CONFLICT OF INTEREST ISSUES PERTAINING TO JOINT LEGAL REPRESENTATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wayne County Pro Bono Conference August 15, 2012 Ethics and Assisted Pro Se Representation.
Advertisements

Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
Dealing With The Client You Can’t Fire Local Government Seminar January 29, 2015 Presented by: Arthur (“Art”) Pertile, III Partner.
Rule 1.11, Subsection (a) Applies to FORMER service as public officer or government employee. Standard of Review – PERSONALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY participated.
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
COUNSEL: ETHICS TRAINING IS FOR YOU, TOO! Presentation to the SACRS Attorney Breakout November 12, 2008 Harvey L. Leiderman & Jeffrey R. Rieger.
1 Conference of California Public Utility Counsel 2009 Annual Meeting Hot Topics in Ethics -- Recent Conflict of Interest Developments Affecting Practice.
1 Overview of Ethics Requirements for Employees of Montgomery County This is a summary to help identify issues; it is not the law. Please address ethics.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Final Rule Joseph Baressi June 3, 2009.
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
June TRECCCIM  May not discriminate on basis of protected class  May not steer  May not inquire about, respond to or facilitate inquiries which.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Chapter Seven Competence In this chapter, you will learn about: Definitions of lawyer and paralegal competence Key components of competence for paralegals.
Conflicts and the Duty to Supervise for In-House Counsel Brian McCormac BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Outsourcing: The Ethical Issues Steven M. Richman November 2014.
Legal Ethics and Social Networks Prof. David W. Opderbeck Seton Hall University Law School © 2011 David W. Opderbeck Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution.
All in the Municipal Family Concurrent Conflicts, Model Rule 1.7, and the Government Lawyer.
Calendaring, Docket Control, and Case Management Chapter 7 Practical Law Office Management, 3 rd Edition, Thomson Delmar Learning ©2007 Thomson Delmar.
Serving those who serve the public Professional Responsibility & Social Networking Presented July 16, 2011 by Joe Lauber Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
The Ethics of Internal Investigations SELECTED ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND COMMENTS By: Cecil E. Morris, Jr. Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey.
CHANGES TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW Prepared and presented by: Brian W. Riley, Esq. Kopelman and Paige, P.C.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.
Ethical Pitfalls of Representing Multiple Clients in a Transaction Presented by Suzanne Raggio Westerheim, Attorney, Mediator, and Counselor to the Legal.
Ethics – Dos and Don’ts Mary Garcia Melissa Miller Dennis McGuire Office of Regional Counsel.
1 Insert Physical & Addresses, Phone and Fax Numbers of your Ethics Counselors Insert Names of your Ethics Counselor Insert Name of your Office.
Week 9.  Arising out of prior or simultaneous representation of another party in the case  Arising out of relationship with opposing attorneys  Arising.
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
Ethics and Corporate Compliance for Health Care Entities: Any Potential Conflicts of Interest? Alaska Bar Association Health Law Section May 3, 2007 Presented.
NEPOTISM & IMPARTIALITY: Definitions and Considerations
Consolidation Commission Training Session Board of County Commissioners Chambers April 6, 2005.
CAPE LIGHT COMPACT RESPONSE TO Special Barnstable County Commission Recommendations - Relative to the Cape Light Compact June 13, 2012.
Requirements for a Retainer Agreement Start with a Written Contract! ALWAYS!
ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: NAVIGATING THE ETHICAL MINEFIELD.
Chapter 10 Trustees, Examiners & Creditors Committees.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
A Response to SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami’s June 1, 2011 Speech Barry J. Mandel Foley & Lardner LLP November 2, 2011 Chair of Foley & Lardner’s.
Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee.
Managing Ethical Issues in the Context of Dual Representation Delisa J. F. Bressler M. Nicole Morrison.
1 ETHICAL LAWYERING Spring, 2006 Class MR 7.3(a) A lawyer shall not by in-person, live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
Privilege, Privacy, Waiver & Ethical Considerations.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Section 285 Litigation Ethics Conflicts of Interest Prosecution Bars Grab bag
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
It is All About the Kids: The Nobility of Amateurism.
Advertising and Solicitation. MR 7.3(a) – p. 126 A lawyer shall not by in-person live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional employment.
Arizona City Attorneys Association Conference, May 19, 2016 Update on Ethics Rules for Government Lawyers Geoffrey Sturr Osborn Maledon, P.A.
Midterm Review 1.  Lawyers have ethical obligations that are required by the organizations to which they belong.  Lawyers are “members of the bar”,
Recognizing the Client
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
Broward Office of the Inspector General
CIPA Visit to ASPA 5 October 2016
What are the rules that apply? What are duties of the lawyer?
Ethics: The High Risk Areas
Broward Office of the Inspector General
Legal Ethics of Information Governance Presented by Sean Monahan
Navigating ethics issues in FERC enforcement investigations
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Post-Government Service Employment Restriction Counseling
Presentation transcript:

CONFLICT OF INTEREST ISSUES PERTAINING TO JOINT LEGAL REPRESENTATION

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION  The purpose of this presentation is to provide the Cape Light Compact (the “Compact”) with background information regarding the Compact’s current legal counsel status, its shared counsel bylaw, and an overview of applicable Massachusetts law on the subject.

FREEDOM TO CHOOSE LEGAL COUNSEL  The Conflicts of Interest Law, G.L. c. 268A, does not prohibit public entities from engaging the same law firm as legal counsel. Many Massachusetts municipalities use the same law firms. Several of the Compact members use the same law firm.  The Towns of Aquinnah, Chilmark, Edgartown and West Tisbury are represented by Ronald Rappaport.  The Towns of Dennis, Eastham, Harwich, Provincetown, Sandwich, Tisbury and Wellfleet are represented by Kopelman & Paige, P.C.  In addition to the seven Compact member towns, Kopelman & Paige, P.C. represents over 100 Massachusetts municipalities.

THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST LAW, G.L. c. 268A  The Conflicts of Interest Law, G.L. c. 268A, does limit the Compact’s counsel from representing anyone other than the Compact in relation to any particular matter in which the Compact has a direct and substantial interest, even if the parties’ interests are substantially aligned.  Joint representation on a particular matter is permitted if such representation is provided for by law for the proper discharge of official duties.  The Compact has a bylaw permitting counsel to jointly work for other public entities on matters where the entities have mutual interests, provided certain conditions are met. This is called the shared legal representation bylaw and it was adopted in accordance with G.L. c. 268A.

CAPE LIGHT COMPACT BYLAW Bylaw 1. Shared Legal Representation Involving Members or Other Public Entities; Official Duties of Compact Counsel. The purpose of this bylaw is to allow the Compact from time to time to retain counsel who may also represent its Members or other public entities in matters in which the Compact has a direct or substantial interest without violating G.L. c. 268A, Section 11(a) and (c). Such dual or common representation allows the Compact to pool resources for a common purpose, develop mutual interests, and preserve scarce Compact funds. Pursuant to this bylaw, the official duties of Compact counsel include, but are not limited to, representing Members or other public entities in: (i) administrative and judicial proceedings in which the Compact is also a party; (ii) contract negotiations or project development matters in which the Compact or its Members have an interest; and (iii) other matters in which the Compact has a direct or substantial interest, provided that in each instance, such dual or common representation would not cause a violation of rules governing attorney conduct. Compact counsel shall discharge such duties only when requested in writing by the Compact’s Governing Board. Prior to making such a request, the Compact’s Governing Board shall determine whether the interests of the Compact would be advanced by such dual or common representation and shall evaluate if actual or potential conflicts of interest exist. If any conflicts are identified, they shall be described in the written request. Counsel shall then make its own determination whether such dual or common representation would not cause a violation of rules governing attorney conduct.

CAPE LIGHT COMPACT BYLAW  The Compact is required to have the bylaw in order to share legal representation with other parties under G.L. c. 268A, the state Conflicts of Interest Law.  As set forth in the bylaw, shared legal representation allows the Compact to pool resources for a common purpose, develop mutual interests, and preserve scarce Compact funds.  The bylaw does not require the Compact to share legal representation with other entities; it only permits shared legal representation if the conditions set forth in the bylaw are met.

CAPE LIGHT COMPACT BYLAW  The Compact’s Governing Board makes a determination as to whether the interests of the Compact would be advanced by such dual or common representation and evaluates if actual or potential conflicts of interest exist.  The Compact’s Governing Board then requests shared legal representation in writing to counsel. If the Board previously identified any conflicts, they are to be described in the written request.  Counsel then makes its own determination whether such dual or common representation would not cause a violation of rules governing attorney conduct.

CAPE LIGHT COMPACT BYLAW  The Compact is free to select legal counsel at any time for any reason. It does not have to work jointly with other public entities on a particular matter using shared legal representation with any other party entity.  The Compact on certain matters uses shared legal representation with its sister organization, the Cape & Vineyard Electric Cooperative, Inc. and the Town of Sandwich.  The Compact’s bylaw only permits it to share legal counsel with other public entities (not private parties).

MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT  Even if the Compact requests that a particular attorney represent it and another entity on a particular matter, the attorney must make sure that such representation is permitted under the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct.  The Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct provide as follows: Rule 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: GENERAL RULE (a) a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client will be directly adverse to another client, unless: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not adversely affect the relationship with the other client; and (2) each client consents after consultation. (b) a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client or to a third person, or by the lawyer's own interests, unless: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not be adversely affected; and (2) the client consents after consultation. When representation of multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, the consultation shall include explanation of the implications of the common representation and the advantages and risks involved.

GUIDANCE FROM STATE ETHICS COMMISSION  The leading opinion from the State Ethics Commission on joint legal representation is EC-COI  In EC-COI-92-10, the Town of Webster adopted a bylaw permitting special town counsel to jointly represent private parties and the Town.  The Commission found that adoption of the bylaw was consistent with the Conflicts of Interest Law, G.L. c. 268A.

GUIDANCE FROM THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL  The use of shared legal representation is consistent with recommendations from the Massachusetts Office of Inspector General (“OIG”).  In its report on An Investigation of the Use of Certain Bond Funds by the North Attleborough Electric Light Department (December 2005), the OIG recommended that the Town of North Attleborough and the North Attleborough Electric Department consider using a common lead law firm in order to improve efficiency and control costs.

CONTACT INFORMATION The information in this presentation is general in nature and is not legal advice. For more information, contact: Jeffrey M. Bernstein, Esq. BCK LAW, P.C. One Gateway Center, Suite 809 Newton, Massachusetts (617) (Phone) (617) (Fax) ( ) (http)