© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the TITLE MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. “ Attorney-Client-Privilege”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION EXECUTIVE BRIEFING PART II.
Advertisements

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2002 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo on the slide and replace it with this logo. Connecting Law.
Attorney-Client Privilege LatAm October 23rd, 2014 AIPLA Annual Meeting Washington | DC Attorney-Client Privilege LatAm October 23rd, 2014 AIPLA Annual.
Alabama Real Estate License Law & The REALTORS Code of Ethics
Responding to Subpoenas Springfield Metropolitan Bar Association Doug Healy March 25, 2013.
Beating Back the Assault Scott O’Connell Nixon Peabody Boston, MA Manchester, NH Attorney Client Privilege.
AIPLA Corporate Breakfast Session, October 23, 2014 PRIVILEGE IN (PARTS OF) EUROPE THOMAS BECHER
Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States Due process in competition law Michaela Nosa Antimonopoly Office of the SR.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Freedom of Information Act Exemption 5. Exemption 5 Threshold “Inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
PRIVILEGE A general overview David Musker, EPA R G C Jenkins, London.
Privilege, Privacy, and Waiver. Privilege Attorney/Client In the law of evidence, a client's privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT Presented by Maribel S. Medina January 16, 2014.
Matthew L. Harvey Office of General Counsel Illinois Commerce Commission.
1 Remedies for True Owner of Right to Obtain Patent against Usurped Patent AIPLA MWI IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Sunday, January 22, 2012.
Confidentiality of MH/DD/SA Records Family Court Conference March 9, 2006 Mark Botts School of Government, UNC.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Code of Ethics – Discussion Question
AIPLA Firm Logo 1 American Intellectual Property Law Association Strategies for Preserving U.S. Attorney-Client Privilege in Patent Prosecution and Litigation.
John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson P.C. International harmonization of Attorney-Client privilege 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Information Privacy Policy in Canada Presented By: Sue Wu.
Outsourcing: The Ethical Issues Steven M. Richman November 2014.
Gresham V The legal profession Regulating for independence.
European Ombudsman Access to environmental information Task Force on Access to Information Geneva, 4 December 2014.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 52 Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals Chapter 52 Liability.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Confidentiality in the School Setting Presented by: Emma Morales, LCSW Myrna Reynoso-Torres, LCSW Yolanda Vargas, LCSW.
Patent Litigation in Japan April 7, 2008 Presented by: David W. Hill Partner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
Corporate governance: Asia Pacific. JAPAN  The Japan corporate governance committee published its revised code in The Code had six chapters, which.
APPLICATION FOR ACCESS (PAIA) Mandatory protection (which must be refused in terms of Chap 4 subject to S46) DENIAL OF ACCESS (PAIA) Internal Appeal to.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters Air Force FOIA Exemptions Brief Della Macias HAF/IMII.
1 Welcome to the International Right of Way Association’s Course 104 Standards of Practice for the Right of Way Professional 104-PT – Revision 3 – INT.
Tax Information Exchange Agreements Formal Ratification 2011.
Access to Public Information in Slovenia Nataša Pirc Musar, LL.B. Commissioner for Access to Public Information The Hague – 24 th -25 th November, 2004.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Eleven: Privileged Communications This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants of HKICPA
Access to Info on Government Deliberations A Comparative Overview Darian Pavli Open Society Justice Initiative.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.
Attorney-Client Privilege Issues
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
© FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 2005 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the TITLE MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. Ten Simple Rules.
Chapter Three Confidentiality In this chapter, you will learn about: Basic principles of confidentiality The attorney-client privilege and the difference.
©2004 Foley & Lardner LLP WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the TITLE MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide in alignment with.
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
BEST PRACTICES FOR RISK REDUCTION CONTINUNING LEGAL EDUCATION.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
1 Attorney-Client Privilege on IP -Japanese Experiences Kay Konishi APAA 2008 Singapore, Oct.19, Patent Committee.
Supreme Court Decision on Enforceability of a US Court Decision Dr. Shoichi Okuyama AIPPI Japan AIPLA Pre-meeting on October 22, 2014.
Recent developments on Access to Justice in environmental matters in Sweden – Joanna Cornelius.
Guidelines for Employee Inventions -Proposal - September Toshifumi Onuki Japan Patent Attorneys Association International Activities Center AIPLA.
Access to justice Regional Workshop for High-Level Judiciary Tirana, november 2008 Article 9, § 1 and 3 Current issues under French law Frédérique.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Recent Japanese Cases Regarding Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing Declaration AIPLA-IPHC Meeting April 11, 2013 Shinji ODA Judge, Intellectual.
1 US and Japan Sides Discussion and Update: Attorney-Client Privilege Takahiro FUJIOKA Meisei International Patent Firm AIPLA 2004 Mid-Winter Institute.
INTRODUCTION TO CZECH BUSINESS LAW 1 Time & Location Thursday10-12 a.m. Grading – criteria Participation in lectures - 50% Presentations Discussion Test.
Attorney-Client Privilege: Pitfalls and Pointers for Transactional Attorneys Moderator: B.T. Atkinson (Partner, Nelson Mullins, Charlotte) Panelists: Tom.
Key Knowledge Confidentiality Year 4 Medical Ethics and Law Thread Course The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Agencija za zaštitu ličnih/osobnih podataka u Bosni i Hercegovini Агенција за заштиту личних података у Босни и Херцеговини Personal Data Protection Agency.
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
AIPLA Annual Meeting IP Practice Japan Committee Pre-Meeting
Situation Analysis Access to Court Decisions in Georgia
TEXAS STATUTES ON PRIVILEGES
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Protection of News Sources
Ninth Annual Prescription for Criminal Justice Forensics Program Department of Justice Forensic Science Projects to Support the Adversarial Process Kira.
Presentation transcript:

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the TITLE MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. “ Attorney-Client-Privilege” in Japan AIPLA 2004 Mid-Winter Institute Japan committee pre-meeting January 28, 2004 Yoshimi Ohara

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. Topics I.How attorney-client communications are protected in Japanese civil procedure I-AAttorney’s tools I-BClient’s tools I-CForeign Attorney’s tools I-DSummary II.Difference of “ACP” between the US and Japan

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1. How AC communications are protected in Japanese civil procedure No published court decision in Japan Rarely discussed among scholars Mostly discussed in US litigation

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-AAttorney’s tools to shield AC communications Testimony (Article 197 I(2)*) –Attorney can refuse to testify regarding facts that: (i) were obtained in the course of professional duties and (ii) should be kept secret (“Facts”). Document Production (Article 220 (4)(c)) –Attorney can refuse to produce documents that contain Facts. *The Code of Civil Procedure in Japan

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1- AAttorney’s tools to shield AC communications (2) Who is “Attorney” under Articles 197 and 220? –Bengoshi (attorney-at-law) –Benrishi (patent attorney) –Gaikokuho-Jimu-Bengoshi –Foreign Attorneys?

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1- BClient’s tools to shield AC communications - Testimony Testimony (Article197 I(3)) Clients can refuse to testify regarding matters relating to secrecy of technology or profession (“Matters”). What are “Matters”? Disclosure of which would cause detrimental effects to professional activities or activities based on technology [-balancing interests] (Supreme Court decision, March 10, 2000)

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-BClient’s tools to shield AC communications - Document Production Clients can refuse to produce documents: (1)if documents contain “Matters” covered by 197 I(3) (Article 220 (4)(c)), or (2)if documents were created for sole purpose of Clients’ use (Article 220 (4)(d))

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-BClient’s tools to shield AC communications - Document Production (2) What are the documents created for sole purpose of Clients’ use? (1)for sole purpose of internal use (2)not expected to be disclosed to third parties, and (3)disclosure would seriously harm Clients who possess documents, such as impeding decision making process. (Supreme Court decision, November 12, 1999)

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-CForeign Attorneys’ tools to shield AC communications -Testimony Testimony (Article197 I(3)) Foreign Attorneys can refuse to testify regarding matters relating to secrecy of technology or profession if disclosure would cause detrimental effects to Clients’ activities.

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-CForeign Attorneys’ tools to shield AC communications – Document Production Document Production (Article 220 (4)(c)) Foreign Attorneys can refuse to produce documents that contain “Matters” covered by 197 I(3).

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-DHow AC communications are protected in Japan – summary (1) Attorney, Client and Foreign Attorney can shield AC communications but the scope of communications to be shielded could be different.

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 1-DHow AC communications are protected in Japan – summary (2) Attorney Client Foreign Attorney Facts obtained in the course of professional duties Matters disclosure of which would cause detrimental effects to professional activities or activities based on technology Documents created for sole purpose of internal use Matters disclosure of which would cause detrimental effects to professional activities or activities based on technology of CLIENTS.

© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003 WHEN PRINTING IN BLACK & WHITE: Go to the MASTER SLIDE, delete the logo and place this logo on the slide. 2Difference of “ACP” between US and Japan U.S. promote full and frank communications, observance of law and efficient administration of justice Client & Attorney communications Japan protect Client’s trust in Attorney’s statutory secrecy obligation Attorney facts Purpose Whose files protected What is protected