P2 Framework Models Overview Jan. 2003 1 P2 Framework Models Overview Bill Waugh U.S. EPA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

The TSCA is a United States law, passed by the United States Congress in 1976, that regulates the introduction of new or already existing chemicals. The.
Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
Chapter 8 AP Environmental Science. * 1. Gives the EPA the authority to control pesticides. Which act is this? * A. Toxic Substances Control Act * B.
Modern Testing Services (Germany) GmbH Sustainability through Chemical Selection along Footwear and Apparel Value Chain Dr. Dieter Sedlak Modern Testing.
PBT – P2 Preventing Pollution: A Tool to Reduce and Eliminate Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes Basin.
P2 Framework and Sustainable Futures: Designing / Selecting Safer Chemicals Bill Waugh December 3, 2004 Lowell Center for Sustainable Production.
Summary Slide Some Industry views on POP/PBT identification in Europe.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry, Microbiology.
Challenges and opportunities for effective implementation of TSCA Joel A. Tickner, ScD School of Health and Environment, UMASS Lowell US EPA National Pollution.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Today’s environmental manager’s toolbox: product based risk assessment and life cycle assessment Kate Winnebeck New York State Pollution Prevention Institute.
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
1 Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Programme (PBT) launched by the EPA in 1998: - Reduce.
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
Life Cycle Analysis and Resource Management Dr. Forbes McDougall Procter & Gamble UK.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Interagency Testing Committee (ITC)
Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases
1 Use of HPV Challenge Data and the EPI Suite TM Model E. Laurence Libelo Economics, Exposure, and Technology Division Office of Pollution Prevention and.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment (DfE) Program WERCS June 9-11, 2009 Melanie Vrabel, U.S. EPA.
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
Evaluate Environmental, Health, and Safety  Anticipate Hazards  Recognize  Evaluation  Control Measures  Evaluation.
Update on the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Program February 2005.
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
The Use of the Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) Program to evaluate 13 Counties of Northwest Florida TRI & RSEI Evaluations.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
Introduction to the GHS: An overview for Comprehensibility Testing UNITAR-CWM Date: Location:
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
1 Selected Current and Suggested Ideas on Uses of HPV Challenge Data Nhan Nguyen US EPA Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Yunmi Lee (period 6 )
Chemical & Environment Considerations in Product Safety: Current research, legislation, and the public and industry response Chemical Safety Regulations.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Moving past one-at-a-time chemical “de-selection”.
Environmental Standards and the GS-37 Revision Cheryl Baldwin, Ph.D. Vice President of Science and Standards Green Seal, Inc. NEWMOA April 1, 2008.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Chlorinated Paraffins
September 22, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics1.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
ChemSTEER Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures & Environmental Releases Scott Prothero US EPA AIHCE May 25, 2000.
Design for the Environment Program Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, Texas December 13, 2006 Clive Davies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
PBT Profiler Helps Identify Persistent, Bioconcentrating and Toxic Chemicals Workshop on PBT Reduction Activities and Opportunities, NEWMOA Web Conference.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
Lecture #4 Risk Assessment, philosophical approaches to risk & regulation.
Identify Tribal Exposures to Toxics (To think about)
Communication: Safety Summary
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
EPA's Call for Use Information for the First 10 Chemicals to Undergo Risk Evaluation March 8, 2017.
Decision Contexts in a Changing Toxicology Paradigm
International Aerospace Environmental Group
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA)
The Consortium for Environmental Risk Management, LLC
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
Chemicals and their properties Day 1.
How Can Standards for Graphene Nanomaterials Support TSCA Compliance?
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Overview Bill Waugh U.S. EPA

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan Chemicals in Commerce Pesticides ~2000 Active Ingredients ( AI) Drugs, Cosmetics, Food Additives ~2,000 AI Industrial Chemicals ~80,000 On TSCA Inventory

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan Challenge: Evaluating Chemicals In The Absence Of Data Under TSCA +Congress gives EPA authority to evaluate / regulate new chemicals +EPA must complete its review in 90 days. +Proponents of manufacture of New Chemicals are not required to do any testing. +EPA can require testing +EPA reviews about 2,000 PMNs per year

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan EPA’s Approach to the Evaluation Of New Chemicals In the Absence of Data +Nearest analogue analysis (Are there data on a closely related structure?) +Structure Activity Relationships (SAR) +Cancer Expert System +Computational approaches for estimating toxicity, fate, exposure from structure –Physical / chemical properties –Environmental fate –Aquatic toxicity –Exposure (general population, consumer, occupational, and aquatic, etc.)

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan EPA’s P2 Framework EPA has automated many of the SARs, computational methods, expert systems, etc., used to predict hazard, exposure and associated risk, based on an analysis of structure and combined them into the P2 Framework.

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan R&D Process - Status Quo Chemicals Meeting All the Desired Criteria Will Be Evaluated Based on Additional Criteria: PerformanceAvailabilityCost Market Research Final Product Development PMN Submission Often no toxicity screening until this point

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan EPA Is Making the P2 Framework Available to Industry Models helped industry: +Pre-screen chemical alternatives +Understand potential risks of product alternatives under consideration at R&D +Understand potential risk trade-offs of alternatives under consideration +Reduce product development costs +Stimulate development of environmentally preferable products and processes

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models +Screening models: NOT replacing measured data! +P2 Models predict information in 4 areas: –Physical / chemical properties –Environmental fate properties –Hazard to humans and aquatic environment –Exposure / risk

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan Risk-related Information From P2 Framework Models +Once released, will the chemical go to air, water, soil, sediment? [EPI Suite  ] +How long will the chemical stay in media? [EPI Suite  ] +Will the chemical present a hazard? [Oncologic & Ecosar] +Could this be a PBT? [PBT Profiler] +Who will be exposed and for how long? [ChemSTEER, E-FAST]

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Phys/Chem Properties +EPI Suite  MP, BP, VP KOW WS KOC Henry’s law constant Environmental Fate +EPI Suite  AOP Fish BCF Biodegradation Hydrolysis Removal in WWTP

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Hazard +ECOSAR Aquatic Toxicity +OncoLogic Carcinogenicity +PBT Profiler PBT potential Exposure / Risk +ChemSTEER Release amounts Worker exposure +E-FAST Consumer dermal & inhalation exposure Human PDRs

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Workshops +Numerous hands-on training workshops have been held nationwide +Participants from several hundred companies P2 Framework Partnerships +Partnerships formed with dozens of companies +Companies using P2 Models in product development

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan But Do These Methods Work? Some Comments from Industry +“...a great help in flagging potential risk issues.” (Hercules) +“The P2 Framework helps us understand potential risk-related concerns associated with chemical substances under development” (Shell) +“By using the P2 Framework, we can...develop and manufacture safer and more sustainable products” (PPG Industries) +“...particularly useful when used to minimize the potential synthesis or generation of hazardous wastes...” (Eastman Kodak) +“EPA...may underestimate the true value of these tools” (Procter & Gamble)

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan Project XL => Reg. Relief => Sustainable Futures +Eastman Kodak & PPG Industries Project XL Experiments +Kodak and PPG incorporate P2 Framework and PBT Profiler at R&D +Kodak and PPG develop inherently safer chemicals - no regulation +PPG: predictive capability Kodak: business benefits +Kodak and PPG eligible for reg. relief

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan Kodak: The Business Benefits of Risk Screening +Reduced product development costs by 13% to 100% for each PMN +Decreased time to market +Decreased generation of chemical waste +Increased HS&E contribution +Tellus Report: Kodak's experience (Published in BNA August 29, 2001) –Case study saved Kodak $750K - $1,000K –Decreased time to market by 1 1/2 - 2 years

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan But Do These Methods Work? Validation Studies by PPG Scientists + Comparison of Aquatic Toxicity Experimental Data with EPA/OPPT/SAR Prediction on PPG Polymers J. S. Chun 1), J. V. Nabholz 2), and M. J. Wilson 2) PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA and US EPA, OPPTS, Washington, DC. + Comparison of Environmental Fate Data from the PBT Profiler with Data Found in the Literature Dr. H. Burleigh-Flayer, PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA.

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan EPA Is Encouraging Risk Screening At R&D EPA Provides 1. Powerful risk screening tools; the P2 Framework and PBT Profiler 2. Training in the use, interpretation and limitations of EPA's screening methods 3. Detailed, one-on-one, technical assistance: P2 Partnerships 4. Regulatory Relief 5. Small Business Assistance Program

P2 Framework Models Overview Jan More Information on the P2 Framework +P2 Framework and Models Internet sites: – – – Suitedl.htm +Call or EPA contacts to: –Request workshop information –Ask additional questions Maggie Wilson Ph: Bill Waugh Ph: