign History Department Clare Crowston Peter Fritzsche Kerry Wynn.
Information Literacy Module for Majors Available to support any department Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Supporting the Architecture.
A Few Words on the CV Original Source (link now inactive): Related Material (still live):
Michigan State University Yanny Lau Joe Lonstein.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
University of Colorado School of Education Margaret Eisenhart (Chair) Tracy Naber (Student) Lorrie Shepard (Dean) 7 Other Members of the Faculty.
J.P. Hornak, , 2006 Research Practices http://
Comprehensive Exams Alan Sved, PhD Department of Neuroscience & Center for Neuroscience University of Pittsburgh A discussion of ‘best practices’
The Graduate School Experience A.J. Brush, Microsoft Lori Pollock, University of Delaware 2012.
Making assessment in PhD programs more useful for faculty and students
An Introduction to the UCA Core The UCA Experience Explore. Enrich
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
University of Pittsburgh Department of History
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
On Being a Successful Graduate Student
LEARNAPALOZZA: SERVICE-LEARNING AT CPCC
Columbia University English and Comparative Literature
Julie Kaiser, PhD Doctoral Professional Development Coordinator
A Successful Graduate Student by
Introduction to the AP Capstone™ Program
Expectations and Quality Control for Ph.D. Students
企業研究方法 11 Making Choice 報告人:易鼐恩 2017/04/18.
Presentation transcript:

1 University of Wisconsin- Madison Adam Fiedler, Tami Lasseter, Erin McElroy, and Lenny Sheps- Graduate Students Judith Burstyn, Charles Casey, Lloyd Smith, Jim Taylor, Howard Whitlock, and Arun Yethiraj - Faculty

2 Purpose of the WI Ph. D. Train for self-teaching/learning. Find, define, and solve new problems. Develop communication skills – both written and oral. Develop leadership and teamwork. Develop depth in a domain and breadth in several areas.

3 First year: Introduction to discipline and department Entrance qualifying exam – four areas. “Core” course-work – defined by Div. Teaching normally done in first year. Early selection of a research advisor. Note: the curricula, exams, and research evaluations are different in the different sub-disciplines or divisions.

4 Introduction to the research enterprise Begin research and “learn the ropes” from older graduate students - apprentice. Research topic exploration from the literature and with advisor. Topic exams and/or group seminars. Cumulative exams or “Cumes” – to provide breadth – done by Division. Research proposal or thesis exam - depth.

5 Significant Transition The most significant part of the doctoral curriculum is how and what students learn themselves, from their advisor and lab- mates, and from the literature. Satisfaction of Preliminary exam requirements is a step in the transition. Process is normally smooth, but the time required varies with each student and with the type of research problem.

6 Other Commonalities Seminars and colloquia by outsiders. Group meetings and sub-group meetings. “Super groups” – combined for common purposes of efficiency. Advanced courses, but with an individually- designed minor. Advising undergraduates (Chem 116) Social gatherings among students.

7 Dissertation and defense Independent research proposal to demonstrate research understanding. Divisional seminar technical meetings to practice scientific communication. Original published work to demonstrate significance and to practice communicating research findings. Open thesis defense to bring it all together and provide evidence of accomplishments.

8 Major Discussions – See HO Issues of balance, reward, and responsibility of the student to select and self learn. Mass of material to cover and efficiency while in graduate school – led to ideas of mini-courses. Whatever changes are made, the importance of the degree lies in the output traits and their evaluation.

9 Novel Idea – Focus on Traits Independence and ability to self-teach in new and unknown environments and formulate and solve problems. Communicate clearly and logically in writing and in oral situations, including ability to analyze critical comments and respond. Demonstrate depth of knowledge in a selected discipline and breadth in others. Demonstrate leadership and teamwork – teamwork remains a problem for us.