Norine E. Dobiesz James R. Bence Prey consumption by key predators in Lake Huron Predator-prey interactions:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact of marine climate variability and stock size on the distribution of Barents Sea capelin Randi B. Ingvaldsen and Harald Gjøsæter BARECORE annual.
Advertisements

The Columbia/Snake System
David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Issues in fisheries sustainability
Fish and Zooplankton Interactions Wetzel Chapter 16, pp
A multi-species population assessment model for the Gulf of Alaska Kray F. Van Kirk, SFOS, UAF, Juneau Terrance J. Quinn II, SFOS, UAF, Juneau Jeremy S.
Food webs and trophic cascades in lakes. How to represent trophic relationships? (Paine 1980) 1.Connectedness Based on observations 2.Energy flow web.
Erik Schoen & Dave Beauchamp
Lake Michigan 2011 Status and Trends of Prey Fish Populations Chuck Madenjian, Bo Bunnell, Tim Desorcie, Margi Chriscinske, Melissa Kostich, and Jean Adams.
Black Sea Bass – Northern Stock Coastal-Pelagic/ASMFC Working Group Review June 15, 2010.
Potential Approaches Empirical downscaling: Ecosystem indicators for stock projection models are projected from IPCC global climate model simulations.
THE FOOD WEB INVADERS GAME (OR, A DAY JOB FOR SOME OF US!) FOLLOWING IS OUR QUICK CONSTRUCTION OF A SIMPLE PHOTO FOOD WEB (NOT FOOD CHAIN!) AS OCCURS IN.
Searching for a good stocking policy for Lake Michigan salmonines Michael L. Jones and Iyob Tsehaye Quantitative Fisheries Center, Fisheries and Wildlife.
Some basic tools for using population ecology as a management tool – A Primer GROWTH RECRUITMENT MORTALITY COMPENSATION.
Multispecies Models-II (Including Predation In Population Models)
Barents Sea fish modelling in Uncover Daniel Howell Marine Research Institute of Bergen.
Climate, Ecosystems, and Fisheries A UW-JISAO/Alaska Fisheries Science Center Collaboration Jeffrey M. Napp Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries.
Age-structured assessment of three Aleutian fish stocks with predator-prey interactions Doug Kinzey School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of.
Modelling the bioenergetics of (marine) salmon migration Doug Booker, Neil Wells, Patrick Ward, Philip Smith, University Marine Biological Station Millport.
RECREATIONAL FISHERY IN LAKE SUPERIOR Don Schreiner, MNDNR Steve Schram, WIDNR Shawn Sitar, MIDNR Mike Petzold, OMNR.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Great Lakes Science Center Great Lakes Research.
Ecological Interactions in Lake Superior Sean Cox, Chris Harvey, and Jim Kitchell Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Lake Michigan Fish Community Goal and Guiding Principles Mark E. Holey U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Green Bay, WI.
Status of lake trout in Lake Superior Shawn Sitar, MIDNR; Chuck Bronte, USFWS; Mark Ebener, CORA; Tom Fratt, RCFD; Ken Gebhardt, BMIC; Ted Halpern,
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. Chapter 20 Predation and Food Webs Dodds & Whiles.
Lake Superior Benthic Fish Community Structure By Michael H. Hoff U.S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center.
Status of Lake Trout in the Main Basin of Lake Huron: A Summary of (SCAA) Models and Projections Aaron Woldt--MDNR Alpena.
Population Dynamics Mortality, Growth, and More. Fish Growth Growth of fish is indeterminate Affected by: –Food abundance –Weather –Competition –Other.
The Negative View Problem: Linkages of habitat & fish Degraded tributary habitat Degraded Saginaw Bay habitat shoreline alteration Loss of connectivity.
Lake Huron Fish-Community Objectives and Guiding Principles.
Walleye Status in Lake Superior Stephen T. Schram Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Status of Coregonines in Lake Huron, 1999 Mark Ebener Chippewa/Ottawa Resource Authority Lloyd Mohr Upper Lakes Management Unit, Lake Huron, OMNR.
STATE OF CHINOOK SALMON IN LAKE HURON in 1999 BY: Jim Johnson, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Lloyd Mohr, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
Study 466 Trawl Update Mt. Clemens Fisheries Research Station Prepared for the Saginaw Bay Coordination Meeting - Feb. 26, 2003 Spottail shiner.
Why Study Diets??. The Life of a Diet Sample Background to foraging Why is it important to analyze diets? Collecting diet samples Identifying diet components.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
Indicators of Chinook Abundance, Growth, and Health Scott Hansen Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
1 ? 2 5 Basic types of species interactions
Relative Abundance of Invasive Fish Species in Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Lake Erie Management Unit Assessment Programs Megan Belore, Larry.
A Walleye Recovery Plan For Saginaw Bay Fisheries Division May, 2003.
Math 15 – Elementary Statistics Chapter 4 Summarizing Data Graphically “A picture is worth a thousand words”
Lloyd C. Mohr Upper Great Lakes Management Unit Owen Sound, ON and Mark P. Ebener Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority Sault Ste. Marie, MI The Fisheries.
Michigan’s Great Lakes Research Fleet Research Vessel “Chinook”, Lake Huron Research Vessel “Steelhead”, Lake Michigan Research Vessel “Channel Cat”, Lake.
Great Lakes Fisheries Chapter 23. Overfishing Problems Sport and commercial fishing concerns Oligotrophic lakes - low productivity - low standing crop.
03Nov2006 Revision11 Priority Questions of TID/MID/CCSF Regarding Tuolumne River Salmonids & Macroinvertebrates.
Management of Introduced Fishes Chapter 13. Reasons for Fish Introductions Increase local food supplies Enhance sport & commercial fishing Manipulate.
Predation Impacts of Round Goby on Zebra Mussels in the Great Lakes
State of Lake Huron Percids
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-19, Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
Effects of grey seals on the herring population in the Baltic Sea area. Teija Aho, Anna Gårdmark, Karl Lundström and Jukka Pönni Swedish Board of Fisheries,
DRAFT Factors for Decline NOAA (1998) HabitatHarvest Disease & Predation Regulatory Mechanisms Other Natural or Human Channel formMarineDiseaseNW Forest.
State of the Lake Huron Prey Fish Community in 1999: Progress toward Fish Community Objectives Jeff Schaeffer, Gary Curtis, Ray Argyle USGS Great Lakes.
Banks Lake Fishery Evaluation Project (Project ) Matt Polacek, Project Manager Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Chapter 4 Biotics 1) What general pattern did Brooks and Dodson observe in Connecticut lakes? 2) What is the SEH? Which parts are correct? 3) What.
The Influence of Spatial Dynamics on Predation Mortality of Bering Sea Walleye Pollock Pat Livingston, Paul Spencer, Troy Buckley, Angie Greig, and Doug.
1.) 180 pike were caught at random in a 30 ha lake and tagged. Two weeks later 200 more pike were captured and 40 of these were recaptured tagged fish.
Analysis of Walleye Growth, Movement and Habitat Quality in Lake Erie, Wang, H.-Y., 1 Rutherford, E.S., 2 Haas, R.C., and 3 Schwab, D. J. Lake.
Kray F. Van Kirk, SFOS, UAF, Juneau Terrance J. Quinn II, SFOS, UAF, Juneau Jeremy S. Collie, GSO, URI, Narragansett A Multispecies Age-Structured.
Size Structure Dynamics
Combining prediction and monitoring for reduction of toxics: the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study Glenn Warren, Russell Kreis, and Paul Horvatin U.S. EPA,
Lake Michigan Salmon Stocking Strategy Process Dennis Eade – Michigan Steelheaders Todd Pollesch – Great Lakes Fishery Commission Advisor (Wisconsin)
AN ECOSYSTEM IS A COMMUNITY (all organisms) PLUS ABIOTIC FACTORS POPULATIONS AND RESOURCES FLUCTUATE AT A PREDICTABLE RATE OVER TIME.
Time of Death: Modeling Time-varying Natural Mortality in Fish Populations Phil Ganz 1 Terrance Quinn II 1 Peter Hulson 2 1 Juneau Center, School of Fisheries.
Baseline Food Web Interactions in Lake Kachess: Seasonal Predation by Northern Pikeminnow and Burbot on Prey Important for Bull Trout Adam Hansen, Jenny.
NOT INVADED INVADED Name _______________
Lakes & Large Impoundments Chapter 22
Lake Erie Fisheries Community Status: 2013
Outi Heikinheimo Fish Pro II, Göteborg 14–16 February 2018
A trout by any other name…
Progress towards Nearshore Zone Fish Community Objectives
Presentation transcript:

Norine E. Dobiesz James R. Bence Prey consumption by key predators in Lake Huron Predator-prey interactions:

Overview Balancing predator forage demand with prey availability Stocking –Widespread since the mid-1960’s –Major component of predator populations –Potential for predators to exceed forage capacity

Main Basin Georgian Bay North Channel Overview Review methods Consumption in the main basin Compare to primary prey abundance Consumption in Georgian Bay and the North Channel Projected consumption

Key predators in the open waters Burbot (Lota lota) Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum)

Main constituents in the diet of the key predators Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax ) Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus ) Others: Bloater Sculpin Stickleback Invertebrates

Estimating consumption in the main basin Consumption = Production / GCE Production-conversion efficiency method Year- and age-specific consumption Data from stock assessment & bioenergetics models

Estimating consumption Gross production is estimated from Stock assessment model –age-specific population abundance –mortality rates Weight-at-age Accounts for consumption by fish that die during the model time step Consumption = Production / GCE

Estimating consumption Gross conversion efficiency (GCE) Estimated from bioenergetics models GCE = predator weight gain prey consumed – Wisconsin Model (version 3.0b) – Lake Huron specific values – Predicts prey consumption from observed growth Consumption = Production / GCE

Chinook salmon and burbot model area Main basin

Lake trout areas modeled North Central South

Walleye areas modeled South Saginaw Bay

Summary of age-structured stock assessment models Models operate on an annual basis

Estimated predator biomass for main basin,

Lake trout & chinook salmon: 77% Estimated consumption by key predators in the main basin,

Estimated chinook salmon consumption and biomass in the main basin Timeframe covered by previous graphs

(USGS fall assessment) Comparison to combined alewife and smelt biomass in the main basin,

Mean consumption in the main basin, (metric tons x 1000) Mean consumption: 38.5 Total alewife+smelt: 31.3

“Back of envelope” consumption in Georgian Bay (GB) and North Channel (NC) vs. main basin (MB) * McLeish, D.A ( )

Projected effects of current stocking practices on consumption in the main basin Mean consumption, : 47,000 metric tons

Effects of projected reduction in sea lamprey abundance on consumption in the main basin 9% Mean consumption, : 51,500 metric tons

Effects of projected reduction in sea lamprey abundance and 50% reduction in chinook salmon stocking on consumption in the main basin 31% 25 % Mean consumption, : 35,000 metric tons

Summary  Major consumers: lake trout & chinook salmon  Consumption by key predators may be approaching prey capacity  Changes in stocking and sea lamprey abundance effect consumption  Importance of continued monitoring of predators and prey