Update for BKCASE Workshop VI Part V: Implementation Examples John Brackett, Aaron Chia, Heidi Davidz, Kevin Forsberg, Richard Freeman, Tom Hilburn, Alex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INCOSE Presentation San Francisco Chapter 13 October 2009 Mapping CMMI to Systems Engineering Adrienne Friedman.
Advertisements

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
Curriculum Leadership Institute (CLI) Academic Program Governance.
LHS CLASS OF 2010 Graduation Research Project. Requirement for Graduation Starting with the 2007 – 2008 academic year, all seniors have been required.
Curriculum Components Version 2.0 Dr. Charles P. Friedman Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) Dr. William Hersh Oregon Health & Science.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
NPSS AdCom 15 November 2014 Seattle President’s Report Janet Barth 1.
Course Outline Process Overview for Course Convenors.
1 Course Schedule Spring 2006 Exam 1 February 2006 Project Introduction(5pages)3/24/06 Project Testing 3/24-4/15 Exam 2 4/11/06 Presentation instructions:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
RefWorks Create bibliography in choice of style– MLA, APA, etc. “Saves time. Awesome!” “It’s nice to keep track of resources.” “It created the bibliography.
BKCASE Workshop V Case Studies January 26–28, 2011 Team: Aaron Eng Seng Chia, Heidi Davidz, Richard Freeman, Sandy Friedenthal, Tom Hilburn, Alex Lee,
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
The Writer’s Handbook: A Guide for Social Workers
Articulating a Program of Study to the Oregon Registry Oregon Center for Career Development in Childhood Care and Education Portland State University pdx.edu/occd.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
GRCSE History GRCSE team established at BKCASE II at Daytona Beach, March 2010 – Team has remained fairly stable since A couple of additions to the team.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Design and Manufacture: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Counselor Conference November 19, 2013 Dr. Lawrence E. Whitman Kansas Affiliate Director, PLTW College of Engineering Wichita State University.
Outbrief for BKCASE Workshop VI Part V: Implementation Examples John Brackett, Aaron Chia, Heidi Davidz, Kevin Forsberg, Richard Freeman, Tom Hilburn,
The Future of Labour – Vol. II Book proposal Miroslav Beblavý.
Part IV: Organizing to Perform Systems Engineering Art, Alice, Heidi, Richard, Hillary, James, Garry, Ken.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
GRCSE Path Forward. Outline of GRCSE section BKCASE Core team + TF have made overview responses to GRCSE review comments – Identified 9 themes I present.
NTHMP MES Action Item Update January 27, 2010 Jenifer Rhoades Tamra Biasco Tom LeBlanc.
GE 121 – Engineering Design Engineering Design GE121 Reporting the Outcome Lecture 7A.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Continuous Improvement Story Cover Page The cover page is the title page Rapid Process Improvement Story Template O Graphics are optional This CI Story.
System conversion project review project deliverable: the final report programmed reviews types of system maintenance information system obsolescence maintenance.
Part IV: Organizing to Perform Systems Engineering Art, Alice, Heidi, Richard, Hillary, James, Garry, Ken, Dick.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Enterprise IPv6 Transition Analysis IETF 62 IPv6 Operations Working Group March 7-11, 2005 Minneapolis, MN Presenter Jim Bound Jim Bound (Editor), Yanick.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
English and Digital Literacies Unit 3.4: Group Roles for a Digital Story Project Bessie Mitsikopoulou School of Philosophy Faculty of English Language.
Take One! January 28, How Do I Become A “Good” Teacher?
©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
North East Regional Network Event 28 th March 2013 ‘The Changing Role of the Technician’
Curriculum Database for Career Academies and Linked Learning Pathways Annie Johnston and Erin Fender College & Career Academy Support Network (CCASN),
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Association of Enterprise Architects International Committee on Enterprise Architecture Standards Jan 23, Collaborative Expedition Workshop #57aeajournal.org.
1 Geant4 Documentation Dennis Wright Geant4 Delta Review 9 October 2002 Internal documentation review Documentation improvements Plans for future improvements.
BUS OPERATOR WORKSTATION PROCUREMENT TEAM TRAINING T O ENHANCE BUS OPERATOR ERGONOMICS, HEALTH, AND SAFETY A TRAINING TEMPLATE FOR TRANSIT AGENCIES [ADD.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Training Materials Workshop Subject Matter Expert USGS Headquarters Reston, Virginia.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
1 Copyright © 2014 by Lockheed Martin Corporation SE Use Cases SysML Roadmap Activity John Watson Lockheed Martin 6/17/2014.
SQA project process standards IEEE software engineering standards
FIRST GENERAL BODY MEETING
Project Management PTM721S
MSc Double Degree students
SQA project process standards IEEE software engineering standards
Multinational Planning MNF SOP 18 After Action Review
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
The GEO-6 Matrix Drafting Approach
For Computer Society Internal Use Only
Decision Analysis Working Group
MathDL Mathematical Sciences Digital Library
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Class Project Guidelines
Fort Valley State University
BKCASE Workshop VI Day 3 Breakout Session Discussion – Forward Plan
Chapter 4: Project Integration Management
Presentation transcript:

Update for BKCASE Workshop VI Part V: Implementation Examples John Brackett, Aaron Chia, Heidi Davidz, Kevin Forsberg, Richard Freeman, Tom Hilburn, Alex Lee, Alice Squires

Workshop VI Deliverables & Expectations Deliverables for Workshop –Adjudication of SEBoK.25 comments and flag major issues for discussion –Outline of Part including topics and authors –Major terminology required for each Part –Some primary references Initial materials submitted to the core team April 1 –Part team leads expected to brief progress at Workshop VI (each team has 30 minutes)

Purpose The purpose of SEBoK – Guide to the body of knowledge – Not duplicating the body of knowledge, so not copying over the case studies in their entirety The purpose of Part V – Illustrate the topics from the other parts – Examples which other part authors reference – Help with the development of SE courses – GRCSE will also use the matrix mapping topics to examples

Adjudication of 0.25 Adjudication complete Key themes: – Suggestions to delete case studies – Suggestions to keep case studies – Recommendations for specific cases – Need expanded breadth of applications – Structural issues

Part V Topic Outline with Authors Full author team to contribute to each section Outline – Introduction – Matrix – Case Studies Description of case study Relating the example to SEBoK topics via the matrix Link to the case study material – Vignettes Description of something that happened Relating the example to SEBoK topics via the matrix Link to source material (if applicable)

Issues for Discussion Team decided to use both full case studies and more informal vignettes to cover more breadth in applications Only real examples used, no notional cases Need part topic outlines so we can populate the matrix linking case studies to SEBoK topics Prefer to build links between other parts and examples as part teams develop material Want examples to be available for other part teams while they do their writing Need agreement from author team on number and breadth of case studies and vignettes Cases available on Sakai for authors to reference

List of Cases and Vignettes

Case Study and Vignette Materials Hyperlink or document loaded in Sakai

Terminology Topics from each part which we reference Case study Vignette

Primary References Reference for each case study used Case study chapter references – Friedman, G., Sage, A. (2004, January). Case Studies of Systems Engineering and Management in Systems Acquisition, Systems Engineering. Vol. 7, No. 1, ( – Haskins, C. (Editor) (2009). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities (version 3.2). International Council on Systems Engineering. – Herreid, C. F. (1997 November). What is a Case? Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, ( – Herreid, C. F. (1998 January). What Makes a Good Case? Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, ( – Herreid, C. F. (2002 February). The Way of Flesch: The Art of Writing of Readable Cases. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31, ( – Kardos, G., Smith, C. O. (1979 March) On Writing Engineering Cases. Proceedings of SEE National Conference on Engineering Case Studies. ( – Moody, C., van Voorhees, B. (1997). Metrics and Case Studies for Evaluating Engineering Designs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. – Air Force Center for System Engineering – Case Study collection ( – Case of the Killer Robot, Richard G. Epstein, Westchester University of Pennsylvania Mike Melamed, CWRU 2000 ( – INCOSE Code of Ethics ( – National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science ( – National Institute of Engineering Ethics (

Issues Having appropriate expertise to discuss/document each case study/vignette accurately Coordinated effort for adding appropriate linking throughout the SEBoK Folding in enterprise, service, product, System of systems consistent with rest of SEBoK

Additional Reference

Pivot Summary of Adjudication Comments Adjudication (Show All) Count of Explanation/Actions Explanation/ActionsTotal Delete Case Studies Delete Case Studies 0447, replace with TPMs1 General Comment - No action4 Keep case studies5 Keep Case Studies - across chapters Keep case studies - separate book1 Keep case studies, add failures Mislabeled as Case Studies comment3 More case studies3 New Case Study Suggestion/Reference8 No, it is not possible that SEBoK will pay for case study content1 Specific Action Suggested2 Verification Missing, Transition out of order Grand Total45 Explanation/ActionsTotal Delete Case Studies921% Keep case studies1638% New Case Study Suggestion/Reference819% Specific Action Suggested410% General Comment - No action512% Grand Total42100%

From January Workshop Adjudication Themes for Chapter 16: Application/Case Studies Explanation/ActionsTotal Delete Case Study Chapter921% Keep case studies1638% New Case Study Suggestion/Reference819% Specific Action Suggested410% General Comment - No action512% Grand Total42100% Delete: Replace case studies with Technical Performance Measures (1) Keep: Integrate case studies throughout SEBoK (4) Keep: Add examples of failures (3) Note: HST not in Chapter 16 Keep: Put entire chapter in separate book (1)