Seeking Employment and Post Employment Obligations for Government Attorneys Entering the Private Sector Peggy LoveStephen J. Csontos Deputy Ethics OfficialAttorney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wayne County Pro Bono Conference August 15, 2012 Ethics and Assisted Pro Se Representation.
Advertisements

Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
ETHICS. Business Conduct  The Agent agrees to conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws in conducting business under this agreement.
Ethics in Mediation Sandy Garrett, Chief Disciplinary Council, TBPR Richard Murrell, Moderator.
ETHICS TRAINING The 14 Principles Crimes, Regulations, Appearances Violates a criminal law. Violates an ethics regulation or civil statute. Appearances.
Special Government Employee Training for Roles and Responsibilities Special Government Employees (SGEs): Provide advice, assistance and input regarding.
Ethics for HSRB Special Government Employees Dan Fort Ethics Officer EPA Office of General Counsel.
Chapter Four Conflicts of Interest In this chapter, you will learn about: Rules governing conflicts involving clients, including simultaneous and successive.
Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
Dheeraj Agarwal Ethics Advisor Health Resources and Services Administration U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Role of and Duties of Plan Commission Members Ralph E. Booker.
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
Seeking Employment and Post Employment Obligations for Government Attorneys Entering the Private Sector Peggy LoveStephen J. Csontos Deputy Ethics OfficialAttorney.
Ethics Issues for Federal Advisory Committee Members Maureen O. Wilson, Ph.D. Deputy Ethics Counselor March 3, 2008.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
COUNSEL: ETHICS TRAINING IS FOR YOU, TOO! Presentation to the SACRS Attorney Breakout November 12, 2008 Harvey L. Leiderman & Jeffrey R. Rieger.
1 Conference of California Public Utility Counsel 2009 Annual Meeting Hot Topics in Ethics -- Recent Conflict of Interest Developments Affecting Practice.
Conversation on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and Critical Infrastructure Protection Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information.
E thics Module 4 N ational G uard T echnician P ersonnel M anagement C ourse.
1 Overview of Ethics Requirements for Employees of Montgomery County This is a summary to help identify issues; it is not the law. Please address ethics.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
Representation Representation, for the purpose of this discussion, means knowingly making, with intent to influence, a communication (orally or in writing)
Matthew L. Harvey Office of General Counsel Illinois Commerce Commission.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42, Chapter 1, Subchapter A Part 2 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE PATIENTS BRYANT D. MILLER CAC II, MAC,
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
National Contract Management Association – Norfolk Chapter Contracting Ground Rules.
Hong Kong Privacy Code on Human Resource Management
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Legal Aspects for Research Administrators. LEGAL ASPECTS FOR RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS Mark Bohnhorst Associate General Counsel* * These materials are informational.
Conflicts and the Duty to Supervise for In-House Counsel Brian McCormac BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Outsourcing: The Ethical Issues Steven M. Richman November 2014.
Five Activities Contracting Officers and Government Contractors Should Avoid Presented by: James F. Moseley, Jr. of Moseley, Prichard, Parrish, Knight,
The Ethics of Internal Investigations SELECTED ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND COMMENTS By: Cecil E. Morris, Jr. Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey.
The Ohio Ethics Law Carrie Williams. Purpose  Provide an overview of The Ohio Ethics Commission and The Ohio Ethics Law  Explain the components of The.
GSA Expo 2009 Ethics: Know the Rules of the Road Nicole Stein Desk Officer/Office of Government Ethics.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Ethics – Dos and Don’ts Mary Garcia Melissa Miller Dennis McGuire Office of Regional Counsel.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Your MRB Legal Brief Presented By FMCSA Chief Counsel’s Office 1200 New Jersey.
Neutral Confidentiality DON ADR Program Office NOTE: These slides are just an overview and not intended as legal advice. People seeking legal advice on.
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
NEPOTISM & IMPARTIALITY: Definitions and Considerations
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Do You Have One?. “I represent the city as an organization and I do not represent you and I cannot guarantee the confidentiality of what you tell me.”
Unit 5 Midterm Review. What are some of the components of the ABA?
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: NAVIGATING THE ETHICAL MINEFIELD.
Ethics of Representing Governmental Entities Helen M. Hierschbiel OSB General Counsel.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
1 Ethics CLARK COUNTY M-PLAN TRAINING. 2 Sources of Ethical Standards Ethics standards for management staff are derived from the following sources. They.
FERPA for the Financial Aid Office NCASFAA Fall Conference November 2012.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Section 285 Litigation Ethics Conflicts of Interest Prosecution Bars Grab bag
United States Public Health Service Commission Corps Post-Retirement Employment Restrictions.
City of Chicago Board of Ethics “The Revolving Door” 740 North Sedgwick, Suite 500 Chicago, IL
Arizona City Attorneys Association Conference, May 19, 2016 Update on Ethics Rules for Government Lawyers Geoffrey Sturr Osborn Maledon, P.A.
GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,
Midterm Review 1.  Lawyers have ethical obligations that are required by the organizations to which they belong.  Lawyers are “members of the bar”,
Recognizing the Client
Technology Transfer and
COUNSELING THE GOVERNMENT LAWYER: Revolving Doors and More APRL 2011 Midyear Meeting Atlanta GA 10 February 2011.
Ethics and the very best practice
Maryland’s Public Ethics Law
What are the rules that apply? What are duties of the lawyer?
Post Government Service Employment Restriction Counseling (18 U. S. C
Navigating ethics issues in FERC enforcement investigations
Post Government Service Employment Restriction Counseling
Presentation transcript:

Seeking Employment and Post Employment Obligations for Government Attorneys Entering the Private Sector Peggy LoveStephen J. Csontos Deputy Ethics OfficialAttorney at Law Office of General Counsel Environmental Protection Agency

Why is this important? More than one set of rules: –Standards of Conduct, 5 C.F.R. Part –Federal criminal statute, 18 USC §207, 5 C.F.R. Part –State Bar rules. Grass may not be greener on the other side –You could be disqualified from doing the work you were hired to do after leaving Federal service. –Law firm could be disqualified from handling a major case. 2

What will we cover? Seeking employment. –When you are doing it. –What you need to know. Post employment. – Federal criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. §207, 5 C.F.R. Part – ABA and D.C Bar Rules. Confidentiality. –Standards of Conduct, –Standards of Conduct, 5 C.F.R – –ABA and D.C. Bar Rule 1.6. Compensation, 18 U.S.C. §203. 3

Seeking Employment Imputed financial interests. –The financial interests of any person with whom you are negotiating employment are imputed to you. –Their financial interests are treated as if they were your own. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(2) 4

Seeking Employment When you are seeking employment –with persons whose financial interests –would be directly and predictably affected by – particular matters in which you are –participating personally and substantially, –then you need to disqualify yourself from –participation, 5 C.F.R. Part , –or get written authorization, 5 C.F.R (d), –remember certain basic principles, 5 C.F.R. Part , and –check your bar rules. 5

Seeking Employment occurs when you... make an unsolicited communication regarding work, make an unsolicited communication regarding work, engage in negotiations regarding possible work, engage in negotiations regarding possible work, receive a positive response to a job application, or receive a positive response to a job application, or make a response, other than rejection, to a communication regarding work. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(1) make a response, other than rejection, to a communication regarding work. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(1) 6

Seeking Employment ends when... you/prospective employer reject the possibility of employment and discussions end, or you have not received any interest after two months. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(2) However, a response that defers discussions does not end your status. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(3) 7

Personal and Substantial Participate personally - participate directly (direct and active supervision of a subordinate). Participate substantially - your involvement is of significance to the matter. For example, approving official for funding an activity, making recommendations, establishing criteria for contracts or grant awards, making decisions, investigating or giving advice. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(4) 8

Matter Particular matter focuses on specific person(s) or a discrete & identifiable class of persons (judicial proceeding, application, request for ruling). Does not need to involve formal parties. May include governmental action (legislation, policy making) that is narrowly focused on the interest of a discrete and identifiable class of persons. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(3) 9

Recusal/Disqualification means... avoiding participation in a matter. To recuse yourself, –notify those who make assignments to you and – those who may consult with you on matters that could impact the affected business. Oral notice sufficient; written advisable. 5 C.F.R. Part 2635 Subpart F and 5 C.F.R.Part

Disqualification begins when... you agree to discuss the prospect of employment, regardless of who made the first contact, or you send a targeted resume to any person or entity over which you have responsibility in your official duties. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(1) 11

Disqualification ends when... you are no longer seeking employment, or if you do not hear from a potential employer for two months after sending out an unsolicited resume. 12

Written Authorization You may participate in a particular matter that has a direct and predictable effect on the financial interests of a prospective employer if you obtain a written waiver under 18 U. S. C. 208(b)(1) from your ethics official. 5 C.F.R To be considered, must make full disclosure. 5 CF.R. Part (d), 5 C.F.R. Part Agency determines that disqualifying interest is not so substantial as to be deemed likely to affect the integrity of your services to the Government. 5 CF.R. Part (d), 5 C.F.R. Part

Basic Principles to Remember You cannot use your public office for private gain, or give preferential treatment to any private entity or individual, or engage in activities that conflict with your official duties, and you must avoid any action that gives the appearance that you are violating these rules. 5 C.F.R. Part

Seeking Employment - Bar Rules Lawyer serving as public officer/employee shall not negotiate for private employment with any person who is involved as a party or as a lawyer for a party in a matter in which the lawyer is participating personally and substantially. Exception for adjudicative officers. ABA MR 1.11(d) D.C. doesn’t address “negotiating,” but prohibits a lawyer from accepting other employment in a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee. D. C. Rule 1.11(a) No waiver offered under bar rules. 15

Seeking Employment Summary When you are seeking employment –with persons whose financial interests would be –directly and predictably affected by particular matters –in which you are participating personally and substantially, then you need to –disqualify yourself from participation in the matter until –you are no longer seeking employment, or get written authorization, and you will need to –remember the basic principles, and –check your bar rules. 16

Federal Criminal Statute, 18 U.S.C. §207 Permanent Bar Key Elements No former employee shall –knowingly, with the intent to influence, make any communication to or appearance before –an employee of the United States on behalf of any other person –in connection with a particular matter involving a specific party or parties, –in which s/he participated personally and substantially as an employee, and –in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. 18 U.S.C. §207 (a)(1), 5 C.F.R. § (a) 17

Federal Criminal Statute, 18 U.S.C. §207 Two Year Bar Key Elements Similar to permanent bar, but –applies to all matters that the former employee knows or reasonably should know were pending under his/her official responsibility during his/her last year of government service, and the –disqualification is limited to two years. 18 U.S.C. §207 (a)(2), 5 C.F.R. Part (a) 18

Federal Criminal Statute, 18 U.S.C. §207 One Year Bar Key Elements Trade or treaty negotiations –one-year restriction on aiding and advising that applies to a former government employee who participated in an ongoing trade or treaty negotiations during his/her last year of federal service. 18 U.S.C. §207(b), 5 C.F.R. Part Former senior employee –No appearance or communication before former agency on behalf of another with intent to influence. U.S.C. 207(c) –No appearance or communication before former agency on behalf of another with intent to influence. 18 U.S.C. 207(c) Former senior and very senior employees –No aiding or representing a foreign entity before United States with the intent to influence a decision of the United States. 18 U.S.C. 207(f), 5 C.F.R. Part

Federal Criminal Statute, 18 U.S.C. §207 Two Year Bar Key Elements Former Very Senior Employees also subject to a two year bar – – on communication with former agency, and certain government officials – –with the intent to influence. 18 U.S.C. §207(d), 5 C.F.R. Part

Rule 1.11 Key Elements ABA Model Rule 1.11 Personal and substantial participation As a public officer or employee In a matter involving a party or parties Requires disqualification From representation of another client In the same matter D.C. Rule 1.11 Personal and substantial participation As a public officer or employee In a matter involving a party or parties Requires disqualification From other employment In the same/substantially related matter 21

Rule 1.11 Key Elements Cont’d. ABA Model Rule 1.11 When a lawyer is disqualified, firm is also disqualified unless –Lawyer timely screened from profits –Written notice promptly given to government agency D.C. Rule 1.11 When a lawyer is disqualified, firm is also disqualified unless –Lawyer timely screened from profits –Written notice promptly given to government agency 22

Rule 1.11 Key Elements Cont’d. ABA Model Rule 1.11 Permits representation with agency consent Includes a prohibition on negotiating employment with an opposing party or lawyer Knowledge of confidential government information is a separate basis for disqualification D.C. Rule 1.11 Rule does not provide for agency consent 23

Rule 1.11 vs. 18 U.S.C. §207 ABA & D.C. Rules 1.11 Applies to behind the scenes representation or employment Applies to behind the scenes representation or employment 18 U.S.C. §207 Applies only to knowing communication with or appearance before a court or agency United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest 24

Post Employment Summary The post employment rules for government lawyers entering the private sector can get challenging. We have shown you how the Federal criminal statute differs from the ABA Model Rule and the D. C. Bar Rule. The Federal statute permits a former government attorney who is otherwise prohibited from representing a client before the federal government to have behind the scenes conversations with the client and his law firm. The ABA Model Rule prohibited such activity unless written consent is obtained. The D. C. Rule prohibits even behind the scenes conversations and no waiver is available. 25

Confidentiality: Standards of Conduct Prohibited from using non-public information to further your own private interests or the interests of others. 5 C.F.R. Part Required to disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to appropriate authorities. 5 C.F.R. Part (b)(11) 26

Confidentiality Key Elements ABA Model Rule 1.6 General rule is that “information relating to the representation” of a client cannot be revealed. A lawyer may not use confidential information relating to a client to `material disadvantage of the client MR 1.9(c). A lawyer may not use confidential information relating to a client to `material disadvantage of the client MR 1.9(c). D.C. Rule 1.6 General rule is that “confidences” and “secrets” of a client cannot knowingly be revealed. A lawyer may not knowingly use confid- ences or secrets to the client’s disadvantage, or for the advantage of the lawyer or another client. 27

Confidentiality Key Elements cont’d. ABA Model Rule 1.6(b) A lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation to the extent reasonably believed necessary –To prevent “reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm,” or D.C. Rule 1.6(c) A lawyer may reveal client confidences or secrets to the extent reasonably necessary –To prevent a criminal act reasonably believed likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm –To prevent the bribery or intimidation of witnesses, jurors, court officials, or other persons involved in proceedings. 28

Confidentiality Key Elements cont’d. ABA Model Rule 1.6(b) To prevent client from committing a crime or fraud reasonably certain to result in substantial injury but only if the crime or fraud was facilitated by use of the lawyer’s services. To prevent, mitigate or rectify substantial injury to financial interests or property of another but only if the crime or fraud was facilitated by use of the lawyer’s services. D.C. Rule 1.6(d) To prevent client from committing a crime or fraud reasonably certain to result in substantial injury for which the lawyer’s services were used. To prevent, mitigate or rectify substantial injury to financial interests or property of another for which the lawyer’s services were used. 29

Confidentiality Key Elements cont’d. ABA Model Rule 1.6 To secure legal advice about the lawyer’s “compliance with these Rules”. To establish a claim or defense in certain instances. To comply with another law or court order. D.C. Rule 1.6 To secure legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with the law, including these rules. To establish a claim or defense in certain instances. When permitted by the rules or required by law or court order For a government lawyer, when permitted or authorized by law. 30

Summary: Confidentiality Rules similar: Basic rule of maintaining confidences applies under the Standards, the ABA MR and the DC Rule. Standards apply only to current federal employees. MR/DC Rule apply to confidences of current and former clients. 31

Compensation Former employees are prohibited from receiving, either directly or indirectly, any compensation for “representational services” in connection with a particular matter in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. 18 U. S. C. §203 32

Compensation cont’d. Representational services means –communications to or appearances before –Federal entities –with the intent to influence the Government –on behalf of a third party. Includes legal and consulting services. 33

Compensation cont’d. Prohibition applies equally to representational services rendered by the former employee personally or by another if the employee shares in the compensation. Prohibition attaches if the covered representational services were provided at a time when the individual was a Government employee, regardless of whether the individual provided those representational services. 34

Compensation, cont’d. Associate – not affected if paid fixed salary. Cannot trace to services before the government. Bonus – cannot be calculated on the basis of the firm earnings that include compensation for services before the government. 35

Summary: Compensation If you leave Federal service, you cannot be paid for representational services involving a particular matter in which the United States is a party or has an interest. It doesn’t matter if you did the representing. The prohibition applies if the services were rendered when you worked for the government. 36

Resources (Adv. Op. 08 x 6 soon-to-be published revisits the 1999 opinion, finds insufficient justification for reaching different conclusions at the two agencies, and concludes that the proceedings are separate particular matters for both agencies) Adv. Op. 99 x 14(2) ( deferring to agency views on whether sunset reviews of agency orders should be treated as the same "particular matters involving specific parties" as the underlying original investigations even though another Department involved in the review reached a different conclusion) (Adv. Op. 08 x 6 soon-to-be published revisits the 1999 opinion, finds insufficient justification for reaching different conclusions at the two agencies, and concludes that the proceedings are separate particular matters for both agencies) Adv. Op (pre-licensing matters relating to Yucca Mountain were part of the same particular matter involving specific parties as subsequent licensing proceedings). Brown v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37 (D.C. 1984) (en banc). In re Sofaer, 728 A.2d 625 (D.C. 1999). United States v. Phillip Morris Inc., 312 F. Supp. 27 (D.D.C. 2004). Government Lawyers and Confidential Norms, 85 Wash. U. L.R (2007).. 37

Hypotheticals 38

1. Ethical obligations for a government attorney seeking employment For almost 5 years, Tom Jones, an attorney with the ABC Agency’s OGC, has been the agency counsel working with the DOJ Civil Division, in defending a class action suit brought against the ABC Agency and several pharmaceutical companies regarding bill practices. Realizing that the 5-year anniversary of his entry on duty is near at hand, Tom calls James Jones, a former colleague at the ABC Agency who is now in private practice, to ask for advice about seeking employment. James is a partner with the L & W Law Firm. James asks Tom for a resume. The L & H Firm represents one of the drug companies in the class action litigation, but James has no connection with that litigation. 1. May Tom send his resume to James? 2. If Tom decides not to send his resume to James, may Tom continue to represent the ABC Agency in connection with the class action law suit? 3. Do you have any advice for Tom or for the ABC Agency? 39

2. Ethical obligations for government attorneys entering the private sector At ABC Agency, a government agency that provides reimbursements for certain categories of medical expenses, Will Smith, a government attorney, participated in the agency’s promulgation of regulations for the submission and payment of claims. Smith also worked on an administrative proceeding brought by XXX Health Services challenging the agency’s denial of reimbursement for Heart Widgets, and he worked on a lawsuit brought by YYY challenging the regulations May Smith represent a client, other than XXX or YYY, who has a claim against the agency under the Reimbursement Regulations? What if he waits a year? May Smith represent XXX before ABC Agency on the claims he worked on while at the agency? What about representing XXX on new and different claims under the Reimbursement Regulation? May Smith represent YYY in claims before the agency? May Smith’s partners or associates represent the clients in the matters above? 40

Questions? 41