The Teapot Dome Field Experimental Facility: CO 2 Program Summary Presentation for the Wyoming Pipeline Authority October 2006 Vicki Stamp CO2 Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
Advertisements

Lydia Cumming, MRCSP Outreach Coordinator, Battelle MRCSP Outreach Program DOE/NETL Cooperative Agreement # DE-FC26-0NT
Geologic Storage of CO 2 : Leakage Pathways and Environmental Risks Michael A. Celia, Catherine A. Peters, and Stefan Bachu Princeton University and Alberta.
Field Demonstration of CO 2 Miscible Flooding in the Lansing-Kansas City Formation, Central Kansas Alan P. Byrnes (KGS, PM-BP1) Class II Revisited DE-AC26-00BC15124.
TTI Regulatory and Permitting Issues For Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Presentation to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership September.
Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.
Primary funding is provided by The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe The Society is grateful to those companies.
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
Evaluation of the usefulness of hydraulic fracturing sites as an analogue for geologic carbon sequestration sites Caitlin Augustin Structural Geology.
AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA PRESENTATION TO : The Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry February 24, Regina.
Deepwater Improved Oil Recovery Can Technology Overcome Economics? Gavin Longmuir – Knowledge Reservoir Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Technical Symposium –
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.
NewTec International Exploration and Production Support NewTec International BV. is specialized in geological advice and training for exploration and.
November Airborne Natural Gas Pipeline Leak Detection Washington State Citizens Committee On Pipeline Safety Johan Wictor.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Motivation and aims  Framework: exploitation of the huge potential of CO 2 in EOR and development of reliable sequestration processes.  Global objective:
1 Carbon Capture and Storage, CCS CCS is various methods for capturing and permanently storing anthropogenic CO 2 that would otherwise contribute to global.
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs 2nd Edition, R. A
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
2 Located within the Naval Petroleum Reserve No.3 (NPR-3), RMOTC –Operates in an oil field environment –Explores solutions to energy issues –Demonstrates.
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Global Energy Security Forum Miami, Florida March 26, 2013 Mark K. Boling President HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERATIONS: SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION.
HSE Screening Risk Assessment (SRA) for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Curtis M. Oldenburg Earth Sciences Division WESTCARB Meeting Portland, OR October 27-28,
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.
WESTCARB Annual Meeting Overview Larry R. Myer University of California Office of the President California Institute for Energy and Environment.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
Remediation of Seepage from Geological Storage (GHG/07/43) Aim of study was to: Identify remediation approaches and techniques that.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Preparing Water Managers for Drought and Climate Change in the Southwest Katharine Jacobs Executive Director Arizona Water Institute USGS Congressional.
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Demonstration at In Salah, Algeria Iain Wright (CO2 Project Manager, BP Group Technology) UNCTAD Africa Oil & Gas Conference.
Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Southwest CO 2 Sequestration Partnership: Field Demonstrations of CO 2 Sequestration Exploring Carbon Science and Technology Options Western Regional Air.
1 Water Use in Oil and Natural Gas Production ConocoPhillips Canada Water in a World of Seven Billion Conference May 10,
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Schlumberger Carbon Services Economics & Risk of Scaling Up for Carbon Storage John Tombari Vice President North & South America Schlumberger Carbon Services.
T OM W ILSON D EPARTMENT OF G EOLOGY AND G EOGRAPHY W EST V IRGINIA U NIVERSITY M ORGANTOWN, WV Developing a strategy for CO 2 EOR in an unconventional.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
University of Colorado Law School June 6, 2014 Mark K. Boling President EXPLORING NEW FRAMEWORKS OF REGULATION: NEGOTIATING MODEL REGULATIONS.
Energy and the Environment: Tapping the Potential for Large Volume Storage of Carbon in the Gulf Coast Susan Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson.
1 1 Presenter / date if required Independent, integrated thinking.
Deploying Carbon Reduction Technologies In Time Daniel A. Lashof February 2007.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION d n Overview West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Terry Surles California Energy Commission (CEC)
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships… “Pathways to Sustainable Use of Fossil Energy”
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Presented by (Team N): Lihui Ye Madison Tenneson Shatha Alnaji Wei Zhang PETE 4735 Spring,
Reaching New Heights Tools and Data for air quality planning in the Intermountain West Intermountain West Data Warehouse Presenter: Agency: Contact Information:
International Association of Oil and Gas Producers Europe’s Indigenous Oil and Gas Production GSE Workshop Brussels – 24th May 2007.
Environmental Impact Assessment Speaker : Yong Hoon Kim, Ph.D.
DESCRAMBLE Executive Summary Project description:
Modeling Natural Fracture Networks in the Context of Flow Simulations: Teapot Dome, Wy Thomas H. Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia.
Modeling Natural Fracture Networks in the Context of Flow Simulations: Teapot Dome, Wy Thomas H. Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia.
POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.
Presentation transcript:

The Teapot Dome Field Experimental Facility: CO 2 Program Summary Presentation for the Wyoming Pipeline Authority October 2006 Vicki Stamp CO2 Program Manager Rocky Mtn Oilfield Testing Center

May 12, 2006: U. S. Senate, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: “The Energy Policy Act of 2005 required the Department of Energy to develop new technologies for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) though injection of carbon dioxide into marginal oil wells. The Act also required the Department to study the potential for increasing oil recovery using carbon injection technologies…”

Today’s presentation Overview of projects and current status Focus areas in CO 2 EOR and geologic storage research & technology development Priorities: –benefits to industry/ partners –technology transfer / data sharing –contributions to domestic energy development— –Focus on Wyoming EOR Estimate possible future CO 2 needs: –Budget-dependent

Teapot Dome Location The field occupies roughly 10,000 acres, 35 miles north of Casper WY.

An EOR / Carbon Storage Test Site Teapot Dome (NPR-3): a field site for scientific and engineering testing, deployment, and technology transfer Salt Creek Anticline Teapot Dome

CO 2 Science Goals NEEDS: –relationship / synergy with EOR –site selection criteria, best practices –demonstration of storage safety and permanence Understand key features, effects, & processes –public safety, understanding and acceptance: needed for wider deployment of geologic storage –large-scale field tests to inform policy and regulations TEAPOT FOCUS: –EOR / storage relationship –site characterization and baseline assessment –leakage risk evaluation, prediction, and management behavior of fractures, faults development of risk mitigation techniques and warning systems –sensitivity and detection limits of monitoring tools, recommended suites and practices –wellbore and cement integrity –formal integration and comparison of MMV outputs

U.S. Applicability of Teapot Results Data: S.J. Friedmann, LLNL, 2005

Existing infrastructure and data 600 active wells, 1300 wells total, drilling rig & field staff; trucked CO 2 for early experiments Photo courtesy S. Cooper, Sandia NL

Anadarko / Salt Creek CO2 Pipeline Location of the pipeline Proximity to NPR-3 Teapot Dome (NPR-3) Distance from main line to central NPR-3 location ~15 mi or less.

Site characterization Regional geology Reservoir geology Reservoir histories and screening Soils, aquifers, reservoir fluids Petrology, petrophysics, geomechanics, seismic interp. (CSM, UW, TA&M, UH, BYU, Stanford) CO2-specific baseline assessments Teapot Dome Key components:

NPR-3 Reservoir Summary 9 Producing (oil-bearing) intervals Depths 500’-5500’ (Shannon to Tensleep) Good range of oil/rock chemistry and petrophysics Additional 5-6 water-bearing intervals Fresh and saline, ’ Range of dep. environments, clastic (Ss) & carbonate Crow Mtn. disposal zone Madison underlies

Tensleep Reservoir Screening for first target Tensleep selected –Well control / few penetrations, modern –Small, viable EOR target –P = 2350 psi, 32 API –CO 2 -miscible conditions –Depth 5500’, 8-12% avg porosity, 80 md, h = 50’ –Risk assessment, caprock –Regional benefits –Research, MMV relevance Proposed Section 10 project area: S1 fault

Proposed Tensleep EOR / storage demonstration 2/3 of Wyoming production comes from Tensleep or equivalent Rangely CO 2 EOR in the Weber (Tensleep equiv.) Significant volumes in Colorado & Utah Analogs throughout U.S. & internationally Compelling state and regional drivers to study EOR and storage in the Tensleep at Teapot Dome: Tensleep fm, Alcova Canyon, WY

NPR-3 Gravity-Stable Miscible CO2 Cost-effective testing of gravity-stable operation in Tensleep fm –High relief structure –Significant fracturing, faulting –Active aquifer –Available wellbores for both operation and monitoring Fluid analyzed and test design simulated –Lab fluid tests were used to generate equation of state inputs for reservoir simulation tuning –Simulation completed at field scale and proposed test scale Tensleep Section 10 project area Results support proceeding with proposed injection

At 30 days CO2 injection30 days after end of CO2 injection 30 Day CO 2 Test Injection: Gas Saturation in Top Layer Fractures Best Response Injection

Proposed Section 10 EOR / Storage Project: Key Points Modest EOR target Small capital outlay required Seamless transition to storage-optimized Template with broad applicability Public domain results Expansion / long-term operation possible if successful Other zones possible: Ex: 2 nd Wall Creek

Saline Aquifer CO 2 Storage Test Crow Mountain Ss (4500’) 3 existing Class II disposal wells, Section 10 Co-locate with Tensleep EOR project Water analysis, permeability, caprock Several surrounding wells available for monitoring Focus: –MMV tool sensitivity and detection limits, comparison, integration of results –Predict and quantify multiple storage mechanisms

Joint Industry Project (JIP) Industry suggestion Under development: –Notice posted on LLNL website –Finalizing package for potential partners Funding independent of DOE and Federal budgets Industry-driven: – to better meet industry’s research needs and timetable – increase program flexibility and scope – support for additional projects – bring business to Wyoming – could affect CO 2 needs

Conclusions Characterization results have showcased the strengths of Teapot Dome as a project site for focused research on CO 2 EOR, monitoring and storage. Earliest projects proposed will focus on: EOR / oil field storage Suite of projects under consideration includes: EOR project expansion Saline aquifer storage Tests for monitoring (MMV) tool development, sensitivity, comparison and integration Long-term testing related to storage safety and wellbore integrity

Conclusions Can grow / stimulate CO 2 EOR and CO 2 storage research in Wyoming: –increasing Wy and domestic production –growing national and global efforts aimed at reduction of CO 2 emissions Domestic and international partners –benefits to Wyoming business and the public Environmentally sound Possible to use at least ~3-10 MCF/D for EOR Could permanently store >10 MCF/D (600 tons per day) in multiple deep zones from industrial sources Need for secure, long-term CO2 supply

For more information: Teapot Dome CO 2 Program: Vicki Stamp CO 2 Program Manager U.S. DOE, CO 2 EOR: U.S. DOE, NETL Carbon Sequestration Program: