Portorož, Slovenia Evaluation of the International Friction Index Coefficients for Various Devices Gerardo FlintschGerardo Flintsch Center for Sustainable.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Why and How of Runway Friction Testing by Delia Harverson Findlay Irvine Ltd. Midlothian, Scotland and Thomas J. Yager NASA Langley Research Center.

Advertisements

Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.

A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.

HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.

Portorož, Slovenia SAMPLES OF SINGULAR DETAILED TEXTURE AND SKID RESISTANCE ANALYSIS Pedro Yarza AlvarezPedro Yarza Alvarez AEPO, S.A. Ingenieros ConsultoresAEPO,

Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.

Portorož, Slovenia Statistical Properties of Road Traffic Noise Emission Measurements Marco ConterMarco Conter arsenal researcharsenal research ResearcherResearcher.

From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.

MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.

A Pavement Damage Based System For Charging HGVs For Their Use Of Road Infrastructure Nii Amoo Dodoo and Neil Thorpe School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences.

Jim Sherwood, U. S. Federal Highway Administration, Turner Fairbank Highway Research Center, Infrastructure Research and Development Roya Amjadi, U. S.

MDSS Stakeholder Meeting June, COMPUTING A BETTER WAY TO PLOW IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA Kwasi D. Amoah, Graduate Student, MSEM University of.

Ames, IA August 15-16, 2013 Establishment of Relation between Pavement Surface Friction and Mixture Design Properties Mozhdeh Rajaei Nima Roohi Sefidmazgi.

2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.

RETROREFLECTIVITY - UPDATE CLIFF REUER SD LTAP WESTERN SATELLITE – SDSM&T

Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.

Module 2-4 Roughness and Surface Friction Testing.

Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition

FAA Runway Friction Program

Virginia Ready Mix Concrete Association Revisions to Current 2009 Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia.

2007 ASHRAE Annual Meeting Conserving Natural Resource Use in Buildings William Tschudi – Tengfang Xu – Lawrence Berkeley.

Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.

Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Presentation for the ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting May 9,

AAPA 2010 Study Tour – Accelerated Pavement Testing & Equipment Observations and Recommendations Accelerated Pavement Testing & Equipment.

Portorož, Slovenia Laboratory test method for the prediction of the evolution of road skid-resistance with traffic Minh-Tan DoMinh-Tan Do LCPCLCPC Research.

High Value Research Session: Allison R. Hardt Office of Policy and Research Maryland State Highway Administration RAC Annual Meeting July, 2011 Evaluation.

Oregon Jobs and Transportation Act Section 18 Bill Ryan and Jennifer Sellers Geo-Environmental, ODOT Tech Services.

Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.

Footer Text 3D TEXTURE MEASUREMENT Development and Field Evaluation of a Texture Measurement System Based on Continuous Profiles from a 3D Scanning Instrument.

Quito, Ecuador, 14 August 2013 Electromagnetic Fields Measurement An important tool to empower the public Colombia’s Point of View Oscar León Suarez General.

Dependency of Coefficient of Rolling Resistance on Pavement Surface Characteristics Richard Sohaney, The Transtec Group Bernard Izevbekhai, MnDOT 19 September.

Runway Friction Measurement

1 Status of Current FHWA Noise Activities Mark Ferroni Noise Team Leader 2006 Summer Meeting Williamsburg, Virginia.

Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 13 (Some of these pictures show bicyclists not wearing.

Overview of the FHWA Pavement Friction Management Program Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Charles E. Via Jr. Department of Civil Engineering.

Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Harmonization of Friction Measuring Devices Using Robust Regression Methods Samer Katicha 09/09/2013.

ÍNDICE “Maintenance Practices and Standards on Pavements at Mexican Airports” MScE Rodolfo Téllez Gutiérrez 6th Symposium on Pavement Surface Characteristics.

Portorož, Slovenia SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS WITH SYNTHETIC LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE Massimo LosaMassimo Losa University of Pisa – Department.

MEASUREMENT of FRICTION PROPERTIES. MEASUREMENT APPROACH Scientific / Design /Engineering: – Available Force from Macro-texture Component Measure macro-texture.

Portorož, Slovenia Pavement management system on a French toll network Cécile GiacobiCécile Giacobi ASFASF Pavement expertPavement expert

User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.

Use of Probe Vehicles to Measure Road Ride Quality

Vehicle Systems & Safety Program Next Steps in Quality Control and Harmonization of Friction Measurements on Highways and Runways.

TYROSAFE Tyre and Road Surface Optimisation for Skid Resistance and Further Effects Karen Scharnigg BASt (Federal Highway Research Institute) 3rd International.

Next-Generation Wireless Bridge Weigh-in- Motion (WIM) System Integrated with Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Capability for Transportation Infrastructure.

Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B

Portorož, Slovenia Slovenia, its roads and its expertise Bojan LebenBojan Leben NK PIARC SlovenijaNK PIARC Slovenija Chairman NK PIARC SlovenijaChairman.

VBMP RCL Workshop: Using VDOT Data November 4, 2015.

1 COMPARISON OF MPD VALUES FROM HIGH- SPEED LASER MEASUREMENTS WITH MPD FROM TWO STATIONARY DEVICES Rohan Perera, PhD, PE Soil and Materials Engineers,

Pavement Profile Viewing and Analysis Presented by ProVAL Support Team.

User perceptions of highway roughness

Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Technology Transfer Conference By: James Zargan and Al Larkin Date: April 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement.

Melissa Lance Operations Systems Manager July 16, 2015 Connected Vehicle Update National and Virginia Perspective.

CERTAIN workshop Kapitanivka CDV - Transport Research Centre (Czech Republic) Division of Infrastructure and Environment Dr. Josef Stryk Ass.

National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.

Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.

Week.  Student will:  Incorporate Force of Friction into calculation  Static Friction  Kinetic Friction Cornell Notes Needed – Section 5.2.

3rd International Road Surface Friction Conference

At Auburn University National Center for Asphalt Technology Accelerated Pavement Testing Facilities “APT”

National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.

Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command – Transportation Engineering Agency HIGHWAYS FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE SDDC Military Surface Deployment.

Pat T. Flora, Education Associate Office of Career and Technology Education October 21, 2015.

Good Pavement Texture = Good Tire Friction

ANALYSIS OF TEMPERATURE INFLUENCE ON SKID RESULTS

Diamond grinding of concrete pavements

Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment As a Tool for Improving Crash Rate Prediction Kevin Wright.

Fan-Filter Testing - The Results Are In

Title Presenter name DATE Towards a More Sustainable World.

FHWA’s Advanced Concrete Pavement Technology Program

Connected Vehicle/Infrastructure UTC Tier 1 Center

Presentation transcript:

Portorož, Slovenia Evaluation of the International Friction Index Coefficients for Various Devices Gerardo FlintschGerardo Flintsch Center for Sustainable Transportation InfrastructureCenter for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure DirectorDirector

Overview Objective Background Experimental program Results Conclusions Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Acknowledgements Oscar Gonzalez & Edgar de Leon  Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure, VTTI Kevin K. McGhee  Virginia Transportation Research Council Mark Swanlund  Federal Highway Administration Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Objective Background Experimental program Results Conclusions Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Different research efforts have studied procedures to harmonize friction measurements  PIARC Experiment to Compare and Harmonize Texture and Skid Resistance Measurements  NASA Wallops Friction Workshops Program  HERMES Experiment Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Motivation

To compare friction and macrotexture measurement results and determine if the previously adopted models are valid for the devices considered.  Measurements taken at the Virginia Smart Road in 2008 by the members of the Pavement Surface Properties Consortium. Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Objective

Background Experimental program Results Conclusions Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Background: Pavement Surface Properties Consortium R esearch program focused on enhancing the level of service provided by the roadway transportation system through optimized pavement surface texture characteristics.

The Virginia Smart Road

The Virginia Smart Road Layout SM 9.5 D SUPERPAVE OGFCSMA 9.5 D Tined CRCP JRCP Ground JRCP Cargill SafeLane™ VDOT EP5LV

Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Current Projects 1. Annual Equipment Rodeo 2. Seasonal Monitoring 3. Evaluation of New Measurement technologies 4. Evaluation of new “High-friction” pavement technologies 5. Griptester loan program 6. Stereo Vision Texture Measuring Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Objective Background Experimental program Results Conclusions Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Experimental Program 24 sections  12 x 2 directions 3 Speeds 5 each speed 2008 Devices:  2 Locked-wheel trailers  DFTester  Griptester Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure  2 CTMeters  1 laser profiler w/ macrotexture  Other …

Sample of Equipment Used Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Experimental Section Layout

Objective Background Experimental program Results Conclusions Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Results: Comparison Using Original Coefficients Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Revised Coefficients Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Adding Macrotexture Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Comparison of F60 IFI Coefficients Frictio n Unit Original Coefficients (1)Revised Coefficients ABCR2R2 ABCR2R2 LWS LWS GT LWR Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

“Experimental” Sp Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Speed Constant Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Comparison of Sp Models Devices LinealPower abR2R2 abR2R2 DFT Sp LWR1 Sp LWS1 Sp LWS2 Sp GT Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Table 4 -

Objective Background Experimental program Results Conclusions Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Conclusions The original PIARC coefficients did not produce harmonious results for the devices and surfaces tested  the original coefficients determined during the PIARC experiment may need to be adjusted for the devices evaluated before the IFI can be implemented in the participating agencies Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Conclusions (cont.) The results also suggest that that there is a better correlation of the speed gradient, Sp, with macrotexture using a power model than with the linear model used on the original IFI equations  Particularly for the measurements using smooth tires Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Conclusions (cont.) Preliminary revised coefficients for the participating devices are provided based on the results on the sections tested. However, it is recommended that these values are verified on other surfaces before implementation. Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure