The National Water Quality Monitoring Council Summer Meeting Fort Collins, Colorado July 22, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
Advertisements

Principles of Standards and Measures
Methods Board Report National Water Quality Monitoring Council July 28, 2005.
Matthias Wentzlaff-Eggebert, BZgA, Cologne, Germany This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
Projects to Help Implement The Monitoring Council’s Framework March 26, 2003.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Jennifer Gimbel, ACWI Chair Acting Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: A Framework for Northeast BC Presentation of Research Results Science and Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Presented.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
EPAs Vision for STORET and the Role of STORET in Water Quality Management Programs.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
July 16, 2002 Colorado Water Quality Monitoring Council An Activities Report to the National Water Quality Monitoring Council by Holly Huyck, Steve Lohman,
Puget Sound Initiative 2007 At A Glance Jay Manning, Director Washington Department of Ecology April 26,
1 Capacity Building: Strategy and Action Plan GEF-UNDP Strategic Partnership Capacity Development Initiative.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
1 Reporting on the Health of the Gulf of Maine Christine Tilburg, EcoSystem Indicator Partnership, Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment Heather.
Activities of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Gail Mallard, USGS NWQMC Meeting Phoenix, AZ, December 10, 2002.
ArcGIS for Local Government’s Capital Project Planning Maps and Apps Scott Oppmann.
Methods Board Meeting – March 2005 Highlights Most 2-yr workplans for each Workgroup prepared Discussed Board involvement in NMN – reported earlier in.
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency National Capacity Self Assessment (GEF/UNDP) The Third GEF Assembly Side Event – 30 th August,2006 Cape town Integrating.
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
1 Proposed Adoption of Biological and Toxicological Water Quality Data Elements and WQDE Guide LeAnne Astin Interstate Commission on the Potomac River.
ACWI 2004 ACTION ITEMS. Opening Remarks Lynn Scarlett, Interior’s Asst. for Policy, Management and Budget ! ACWI is part of a larger spectrum of conversation.
The ten-year framework of the Global Centre for ICT in Parliament ECPRD Working Group on ICT Annual Meeting November 2010 Bucharest,
Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup West Palm Beach November 2006.
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Methods and Data Comparability Board Advisory Committee on Water Information Herb Brass September 15, 2004.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementation Team August 19, 2013.
FDDC’s Internal Evaluation Processes. Making Evaluation Practical & Manageable Not Rocket Science.
National Water Quality Monitoring Conference Water Quality Monitoring 2002: Building a Framework for the Future May 20 –23, 2002 Monona Terrace, Madison.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Planning for Results National Peer to Peer (NPtP) ROMA Training Project Goal 5 – Agencies improve capacity to Achieve Results.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
Report to Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI) January 19, 2006 Herndon, VA.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is envisioned as a coordinated national and international network of observations, data management and analyses.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Update Methods and Data Comparability Board San Diego, CA, Dec. 6,2007.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Mark A Limbaugh Asst. Secretary for Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior Robert M. Hirsch,
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Revision of the UN FDES United Nations Statistics Division.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Anne Castle, ACWI Chair Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior William H.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Framework for Getting Results at Scale
Suggestions for Next Steps
Partnerships for Pandemic & Bioterrorism Incidents
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Research Program Strategic Plan
Conclusions and recommendations
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
The Nova Scotia Asset Management Program
How do you build a common agenda?
Presentation transcript:

The National Water Quality Monitoring Council Summer Meeting Fort Collins, Colorado July 22, 2008

Goal for the Meeting: To reassess where the Council stands, to establish its goals for the next two years, to organize itself, and to involve others in order to achieve those goals.

 Review the Strategy and interests that have guided us  Status Report Review our accomplishments Review the evolution and accomplishments of others  Look to evolving circumstances  Decide on the things that need to happen and the Council’s role in making them happen

Our Charter, the Strategy and interests that have guided us  Terms of Reference  Council  Methods Board  The Strategy for Improving Water-Quality Monitoring in the United States  Requests from ACWI, CEQ, NSTC  Insights / Initiatives of the Council From the Conferences Represented groups on the Council Council Member Concerns and Interests

Past Accomplishments:  2008 and five previous conferences  National Coastal Monitoring Network (NMN) Design Pilot studies  National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI)  Water Quality Data Elements Chemical & Microbiological Analytes Biological Populations Toxicity Physical Habitat Measures

National Coastal Monitoring Network Design  Design for interrelated resource monitoring  Refined specifications for data management  Specifications for nutrient monitoring

Council Member Concerns and Interests  The Golden Rule

A Format for Discussions  Issue Summary Actions needed  Do the work  Advise  Summarize status  Share successes  Ask Questions Schedule & Responsibilities

The Two-Year Cycle ACWI Conference

Issues 1. Do we need a more current strategy for improving WQ in US (1995)? Report to ACWI on our progress 2. How do we help w/ NEST? 3. What’s council’s role in climate change monitoring? How will CC affect monitoring programs (e.g. index periods)? How would we monitor for changes? (e.g. volunteers to monitor for CC/not WQ; using statistics for demonstrating change – so what) Can we ID and share core indicators – start dialog? 4. How to more fully engage volunteer monitoring? How do we capture volunteer data that exists? How to incorporate citizen scientists?

Issues (con’t) 5. How do we foster collaboration to look at multi-entity assessment? 6. How do we provide tools for assessment and interpretation, e.g. use for priority setting?  How do we help build capacity for assessment and interpretation?  Tools for different types of design, e.g. probablistic, targeted  More support from users – build constituency 7. What should this council do relative to state councils – develop statement? ($5K; moral support) 8. Should we track overall monitoring effort in US? (dashboard; are we there 50%; what does success look like – publicly available data; status of 10-yr strategies?)

Issues (con’t) 9. Should we be tracking state legislative issue in monitoring? Share w/states; how to encourage, stimulate interest 10. How much money spent on monitoring relative to other water mitigations? (e.g. ASIWPCA gap analysis refresher/ addition; what does it buy you? 11. How to follow up with network on NMN? 12. How to coordinate with other, ongoing monitoring efforts? 13. How do we improve the access and exchange of data and information? (how can sensors change monitoring, like method bd.; implications; data management and assessment; value of it) 14. How does council advise on emerging contaminants? 15. Invasives/non-native species, early detection, rapid response

16. How can standards world keep up with new constituents/technologies. 17. Do we have guidance on quality control for volunteers? Should there be some? 18. How to effectively share examples from states/other entities on things that work? 19. Are we engaged enough with biological assessments? Where does it fit with assessment methodologies? 20. How do we gain representation from experts outside the council? 21. IT IS – Where does it stand ?

The End

Ways the Council Can Work:  Produce things  Act as an advisory committee  Be the “Lord of the State-of-the Art” produce and keep current status summaries  Become a convener  Reach out actively