Anthony Boccaletti Observatoire de Paris LESIA. Several instruments dedicated to Exoplanet detection and characterization with High Contrast Imaging since.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet Research
Advertisements

The SPHERE/ZIMPOL polarimeter for extra-solar planetary systems Hans Martin SCHMID, ETH Zurich and many collaborators in the SPHERE consortium IPAG Grenoble,
Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
ESO, 27 Nov 09 SPHERE – the high contrast challenge Markus Kasper, ESO 1 1.
GLAO instrument specifications and sensitivities
Error budget for the PRIMA conceptual design review Bob Tubbs, Richard Mathar, Murakawa Koji, Rudolf Le Poole, Jeff Meisner and Eric Bakker Leiden University.
E-ELT VLT HARMONI – the first light integral field spectrograph for the E-ELT Niranjan Thatte On behalf of the HARMONI consortium Florence - 29 June 2013.
Meeting of the Blue Dot Team, UCL, London, sept Single Aperture Concepts.
Halftoning for High-Contrast Imaging P. Martinez 1 C. Dorrer 2, E. Aller Carpentier 1, M. Kasper 1, A. Boccaletti 3, and K. Dohlen 4 1 European Southern.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Pupil Remapping for high dynamical range imaging Olivier Guyon Subaru Telescope National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Hilo, HI Michelson.
TIGER The TIGER Instrument Overview Phil Hinz - PI July 13, 2010.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
Recent & planned high-contrast work on the WCS and P3K Gene Serabyn Nov. 12, 2007.
NGAO Instrumentation Cost Drivers and Cost Savings September 2008 Sean Adkins.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
NGAO High-Contrast Performance Budget (WBS aka Companion Sensitivity) Initial WFE budget and status report NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela.
An Optimized Pupil Coronagraph: A New Way To Observe Extrasolar Planets This work was performed for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute.
1 NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 1: NIRC2 NGAO IWG December 12, 2006.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrometer simulation Note in ● Why we need it now ● What should.
Lyot coronagraphs with band-limited masks Brian Kern (JPL) (supported by all of TPF-C work to date)
Figure 2.1 Block diagram of a generic projection imaging system.
Blue Dot Team « Multi aperture imaging ». BDT sept MAI techniques High accuracy visibility measurement Differential interferometry Nulling.
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
Spectral Analysis of atmospheres by nulling interferometry Marc OLLIVIER Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale - Orsay.
Direct Imaging of Exoplanets
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
RAS E-ELT meeting 9th May 08 Fraser Clarke Towards EPICS; high contrast spectroscopy Fraser Clarke N Thatte, G Salter, M Tecza C Verinaud, M Kasper (EPICS.
The two faces of the METIS Adaptive Optics system Remko Stuik, Stefan Hippler, Andrea Stolte, Bernhard Brandl, Lars Venema, Miska Le Louarn, Matt Kenworthy,
Exoplanet Exploration Program Starshade and Coronagraph Technology Gaps and Paths to Close Them Peter Lawson and Nick Siegler Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Clio: 3-5  m planet-finding AO camera Ari Heinze (Steward Observatory) Collaborators: P. Hinz (Steward), S. Sivanandam (Steward), M. Freed (Optical Sciences),
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
1 A. Boccaletti Pasadena, Sept th Imaging EGPs with JWST/MIRI and VLT/SPHERE valuable experiences for TPF-C A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz D. Rouan + coronagraphic.
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Update to End to End LSST Science Simulation Garrett Jernigan and John Peterson December, 2004 Status of the Science End-to-End Simulator: 1. Sky Models.
From NAOS to the future SPHERE Extreme AO system T. Fusco 1, G. Rousset 1,2, J.-L. Beuzit 3, D. Mouillet 3, A.-M. Lagrange 3, P. Puget 2 and many others.
High Contrast Imaging with Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing and PIAA for Subaru Telescopes Olivier Guyon Basile Gallet
Eric Pantin, Jean Schneider, A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz, R. Galicher, R. Gratton, D. Stam et al. Polarimetry and spectral imaging of mature Jupiter and super-Earth.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Molecules in the atmosphere of extrasolar planets, Paris, nov Direct Imaging of Extrasolar Planets Overview of Ground & Space Programs Anthony.
Hubble Space Telescope Coronagraphs John Krist JPL.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Optical principles of diffraction focussing, Preparing the way to space borne Fresnel imagers NiceSeptember 23-25, Fresnel Imagers Observatoire.
Simulations in the context of SPHERE Exoplanet Imaging Workshop David Mouillet Lecture 27 Feb 2012 Numerous contributors in the simulation work for SPHERE:
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS
Part 2: Phase structure function, spatial coherence and r 0.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Optics for AO
Development of Coronagraphs for Exoplanet Detection with SPHERE - direct detection and characterization of Extrasolar Giant Planets in the NIR among nearby.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
Page 1 Lecture 16 Extreme Adaptive Optics: Exoplanets and Protoplanetary Disks Claire Max AY 289 March 7, 2016 Based in part on slides from Bruce Macintosh.
Big Bear Solar Observatory Some ground-based technology developments that will propel solar physics Phil Goode for Jeff Kuhn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Focal Plane Instrumentation at Big Bear Solar Observatory
Extra Solar Planet Science With a Non Redundant mask
M. Beaulieu, L. Abe, P. Martinez, P. Baudoz C. Gouvret
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
Instrument Considerations
Observational Astronomy
He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Presentation transcript:

Anthony Boccaletti Observatoire de Paris LESIA

Several instruments dedicated to Exoplanet detection and characterization with High Contrast Imaging since 2001 For this decade : SPHERE and GPI : 2011/12 JWST-MIRI: 2015 For the future (> ): ELT / EPICS Space coronagraphs : ACCESS, PECO, SPICES …. => need for simulation tools adapted to the instruments and to the observing cases

Effectsissuessolutions Stellar diffraction- photon flux - photon noise coronagraphy Wavefront errors (dynamic and static) - speckle noise - photon noise wavefront sensing and correction Residual aberrations (mostly static) - un-seen - un-corrected speckle calibration differential imaging Issues or noises related to Image formation (so to the source itself)

Background : sky, thermal emission of instrument/telescope, zodiacal light, exozodi Detector related : Flat Field, readout noise, remanance, … Many others that we don't even thought about !!! simulator coronagraphy Wavefront aberrations Differential imaging Background Detectors artifacts Targets characteristics

Assess the performance for a science case Evaluate the limitations : which source of noise, or which issues are relevant ? Put some constraints on the instrument design Optimize the design itself (instrumental choices) And then => reassess the performance

plan focal + diaphragme pupille détecteur pupille FFT FFT -1 FFT + masque Plan A Plan B Plan C Plan D

si Plan A: Plan B: Plan C:Plan D:

High frequency AO correction (41x41 act.) High stability : image / pupil control Visible – NIR Refraction correction FoV = 12.5’’ 40x40 SH-WFS in visible 1.2 KHz, RON < 1e- High frequency AO correction (41x41 act.) High stability : image / pupil control Visible – NIR Refraction correction FoV = 12.5’’ 40x40 SH-WFS in visible 1.2 KHz, RON < 1e- Pupil apodisation, Focal masks: Lyot, A4Q, ALC. IR-TT sensor for fine entering Pupil apodisation, Focal masks: Lyot, A4Q, ALC. IR-TT sensor for fine entering Coronagraphic imaging: Dual polarimetry, direct BB + NB. λ = 0.5 – 0.9 µm, λ 0.6 µm, FoV = 3.5” Coronagraphic imaging: Dual polarimetry, direct BB + NB. λ = 0.5 – 0.9 µm, λ 0.6 µm, FoV = 3.5” 0.95 – 1.35/1.65 µm λ 0.95 µm, Spectral resolution: R = 54 / 33 FoV = 1.77” 0.95 – 1.35/1.65 µm λ 0.95 µm, Spectral resolution: R = 54 / 33 FoV = 1.77” 0.95 – 2.32 µm; λ 0.95 µm Differential imaging: 2 wavelengths, R~30, FoV = 12.5’’ Long Slit spectro: R~50 & 400 Differential polarization 0.95 – 2.32 µm; λ 0.95 µm Differential imaging: 2 wavelengths, R~30, FoV = 12.5’’ Long Slit spectro: R~50 & 400 Differential polarization Nasmyth platform, static bench, Temperature control, cleanliness control Active vibration control Nasmyth platform, static bench, Temperature control, cleanliness control Active vibration control Beam control (DM, TT, PTT, derotation) Pola control Calibration Beam control (DM, TT, PTT, derotation) Pola control Calibration

- characterization of Giant Planets and Brown Dwarves : contrast of / ’’ - instrumentation :- exAO - coronography Calibration of the residual speckle pattern is needed contrast ~

plan focal + diaphragme pupille détecteur différentiel pupille FFT FFT -1 FFT + masque Plan A Plan B Plan C Plan D

- single subtraction : obj(  ) – obj(  ) - spectral obj(  ) – ref(  )- temporal (reference star or filters swapping) - double subtraction : [obj(  ) – obj(  )] – [ref(  ) – ref(  )] telescopeAOcoronagraph filter 2 filter 1 detector data are rescaled and normalized in intensity calibration of common aberrations (dynamic & static) calibration of differential aberrations (static)

pupil plane 1 focal plane 2 focal plane 1 (coro. mask) pupil plane 2 (Lyot stop) - phase & amplitude screen, (atmospheric): , , star, ref - instrumental jitter - telescope aberrations - aberrations: telescope -> dichroïc - aberrations: dichroic -> corono - common aberrations corono -> detector - differential aberrations corono -> detector ( ,  ) - flux normalisation: star, ref, planets ( ,  ) - background - RON - flat field ( , , star, ref) - corono (4Q, achro 4Q, Lyot, apo Lyot): chromatism - pupil shear: ( , , star, ref) - pointing: ( , , star, ref) - Lyot stop shear (star, ref) FFT FFT -1 FFT - single subtraction - double subtraction - detectivity plot AO filtering phase diversity filtering

Sampling of the pupil : good sampling needed to reproduce pupil shape Make use of grey approx. Sampling of the image PSF size = N / D = lambda/D (N: array size, D: pupil diameter) PSF chromaticity Modify pupil size but keep the array constant => change the actual shape of the pupil Modify array size but keep the pupil constant Uses of FFT with IDL Shift the center to coordinates [0,0] Aliasing: make sure N is at least 2xD

Image normalization: use an off-axis object far from the center (not affected by the mask) but account for the throughput Wavefront errors: Define the Power Spectrum Density of aberrations with power law and cut-off frequencies WFE screen = random screen X sqrt (PSD)

2 codes : 1 for image formation and 1 for contrast curves Image formation – Make pupil – generate common aberrations + differential temporal aberrations upstream – Build complex amplitude in pupil – Build PSF complex amplitude – Make coronagraphic image for on-axis and off-axis objects – Save results Contrast curves – Read results – Normalize – Resample 1 to 0 – Calculate various subtraction – Plot contrast curves

Image formation – Start with circular pupil then use the routine sph_pupil to produce VLT pupil in grey level. – Generate diaphragm (under/over-sized) – Define bands: H2 H3 filters of SPHERE = & microns – upstream aberrations : use the provided VLT_wfe.fits Add a 4nm defocus on the reference target – Define a loop on filter and scale array size accordingly – Calculate complex amplitude in pupil : sph_amp_complex.pro – Build PSFs with sph_psf.pro – Introduce differential aberrations with sph_wfdiff.pro – Build coronagraphic images with sph_corono.pro – Take intensities – Rescale the arrays to 1kx1k with sph_taille.pro – Produce off-axis planets with sph_planet.pro – Save results

Contrast curves: – Read results of image formation – Resample to camera pixels (shannon at 0.95mic) make use of sph_rescale.pro – Resample of image at 1 to 0 (again sph_rescale.pro ) – Calculate subtractions: obj( 0)-ref( 0) obj( 0)-obj( 1) [obj( 0)-obj( 1)] – [ref( 0)-ref( 1)] – Azimuthal contours with sph_profil1d.pro – Plot averaged contour for psf and corono image and 5sig level for subtractions

And play with the parameters …. D = 8m / 160 pix N = linear actuators Relative offset (star/ref) = 0.5 mas Differential aberrations = 10nm Planet separations = 0.1", 0.5", 1"

Reference to : – CAOS + SPHERE Software package (public) – PROPER by John Krist (public) – PESCA for ELT (not public)