Reminder:. Robo-AO at South Pole Station Tony Travouillon Thirty Meter Telescope / Caltech Richard Dekany Associate Director for Instrumentation Development,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
Advertisements

GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Planetary Imaging with PILOT Jeremy Bailey Anglo-Australian Observatory March 26th 2004.
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presented by Julian C. Christou Gemini Observatory.
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
Observational techniques meeting #5. Future surveys Narrow (pencil beam): HDF UDF GOODs Cosmos MCT JWST.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
CAMERA Compact Automated MEMS Rayleigh Adaptive Optics System C. Baranec, S. Kulkarni, R. Dekany, N. Law, E. Ofek, M. Kasliwal, V. Velur, & A. Ramaprakash.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
CAMERA A Compact, Automated MEMs-based Rayleigh Adaptive Optics System Matthew Britton, Nick Law, Viswa Velur, Christoph Baranec.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
TIGER The TIGER Instrument Overview Phil Hinz - PI July 13, 2010.
Imaging Science FundamentalsChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science The LASP* at RIT’s Center for Imaging Science *Laboratory for Astronomy in Strange.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Robo-AO Replicable Robotic Laser Adaptive Optics and Science System for 1-3 m Telescopes Christoph Baranec Caltech Optical Observatories Laboratory development.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Diffraction-limited imaging in the visible at the WHT Craig Mackay, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge. 22 March 2010: Science with WHT.
Robo-AO First Science Workshop May 20, The Demo Period Robo-AO Science Workshop Agenda.
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
PALM-3000 Systems Engineering R. Dekany, A. Bouchez 9/22/10 Integration & Testing Review.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
Page 1 Introduction to Adaptive Optics Antonin Bouchez (with lots of help from Claire Max) 2004 Observatory Short Course.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
AO4ELT - Paris Giant Magellan Telescope Project Science Drivers & AO Requirements Patrick McCarthy - GMT Director Phil Hinz & Michael Hart - GMT.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
MAXAT-II Woods Hole September Overview Science Drivers Lessons of the past Focusing on Science and Innovation.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
Early scientific goals for the MMT’s multi-laser-guided adaptive optics Michael Lloyd-Hart, Thomas Stalcup, Christoph Baranec, N. Mark Milton, Matt Rademacher,
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
Science with AO A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team. Topics Sample scientific programs. Observing strategies. Technical issues. Keck AO, K'
Chinese- international collaboration solved the central question: ”How common are planets like the Earth”
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
Adaptive Optics for Astronomy Kathy Cooksey. AO Basics Photons –Travel in straight lines Wavefront –Line perpendicular to all photons’ paths Atmospheric.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Mega Telescopes of the 21 st Century Evolution in the Ground-Space Synergy Dr. Marc Postman (STScI) & Richard Ellis (Caltech) James Webb Space Telescope.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
Dynamic Andromeda: Novae and Variable Stars in M31 Yi Cao 2 nd year graduate at Caltech On Behalf of the Palomar Transient Factory collaboration.
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
GMT’s Near IR Multiple Object Spectrograph - NIRMOS Daniel Fabricant Center for Astrophysics.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Robo-AO: Demo Period Nicholas Law.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
A telescope for an ANtarctica Imaging & Survey
Presentation transcript:

Reminder:

Robo-AO at South Pole Station Tony Travouillon Thirty Meter Telescope / Caltech Richard Dekany Associate Director for Instrumentation Development, COO Principal Investigator, PALM-3000 Adaptive Optics System Christoph Baranec Principal Investigator, Robo-AO California Institute of Technology 25 March 2011

Robo-AO at SP Why NIR astronomy in Antarctica? Advantages –Low near-infrared background, K ~ 17 arcsec -2 B ~ 40x smaller than Mauna Kea –Faint sources (compact or extended) –Particularly attractive at the telescope diffraction limit –Sites of superb image quality above boundary layer Dome C median seeing ~0.27” FWHM at 0.5  m (Lawrence et al., 2004) –Long nights Flexible observing cadence –Fast transient events (Law, Kulkarni, Dekany, et al., 2009) –Precision radial velocimetry of late-type stars (Seifarht and Kaufl, 2008) Challenges –Need logistics and infrastructure –Need technology validation, experience, confidence 2m class telescope operation Adaptive optics instrumentation Solution –Commit to an incremental program to establish a US optical / NIR astronomy presence in Antarctica –Begin at the South Pole “Not enough has been done in the NIR and that’s a tragedy” – M. Burton, a few hours ago… 3

Robo-AO at SP GLAO at SP? 4

Robo-AO at SP What is Robo-AO? Robo-AO (C. Baranec, Caltech, PI) –“A robotic laser guide star adaptive optics system” –A new paradigm of automated observing Based on 11 years operation of Palomar 5m telescope AO and robotic operation of Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) –A demonstration collaboration between Caltech and IUCAA (India) 5 Traditional Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Robo-AO Robotic Laser Guide Star AO Telescope diameter3-10m1.5-3m Lock-on time5-15 min / target0.5-1 min / target Targets per nightTensHundreds Program LengthFew nightsWeeks+ Targets per program~100Thousands Personnel 1 astronomer + 6 spotters + 2 telescope control 1 astronomer (peacefully sleeping) [Or on-site but rarely attending]

Robo-AO: Projector & Cass Instrument

Robo-AO at SP Robo-AO at SP Capabilities Current Robo-AO operational modes at Palomar –Diffraction-limited over 1’ – 2’ using mV < 18 tip-tilt guide star ~0.1” in the visible ~0.2” in the near-infrared K-band Strehl ratio > 0.8 over 30% sky –Seeing improvement over the entire sky without tip-tilt star ~0.3” in visible or near-infrared Or diffraction-limited with short exposure L3CCD camera in visible Design optimization for SP –Ground-layer AO (GLAO) deformable mirror conjugation to ~200m altitude (Travouillon et al., 2009) –Increase DM actuator count to correct poor boundary layer –Use higher power DPSS laser at 532 nm –Consider 2x2 mosaic H2RG camera for ~ 7’ FoV 7

Robo-AO at SP Why start Robo-AO at SP? Advantages –Robotic: High efficiency observing; Large diffraction-limited observing programs –Adaptive optics: High angular resolution High sensitivity, low confusion Small spectrographs match to diffraction limit –Laser guide star: High sky coverage Rayleigh LGS –Particularly well suited for correction of thin boundary layer –Commercial, affordable, high power lasers –Low-cost Hardware ‘replication cost’ of Palomar system < $500K (not winterized) With dedicated H2RG imaging camera ~$1M (not winterized) –Maturity Developed and to be demonstrated at Palomar Observatory in Expected performance of Robo-AO clone at SP ~180 nm equivalent RMS WFE for > 80% K-band Strehl –Supported by detailed error budget validated at Palomar and Keck –SP system would be reoptimized to better balance terms Current goal is weeks of unattended operation – no reason not to obtain months –Data quality monitors and pipelines to be developed for Palomar demonstration Challenges –South Pole 2m-class robotic O/IR telescope –Winterizing for SP –Power requirement – several kW draw, but a LGS power a tradable design parameter –Installation and human safety – particularly with green LGS option 8

Robo-AO at SP SP 2m AO equiv to Mauna Kea 5m with AO in point source sensitivity SNR  (S  qF 0 D 2 ) / sqrt(S  qF 0 D 2 +  qB ackground ) For background limited observations, combination of AO and low K-band background makes 2m SP telescope highly competitive for NIR observations 9 D [m] Image Size Strehl, S  q (trans*QE) K-band Lim mag (5 , 1 hr) Gemini N8.40.7” Gemini N w/ AO (ALTAIR) ” (on axis) SP21.8” SP w/ AO20.23” (averaged over 3.5’) Equiv to 5m AO telescope on Mauna Kea

Robo-AO at SP Robo-AO science programs executable in 3-year SP program High-contrast surveys –IR excess targets as debris disk candidates A new view of planetary system formation via direct dynamical studies Astrometric planet searches –Companions to M dwarfs, T dwarfs 1000’s of potential substellar companions to complete low-end of the initial mass function Rapid transient characterization SNe classification Microlensing events Precursor demonstration for ultimate LSST coordination Large imaging surveys –Interacting galaxies, star formation –1000’s of new lensed quasars Astrometric surveys –IMBH’s in globular clusters … and others 10

Robo-AO at SP Microlensing OGLA and MOA alert over 1,000 new microlensing events each year primarily during the bulge season (May-September) 12 Exoplanets have been discovered this way Better time coverage is needed Benefits from high resolution to reduce blending of background sources Does not need very wide field of view (<10’) 11

Robo-AO at SP Robo-AO at SP an essential step to a wide- field NIR presence on at a plateau site Proven technology transportable across the Continent –2-3 winter demonstration of Robo-AO at SP key to technology validation Commercial lasers, deformable mirrors, electronics, mechanisms (drives, etc.) 2 nd generation Robo-AO to have wider field correction –Dome C, e.g., has even thinner boundary layer and larger isoplanatic angle (NGS?) –Robo-AO DM technology reconfigurable for wider FoV correction Additional of 2 nd DM can open available diffraction-limited field for successive telescopes Terminology: Multi-Conjugate Ground-Layer AO (MCGLAO) (Dekany et al, in preparation) Mosaic detector array provides large, sensitive complement to JWST in 2020 time frame 12

Robo-AO at SP The field of view increases at Dome C 13

Robo-AO at SP DC 2m MCGLAO order of magnitude better than VISTA 4m for NIR survey speed Survey Speed  SNR 2 *   2 60x shorter SP MCAO frame integration time avoids pixel saturation, nonlinearities, cosmic rays, and allows dithering for background subtraction 14 K-band Strehl, S SNR (K=22, 1 hr) Field of View Survey Speed (relative) VISTA 4m SL 16 VIRGO 340 mas/pix deg1 Cerro Pachon 8m MCAO “GeMS” 4 H2RG 20 mas/pix 0.4 (avg over 85”) deg0.14 SP 2m AO (1 st generation) 1 H2RG mas/pix 0.6 (avg over 3.5’) deg0.31 Plateau site 2m MCGLAO (2 nd generation) 25 H2RG mas/pix 0.4 (avg over 30’) deg10.4

Robo-AO at SP The wider field correction allows… Transit search in young stellar clusters (early planet formation and frequencies of planets in cluster environment) Does not have the restrictions of Keppler (Faint stars and northern sky) Antarctica has a much better window function than SuperWASP and HATNet which lead to better parameter space and resolution of eclipsing binaries contaminations (Braun et al. 2009) 15

Robo-AO acknowledgements Partially funded by the National Science Foundation.

Robo-AO at SP References N. Law, S. Kulkarni, R. Dekany, et al.,“The Palomar Transient Factory: System Overview, Performance, and First Results”, PASP L, Seifahrt and Käufl, “High precision radial velocity measurements in the infrared - A first assessment of the RV stability of CRIRES”, A&A 491 (3) (2008) T. Travouillon, L. Jolissaint, M. C. B. Ashley, J. S. Lawrence, and J. W. V. Storey, “Overcoming the Boundary Layer Turbulence at Dome C: Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics versus Tower,” PASP, 121: , 2009 June. 17

Robo-AO at SP Backup Slides 18

Robo-AO Survey Programs - Lensed Quasars By observing lensed quasars, we can model the mass distribution within a galaxy: tells us about the dark matter distribution Currently there are ~100 known lenses, and 10,000++ known candidates Using Robo-AO and a few months of observing we can expand the number of known lenses by factor of 10 or more Follow up for time delays / dynamics Einstein Cross (HST) (1.6 arc sec top to bottom)

2006GY Optical Transient resolved with Lick AO system

Palomar test demonstrates very high contrast possible with 2m-class telescope 3 planets around HR 8799 Image taken with 1.5m portion of P200 w. PALMAO Vortex coronagraph for high-contrast imaging Serabyn et al. Nature 2010

UV Laser at the P60

Robo-AO at SP PALM-3000 Shack-Hartmann WFS reusable for NPX 2m AO with N = 64 subapertures across pupil Microlens arrays imaged with a CMOS alignment camera Shack-Hartmann spots imaged with the CCD-50 NPX 2m Robo-AO sampling