S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Foster Care Service Planning & Structured Decision Making FOM 722-6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

Expedited Family Reunification Project
Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Transforming Children’s Needs to Outcomes John Polakowski August 2010 © Copyright 2010 Cúram Software Limited. Company Confidential – For Internal Use.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #3 The Foster Care Process. FOSTER PARENTING  They are licensed and receive specialized training.  Work collaboratively as a member.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
The Heart of the Matter: supporting family contact for fostered children.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.
1 Family Engagement in Case Planning & Case Management Version 2.3, 2013.
Service Planning Block Stakeholder feedback. Agenda Welcome Orientation Acknowledgements Overview of Common Core 3.0 Overview of Service Planning Block.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
Welcome to the Quarterly FTM Facilitator Advanced Training  Please make sure you have signed in.  In order to receive PE training hours you must be registered.
Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Families Achieving Independence Through Recovery Detroit Department of Health and Wellness Promotion/Bureau of Substance Abuse Prevention Treatment & Recovery.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Conducting & Documenting Monthly Health and Safety Visits with Children, and Monthly Visits with Caregivers and Parents.
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
© CDHS College Relations Group Buffalo State College/SUNY at Buffalo Research Foundation Guiding Framework for Interventions Recommendation 1.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
Ongoing Assessment/Permanency FSFN CM 123_OAP_FSFN_PPT_July 2012 PPT 1.
Clinical Supervision in CPS and FVS Safety Risk Critical Thinking.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Decision Making
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS)
Maintaining Child and Family Connections
Presentation transcript:

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Foster Care Service Planning & Structured Decision Making FOM 722-6

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints What is service planning? Process of: developing implementing evaluating Efforts or Activities to achieve the permanency planning goal.

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints History Structured Decision Making (SDM) Initially services workers had limited parameters to follow when doing their service planning. There were no structures or frameworks as a starting point. No basis for evaluating progress. How a family/child was assessed varied from worker to worker and across county. Therefore SDM Model was implemented.

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints What is Structured Decision Making ? (SDM) Consensus based process Increases consistency Validates decision making Targets interventions to those most at risk Provides structure in formulating case planning and activity Improves effectiveness of Foster Care Reduces length of time to attain Permanency Plan Goal

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints What forms will be used? Family Assessment and Reassessment of Needs and Strengths (DHS 145) Age Appropriate Child Assessment and Reassessment of Needs and Strengths (DHS 0432, DHS 0433, DHS 0434, DHS 0435) Parent-Agency Treatment Plan & Service Agreement (DHS 67) Initial Service Plan (DHS 65) Updated Service Plan (DHS 66) Family Reunification Assessment (DHS 147) Safety Assessment (DHS 149) Action Summary (DHS 69) Permanent Ward Service Plan (DHS 68)

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Where do we get our information? TOGETHER with the family and with others, we gather information, assess and then develop the plan. Sources: oFamily (including children) oPrevious child welfare history oSchool records oPsychological evaluations oOther assessments (esp. Substance abuse) oOther family members oEco-maps

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Family Assessment of Needs/Strengths (FANS) Assess and evaluates the presenting needs and strengths of each household/caretaker with legal rights to child(ren). Used with every ISP and USP Identifies prioritized barriers and strengths. Establishes a Commonality Consistency Case planning reference tool Evaluation tool CFF 722-8A

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Scoring the Family Assessment Any negative number = need/barrier Any positive number or zero = strength FC Worker must identify top 3 barriers to reunification=primary barriers. FC Worker must identify top 3 strengths. Justify scores in ISP/USP; address in PATP When 2 or more household members are assessed use highest score. “US”=Unable to Score (ISP only, or with supervisory approval for USP) CFF 722-8A

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Use the DEFINITIONS Part of every template Know the parameters Be objective Be consistent Not own standards

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Child Assessment of Needs/Strength (CANS) Similar to the Family Assessment in foundation, purpose and functionality Has separate assessment based on age and developmental stage of child. DHS 0432, 0433, 0434, 0435 Each child must be scored individually Identify the top three needs & strengths Justify scores in ISP/USP; address in PATP Address those needs in PATP CFF 722-8B

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Initial Services Plan (ISP) Presents family history/information Describes Reasonable Efforts Identifies Permanency Planning Goal Defines services/activities to achieve Makes recommendations Completed- 30 calendar days after removal date FOM 722-8

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Parent Agency Treatment Plan & Services Agreement (PATP) Involves all stakeholders Written with ISP and USP Negotiated with all parties Identifies goals/objectives/action steps/expected outcomes/timeframe needed to address needs and achieve the Permanency Planning Goal Used to assess parent progress toward barrier reduction FOM 722-8C

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Updated Service Plan (USP) Completed within 120 days of child’s initial placement and with every 90 days after that Same identifying information as ISP Includes an evaluation of progress of barrier reduction & parenting time Must reassess (FANS/CANS) of the family and children for each USP CFF 722-9

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Reunification Assessment Purpose is to structure critical case management decision for children in Foster Care. Evaluates: barrier reduction; parenting time. Incorporated into USP but –Complete stand alone document (DHS- 147) if return home recommended before next scheduled USP CFF 722-9A

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Safety Assessment Completed following reunification assessment where parenting time and barrier reduction is at least partial. Helps assess if child: –Is in immediate danger –Source of danger –Protecting intervention to be maintained or initiated. FOM 722-9B

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Permanent Ward Service Plan (PWSP) Completed to record progress and planning of all MCI wards and permanent court wards. To be developed and updated following same guidelines. CANS to be completed. Treatment Plan is incorporated in the document/template. FOM 722-9B

S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints REMEMBER Strength based Collaborative Teaming Concurrent planning Limited time-frames Small successes