JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE 651-282-3972 Permanency Timeline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Advertisements

Practice Guidelines for Attorneys Representing Parents in Abuse, Neglect and Termination of Parental Rights Cases Cindi Wood, JD John Chambers, JD February.
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
1 During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training. You will answer questions based upon information.
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
Dallas CASA Court Appointed Special Advocates. Allegations of abuse and neglect Investigation by DFPS DFPS has arranged for a residence for the child.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
Working Across Systems to Improve Outcomes for Young Children Sheryl Dicker, J.D. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Family and Social Medicine, Albert.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS. 2 Court System  District Court  Trial Court  Some “specialty” courts including  Family Court  Drug Court  Juvenile Court 
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Judy Nord Staff Attorney & CJI Manager Judy Nord Staff Attorney & CJI Manager Lois Pirsig Data Quality Coordinator Lois Pirsig Data Quality Coordinator.
Juvenile Justice system
Defining the Role of the Guardian ad Litem
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
CJI Reducing Trauma in Children by Ensuring Involvement of Fathers Nancy K. Jones, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office Kevin McTigue, Hennepin County Human.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Achieving Timely.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
Understanding DCBS Custody & Medical Consent for Services Todd MeadeDebbie Acker, RN CPS Specialist Nurse Service Administrator Child Safety BranchMedical.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Termination of Parental Rights and Adoption: Where does the GAL fit in? The most important steps to know in the TPR process and how the GAL plays a role.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
BRINGING COMMUNITY TOGETHER TO SUPPORT FAMILIES AND THEIR REUNIFICATION FAMILY REUNIFICATION TELECONFERENCE Strong Families Make a Strong Kansas.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Comparison of Health Laws Audrey Kaiser Manka, J.D. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General "The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been.
What does the Safe Haven Law provide? The law protects a parent who leaves their baby at a “Safe Haven” location. The parent will not face criminal prosecution.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
Welcome to the Quarterly FTM Facilitator Advanced Training  Please make sure you have signed in.  In order to receive PE training hours you must be registered.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Foster Care Eligibility Determination Training System Century College MFWCAA Conference Title IV-E Workshop October 9, 2008 Deborah Trotter NW Region Paula.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
P RESENTED BY : T RACY S HEEHAN, C IRCUIT C OURT J UDGE & J ON J OHNSON, G ENERAL M AGISTRATE T HE T HIRTEENTH J UDICIAL C IRCUIT T AMPA, F LORIDA I N.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Permanency Planning From Day One. Every child is born with the beautiful potential to become wonderful human beings who experience love, joy, growth and.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Permanency.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio SAFE CHILDREN, STABLE FAMILIES, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITIES.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
In “it” for the money? Financing Child Safety, Permanency, and Well-being January 2014.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
21 st Century Caregiving : Foster VC Kids Resource Family Training Session 1.
Ongoing Assessment/Permanency FSFN CM 123_OAP_FSFN_PPT_July 2012 PPT 1.
Foster Care After 18 AB12 signed into law September 30, 2010 Designed to align with the Federal Fostering Connections to Success Act Extends foster care.
Kinship 101: Information for Relatives and “Suitable Others”
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
Removal and Placement FSFN
Removal and Placement FSFN
Presentation transcript:

JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline for Children in Out-of-Home Placement

The 12-Month Permanency Timeline – It’s Based on the Healthy Development of Children

 Mother’s and father’s name and address  Child’s name and current address in foster care Petition Content

 Personal service on mother AND father (except alleged fathers)  Service by publication, if parent’s name or address unknown  Service in foreign countries Service of Summons and Petition

 Noncustodial parent (e.g., father)  Attorney for parents (one attorney for both parents unless exceptional circumstance) EPC Hearing Critical Attendees Often Missing

 The court may appoint only one attorney to represent both parents for first hearing  Exception: Any party may request appoint of separate counsel  Court determines and makes written findings or findings on the record that extraordinary circumstances exist that appointment of separate counsel Minn. Stat. 260C.163 Counsel for Parents

 County pays for court-appointed counsel for the parent  Court must appoint attorneys retained by the county Minn. Stat. 260C.163 Counsel for Parents

Attorneys appointed to represent parents must meet one of the following qualifications: (1)Experience: Represented at least 10 parties or participants over the last two years (2)Training: Completed at least 18 hours of core skills training approved by State Court Administration (3)Supervision: Supervised by an attorney who meets the experience or training qualifications Minn. Stat. 260C.163 and Judicial Council Policy Counsel for Parents

 Prima Facie Case Established  Endangerment - child or others endangered if child returns home  Reasonable or active efforts to:  prevent removal  reunify child (later stages of case)  finalize permanency plan EPC Hearing Findings

 Best interests – out of home placement is in child’s bests interests  Protective supervision  Trial home visit  Relative in home  Emergency relative placement EPC Hearing Findings

 Assessments for parents can be ordered at first hearing, without adjudication -  Types of assessments  Mental health  Chemical health  Parenting capacity  Medical, dental, etc.  Visitation tersm EPC Frontend Loading

 Commenced within 60 days of EPC or ADH, whichever is earlier  Held over consecutive days  Completed within 30 days  Findings issued within 15 days of last person who testified (court may add 15 days, for total of 30) Trial

 Adjudication may be withheld for up to 90 days  Orders distributed to parties  Recommend distribution to participants (at least parents) Adjudication and Withholding Adjudication

 Dismissed  Termination of Jurisdiction  Reunified Dismissed, Termination of Jurisdiction, Reunified

 OHPP must be prepared for each parent, including incarcerated parent, unless court finds reasonable efforts are not required  OHPP must be filed within 30 days of child’s court-ordered placement (ex parte order or EPC order) Out-of-Home Placement Plan

 Safety risk for this child in this case  Parent’s “task list”  Behavioral change that parent must demonstrate and sustain (“AND”)  Agency’s responsibilities (reasonable or active efforts) Out-of-Home Placement Plan Critical Components

 Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) findings  High foster care re-entry rate  Caused when reunification is not yet safe?? Out-of-Home Placement Plan Critical Components

 Held on or before day 180 (month 6)  For all children regardless of age  Parent making progress on case plan – demonstrating behavioral change?  Parent maintaining regular contact with child? Permanency Progress Review Hearing

 If making progress and maintaining contact – court can continue case for up to 6 months  If not making progress OR not maintaining contact, court may direct county to file a permanency petition within 30 days Permanency Progress Review Hearing

 Child is on Trial Home Visit – court may continue permanency proceeding for time child is in THV (6 months)  Prior CHIPS petition(s) during last 5 years for which child in OHP for 365 days or more – upon showing of compelling reasons, court may extend permanency proceeding up to 6 months Exceptions to Filing of Permanency Petition

Reunification Options Trial Home Visit Return only to custodial parent Permanency clock continues Legal custody retained by county County may remove child without court order Maximum 6 months Protective Supervision Return to custodial or noncustodial parent Permanency clock continues if noncustodial but stops if custodial Legal custody returned to parent County may remove child only with court order Indefinite

Questions and Wrap Up Judy Nord Staff Attorney and Manager, Children’s Justice Initiative