Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review & Update of the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Advertisements

Discussion Topics Brief history of structural stormwater management The Low Impact Development (LID) alternative to ponds, ponds, ponds… LID for Hydromodification.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
Low Impact Development They took all the trees and put them in a tree museum and they charged all the people a dollar and a half just to see 'em. Don't.
Infiltration Trenches Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan Stormwater C.3 Guidebook 6 th Edition.
UW LID Workshop Permeable Pavement Modeling June 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
LID Site Design and Drainage Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
UW LID Workshop Bioretention Flow Control Modeling May 2008
Leah Johanson, Water Environment Services
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
Where are the regulations going? Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
Wake County Stormwater Workshop Guidance on the New Stormwater Ordinance and Design Manual August 29, 2006.
Green Roof Hydrology by Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, WA.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 Vancouver, WA, Workshop October 17, 2007 PM.
Hydrologic Abstractions
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTER MODELING Washington Hydrology Society March 2006 Joe Brascher, President Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
Stormwater Infrastructure for Water Quality Management Dr. Larry A. Roesner, P.E. CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas, Austin April 8,
For Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting December 14, 2010 Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Bernie Engel Purdue University. Low-Impact Development (LID) An approach to land development to mimic the pre-development site hydrology to: 1)Reduce.
SUSTAIN Pilot Study April 25, 2012 Curtis DeGasperi King County
How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies?
Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Stormwater Specialist Biosystem and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University.
Bioretention Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Module 6: Design Process Preliminary Field Review Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Design Report, including Preliminary NOI Package Alignment and.
STEP 3: SITING AND SIZING STORM WATER CONTROLS Section 6.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
Putting the “LID” on Water Pollution New Water Quality Requirements for Land Use County of Orange Mary Anne Skorpanich Richard Boon.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Bay Area Hydrology Model Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
ODOT 2015 Geo-Environmental Conference
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Discussion of Proposed MS4 Permit Design Standards Language.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
Presented by George Doubleday 1. What is The Woodlands Purpose of this Research Build and Calibrate Vflo TM model for The Woodlands Compare storms with.
Seattle’s Testing and Application of Low Impact Development BMPs in WWHM3 July 2006 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
Bernie Engel, Larry Theller, James Hunter Purdue University.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Term Project Presentation CE 394K.2 Hydrology Presented by Chelsea Cohen Thursday, April 24, 2008.
Low impact development strategies and techniques jennifer j. bitting, pe the low impact development center, inc. june 2008.
Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.
Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
PSGB Ecosystem Conference The Effectiveness of LIDs in Reducing Stormwater Runoff February 9, 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Western Washington Hydrology Model 2005 AWRA Annual Conference Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Sizing Stormwater Control Facilities to Address Stream-Bank Erosion Control Anthony M. Dubin, PE Brown and Caldwell Anthony M. Dubin,
Kitsap County Department of Public Works CRAB – November 04, 2015 Bioretention Stormwater BMP Benson Burleson Design Engineer
Storm Water Runoff Storm Water Runoff
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
ASCE LID Conference LID Analysis Considerations in Western Washington November 17, 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
WWHM3 LID Stormwater Modeling Snohomish County August 2006 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Land Use. How We Use Land Urbanization of areas is becoming a problem. Thousands of acres of open space just in Pennsylvania have been lost to development.
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
MIDS Calculator Fundamentals
LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Source: US EPA National Stormwater Calculator Release
MIDS calculator Quantifies reductions in runoff volume for a given BMP or group of BMPs Quantifies reductions in phosphorus (P) and TSS runoff for a given.
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
Kickoff example Create a new file
Intro MIDS Calculator Use
MIDS Calculator Use - Intermediate
Doug Beyerlein, P.E., Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
What we have developed is…
Presentation transcript:

Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants

Presentation Overview WA NPDES permit WA NPDES permit Simplified tool: allows sizing of pre- designed LID BMPs without continuous modeling Simplified tool: allows sizing of pre- designed LID BMPs without continuous modeling Kitsap County Kitsap County Western WA lowlands Western WA lowlands

NPDES Permit Requirements Oregon Hydromodification Provisions Oregon Hydromodification Provisions –Assessment of hydromod impacts –Development strategies National Shift National Shift –LID, infiltration –MEP ->numerical stds –Focus on flow duration Western Washington Western Washington –LID to maximum extent feasible –Numerical Std: Match pre-developed flow durations –Continuous hydrologic modeling

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Compost Amended Soil

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Retain Trees and Vegetation

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Green Roofs

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Bioretention

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Permeable Pavement

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Dispersion

Minimize impervious surfaces Minimize disturbance to soils & vegetation BMPs that reduce runoff using infiltration, evapotranspiration, or stormwater reuse Examples…. Mimic predeveloped hydrologic function BMPs to Reduce Hydromod Rain Water Harvesting

Hydrologic Modeling Use of mathematical equations to estimate runoff as a result of: Source: weather patterns, land use and topography.

Single-Event Methods Single storm event (typically 24-hours) Simulate corresponding runoff (peak flow) Ex. SCS, SBUH, StormShed, xp-SWMM, HEC-HMS Runoff (cfs) Rainfall (inches) Rainfall (in) Unmit. Runoff (cfs) Mit. Runoff (cfs) Time (hrs)

Continuous Models Long-term rainfall and evaporation Simulate long-term runoff Flow durations -> period of time channels experience elevated flows Time (hrs) Runoff (cfs) Rainfall (inches) Rainfall (in) Unmit. Runoff (cfs) Mit. Runoff (cfs) Ex. HSPF, WWHM, MGS Flood

Challenges for Region New BMPs New BMPs New Modeling Requirements New Modeling Requirements New Standards -> BMP size vary widely across the region New Standards -> BMP size vary widely across the region –Rainfall patterns –Precipitation depth –Soil characteristics –Predeveloped vegetation cover 26 inches 68 inches

Objectives of Project Size BMPs without extensive calculations or continuous modeling Size BMPs without extensive calculations or continuous modeling Streamline agency review (“rule of thumb” sizing equations) Streamline agency review (“rule of thumb” sizing equations) Reduce barriers to LID implementation Reduce barriers to LID implementation

Project Site Kitsap County Kitsap County Interest in integrating LID Interest in integrating LID Support plan reviewers Support plan reviewers Allow design without engineer Allow design without engineer Coming Soon to all western WA lowlands

“Pre-Designed” BMPs: prescribed depths, slopes, porosities, etc. “Pre-Designed” BMPs: prescribed depths, slopes, porosities, etc. Sizing Equations: BMPs by contributing impervious area, infiltration rate & precip Sizing Equations: BMPs by contributing impervious area, infiltration rate & precip Flow Credits: impervious surface reduction credits Flow Credits: impervious surface reduction credits Calculator Calculator Sizing Tool Summary

Sizing Equations Seattle Public Utilities Infiltration BMPs Infiltration BMPs Function of contributing area, infiltration rate & precip. Function of contributing area, infiltration rate & precip.

Bioretention Cell Bioretention Cell Permeable Pavement Facility Permeable Pavement Facility Infiltration Trench Infiltration Trench Gravelless Chamber Gravelless Chamber Sizing Equations “Pre-Designed” BMPs

Bioretention Cell Bioretention Cell Permeable Pavement Facility Permeable Pavement Facility Infiltration Trench Infiltration Trench Gravelless Chamber Gravelless Chamber Sizing Equations Design Configurations –No underdrain –Ponding: 2 to 10” –Side slopes 3H:1V –12” bioretention soil (18” for treatment) per Seattle specs

Sized BMPs for range site conditions Sized BMPs for range site conditions –Western Washington Hydrology Model –Precipitation: 32, 36, 44, 52 in/yr –Contributing Imp Area: 2,000 – 10,000 sf –Design Infilt. Rates: in/hr Developed Relationship Developed Relationship –Contributing Imp Area and BMP Area –Linear, typical R 2 at least 0.99 Sizing Equations Developed Using Continuous Modeling

Sizing Relationships for Sites with 52” Annual Rainfall

Sizing Factors for Sites with 52” Annual Rainfall BR Area = 0.21 x Imp. Area

Sizing Factors for Sites with 52” Annual Rainfall Sizing Factors BR Area = SF x Imp. Area 42% 29.3% 21%

Sizing Equations for Anywhere in Kitsap County Sizing Factors Bioret Area = SF x Imp. Area Slope (M) BR Area = Imp. Area x [(M x Precip) + B] Y-Intercept (B) Sizing Factor

Sizing Equations BMP Design Infilt. Rate (in/hr) Forest Standard Treatment Standard MBMB Bioretention Cell 6 inch ponding depth inch ponding depth BR Bottom Area (sf) = Impervious Area (sf) x [M x Mean Annual Precipitation (in) + B]

Sizing Equations BMP Design Infilt. Rate (in/hr) Forest Standard Treatment Standard MBMB Bioretention Cell 6 inch ponding depth inch ponding depth Site Precip. = 49 inches/yr BR Bottom Area (sf) = Impervious Area (sf) x [ x ] = Imp. Area (sf) x

Sizing Equations BMP Design Infilt. Rate (in/hr) Forest Standard Treatment Standard MBMB Bioretention Cell 6 inch ponding depth inch ponding depth Site Precip. = 49 inches/yr BR Bottom Area (sf) = Impervious Area (sf) x [ x ] = Imp. Area (sf) x

Sizing Equations PP Area (sf) = Impervious Area (sf) x [M x Mean Annual Precipitation (in) + B] BMP Design Infilt. Rate (in/hr) Forest Standard MB Permeable Pavement Surface depth calculated 0.13 – ≥ Permeable Pavement Facility 6 inch ponding depth PP Aggregate Depth (in) = M x Mean Annual Precipitation (in)

Sizing Equations BMP Design Infilt. Rate (in/hr) Forest Standard MB Infiltration Trench 18 inchdepth Gravelless Chamber Void space of 2.6 cf/ft Length (ft) = Impervious Area (sf) x [M x Mean Annual Precipitation (in) + B]

Flow Control Credits Seattle Public Utilities Impervious surface reduction credit Impervious surface reduction credit Degree standard achieved Degree standard achieved

Retained Trees Retained Trees Newly Planted Trees Newly Planted Trees Green Roof Green Roof Dispersion Dispersion Permeable Pavement Surface Permeable Pavement Surface Flow Control Credits “Pre-Designed” BMPs

Retained Trees Retained Trees Newly Planted Trees Newly Planted Trees Green Roof Green Roof Dispersion Dispersion Permeable Pavement Surface Permeable Pavement Surface Flow Control Credits Design Configurations –Evergreen and deciduous trees –Minimum 6” DBH Literature review of infiltration, evapotranspiration, interception

Flow Control Credits Facility Type Design Variable Flow Control Credit (Forest Standard) Retained Trees Evergreen 20% canopy area (min 100 sf/tree) Deciduous 10% canopy area (min 80 sf/tree) New Trees Evergreen 50 sf / tree Deciduous 20 sf / tree Green Roof 4 inch depth 42% 8 inch depth 46% DispersionNA77% Permeable Pavement Surface (3” subbase) Slope ≤ 2% 100% Slope 2% - 5% 41%

Flow Control Credits Facility Type Design Variable Flow Control Credit (Forest Standard) Retained Trees Evergreen 20% canopy area (min 100 sf/tree) Deciduous 10% canopy area (min 80 sf/tree) New Trees Evergreen 50 sf / tree Deciduous 20 sf / tree Green Roof 4 inch depth 42% 8 inch depth 46% DispersionNA77% Permeable Pavement Surface (3” subbase) Slope ≤ 2% 100% Slope 2% - 5% 41% Impervious Area Mitigated = Canopy Area x 20%

Flow Control Credits Facility Type Design Variable Flow Control Credit (Forest Standard) Retained Trees Evergreen 20% canopy area (min 100 sf/tree) Deciduous 10% canopy area (min 80 sf/tree) New Trees Evergreen 50 sf / tree Deciduous 20 sf / tree Green Roof 4 inch depth 42% 8 inch depth 46% DispersionNA77% Permeable Pavement Surface (3” subbase) Slope ≤ 2% 100% Slope 2% - 5% 41% Impervious Area Mitigated = Green Roof Area x 42% Downstream BMP Sized for Green Roof Area x 58%

BMP Sizing Calculator Guides designer through selecting and sizing BMPs Guides designer through selecting and sizing BMPs Documentation for project submittal Documentation for project submittal

Conclusions Relatively easy method for designers to select and size BMPs Relatively easy method for designers to select and size BMPs Streamline agency review Streamline agency review –Rule of thumb sizing –Standard submittal worksheet Reduces barriers to LID implementation Reduces barriers to LID implementation Through Ecology grant will expand tool to western Washington lowlands in Through Ecology grant will expand tool to western Washington lowlands in

Questions? Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants