Washington State Department of Commerce Comprehensive Planning: the Context and Basics City of Tacoma Short Course February 20, 2013 Edward G. McGuire.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

Shoreline Master Program Update. Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline.
Merle H. Bishop, FAICP President Florida Chapter American Planning Association.
Public Visioning Meeting January 28 & 29, 2015 CenterPlace Regional Event Center.
Town of Lyndon Zoning Bylaw Changes Town Planning Commission Public Informational Meeting 09December09.
Community GPU Forums California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter Carmel Valley Association Citizens for Responsible Growth Coalition to Protect.
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C. “Serving Land for Jobs” Infrastructure.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
KING COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE Harry Reinert King County Department of Development and Environmental Services.
Burnet County Comprehensive Plan. What Is the Comprehensive Plan? This is a county strategic plan that will focus on the areas where the county government.
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
Local Planning Process The General Plan SB 18 Training Program.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Planning for Economic and Industrial Development Managing Your Update Bruce Hunt Planners Forum 2014.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Capital Facilities Planning Under the Growth Management Act CFP Webinar #1 November 18, 2014.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Update
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Workshop on Sequim Urban Residential – I Zoning Responding to Non-Compliance and Invalidity Ruling of Western Washington Growth Management Hearing Board.
Container Port Element City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services January 17, 2014.
From Mandate to Smart Growth: The Evolution of Growth Management in the United States Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
Oregon and Washington: A Comparison of State Mandated Land Use Planning Programs Presented by: Richard H. Carson, director Clark County Department of Community.
TUSAYAN GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN Town Council January 23, 2013.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning - pg 1 Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2010.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Presentation by Jon Laria, Chair to the Maryland Association of Counties Winter Conference January 6, 2011.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
June 10, 2008 Board of County Commissioners B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Transmittal Hearing.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public Hearing May 19, 2009 Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public.
N orth C entral W isconsin R egional P lanning C ommission 210 McClellan Street, Suite 210 Wausau, WI (715)
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Kitsap County ▪ Jefferson County ▪ City of Bremerton Naval Base Kitsap ▪ Naval Magazine Indian Island
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Amendment. Overview Background Statutory Requirements Meeting the Requirements Identified Issues Timetable.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
DUVALL 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE and SURVEY RESULTS 9:00 – 10:30 AM Survey Results 30 minutes (Lara) Comprehensive Plan, Density and Capacity, and.
1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
San Juan County 2036 Comprehensive Plan Update
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Update on Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan
The Achilles Heel in GMA
St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan 2040 Mapping Our Future
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Land Use 101: The Comprehensive Plan
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Washington State Department of Commerce Comprehensive Planning: the Context and Basics City of Tacoma Short Course February 20, 2013 Edward G. McGuire E. G. McGuire & Associates LLC - (253) City of Tacoma Short Course February 20, 2013 Edward G. McGuire E. G. McGuire & Associates LLC - (253)

Physical Geography of Washington State

Pre-GMA Planning Context 1970’s and 1980’s Plans optional - advisory Zoning - governs SEPA – largely project specific SMA – 200’ of shoreline EFSEC – major energy facilities Pre conditions Not Comprehensive Piecemeal...yields: – Sprawl – Congestion – Loss of open space, critical areas and resource lands

1990 Growth Management Act Chapter 36.70A RCW Key Changes to land use planning: – CONSISTENCY [cannot conflict or thwart] Plans and development regulations must be consistent with 14 State Goals [RCW 36.70A.020] Development regulations must be consistent with and implement plans [RCW 36.70A.040,.070,.130] All elements of plans must be internally consistent [RCW 36.70A.070,.130] Plans must be consistent with the plans of adjacent counties and cities [RCW 36.70A.100] Plans must be consistent with CPPs [RCW 36.70A.210]

1990 Growth Management Act Chapter 36.70A RCW Key Changes to land use planning (continued): – No plan or development regulation can preclude the siting of essential public facilities – EPFs [RCW 36.70A.200] – All plans must accommodate the allocated share of the State’s forecast population for the subsequent 20 years [RCW 36.70A.110,.115] – Public Participation is the bedrock of GMA [RCW 36.70A.020(11),.035,.130 and.140] – Counties allocate forecasted population to its cities and draw Urban Growth Areas – UGAs [RCW 36.70A.110,.115] – Concurrency of infrastructure and development is required [RCW 36.70A.020(12),.070(6) – Plans can be amended only once a year, periodic updates are required every seven years [RCW 36.70A.130]

The GMA’s Goals [RCW 36.70A.020] ALL PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS MUST BE GUIDED BY THE FOLLOWING GOALS [Each Goal is backed by a GMA requirement]: 1.Urban growth - Encourage development in urban areas [.070,.110,.115] 2.Reduce sprawl – Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land [.070,.110,.115] 3.Transportation - Encourage efficient multimodal transportation [.070] 4.Housing - Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments [.070] 5.Economic Development - Encourage economic development throughout the state [.070] 6.Property Rights - Preserve private property rights [.370] 7.Permits - Process permits in a timely and fair manner [.120,.200,.040]

The GMA’s Goals [RCW 36.70A.020] GMA Goals (continued) 8.Natural Resource Industries – Maintain and enhance natural resource industries [.060,.170,.172] 9.Open Space - Retain open space [.070,.165] 10.Environment - Protect the environment [.070,.060,.170,.172, SEPA] 11.Citizen Participation - Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process [.035,.130,.140] 12.Public Facilities and Services - Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at occupancy [.070,.120] 13.Historic Preservation - Encourage the preservation of sites with historical and archeological significance [.070] 14.Shorelines of the State - The goals and policies of the Shoreline Management Act [RCW ] are added to RCW 36.70A.020 [RCW 36.70A.480(1)]

GMA Planning Process and Timelines Coordination and Communication: County-wide Planning Policies (CPPs) developed to guide planning among jurisdictions within the county – 1991 The Land Speaks First: Natural Resource Lands and Critical Areas identified, designated, conserved and protected UGAs: Urban Growth Areas drawn outside of which urban growth cannot occur – 1992 Comprehensive Plans adopted – Implementing Development Regulations adopted within 6 months of Plan adoption – Plan Amendments – no more often than once a year – Plan Updates every 7 years – UGA Updates at least every 10 years Public Participation throughout all stages

Public Participation “early and continuous” [RCW 36.70A.035,.130,.140] Notice: newspapers, posting, websites, media Public meetings Public Workshops Charettes Citizen Advisory Committees Public Hearings Always opportunity for written comment Elected officials decide! Pool of Potential “Petitioners”

GMA Comprehensive Plans [RCW 36.70A.070] Three fundamental types of land: Urban, Rural, and Natural Resource Lands – Critical Areas are found on all lands. All cities are Urban – within UGAs – must allow urban uses and intensities, urban densities, and ensure urban services are adequate and available to support growth. [Infill, mixed uses, transit oriented design, and TDRs] GMA specifies mandatory elements for each Plan. Each element includes inventories, needs projections and sets out policies and programs to shape the future and meet needs [financing plans are required for capital facilities and transportation]

Required Elements of GMA Comprehensive Plans [RCW 36.70A.070] Each comprehensive plan shall include [maps and text] for each of the following elements [mandatory elements] – Land Use* – Housing – Capital Facilities* – Utilities – Rural [Counties only] – Transportation* – Economic Development (in updates if funded) – Parks and Recreation (in updates if funded) – Ports (Seattle and Tacoma) Subareas plans are permitted as are other optional elements such as Environment, Energy and Natural Resources * = inextricably linked

Land Use, Transportation, and Capital Facilities Elements – Linkages! Capital Facilities Element Inventory of existing facilities Forecast of future needs Six-year financing plan to fund needed facilities Reassess land use element if funding falls short Proposed locations an capacity of needed facilities Transportation Element Inventory of existing modes Needs assessment – LOS standards Multi-year financing plan to fund needed facilities Reassess land use element if funding falls short Assumptions on land use and traffic – Demand management

Urban Growth Areas - UGAs OFM forecasts 20-year population by county County, in consultation with Cities, allocates population Land capacity analysis – land supply Density assumptions, and ability to serve UGAs drawn by County to accommodate growth

Conservation of Natural Resource Lands and Protection of Critical Areas [RCW 36.70A.050,.060,.170] All jurisdictions must identify, designate and conserve Natural Resource Lands: – Agricultural lands, Forest lands and Mineral lands of long-term commercial significance – These provisions are intended to protect the related natural resource industries All jurisdictions must identify, designate and protect [using the “best available science”] Critical Areas: – Wetlands, Aquifers, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation areas, Frequently Flooded areas and Geologically Hazardous areas – These provisions are to protect the function and values of the critical areas and public safety – Critical areas are found in urban areas, rural areas and on resource lands

GMA Enforcement! All plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, must be submitted to the State Department of Commerce (DOC provides technical assistance and limited funding support) for circulation to other agencies for their review and comment prior to adoption. There is no requirement for GMA plans to be approved by any state agency or department – they are presumed valid upon adoption. Enforcement of the GMA is through appeal to the Growth Management Hearings Board – 3 regional panels. If the Board finds Noncompliance and remands: affects certain state funding priorities (all), can invalidate (not so rare), recommend gubernatorial sanctions (rare).

Updates to the Plan An opportunity to improve plans and regulations: Review vision, goals and policies Address new issues [climate change, regional transit] Assess plan performance – is it working? [buildable lands] Assess land availability for needs [population, housing, jobs, etc.] Incorporate new and updated data and information [statutory changes, case law, etc.] Refine how it all fits together.

Where Urban Growth Has Been Guided Urban Growth Areas Physical Geography

Tacoma Specific Thoughts from a former Board Member Point of View Moratoria - follow.390, don’t string together too many, careful with EPFs. Public Participation and Notice – elected officials decide (but, record reviewed closely), allow written comments if oral testimony is short, watch timing and content of notices. Shoreline Updates – Not many cases, watch critical areas issues. Subarea Plans – Must be consistent with City’s overall Comprehensive Plan. Consult the Board’s Digest of Decisions for insight on prior holdings