Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Webcast Section 6: Overview of PCSA and Validation Activities 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate.

Advertisements

Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and

Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.

Student Intervention & Support Services (SISS) Overview of the IEP Process Professional Development for Professional Staff Wednesday, May 7, 2014.

INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.

Arkansas Department of Education Division of Public School Accountability.

Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment (PCSA) Webcast Section 2: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Sampling.

Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Uniform Complaint Procedures Monitoring Requirements Training.

Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.

Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.

2009 Mid-year Directors’ Meeting Department of Education School Transportation Monitoring.

Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.

Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 3: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Evaluating Compliance.

April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.

WHAT IS EMIS? Education Management Information System Established by law in 1989, the Education Management Information System (EMIS) provides the architecture.

Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.

A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.

1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.

Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National.

Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 5: Correcting Noncompliance and Systems of Internal Control.

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA) Parentally Placed Children with Disabilities in Private Schools.

An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.

Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.

Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment (PCSA) Webcast Section 4: Reporting Results and Corrective Actions Using the Electronic Reporting System 1.

Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 5 Reporting Results : Using the Electronic Reporting System.

Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY March 10, 2011.

1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.

Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.

On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.

7 Due Process Update Evaluation Standards. Evaluation Materials and Procedures.

Office of School Improvement Updates Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary December 3, 2012.

Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,

1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information

Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 6: Validation and Verification Activities.

Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.

Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.

245D-HCBS Licensing Update ARRM Business & Finance Forum Minnesota Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General Licensing Division November.

ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.

District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.

Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring English Learner Accountability.

In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.

January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Monitoring in California Special Education Division California.

April Workbook Overview for Part B Locals April Workbook Overview for Part B Locals Office of Special Education Monitoring and Technical Assistance Team.

Patricia Williams & Anita Castro Special Education Team 1 Sample IEP Forms College and Career Ready.

An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) Council For Exceptional Children March 2015 Grand Rapids.

An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) CEC Presentation March 2014 Grand Rapids, MI 1.

March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.

Top Ten Policy Tips for Special Education Carol Ann M. Hudgens, Ed.S Section Chief: Policy, Monitoring and Audit Exceptional Children Division April 2015.

CIMS Community of Practice (COP) Face-to-Face Call CIMS Community of Practice (COP) Face-to-Face Call ISD Monitors December 9, :00 – 2:45 p.m. 1.

April 29-30, Review information related to the RF monitoring system Ensure that the agency meets its ongoing obligation to have a monitoring system.

January 21, 2014 Welcome! The January COP call will begin in a few moments. –Event password: 5COPcall –Event number: 666– To hear the presentation.

District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.

Special Education Proportionate Set-Aside Requirements

Student Data Privacy and Security

New SELPA Directors November 2016 Presented by Heather DiFede

Compliance Committee (3C)

Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.

Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section

Oregon Department of Education

Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends

Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section

Idaho New Charter Schools Determination Levels 2011

SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting

Presentation transcript:

Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Webcast Section 6: Overview of PCSA and Validation Activities 1

Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Visuals  Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Process Visual  Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Process June, 20132

Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Timeline Visual  Validation Dates  December 1 – January 25  DPI Notification to LEAs  DPI Schedules and Conducts Onsite Visit  Validation Report Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Timeline June, 20133

How is an LEA Selected for Validation?  Selection Factors  Noncompliance  Parent Participation  Geographic Representation  LEA Size  Timeliness of Reporting  Random Selection Validation Process Visual  Validation June, 20134

On-Site Validation Department Staff  Review Records from the Three Samples  Evaluation (7 Items)  IEP (13 Items)  Discipline (4 Items)  Review Records from No Sample Items  N-01: Timeliness of Initial Evaluations  N-02: Consultation with Private Schools  N-03: Private School Services Plans  Evaluate Public Agency’s Compliance Determination Validation Activities June, 20135

Result of inaccurate assessment of an item Reassess all records in the sample  Item-specific  Pursuant to the DPI’s explanation of the item  Submit a revised self-assessment report  DPI staff review Special Education Web Portal  Reassessment Activities June, 20136

Verification  Step One: Student-Level Corrections  Step Two: Current Compliance For More Information...  On Validation  View DPI Validation of Self-Assessments Online at:  On Verification  View Webcast #7 Next Steps & More Information June, 20137

Janice Duff, , Allison Markoski, , Courtney Reed Jenkins, , Marge Resan, , Paul Sherman, , Christina Spector, , Paula Volpiansky, , Patricia Williams, , Questions? June, 20138