Spatial-economic-ecological model for the assessment of sustainability policies of Russian Federation Modeling environmental dimension, policy analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cost-effective internalisation and international competitiveness External costs of energy and their internalisation in Europe Brussels - Friday, 9 December.
Advertisements

1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
ZEW Economic Effects of Co-ordinated and Non-co-ordinated Permit Schemes in an EU-Bubble An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis with the GEM-E3 Model.
4 good reasons why Energy Efficiency is Important.
Climate Action EU ETS #EU2030 Jos Delbeke DG CLIMATE ACTION Carbon Expo 2014 – Cologne 28 May 2014.
The impact of the rebound effect of first generation biofuel use in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions 17 th ICABR Conference, 19 June 2013 Edward Smeets,
1 TETRIS Work Package 6 – Quantitative Analysis of International Emissions Trading Christoph Böhringer, Ulf Moslener, and Niels Anger TETRIS Final Conference,
ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.
June GTAP Conference Purdue University Welfare Cost for Europe of Non Participation in the Market for Tradable Permits and Comparative Efficiency.
The 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Sustainable Development or Expensive Dreams? PRESENTATION by Michael STEURER Warsaw, 15 October 2014.
International Energy Workshop June, Paris Gernot Klepper & Sonja Peterson Kiel Institute for World Economics The EU Emissions Trading Scheme Efficient.
Interrelations between Environmental Fiscal Reform and Emissions Trading schemes : Lessons from Hungary* Pendo Maro European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
A Regulatory Framework for Energy Intensive Industries within the EU Berlin 30 November 2012 Chris Lenon – Green Tax Group BE.
Distributional effects of Finland’s climate policy package Juha Honkatukia, Jouko Kinnunen ja Kimmo Marttila 10 June 2010 GTAP 2010 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE.
Choice of Policy Measures in Annex B Countries and Impacts on Non-Annex B Countries Workshop on Mitigation of Climate Change Socio-Economic Impacts of.
Climate Change Policy: Cost Effective Strategies Dr. Margo Thorning Managing Director, International Council for Capital Formation Brussels Office: Park.
Dutch Enviromental Accounts and policy demands Geert Bruinooge Deputy Director General Statistics Netherlands.
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
1 5.2 Low-energy strategies for the European Union Katharina Koch Manuela Steiner Barbara Unterrainer.
Rome Energy Meeting 2008 Rome, November 2008 Investments Opportunities and Project Finance in the Energy Market Luigi Marsullo President Finpublic.
Latest EU policy developments in the field of bioenergy
1 1 CURRENT ENERGY POLICY CHALLENGES. THE 2030 ENERGY AND CLIMATE FRAMEWORK DG Energy, European Commission.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
Towards an effective and efficient carbon price signal minimising leakage How to combat climate change while preserving Europe’s competitiveness European.
1 TETRIS WP6 – Quantitative Analysis of International Emissions Trading and Linkages between Workpackages Christoph Böhringer, Ulf Moslener and Niels Anger.
Climate change policy as today’s driver for energy policy IFIEC Europe’s suggestions for EU ETS post 2012 AEM XI. Autumn Conference, Prague 11 September.
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
1 “Seeking Common Ground” Second consultation meeting on options for structural measures to strengthen the EU ETS on 19 April 2013 in Brussels Peter Botschek.
Leszek Kasek World Bank, Europe and Central Asia Region Skopje, March 1, 2011 Prospects for Green Growth in Macedonia. Methodological approach.
Q-Tool Extension: Competitiveness 1. Agenda 2. Definitions and Indicators 3. CGE Implementation 4. Conclusions.
The Dutch energy accounts Sjoerd Schenau Statistics Netherlands.
1 Economics of The European 2020 Climate Goals Torben K. Mideksa Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo April 18, 2009 The.
Industrial competitiveness in the context of the EU climate and energy policy framework - Chatham house rules - 23 June 2014 Albert PRECUP European Commission.
Anni Podimata MEP Member, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 8th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Budapest,
European Commission DG TREN / C: Conventional Energy Greenhouse gas mitigation and energy policy, a European perspective Presentation by Cristóbal.
Role of Integrated Assessment Modelling (IAM) in climate change policy analysis The Global Integrated Assessment Model (GIAM) An ABARE-CSIRO joint initiative.
CAPRI EC4MACS Kick Off meeting, Laxenburg, Peter Witzke, EuroCARE The role of EuroCARE and Bonn University in EC4MACS The role of EuroCARE.
Climate and Energy Package Open Days 2008 Workshop “ Climate change and the role of regions“ 7 October 2008 Martin Weiss European Commission DG ENV, unit.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
European Union Side Event: EU policies, dilemmas and actions REC Training for state negotiators on the UNFCCC Szentendre, July Erika Hasznos Climate.
RGGI Cost Benefit Analysis Subgroup Dwayne Breger MA Division of Energy Resources Economic Modeling Overview.
Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 °Celsius The way ahead for 2020 and beyond Jos Delbeke DG ENV Director Climate Change & Air Energy for a changing world.
Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague,
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme and its review Thomas Bernheim DG Environment, unit C.2 European Commission.
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
The European Union Climate Policy and Related Data Needs Velina Pendolovska European Commission, DG Climate Action Meeting on Climate Change Related Statistics.
ETS POST REVISION THE LIME SECTOR Ms. Eleni Despotou EuLA Secretray General.
Energy Management and Planning MSJ0210 Energy planning Eduard Latõšov.
Climate Change October Main concepts Climate change – lasting change of some or all characteristics, describing the average weather condition Greenhouse.
CES KULeuven The Pan EU NEEDS TIMES model: main results of scenario analysis The Pan EU NEEDS TIMES model: main results of scenario analysis SIXTH FRAMEWORK.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
1 Economics of The European 2020 Climate Goals Torben K. Mideksa Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo [CICERO] April 18,
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
The European Chemical Industry against global competition : why energy efficiency matters Vassos Efthymiadis Hellenic Association of Chemical Industries.
Clean Air for Europe ROLE OF ENERGY BASELINE IN CAFE 28 February 2002 Matti Vainio DG Environment, Air Quality and Noise Unit.
Climate Action Climate and Energy: EU perspective Madrid, Universidad Pontificia Comillas 18 May 2015 Jos DELBEKE Director General for Climate Action European.
EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission.
CEESA WP4: Market Development and Public Regulation
Markus Blesl, Tom Kober IER; University of Stuttgart
Macroeconomic Impact of Air Pollution Reduction
South East Europe 2020 indicators
Key elements of Finnish Climate change strategy
Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 25 February 2010
Agriculture’s contribution to a carbon neutral Europe
Energy Management and Planning MSJ0210
EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON AIR AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Presentation transcript:

Spatial-economic-ecological model for the assessment of sustainability policies of Russian Federation Modeling environmental dimension, policy analysis and the assessment of the model reliability Victoria Alexeeva-Talebi Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim Kick-off meeting CEFIR, Moscow, 11 February 2009

Agenda ZEW‘s objectives in the Sust-Rus Project Dimensions and structure of the PACE model Policy applications of the PACE model Sensitivity Analysis Outlook

To review the literature on crucial model parameters (Task 3.3) To review the environmental indicators (Task 4.4) To develop the environmental module (Task 5.1 and 5.2)  data availability and model development To run alternative policy scenarios (Task 9.1)  definition and assessment of policy scenarios To assess the model reliability: sensitivity analysis (Task 9.2) 1. ZEW‘s Objective within the Sust-Rus Project

2. Structure: PACE core model Other regions Demand for goods Exports of Imports of Income cycle Other regions Hous- hold Exports of goods Imports of goods Agri.Food Petro- leum prod Iron and Steel PPP Other ETS Che- mical prod. Other EII Rest of ind. TranspHeatElec

Highly flexible core model system Regional/spatial resolution N(ation): Small open economy (SOE) E(urope): Bilateral EU-15 (SOE closure wrt ROW) W(orld): Bilateral world trade model (up to 45 regions) Sectoral resolution N: Country specific (national IO), E/W: up to 50 sectors Temporal resolution Comparativ-static (myopic) Dynamic-recursiv (myopic) Intertemporal (rational expectations) 2. Structure: Model implementation

2. Structure: PACE modeling environment  Intuitive programming language  GAMS  Model development and test tool  MPSGE  Powerful solution algorithm  PATH  Tools for automatic reporting  Transparent user interface and online-communication  GAMS-X/SM  Flexibility to quickly tailor core model to specific policy issues  Flexibility to quickly link core model to complementary models

2. Structure: PACE model extensions

Structure: PACE-BU model Bottom-up (BU) representation of the electricity sector Project: Analysing the Economic Impacts of the Renewables and Climate Change Policy Implementation For: DG Enterprise and Industry 2007, 2008 Publications: Neuwahl, F., Löschel, A., Ignazio, M. and L. Delgado (2006), Employment Impacts of EU Biofuels Policy: Combining Bottom-up Technology Information and Sectoral Market Simulations in an Input-Output Framework, forthcoming in Ecological Economics.

2. PACE: Structure of BU-TD model

11 3. Policy application: The Energy package Directive & Decision: Implementing the CO 2 targets Specifying the non-ETS targets (Decision) Division of EU wide emission budget between ETS and non-ETS sectors Specifying non-ETS targets for individual member states vs 2005 Amending the ETS (Directive) Defining overall ETS cap Centralized allocation, mainly auction, but sector-specific B oth Carbon: „external affairs“ (use of flex-mex) Timeframe: 2013 to at least 2020 Special provisions in case of international agreement

12 3. Policy application: The ETS targets ETS: Target and allocation procedure One EU wide cap (linear decrease from 2013 to 2020) Auctioning as basic principle for allocation Power sector: 100% auctioned from 2013 on All others: 30% in 2013 increasing to 100% in 2020 „Facilitating Package for energy intensive industries“: For sectors with potential leakage problems (or danger of loss of market share) free allocation of up to 100% (base: reduced ETS-cap, share based on 2005 emissions) All allocation other than auctioning according to EU-wide harmonized rules (benchmarking suggested)  No National Allocation Plans (NAPs) anymore!

3. Policy application: The policy scenarios Evaluation of macroeconomic and environmental impacts of the EU energy package Quantification of effects on international competitiveness, social welfare and greenhouse gas emissions Policy scenario covering the following policy issues of the new EU 2008 energy package Allocation rules in EU ETS + renewable certificate trading schemes Burden sharing rules between MS in non-ETS sectors Burden sharing rules between MS for renewable targets Degree of flexibility for JI/CDM

FranceGermanyItalySpainUKRest EU- 15 PolandRest EU- 12 €/tCO 2 3. Policy application: Carbon prices in 2020

15 3. Policy application: Macro-economic impacts Welfare changes (in % vs BaU)

16 3. Policy application: Sectoral impacts in 2020 Energy intensive industries (prod. change in % vs BaU)

4. Sensitivity Analysis Definition  Sensitivity analysis is the study of how the variation in the output of a model (numerical or otherwise) can be apportioned, qualitatively or quantitatively, to different sources of variation.  Sensitivity analysis serves to check the robustness of results of the simulation of an economic model. Approaches  Deterministic vs. Stochastic Approach Publications:  Claudia Hermeling and Tim Mennel (2008), Sensitivity Analysis in Economic Simulations – A Systematic Approach, ZEW Discussion Paper

5. Outlook Modeling issues: MCP vs. MPSE Data  Modeling  Policies: What issues are central for the analysis? European Council (2007): Linking to the EU ETS? Russia‘s Energy strategy (2003): Focus on the energy-intensive sectors (energy taxes & subsidies)? Russia‘s Energy strategy (2003): Focus on the energy demand by the households? EU, Russia: Energy supply issues?