ECitizen Component 5 meeting 31st March 2006 TARTU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brussels, May 2009 Awareness and Public Opinion results from: Evaluation of the means used by national Data Protection Authorities in the promotion.
Advertisements

EC PHARE project EU IMPACT - Academic network for communicating integration impacts in Croatia Effective networking: Case study EU IMPACT: Academic network.
Multilingual Early Language Transmission MELT Project Comenius- LLP, Idske Bangma MSc Poliglotti4.eu Expert Seminar on Early Language Learning.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH RCBI ‘handover’ meeting Latvia-Lithuania-Belarus ENPI CBC Programme Vilnius,
Open Government: WSIS +10 and Beyond Yuri Hohlov AL C7 e-Government Open Government Coordinator.
Utilization of Basic Register Information from the PSI Perspective Aki Siponen, Counsellor, Ministry of Finance Business with Public Information National.
THE EURO & THE AUDIT PROCESS RISK ANALYSIS, MATERIALITY AND CERTIFICATION November 14, 2000 Christian Perrier.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
EMMA clustering conference, Bucharest, Developing National Standards for Basic Numeracy Senior adviser Hanne Christensen Senior adviser Svein.
Citizenship Foundation Project Profile Presentation
With the Support of the TEMPUS programme of the European Union Information on PRIUM: Promoting a model of Integrated University in the fYR of Macedonia.
The Austrian Adaptation Platform Sabine McCallum, 19 June 2013.
Scotland’s Environment Web LIFE Project LIFE10 ENV-UK Paula Brown Senior Project Manager – SEPA.
How can citizen’s participate? Purpose and levels of participation: approach, methods, techniques, tools. Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations.
Challenges to citizens online participation: open and inclusive policy making Council of Europe E-democracy symposium April 2007 Tanja Timmermans,
Local e-Democracy National Project Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, UK.
Consultative meeting Gender in Value Chains Addis Ababa, May 9.
Interregional Network Summit. House of the Regions. Brussels, 11th October 2006 Juan D Olabarri Networks and Co-operation Manager SPRI / Basque Country.
Overview of Activities of Twining Partnership VIETNAM - KOREA N.M. HANG, Office 33.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
Action Plan for AWM WP5: Establishment of Permanent Adriatic Welfare Observatory Welfare Mix Days Ulcinj, July Andrea Russo Adriatic Welfare Mix.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
Development of Evaluation Tool (KPI) for e-Gov Development Veselin Stoyanov Management consultant, ICB 11 Mar 20111BG-KR eGov Experts Workshop:
Building Competence. Crossing Borders. PEMPAL Workshop Istanbul; Feburary 25, 2008 The Value Added of IPSAS Prof Andreas Bergmann Robin Braun.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
InWEnt | Qualified to shape the future1 Internet based Human Resource Development Management Platform Human Resource Development Programme in Natural Disaster.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
National Library of Estonia in the TEL-ME-MOR project IST4Balt workshop in Estonia June 2006 Baltic ICT Community.
Joint Education Sector Review Sept 28-30, 2010 Report on Milestones.
INTRODUCTION.
European Commission DG Enterprise VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FOR INNOVATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES VERITE Kick-off meeting Thessaloniki November 2001.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
Restructuring and employment E.Pichot European Commission TRACE Stocholm 23 May 2005.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
Financial and Support Instruments for Fuel Poverty in Social Housing FinSH Contract number: EIE/07/146/SI Project duration : 12/2007 – 05/2010.
EUROSAI Professional Standards – Goal Team 2 Brief introduction Cristina Breden Mária Kysucká Vilnius, September 2012.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
The Coordination seat is situated at the Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell'Informazione Giuridica of the CNR Via de’ Barucci, 20 tel
Financing Natura 2000 WORKSHOPS 2nd meeting of the Steering Group, 2 March 2006.
Gas balancing interactions: Proposal for case studies Cemil Altin (Ofgem)
NFP/Eionet meeting, October 2014, EEA PAN NFP/Eionet coordination European Environment Agency (EEA) Key points and actions Bratislava, Slovakia,
National Agencies’ contribution to the evaluation of Grundtvig Action and to the National Evaluation Report on Socrates Programme Socrates - Grundtvig.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
Community for Risk Management & Assessment Kick-off January 20 th Brussels N. van Os Veiligheids Regio Zuid-Holland Zuid (Safety Region South-Holland South)
Project Manager – MCESD Project Partner - MEUSAC “ Closer to Europe ” Operational Programme 2 Cohesion Policy Empowering People for More Jobs.
European Commission initiatives for financial education Conference “Financial education: the present and prospects for the future” 30 April 2009, Vilnius.
Communicate your project Lead Partner Seminar, 25 March 2011.
European Union COMMUNICATION AND VISIBILITY. Importance of Visibility EU taxpayer money Need for awareness, accountability and transparency EU should.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG Task D 3.4 Report "Lessons learnt" 04/02/ /209.
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT for the CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM for CAMBODIA (CD4CDM-CAM) National Workshop on Capacity Development for the Clean Development.
Expert Workshop on UN-REDD FPIC Guidelines Charles McNeill, UNDP 10 February 2012, Geneva.
Communicate your project
Javier Ossandon President of ELANET (CEMR)
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Report by the VICH Steering Committee on issues raised by Forum members during the 1st Outreach Forum meeting Hervé Marion, DVM VICH Secretariat.
Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI)
Third Climate-ADAPT Webinar
Message in a bottle: how to communicate macro-regional strategies -
Consultation LG members 2 papers in November 2006
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Future design of the roundtable
"Financing Natura 2000 Guidance and Workshops”
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Innovative Public Services Group Meeting eGovernment Working Group Dr
Presentation transcript:

eCitizen Component 5 meeting 31st March 2006 TARTU

Agenda 1.Summary from Lead Partner on original intentions and conditions for comp. 5 actions ! 2.Existing comp.5 action plan (31st aug necessary adjustments ! 3.Sheffield related issues checked out ? 4.eGov. Study ? 5.Local awareness raising strategies ? 6.Survey of eGov. Awareness initiatives by project partners ? 7.Conclusions on further adjustments to Comp.5 action plan ?

1.Original intentions by lead partner Joint Component 5 activities eGovernment study Survey of awareness raising activities by project partners Guidelines for development of local awarenes raising strategies and tools

2. Revised 31st Aug.2005 plan Necessary adjustments acc. to orginal component description: Act. 1 –Survey > Study –Workshop >Virtual Meeting Act. 2 –Reports on lessons learned from act 2 > ”3 * Sheffield” Not to be discussed !!!

3. Sheffield What –Introduction of best practices and methods used by Sheffield to encourage citizens participation in local eDemocracy and eVoting actions –Publishing best practices from Sheffield on projects website Can we check this out from the ”to do list”?

4. eGov Study - 1 Original intentions –Hiring expert to conduct study on European eGov. Actions and awareness raising strategies (05/1) –Publishing study results on project web site (05/2) –Organizing virtual meeting between local coordinators regarding the results of the study (06/1)

4. eGov Study - 2 May 2005: ToR for Study of eGov. Actions in Europe: –Taxonomy for eGov. Actions –Overview of eGov. Actions at local European level based upon one / two qualified resently published reports –Best practice examples –Survey on awareness raising strategies and actions at local gov. Level in Europe

4. eGov Study - 3 Problems –Not only 1 expert (Ossandon, Elanet) – background and language problems – Euro not enough for prof. West European consultant –Uncertainty of model for project financing

4. eGov Study - 4 Actual situation –Budget reduction to Way forward ??? –Narrowing the scope of the study to only focus on awareness raising activities –Not much published on this topic at European level (and in English): Sheffield, UK, Denmark + Netherlands ??

5. Local awareness raising strategies – hiring expert Original intention: contracting expert for preparing guidelines for development of local awareness raising strategies and tools Situation –No interest (Tampere, Kick off meeting) –Not much money left What instead ????

6. Survey of awarenss activities by project partners Need for common understanding Structuring of received summaries of awareness raising activities Problems, challenges and needs Next steps –Input from remaining partners ! –Virtual discussion of draft observations –Observations and conclusions

6.2. Survey of awarenss activities by project partners Need for Common understanding on –“what is awareness raising” compared to –“what is service provision” Raising awareness –by whom citizens / enterprises employees in local authorities politiciens public opinion –About what eServices eDemocracy eParticipation / eInclusion e”Else” Portal ??? >AIDA

6.3. Survey of awarenss activities by project partners AIDA A ….. Awareness (eye opener) I……. Interest (relevance) D…….Desire (needs /benefits) A…….Action (buying/using) Awareness campaign Service development / delivery

7. Conclusions and decisions Conclusions on adjustments to joint component 5 action plan Decisions to be implemented

New comp. 5 joint activities action plan 06/1 –eGov. Study expert contracted 1. delivery (euro 3000) –Partner awar. survey ongoing and planned activities 06/2 –eGov. Study seminar and 2. delivery (euro 9000) – Partner awar.surv. Observ/concl. –Awareness raising seminar / campaign contract. Expert 07/1 –Awareness raising seminar implemented 07/2 –reports on local awar. Campaigns