ACTON COMMUNITY WIDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY Town of Acton and PAL, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Advertisements

Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007 Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa Councilman Tom LaBonge, CD 4 General Manager Jon Kirk Mukri City of Los.
Archaeology in Your Community Amy L. Johnson, Research Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Essex Region Conservation Authority Brad Arsenault & Kaylyn Boyd.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
Draft Kane County 2040 Green Infrastructure Plan Energy and Environment Committee November 14, 2013.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service By: Amber Carr SuAsCo CISMA Coordinator.
Pittsford :: Erie Canal Area Master Plan Public Workshop Welcome! Thank you for being here May 26, 2010 This presentation was prepared for the New York.
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
Curriculum Model for Community Profiles in Massachusetts: A Student Website Project.
Holden Heights Community Improvement Project Update Orange County Board of County Commissioners December 17, 2013.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Laura Hemming – Project Manager Jan Dodd – Project Engineer Ty Gremaux – Report Editor/CAD Tech. Cory Howell – Project Engineer.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Maintaining Watersheds. Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards addressed! HS‐ESS2‐5. Plan and conduct an investigation of the properties of water.
DATA VISUALIZATION NEEDS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Trish Settles, AICP Principal Planner/Project.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Master Plan Update Chapter 213 of the Local Government Code provides that Cities may engage in Comprehensive Planning which may:  include but not be limited.
Highway 169 Phase 2 (Part 2) – Cross Range Expressway April 30, 2014 Public Information Meeting Taconite Community Center.
An Appeal of a Request For a Special Use Authorization For a Solar Energy Power Plant Docket SUA Appeal of Rainbow Solar Facility.
Linda Zellmer Government Information & Data Services Librarian Western Illinois University
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
North East Study Area Staff Recommendation Thursday, June 25, 2009.
Application CPA (Large Scale Map and Text Amendment): A request initiated by Alachua County to amend Conservation and Open Space Element as follows:
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
Blackstone Valley Prioritization Project Blackstone River-Users Conference September 18, 2012.
Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel September 19, 2007.
The “Smith Property” Public Forum March 2, 2011 Photo: Historical Society.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
Cultural Resource Management Preservation and Conservation.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Floyds Fork Greenway Presentation of Greenway Concept & Trail Alternatives: Public Meeting #2 June 13, 2007.
Bijou Erosion Control Project Project Kickoff TAC Meeting May 4, 2007 City of South Lake Tahoe ENTRIX, Inc. California Tahoe Conservancy.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
The Pine Lake Archaeological Field School: Investigations from the 2003 and 2005 Seasons Renee B. Walker (SUCO) and Cynthia J. Klink (Hartwick College)
Gainesville Youth Center University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning URP 4273 Survey of Planning and Information Systems Spring 2003.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Taunton River Wild & Scenic Study A Partnership Effort on Behalf of The Taunton River.
Open Space and Recreation Plan Committee Public Forum October 18, 2007.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Cultural Technical Working Group Meeting November 18, 2008.
Planning Construction Chapter 15. Private Sector  Most buildings and other structures are built for ordinary people. These people make up the private.
Agenda  Review project scope and goals  Update project status  Review results of public surveys  Identification of capital projects  Draft capital.
EPA-Great Lakes The US Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, applies the WBD to many facets of their programs. Using Subwatershed (5th-level, 10-digit.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Lancaster Open Space & Recreation Public Forum March 22, 2009.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN & RZ-OTH
Board of County Commissioners October 14, 2008 Vinzant Landing Swallet Santa Fe River.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
Village of Naples and Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards Sewer Feasibility Study.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Graduate Project Proposal Leanne Knott RA536, Spring 2014.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Maps In Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal Company Collection ► Approximate: 240 Hardback Maps- with linen backing (average length 5 feet long) with some 9.
La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Plan Heritage Preservation Commission Wednesday, September 16, 2015 Sara Dechter, AICP City of Flagstaff Comprehensive Planning.
Town of Harvard Conservation Commission
Concord Community Preservation Committee
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
York River Wild and Scenic Study
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Rob Pierce, Planning & Development Director
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study
Background research Starting a Project.
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

ACTON COMMUNITY WIDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY Town of Acton and PAL, Inc.

Objectives and Scope of Work Four phase study; (1. research, 2. draft report outline, resource protection bylaw, 3. draft sensitivity maps, user guide, 4. final report, sensitivity maps and user guide). Identify patterns of past Native American and historic/early modern period settlement in Acton. Identify known and likely locations of archaeological sites within the town. Funding provided by town of Acton through Community Preservation Act (CPA). Survey was done in cooperation with Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC), under permit. Results used to develop plan/recommendations to identify and protect Acton’s cultural resources. Existing and future permitting/approval processes for development, land use planning. open space acquisition.

Phase I Survey Activities Comprehensive background research using archival sources: Known archaeological, historic sites in state level (MHC) and local inventories. Documentary sources such as town histories (Acton, Concord, Maynard, Sudbury) library files, and historic maps of Acton (1794, 1830, Beers 1875, Sanborn 1916, etc). Museum and private artifact collections, avocational archaeologists (Mass. Archaeological Society). Cultural Resource Management (CRM) archaeological surveys of proposed development done in Acton under federal, state permit/review (sewage treatment plant, residential development). Environmental studies (geology, soil, hydrology etc).

Environmental Context for Acton Acton is within SUASCO basin; middle portion of Assabet drainage; Fort Pond, Nashoba, Nagog, Heath Hen Meadow brooks important tributary stream networks. Wetlands/marsh located along stream drainages and in upland settings (Spring Hill, Wills Hole, Pratts Brook). Natural ponds (Nagog, Grassy, Parkers Ponds) at head of stream drainages. Topography formed by glacial drumlin hills (Great, Faulkner, Strawberry, Nagog Hills), uplands of rocky ground moraine and deposits of sand/gravel glacial outwash along streams, wetlands. All these environmental features contribute to diversity of natural resources and affected both Native American and historic period Euro-American settlement in Acton.

Native American Context Acton is within SUASCO basin which has a long record of Native American settlement from Paleo Indian (10, yrs ago) to Late Woodland ( yrs ago) periods. 17 known archaeological sites in Acton dating from Middle Archaic (7500 yrs ago) to Middle Woodland (1500 yrs ago) period. Few identified by avocational archaeologists ( s); mostly by recent CRM surveys. Range from large complex site on Assabet River (Pine Hawk) to small camps on streams (Nagog Brook). Low number of known sites reflects focus on Concord, Sudbury River, less artifact collecting in Acton by avocational archaeologists. Native American settlement likely equal in intensity to other parts of SUASCO basin (Stow, Maynard, Concord). Based on environmental features (stream networks, wetlands, well drained soils, etc), results of fieldwork to date, expect many more archaeological sites to be present in town.

Historic Period Context Native American settlement survives until mid to late 17 th century near Nagog Pond, Fort Pond (Littleton). First Euro -American settlement ( s) at small farms expanding from Concord, Iron Works Farm grant (South Acton). In 18 th century early industrial development (iron works, mills) on Nashoba (North, East Acton) and Fort Pond brooks (South Acton), farmsteads along primary roads. In 19 th century small industrial/commercial districts with mills, stores etc at villages in North, East, South, West Acton, roadways, railroad depots (after 1840s). Civic activity focus at Acton Center. Late 19 th /early 20 th century, expansion of commercial, industrial developments at South, West Acton near railroads. Farming still important in town economy. Known historic period archaeological sites in Acton, mostly industrial (mills), granite quarries, few farmsteads and related structures (“Potato Cave”). Only three sites on state inventory (MHC); recorded in CRM surveys. Many more historic period archaeological sites likely, based on background research and fieldwork to date.

Potential Historic Period Archaeological Sites, East Acton (Beers 1875 atlas)

Reconnaissance Survey Fieldwork Four survey units (North, Centre/East, South, West Acton) used to organize data collection during fieldwork. Units conform to nodes of historic period settlement. Maps with topographic, soils information and aerial photo on town GIS base map with wetlands, roads used as guide during fieldwork. Windshield survey (general areas) and walkover inspection (specific land parcels, known sites) used. Walkover inspection mostly in largest parcels of open land (Acton Conservation Land, town recreation land, etc). Collected information on present conditions (intact, developed/disturbed), environmental setting (upland hill, stream, pond, etc) evidence of archaeological sites, historic structures, estimated archaeological sensitivity. Location and present condition (intact, damaged, destroyed) of known archaeological sites confirmed.

Fieldwork (continued ) Both known and unrecorded archaeological sites found during fieldwork documented with photographs, notes. Information from fieldwork used to develop sensitivity assessment and predictive models for both Native American and historic/early modern period archaeological resources.

Survey Units

Archaeologically Sensitive Areas - Native American Upland pond and wetlands zone Tributary stream network Small terraces and swales in upland hill zones

Historic/Early Modern Period Archaeological Resources Granite quarry, North Acton Pencil Factory, Nashoba Brook Mill dam on Fort Pond Brook, South Acton House foundation, near Nashoba Brook, North Acton

Predictive Model/Preliminary Archaeological Sensitivity Mapping Preliminary archaeological sensitivity maps were developed. Constructed from synthesis of background research, fieldwork (windshield survey, walkover inspection). Depict zones of high, moderate and low sensitivity for Native American and historic/modern period archaeological resources. Maps will be refined as Town Wide Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey moves through remaining phases of this study and new information becomes available.

Management Recommendations Review protection offered to archaeological sites, open space with archaeologically sensitive environmental settings. Apply Community Preservation Plan for Acton (2005) goals to archaeological resources: Preserve rural character of town, landscapes, historic and archaeological properties through open space acquisition, purchase of development rights. Update and expand inventory of archaeological resources in Acton. Education, outreach in town to increase public awareness of town’s cultural resources. Increase level of local review for proposed development of remaining open land and developed areas with known cultural resources.

Management Recommendations (continued) Coordination of development/project review between Planning Board, Historical, Conservation Commissions, consultation with Acton Historical Society. Follow examples from other towns where this has been implemented for projects not covered by federal or state level review. Coordination with organizations involved in protection study of natural environments and open space in SUASCO basin, (SUASCO Watershed Community Council, Organization for Assabet River etc) and Native American community.