M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April 15 2005 Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of alpha backgrounds using flash ADC in the XMASS experiment Feb. 22nd, 2013 ICRR, Suzuki-Lab. M2 Osamu Takachio.
Advertisements

Activity for the Gerda-specific part Description of the Gerda setup including shielding (water tank, Cu tank, liquid Nitrogen), crystals array and kapton.
M. Carson, University of Sheffield IDM 2004, University of Edinburgh Veto performance for a large xenon detector.
Status of Ultra-low Energy HPGe Detector for low-mass WIMP search Li Xin (Tsinghua University) KIMS collaboration Oct.22nd, 2005.
13/12/2004Vitaly Kudryavtsev - LRT20041 Simulation of backgrounds for particle astrophysics experiments V. A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Possible merits of high pressure Xe gas for dark matter detection C J Martoff (Temple) & P F Smith (RAL, Temple) most dark matter experiments use cryogenic.
Cosmic Induced Backgrounds D. Reyna Argonne National Lab.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
LLNL A Sandia and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories Joint Project Nathaniel Bowden Detection Systems and Analysis Sandia National Laboratories,
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
Modane, 12/01/2005 Vitaly Kudryavtsev - JRA1 meeting 1 Background simulations: testing Monte Carlo codes V. A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Backgrounds. Their removal and avoidance Tom Shutt Princeton University.
The XENON Project A 1 tonne Liquid Xenon experiment for a sensitive Dark Matter Search Elena Aprile Columbia University.
Measurements of the neutron background from rock at Boulby mine Eirini Tziaferi University of Sheffield, UK JRA1 meeting, ILIAS, Paris, 14/02/2006.
PANDAX Results and Outlook
Search for Dark Matter at CJPL with PANDAX
Proportional Light in a Dual Phase Xenon Chamber
LAUNCH - Low-energy, Astroparticle Underground, Neutrino physics and Cosmology in Heidelberg, Low-level techniques applied in experiments.
Abdel Bachri, Southern Arkansas University In collaboration with Perry Grant, Martin Hawron, Clayton Martin, and Azriel Goldschmidt physica scripta, 2014.
CUORICINO and CUORE Chiara Brofferio Università di Milano – Bicocca and INFN, Sez. di Milano NOW 2004 – Otranto 12 – 17 September 2004 On behalf of the.
Report on The Study of (α,n) Neutron Yield and Energy Spectrum Dongming Mei for the AARM collaboration 1.
UKDMC Dark Matter Search with inorganic scintillators Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev University of Sheffield IDM2000 York, UK September 19, 2000.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
TAUP2007, Sendai, 12/09/2007 Vitaly Kudryavtsev 1 Limits on WIMP nuclear recoils from ZEPLIN-II data Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Laura Cadonati Princeton University.
Recent status of dark matter search with ULE-HPGe detector Tsinghua University Qian Yue nd Korea-China Joint Seminar on Dark Matter Search.
APS April meeting Jacksonville, 2007 WIMP Search With SNOLAB Chris Jillings SNOLAB Staff Scientist For the DEAP-1 Collaboration.
A large water shield for dark matter, double beta decay and low background screening. T. Shutt - Case R. Gaitskell - Brown.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
SNS2 Workshop August 28-29, 2003 Richard Talaga, Argonne1 Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector Outline –OMNIS Experiment and Detectors.
Context: astroparticle physics, non-accelerator physics, low energy physics, natural sources physics, let’s-understand-the-Universe physics mainly looking.
CTF and low background facility at Gran Sasso A. Ianni a, M. Laubenstein a and Y. Suvorov a a INFN, Gran Sasso Laboratory, Assergi (AQ), Italy The Counting.
A Study of Background Particles for the Implementation of a Neutron Veto into SuperCDMS Johanna-Laina Fischer 1, Dr. Lauren Hsu 2 1 Physics and Space Sciences.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
Stellenbosch University
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
1 Henderson DUSEL Capstone 05/06/2006 Background Modeling and Clean Room Design Considerations for HUSEP Zeev Shayer and Jonathan Ormes Department of Physics.
Experiment TGV II Multi-detector HPGe telescopic spectrometer for the study of double beta processes of 106 Cd and 48 Ca For TGV collaboration: JINR Dubna,
VIeme rencontres du Vietnam
Ultra-low background gamma spectrometry 2 nd LSM-Extension Workshop, Valfréjus, 16 October 2009 Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane.
MaGe framework for Monte Carlo simulations MaGe is a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation package dedicated to experiments searching for 0 2  decay of.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
ZEPLIN I: First limits on nuclear recoil events Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Sheffield, UK For the UK Dark Matter.
1/27/2016Katsushi Arisaka 1 University of California, Los Angeles Department of Physics and Astronomy Katsushi Arisaka XAX 10.
Results of the NEMO-3 experiment (Summer 2009) Outline   The  decay  The NEMO-3 experiment  Measurement of the backgrounds   and  results.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
Current status of XMASS experiment 11 th International Workshop on Low Temperature Detectors (LTD-11) Takeda Hall, University of Tokyo, JAPAN 8/1, 2005.
HP SURVEY INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION AND SELECTION PRINCIPLES OF RADIATION DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION CHAPTER 5 – REVIEW AND SUMMARY January 13 – 15, 2016.
DARK MATTER SEARCH Carter Hall, University of Maryland.
The COBRA Experiment Jeanne Wilson University of Sussex, UK On behalf of the COBRA Collaboration TAUP 2007, Sendai, Japan.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
1 Status and background considerations of XMASS experiment Yeongduk Kim Sejong University for the XMASS collaboration LRT2006 Oct. 3, 2006.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
Sep. 22, 2011 Seoul National University Jae Keum Lee KIMS Background 1 China-Korea Workshop 2011 September 22-23, 2011.
Development of a Underground High-Energy Neutron Detector Joel Sander - UCSB.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
The COBRA Experiment: Future Prospects
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Simulations of UAr dark matter detectors shielded by LAr vetoes
Muon and Neutron detector of KIMS experiment
Very preliminary study of the random background for the BiPo detector (PhoSwich configuration) Work done by Jonathan Ferracci.
CRESST Cryogenic Rare Event Search with Superconducting Thermometers
2nd International Workshop on Double Beta Decay
XAX Can DM and DBD detectors combined?
Neutronics Studies for the Nab Experiment
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Presentation transcript:

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson, University of Sheffield

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Sources of radioactivity Gammas/neutrons from Uranium and Thorium decay chains. Gammas from 60 Co (1.17 MeV, 1.33 MeV) and 40 K (1.46 MeV). Radon and 85 Kr (in Xe). External sources: rock, laboratory … Internal sources: readout (PMTs), copper, steel, target … Aim is to figure out the main contributions to background signal in the target and develop techniques to remove them: shielding, active veto, muon veto …

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Radon and Kr 222 Rn from decay chain of 238 U. Rn decay in air produces alpha, beta and gamma radiation. Detector vessel can shield against alpha and beta radiation but gammas may deposit energy in target. Beta decay of 214 Pb and 214 Bi gives main contribution to gammas from Rn. In liquid Xenon, 85 Kr beta-decay can also deposit energy in target.

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Model detector 250 kg liquid xenon CH 2 Pb PMTs Cu (1m diameter)

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Contamination levels U (ppb)Th (ppb)KCo 60 (ppb) PMT (R8778) ppb1.9×10 -9 Cu Vessel ppbN/A NaCl ppmN/A

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Model detector NaCl rock

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gammas from rock A is spectrum of gammas from rock (input). Total rate 0.09 cm -2 s -1. B, C, D, E after 5, 10, 20, 30 cm of lead shielding. F shows gamma spectrum after 20 cm Pb + 40 g cm -2 CH 2.

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Energy deposition in target 0.9 kg -1 day kg -1 day kg -1 day kg -1 day cm CH keV 222 Rn (10 Bq/m 3 ) PMTs 85 Kr (5 ppb) Copper vessel 10 cm Pb + 40 cm CH 2 20 cm Pb + 40 cm CH 2

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Veto performance Detector is 250 kg of liquid Xe viewed by array of R8778 PMTs contained in copper vessel. Surrounded by CH 2 veto in stainless steel container 0.5 cm thick. 10 cm lead shielding outside. Neutrons and gammas generated in copper vessel and propagated isotropically through the detector. Internal neutrons only, lead shielding reduces external neutron flux.

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Source neutron spectrum (Copper vessel)

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Efficiency for neutrons Graph shows veto efficiency as a function of veto threshold energy for 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 g cm -2 (CH 2 ρ = 1 g cm -3 ). Xenon recoils are between keV (2- 10 keV ee ). Proton recoils only. Quenching factor for protons is 0.2×E 1.53 (E in MeV). Efficiency = Addition of Gd to CH 2 can help improve the efficiency by detecting gamma from neutron capture on Gd.

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Neutron capture Neutrons can be captured anywhere in the set-up and subsequent gamma may deposit energy in veto. Efficiency increases from 65% to 82% with increasing Gd loading. Counting either proton recoils or neutron capture efficiency can increase to 89%. Xe n 0.2 % Gd NC only NC & || PR

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Reality Have assumed full 4π veto coverage and infinite time window to detect gammas from neutron capture (not very likely). Capture time (e τ ) inversely proportional to Gd loading: τ = 30μs for 0.1% Gd and 6μs for 0.5% Gd. For protons τ = 200 μs. If time window is reduced to 100 μs then efficiency drops to 82%. For more realistic geometry get 82% efficiency (and 70% with 100μs time window). One possibility is for a modular veto design. This means less coverage and more gamma/neutron emitting material. Passive CH 2 with Gd

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Internal gammas Spectrum of gammas entering target from Cu vessel

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gammas Veto configuration optimised for neutrons – 40 g cm -2, 0.2 % Gd. For gammas from copper vessel or PMTs get 40% efficiency between keV ee, above 100 keV in veto. Get absorbtion on the Cu vessel walls, veto container and PMTs. Increasing the energy range causes efficiency to drop. Compton Photoelectric

M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Conclusions 70% - 80% veto efficiency for internal neutrons. 40% efficiency for internal gammas. Precise numbers depend on detector configuration. 10 cm Pb is enough to shield this model detector (of course, depends upon internal contamination). Radon gas within the shielding may present a problem (ventilation?).