Win2k3 EoS and Enterprise Modernization Matt Starkie Business Architect WW DC and Cloud Infrastructure CoE Microsoft Michael Loftus Chief Strategist & Consulting Partner Hyper Technologies

Objectives for Win2k3 EoS / Enterprise Modernisation Identify Existing Risks in Applications Reduce Risk Exposure Reduce Financial Exposure Leverage Newer Capabilities Reduce Time to Value of Services Simplify the Environment

Why? Organisations have an Application Transformation Challenge, still The Traditional Destination has evolved Organisations are going BiModal Risk vs Cost – what’s your preference? What’s your exposure? What are we hearing that is relevant to you General Themes Specific Role Viewpoints

Going Bi-Modal Fast Twitch AND Slow Twitch Agility Revenue, Brand, Customer Experience Agile, Kanban Empirical, continuous, fail faster Startups, small, short term deals Good at new and ambiguous projects Business-centric, customer focused Short – (days, weeks) Goal Value Approach Governance Sourcing Talent Culture Cycle Times Reliability Price for Performance Waterfall, V-Model Plan Driven, Approval Based Enterprise Suppliers, long-term deals Good at conventional process/ projects IT Centric, customer removed Long – (months / years)

Win2k3 EoS / Enterprise Modernisation – Common Themes Again, we’ve just done this on the desktop!! Our solution works as is, why change it? We don’t need any help, we’re all covered This is an IT problem This is a Business Problem What are you trying to sell us this time? Yes we have a problem, we don’t know how big or where to start Another vendor trying to scare us into buying from them We haven’t budgeted to address this You’re no different than the other vendors Yes we’re an ITIL shop……… Show me the value We want this to be the last time we do this

Win2k3 EoS / Enterprise Modernisation – Role Based Viewpoints Viewpoint Perspectives CIO Strategy Lines of Business Business Relationship Managers Enterprise Architecture Senior IT Roles Innovation Teams Finance and Procurement Legal

How to Start Understand your problem Communication – Early, Often, Relevant Service RACI Service Cost is Key How Much today How Much in future Avoid Analysis Paralysis Lower the time to Value Offload Risk Outcome based solutions

How to Start

Accelerated Application Modernization Approach Discovery &Rationalisation Sprint Project – Assessment & Planning Sprint Project - Migration CSA Start Week 1-4 Week 5-12 Weeks 13-26 July 2015 Environment Data Collection Low Complexity Migration Planning (3rd Party & MS) Microsoft Velocity Migrations Testing and Remediation Quarterly CSA Server Count Defined Objectives Service Catalogue Findings and Reports 5-10 Application Migration Pilot CSA Accountability Roles and Responsibilities Custom Application Review and Validation Impact Project – Assessment & Planning Impact Project - Migration Initial Business Case Analysis (CSA & Risk Impacts) Week 7-15 Week 15 – TBD (ASAP) Medium Complexity Migration Planning Governance and Risk Mitigation Microsoft Velocity Migrations Partner Migration Management Business Impact, Risk, Schedule and Approach Business Testing and Remediation End User Communication and Training Complexity Project – Assessment & Planning & Migration Week 15 onwards Target Destination Decisions Target Destination Design / Build / Operate

Infrastructure Modernisation Michael Loftus Hyper-T

Hyper Technologies (HyperT) A Perspective on Modernization and Win 2003 Microsoft Partner Deep expertise in Hyper-V, System Center, and core MS Platforms Focused primarily on Consulting and On Premises Managed Service, with a “Boutique” Hosting Capability Azure activity restricted to DR feasibility discussions thus far. Dev/Test on the horizon. Active in Several Windows 2003 Upgrade Projects Focused on Infrastructure – so not confronting Application Server challenges yet

HyperT and Infrastructure Modernization –Beliefs and Approach Infrastructure Matters Availability Agility Time to Value Service Quality Our Core Services Core MS Platforms Virtualization (server, desktop, user) Automation and Self Service Our Approach Modernize Optimize Automate PrivateCloud Hybrid Cloud

The HyperT Migration Roadmap s/w currency h/w currency supporting “glue” (DNS, AD, backup, etc) Modernize Optimize Consolidate Cluster/HA & basic DR Point Virtualization Manage Automate Advanced scripting Task automation Basic self service Private Cloud Broad virtualization Standard builds Orchestration Advanced self service Hybrid Cloud VMM/WAP mastery DR focus Dev/Test pilots Network optimization

Windows 2003 Initiatives- HyperT All focused more on “point” modernization than EOL/CSA risk. Windows 2003 Remediation seen as larger challenge and not necessarily being addressed as single project by our clients. Two separate Financial Services Engagement examples First is moving Windows 2003 File Servers to Virtualized Windows 2012 clusters. Build out new environment, migrate data, retire old servers. Second engagement is also a File Server/DFS-R upgrade to Windows 2012. As you would expect, very few significant technology challenges with these migrations In “Proposal Stage” for multiple clients starting to look at Application Servers. Initial trend is they are not interested in diagnostic tools like ChangeBase/App DNA. They seek ISV validation of support for Win 2012

HyperT Summary We are absolutely committed to (and optimistic about) the prospects for private and hybrid cloud based on MS Cloud OS. There is a need to improve understanding of networking and WAN optimization in the context of Azure and O365 We are in dialogue with a few smaller clients about moving their entire IT infrastructure Azure and O365 Client interest/demand for these migrations is driven by modernization imperatives. Although the Windows 2003 EOL “event” is acknowledged, it does not appear to represent the major “inflection point” that we believe it is. Not clear that patch availability as critical a concern as it should be.

Why Microsoft and Partners? We’ve Done This Before, countless times We know Your: Organisation Industry Geography Experienced Resources & Partners Onshore Offshore Tailored and Proven Approaches Choice of Destinations Microsoft Non-Microsoft Shared Interests and Goals The clock is ticking!!!!

Questions? Matt Starkie Business Solutions Architect WW Datacenter and Cloud Infrastructure CoE mstarkie@microsoft.com Michael Loftus Role? Hyper Technologies Michael.Loftus@hypert.com

4/15/2017 © 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION. © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

Target Workstream Set the Target Destinations to work towards Principles Private Cloud Unless…… Public Cloud Unless…. Hybrid Cloud Unless… Pre-requisites Identity Strategy Comms Plan CAPEX / OPEX Goals Justification for change Destination Build Internal Resource External Resources Mixed?

Discovery & Rationalisation Workstream Catalog Software, Workloads, Owners, Stakeholders Self-Service tools Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) Toolkit Dell ChangeBASE Lakeside Software SysTrack Internal Resources Dev Teams Business Units Long Serving Employees Service Desk System integrators Microsoft Services Microsoft partners Non-Microsoft Partners

Assess & Planning Workstream Asses Service Components Business Criticality Mission Critical Important Marginal Duplicate Gartner 5 R’s Retire Rehost Refactor / Revise Rebuild Replace Complexity / Risk High High to Medium Medium to Low Low

Migrate Workstream Who, When, What, How Much? How Much? Who? Internal Resources External Resources COTS Upgrades Remember Service Owners When / What? Simplify first Mix of Risk / Complexity Leverage Cloud Plan for Vacations How Much? Internal cost vs External Remember licensing Remember OPEX Budgetary Year