Larry Galehouse, PE, PS, Director.  Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AASHTO - FHWA Peer Exchange on Asset Management and Performance Management July 26-27, 2010.
Advertisements

From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Update - Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures Kelley Rehm, PE July 2011.
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
EVOLVING DEMANDS Highway Usage Increased 29% in the 1990’s Truck Traffic Increased 40% in the 1990’s Truck Traffic Will Increase 3% per year in next 20.
City of Willows Pavement Management Program Road Maintenance Needs March 25, 2014.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Your Roads The Future, Some History, and Alternatives For Wasco County April 23, 2013.
Why Pavement Maintenance and Preservation? Sponsored by: Minnesota T 2 Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman,
The Dalles Pavement Preservation Program Presented by Bill Barrier Transportation Manager City of The Dalles Public Works Department.
Pavement Preservation Update By Shakir Shatnawi Chief, Office of Pavement Preservation PPTG Caltrans Co-Chair Gary Hildebrand and Casey Holloway PPTG Industry.
A PRESERVING AIRPORT PAVEMENTS Highlights from 2010 ACRP Synthesis FAA Eastern Region 2011 Airports Conference Paul W. Wilke, P.E. Principal Engineer.
LTAP/TTAP Center Directors November 20, 2013 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION Stephen R. Mueller, P.E., MPA Pavement and Materials Engineer FHWA Resource Center (Lakewood,
A Urban Highway Infrastructure: Design For Long, Long Life Michael I. Darter, Ph.D, PE Principle Engineer, ARA, Inc. Director, Pavement Research Institute,
August 31, SASHTO – Biloxi, MS FHWA Support for Pavement Preservation Stephen R. Mueller, P.E. Pavement and Materials Engineer Federal Highway.
GASB#34 Asset Management TEAM Transportation Fair Presentation by: Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. October 8, 2004St. Louis, Missouri.
DUPAGE COUNTY MAYORS & MANAGERS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MAY 24, 2012 LOMBARD, IL.
Herriman City Engineering Department.  Herriman City has experienced tremendous growth over the last several years  Many new subdivisions and associated.
1.000 delegates to gather in Lisbon Financing the European Road Infrastructure Jean-Claude Roffé, Vice President & Christophe Nicodème, Director General.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Moving Toward a Performance- based Federal-aid Highway Program Integrating Maintenance AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance July 18, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance - PTWG July 18, 2011 System Preservation Research Roadmap Implementation and Tracking Stephen R. Mueller, P.E., MPA.
Larry Galehouse, PE, PS, Director.  Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 3, 2013.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
TAM ETG Webinar #3 Network Life Cycle Analysis Part 1: Introduction and Overview Wednesday, July 8,
Street Maintenance. The Town of Bayfield maintains centerline miles of road.
National Highway Institute Federal Highway Administration
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
FHWA - O FFICE OF A SSET M ANAGEMENT October 14, 2009 Managing our Pavements FHWA Initiatives U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
PPTG2005 FORUM Shakir Shatnawi – Caltrans Chair Gary Hildebrand- Industry Chair George Bradley – Local Agency Chair Pavement Preservation Task Group.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
FHWA Updates WASHTO Committee on Maintenance Cheyenne, Wyoming March 8, 2010 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
Incorporating Pavement Management into the LRTP John Kiefer, P.E. Research Engineer Center For Technology and Training Michigan’s Local Technical Assistance.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
JC VAN DER WALT.  Who is SANRAL?  Functions  Network  Budget Allocation  Western Region Projects for 2011/12.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Re-Do It -- Faster, Cheaper, Greener Pavement Renewal Solutions.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Timothy Hens, PE NACE State Director – New York County Engineer, Genesee County, NY.
By Larry Galehouse, Director, National Center for Pavement Preservation and Jim Sorenson, Team Leader, FHWA Office of Asset Management by Larry Galehouse,
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Design and Rehabilitation Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Pavements H. Thomas Yu Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
Road Pavements and New Approaches! IPWEA CONFRENCE David Moloney Director Infrastructure - Southern Grampians Shire.
 SCDOT has over 41,000 miles of pavements and over 8,400 bridges.  4 th largest state maintained system in the country.  Started working on the TAMP.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Transportation Development District Presentation
Pavement Preservation Techniques Used in Virginia
What we plan to do and why
Update from FHWA Emulsion Task Force
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Highway Network Health
Consequences of Delayed Maintenance of Pavement Networks
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Pavement Preservation
Ranking of Pavement Preservation Methods and Practices
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

Larry Galehouse, PE, PS, Director

 Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support to state and local agencies.  Affiliated with the Michigan State University, College of Engineering, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering  Sponsored by FP 2, Inc  Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support to state and local agencies.  Affiliated with the Michigan State University, College of Engineering, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering  Sponsored by FP 2, Inc

 Original concept of forming NCPP supported by Resolution from the AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance in 2002  Start-up funds provided by Michigan State University, Federal Highway Administration, Foundation for Pavement Preservation, and over 50 company/individual donations  NCPP is a non-profit entity  Self-sustaining through program and project revenues  Original concept of forming NCPP supported by Resolution from the AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance in 2002  Start-up funds provided by Michigan State University, Federal Highway Administration, Foundation for Pavement Preservation, and over 50 company/individual donations  NCPP is a non-profit entity  Self-sustaining through program and project revenues

Currently 11 employees and growing

 Program for Pavement & Bridge Preservation  Financially supported by 39 AASHTO member agencies  Over 90% of AASHTO member agencies participate in regional partnerships  Program for Pavement & Bridge Preservation  Financially supported by 39 AASHTO member agencies  Over 90% of AASHTO member agencies participate in regional partnerships

First Printing: 2007 Distributed: > 12,000 Copies Endorsed by: The Road Information Program (TRIP) Supported by: FP2 Inc. MeadWestvaco Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions, Inc SemMaterials

© ncpp

Only half of the nation’s major roads – are in good condition. © ncpp

Soaring construction costs during the past five years are straining state and local budgets. Rough roads add an average of $335 to the annual cost of owning a car –due to damaged tires, suspensions and reduced fuel efficiency. Every $1 spent in keeping a good road good precludes spending $6 - $14 to rebuild one that has deteriorated.

Source: FHWA Office of Asset Management

A program employing a network level, long-term strategy that enhances pavement performance by using an integrated, cost-effective set of practices that extend pavement life, improve safety and meet motorist expectations. Pavement Preservation Source: FHWA Office of Asset Management & FHWA Pavement Preservation ETG

PMS Data Point Very Good Fair Poor Very Poor Time (Years) PMS Data Point Measured Life Extension Life Extension

(Years) Treatment Good Condition (PCI=80) Fair Condition (PCI=60) Poor Condition (PCI=40) Crack Fill Crack Seal Fog Seal Chip Seal Micro-Surfacing4 – Thin HMA Typical Life Extensions

Developing a Strategy Must know: –Available Budget –Lane Miles of Network –Unit Costs of Work Types –Design Life of Reconstruction & Rehabilitation Work Types –Life Extensions of Pavement Preservation Treatments

Example: Agency Highway Network Network Size = 4,356 lane miles Example: Agency Highway Network Network Size = 4,356 lane miles

Pavement Remaining Service Life (years) Percent of Network Pavement Current Condition 6

Pavement Remaining Service Life (years) Percent of Network Pavement Condition - One Year Later 6 7 8

4,356 lane mile years Agency Highway Network = 4,356 lane miles Each year the network will lose

Reconstruction Evaluation Project Lane Miles Design Life Lane Mile Years Lane Mile Costs Total Cost #12225 yrs 550 $463,425$10,195,350 #21830 yrs 540 $556,110$10,009,980 Total=1,090$20,205,330

Rehabilitation Evaluation Project Lane Miles Design Life Lane Mile Years Lane Mile Costs Total Cost #32218 yrs 396 $263,268$5,791,896 #42815 yrs 420 $219,390$6,142,920 #53212 yrs384$115,848$3,707,136 Total=1,200$15,641,952

Pavement Preservation Evaluation Project Lane Miles Life Ext. Lane Mile Years Lane Mile Costs Total Cost # yrs 24 $2,562$30,744 # yrs66 $7,743$170,346 # yrs130$13,980$363,480 # yrs112$29,750$476,000 # yrs80$54,410$435,280 Total=412$1,475,850

Required: 4,356 lane mile years Programmed Activity Lane Mile Years Total Cost Reconstruction ( 40 lane miles ) 1,090$20,205,330 Rehabilitation ( 82 lane miles ) 1,200$15,641,952 Pavement Preservation ( 84 lane miles ) 412$1,475,850 Total = 2,702$37,323,132 Network Trend $$$$ $$$ $

Network Size (needs) 4,356 (lane mile years) Programmed Activity 2,702 (lane mile years) Deficit = 1,654 (lane mile years) Network Needs Summary

Programmed Activity Lane Mile Years Reconstruction ( 40 lane miles ) 1,090 Rehabilitation ( 82 lane miles ) 1,200 Pavement Preservation ( 84 lane miles ) 412 Total =2,702 Steps to Address Minimal Needs ( 31 lane miles ) 820 2,357 1,125 ( 77 lane miles ) Savings = $ 6.1 M Required: 4,356 lane mile years

Preservation Treatment Life Ext Lane Miles Lane Mile Years Total Cost Concrete Reseal4 yrs31124 $979,600 Thin HMA Overlay10 yrs16160 $870,560 Micro-surfacing7 yrs44308$1,309,000 Chip Seal5 yrs79395$1,104,420 Crack Seal2 yrs5061,012$1,296,372 1,999$5,559,952 Savings = $ 6,101,940 Needs = 1,999 LMY Program Modification

Programmed ActivityLane Mile Years Reconstruction ( 31 lane miles ) 820 Rehabilitation ( 77 lane miles ) 1,125 Pavement Preservation ( 2,083 lane miles ) 2,411 Total =4,356 Net Savings = $ 541,988 Revised Network Strategy Required: 4,356 lane mile years

Establishes Network Need Evaluates Reconstruction Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Incorporates Design Life Life Extensions Establishes Network Need Evaluates Reconstruction Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Incorporates Design Life Life Extensions Quick Assessment Method

by Larry Galehouse, Director, National Center for Pavement Preservation and Jim Sorenson, Team Leader, FHWA Office of Asset Management by Larry Galehouse, Director, National Center for Pavement Preservation and Jim Sorenson, Team Leader, FHWA Office of Asset Management A Quick Check of Your Highway Network Health A Quick Check of Your Highway Network Health

Please visit the web at