GOES-R Fog/Low Stratus (FLS) IFR Probability Product.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Forecasting Ceilings in EVENTS Meteorology 415 Fall 2012.
Ch 14 – Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC)
Aborted Landing! July 26, 00:46 UTC Juneau Area. The GOES-R AWG Fog/Low Cloud, Cloud Type, and Volcanic Ash Products Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS) Justin.
15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
CLEARING THE AIR…..ON FOG FORECASTING FOG IN ONTARIO Bryan Tugwood Program Supervisor Ontario Storm Prediction Centre.
A short term rainfall prediction algorithm Nazario D. Ramirez and Joan Manuel Castro University of Puerto Rico NOAA Collaborator: Robert J. Kuligowski.
1 Operational low visibility statistical prediction Frédéric Atger (Météo-France)
Hayden Oswald 1 and Andrew Molthan 2 NASA Summer Intern, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 1 NASA SPoRT Center, NASA/MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama.
16/06/20151 Validating the AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature and Height product using weather radar data COST 722 Expert Meeting Sauli Joro.
Strategies to Improve Radiation Fog Forecasting at Elmira, NY (KELM) Robert Mundschenk, Michael Evans, Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr., and Ron Murphy – WFO Binghamton,
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
Air Law 1.02 VFR Flight Conditions References: FTGU page 115
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Motivation Many GOES products are not directly used in NWP but may help in diagnosing problems in forecasted fields. One example is the GOES cloud classification.
Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !
A New Cloud Cover Layers Application Andrew Heidinger and Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS Andi Walther, Steve Wanzong UW/CIMSS Steve Miller, YJ Noh, Curtis Seaman.
Introduction and Methodology Daniel T. Lindsey*, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/RAMMB Louie Grasso, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere
Synthetic Satellite Imagery: A New Tool for GOES-R User Readiness and Cloud Forecast Visualization Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and.
Weather Satellite Data in FAA Operations Randy Bass Aviation Weather Research Program Aviation Weather Division NextGen Organization Federal Aviation Administration.
KMA NMSC Abstract Operational COMS(Communication, Ocean and Meteorological Satellite) Cloud Detection(CLD) algorithm shows that fog and low-level clouds.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air Force Weather Agency Lt Col Jeffrey S. Tongue Individual Mobilization Augmentee Air Force Weather.
0-3 Tackling Central California’s Big Weather Issue Paul Iñiguez Science & Operations Officer NOAA/NWS Hanford, CA GOES-R Science Seminar 27 September.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CLOUD MASK AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR SST WITHIN THE ADVANCED CLEAR SKY PROCESSOR.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
An Analysis of Eta Model Forecast Soundings in Radiation Fog Forecasting Steve Amburn National Weather Service, Tulsa, OK.
Radiation in the Atmosphere (Cont.). Cloud Effects (2) Cloud effects – occur only when clouds are present. (a) Absorption of the radiant energy by the.
Low Clouds and IFR Forecasting Southwest Aviation Weather Safety Workshop, Phoenix, AZ Ken Widelski Meteorologist NWS: Lubbock, TX.
FRAM, Montreal, Que 15 June 2005 Analysis of Hazardous Fog and Low Clouds Using Meteorological Satellite Data Gary P. Ellrod NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs,
Quality Assessment - National Ceiling and Visibility (NCV) Analysis (now, not forecast) Product Tressa L. Fowler, Matthew J. Pocernich, Jamie T. Braid,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 GOES Solar Radiation Products in Support of Renewable Energy Istvan Laszlo.
Month day, year Comments from NWSHQ Perspective Need to produce table showing 68 baseline & option products vs products that PG is working on What is link.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.
1 Geostationary Cloud Algorithm Testbed (GEOCAT) Processing Mike Pavolonis and Andy Heidinger (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR) Corey Calvert and William Straka III (UW-CIMSS)
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
Towards Operational Satellite-based Detection and Short Term Nowcasting of Volcanic Ash* *There are research applications as well. Michael Pavolonis*,
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
Characteristics of Fog/Low Stratus Clouds are composed mainly of liquid water with a low cloud base Cloud layers are highly spatially uniform in both temperature.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Using Simulated Satellite Imagery in NWS Experiments and Testbeds Justin Sieglaff Wayne Feltz Tim Schmit Jordan Gerth Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Preparing for GOES-R: old tools with new perspectives Bernadette Connell, CIRA CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA ABSTRACT Creating.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
LOW CLOUDS AND IFR FORECASTING NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE KEN WIDELSKI October 11, 2005.
Future GOES Satellite Product Upgrades Donald G. Gray Office of Systems Development NOAA/NESDIS, Washington, DC Satellite Direct Readout Users Conference.
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
Version 1.0, 14 May 2004 Slide: 1 APPLICATIONS OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) FOG DETECTION Author:Jochen Kerkmann (EUMETSAT)
Overview of Satellite-Derived Cirrus Properties During SPARTICUS and MACPEX P. Minnis, L. Nguyen NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA R. Palikonda,
Satellite Interpretation & Weather Patterns West of the Cascades Clinton Rockey Aviation Meteorologist.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: SO 2 Detection Presented By: Mike Pavolonis NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
A collaboration between Environment Canada will allow for a detailed analysis of the GOES-R FLS products that is not possible with standard surface based.
METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION FROM FIRST TO SECOND GENERATION METEOSAT
GOES-R Fog/Low Stratus (FLS) Products AWIPS/AWIPS2 Examples and Product Information.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
NMSC Daytime Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties (DCOMP) 이은희.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
1 Algorithm Theoretical Basis (Fog/Low Stratus) Presented by Michael Pavolonis Aviation Application Team STAR With significant contributions from: Corey.
The GOES-R/JPSS Approach for Identifying Hazardous Low Clouds: Overview and Operational Impacts Corey Calvert (UW-CIMSS) Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
1 IFR Instrument Flight Rules Instrument Meteorlogical Conditions Background: –IFR is specified by the FAR’s(Federal Aviation Regulations) –Weather Conditions.
1 Product Overview (Fog/Low Cloud Detection). Example Product Output 2.
Fog/Low Clouds: Formation and Dissipation Scott Lindstrom University of Wisconsin-Madison CIMSS (Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies)
A Probabilistic Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Algorithm
GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: Fog/Low Cloud Detection
Validation Specialized ground based instruments are better suited for observing fog, but are extremely limited by their lack of spatial coverage. Conventional.
Presentation transcript:

GOES-R Fog/Low Stratus (FLS) IFR Probability Product

What is FLS? VFR - Visual flight rules ceiling > 3000 ft and vis > 5 mi MVFR - Marginal visual flight rules 1000 ft < ceiling < 3000 ft or 3 mi < vis < 5 mi IFR - Instrument flight rules 500 ft < ceiling < 1000 ft or 1 mi < vis < 3 mi LIFR - Low instrument flight rules ceiling < 500 ft or vis < 1 mi FLS = Fog/low stratus There is no widely accepted definition of fog/low stratus so the GOES-R definition of FLS is based off aviation flight rules The primary goal of the GOES-R fog/low cloud detection algorithm is to identify IFR, or lower, conditions.

Fused Fog/Low Cloud Detection Approach Satellite Data Naïve Bayesian Model Clear Sky RTM -Minimum channel requirement: 0.65, 3.9, 6.7/7.3, 11, and 12/13.3 μm -Previous image for temporal continuity (GEO only) -Cloud Phase IFR and LIFR Probability ++ Static Ancillary Data -DEM -Surface Type -Surface Emissivity Daily SST Data 0.25 degree OISST + NWP -Surface Temperature -Profiles of T and q -RUC/RAP (2-3 hr forecast) or GFS (12 hr forecast) NWP RH Profiles -RUC/RAP (2-3 hr forecast) or GFS (12 hr forecast) ***IMPORTANT: Other sources of relevant data (e.g. sfc obs) influence results through the model fields Total run time: minutes

The following scenes show the capabilities of the GOES-R FLS IFR probability product during May, 2014 around St. John’s, Newfoundland and several offshore oil platforms St. John’s, NL Terra Nova oil field

St. John’s, NL Long Pond Helipad Heritage BTD product Clear Sky Liquid Water Clouds Ice Clouds The GOES-R IFR probabilities correlate very well temporally with changes in reported visibility Terra Nova oil field May 18 at 00:45 UTC (Nighttime) St. John’s, NL Long Pond Helipad Terra Nova oil field

May 18 at 06:45 UTC (Nighttime) The GOES-R IFR probabilities correlate very well temporally with changes in reported visibility The heritage BTD product is not useful when multiple cloud layers are present St. John’s, NL Long Pond Helipad Terra Nova oil field St. John’s, NL Long Pond Helipad Terra Nova oil field

Clear Sky Liquid Water Clouds Ice Clouds May 19 at 18:45 UTC (Daytime) The GOES-R IFR probabilities correlate very well spatially with reported visibility The heritage BTD product is not useful during the day due to additional reflected solar radiation the 3.9 micron channel St. John’s, NL Long Pond Helipad Terra Nova oil field St. John’s, NL Long Pond Helipad Terra Nova oil field

Main Strength of GOES-R Products – Unlike qualitative imagery based products, the GOES-R products can be used to quantitatively identify IFR producing cloud layers, even when multiple cloud layers are present, day and night. – Statistical analysis of the heritage BTD and GOES-R FLS IFR probability product indicated that the GOES-R FLS product is more than twice as skillful as the BTD product for detecting IFR conditions. Main Limitation of GOES-R Products – Due to differing radiative transfer processes, the GOES-R products will exhibit some day/night discontinuity (especially under twilight conditions). – Satellite measurements are much better correlated with cloud ceiling than surface visibility. Thus, it is difficult to strictly limit our detection to low surface visibilities. Future Work – Improved detection and characterization of coastal and valley fogs – Development of an empirical model that estimates the dissipation time of radiation fog – Development of radiation fog formation alerting tool for operational forecasters – Continued validation through comparison to traditional surface observations and Environment Canada field campaign data Summary

Naïve Bayes Probabilistic Model The naïve Bayes’ model returns a conditional probability that an “event” will occur given a set of measureable features defined by the equation below The “naïve” aspect comes from the assumption that the measureable features are independent of each other is the climatological probability an “event” occurs regardless of the measured features is the climatological probability an “event” does not occur regardless of the measured features Is the conditional probability that an “event” is observed given a measured feature Is the conditional probability that an “event” is not observed given a measured feature where