John Lockey School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering Newcastle University Innovation Fund 2013 Self and Peer Assessment Interim Report.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A centre of expertise in digital information management Developing a Quality Culture For Digital Library Programmes Author & Presenter Brian Kelly UKOLN.

Advertisements

Session 2.3: Skills for Supportive Supervision

UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)

Eva Sørensen Department of Chemical Engineering University College London Experiences of using peer assessment in a 4th year design module.

Creating a high performance culture

Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Managing Change: Innovation and Diversity Chapter 7 Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights.

Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.

2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff

Grading Group Projects Taryn Vian. Why do group projects? Increases student engagement through applied learning Allows us to give more complex assignments.

OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.

The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.

Assessing employability through reflective diaries on teamwork CEC 202 A Sense of Place School of English Second Year Approved Module.

Introducing small-group workshops as formative assessment in large first year psychology modules Suzanne Guerin School of Psychology, University College.

Practical Placements & the QAA and ASET Guidelines By Ian Sunley & Lorna Uden Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Staffordshire University,

Chapter 10 Resort Operations: The Importance of Guest Activities

AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,

Initial Rating Assessment Content of the Discussion

Work Package 4 Learning Process for Reflective Policy Making 3rd TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE AND STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 18 Sept – Thessaloniki.

Developing a High-Quality Teaching Profession – What TALIS can tell us Michael Davidson OECD Directorate for Education TALIS webinar, 7 December 2012.

“Request for Proposal” Presentation Project

Assessing Performance and Developing Employees

Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.

Stress & Empowerment Case Study at Scottish Power Lynn Holdsworth, University of Manchester Helen Russell, Scottish Power.

Being The Best We Can Self-evaluation workshop Key results for Victoria’s public library services.

Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.

Wilmer Arellano FIU.  If you are using acronyms for your project title include also a description.  PAM  (Pulse Amplitude Modulation)

Ofsted Good Practice South East Provider Event Matthew Coffey HMI Director, Further Education and Skills 11 July 2013.

Disclosure of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Continuing Medical Education Michael D. Jibson, MD, PhD and Jennifer Seibert, MD University of Michigan.

SEAMEO College Module 4 Learning and Innovation Forum of Youth Leaders (LIFYL) Lead Centre: SEAMEO SPAFA Cooperating Centres: BIOTROP, RELC and all SEAMEO.

Summary of instrument review National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.

School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.

Overview What do we mean by a Learning Organisation? Why did we develop a People Development Framework? What was the process involved in building the.

Sophie Makris  What is a team?  A group of people pooling their skills, talents, and knowledge, with mutual support and resources, to provide.

Developing personal and team effectiveness using IT

Work Place Based Assessment: A deeper understanding of competency assessment John Kedward, Associate Dean.

1 Benchmarking ETI 6134 Dr. Karla Moore. 2 Today’s Lecture  Definition  Advantages  Disadvantages  Types.

Class #11: Final Class for this course. Course Overview SUU Registration and payment Next Steps Final assessment: PLC RtI Action Planning TODAY’S OBJECTIVES.

Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.

Listening Skills Listening is not the same as hearing. Listening implies understanding. For this to happen, you need to practice active.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

WHAT IS HUMAN ACTION?. OVERVIEW In this unit we explore the conditions of human action. This focus will isolate the human capacity to act and to recognize.

Session Developing others. Session 1.3.4: Objectives Learning objectives At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Apply coaching.

Team Rewards The Peer Evaluation Process. Your rewards Assessed by instructor Assessed by your team peers.

JANUARY 8 TH WELCOME TO ECS 311. MY BACKGROUND MOM, WIFE, BABA.

100,000 Genomes Project North East and North Cumbria GMC An Introduction Mike Pratt (Genomic Education Development Officer) Susan Goldstein (100,000 Genomes.

 This what we have done so far, basic ideas and headings.  Any ideas or important topics that we have missed which you feel should be included, just.

Internal and External Peer Review Focused Group Discussion PAASE 06/15/2011.

Starter Define in your books (without peeking): Just War Holy War Pacifism Ahimsa Just War Holy War Pacifism Ahimsa.

Team Assignment Importance of the assignment Assignment details Team Allocations Presentation details Submission Requirements Feed forward into Assignment.

101 Leadership. +1 (443) Developed by Matt Shlosberg.

WORKSHOPS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED BY WINS TO SUPPORT THE STRENGTHENING OF RADIOLOGICAL SECURITY WORLDWIDE Pierre Legoux, WINS 05 March Mumbai,

AS2: Business Studies (Principles of Management and Leadership)

Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders

UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)

2016 Year-End Performance Management

The Assessment Ladder Exercise

Facilitation guide for Building Team EQ skills.

MODULE 13 – LEARNING ORGANISATION

Engaging Students in Construction Safety Research

Yıldız Arıkan Oguz Baburoglu September

A culture's values are its ideas about what is good, right, fair, and just.

Indiana University School of Social Work

Programme Structure 180 credits needed for the degree

Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees

Colleges Delivering For Wales Annual Conference

WAT-E2140 Jaana Sorvari & Meeri Karvinen

Group 4 Project.

What to include in your personal evaluation

Presentation transcript:

John Lockey School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering Newcastle University Innovation Fund 2013 Self and Peer Assessment Interim Report

Students Perception of Peer Assessment  Proposal  A Cross Cultural Study  Collaboration with other Schools  £3,740 Funding Support

Students Perception of Peer Assessment  Modules used for Focus Groups  On Line Questionnaires have been developed and sent to students for feedback.  Focus groups have taken place for last years stage three students.  Surveys and group meetings to take place after Christmas.

Focus Group Meetings  Companies you worked with?  At the End of Semester 1 did you understand the aim and process of Peer Assessment?  How would you rate yourself and the members of your group today? Similarly or Differently if Differently Why?  Did you understand how P.A. may affect your overall grade?  Do you think the process is Fair/Unfair? (If unfair explain why)  What can we do to improve the Peer Assessment?

Results of Interim Survey (Part)  The majority of students in Singapore (52%) were unsatisfied with their final grade as compared to the students in the UK (70%) who were generally satisfied with their result  The majority of students from both countries agreed that the peer assessment was fair  The majority of students from both countries to agree to leave their ratings of each other’s contributions unchanged, if given the option to reassess.  The majority of students in Singapore (92%) believe that PA can be improved whereas in the UK, majority of the students believe that the PA cannot be improved any further (93%)

Peer Assessment Form Assessed Student Names Contribution to group Was he/she regularly at the group meetings and available for discussion, planning and actions? Did he/she contribute to the needs of the group? e.g. produce ideas, listen to others, provide leadership or direction, help the group function well as a team. Did he/she do what was agreed to be done at the meetings? Did he/she take a fair share of the work? Overall Rating

Peer Assessment Grading  A for an outstanding contribution - this should be used rarely  B for a leading contribution  C for a significant contribution - this is the expected average level of contribution  D for a below average contribution  E being for a very limited contribution  N being for NO contribution - this should be used only in exceptional circumstances

Questions?