Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Failure Analysis of a Fin Design for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural scales and types of analysis in composite materials
Advertisements

Mechanics of Composite Materials
Chap.8 Mechanical Behavior of Composite
Composites Design and Analysis Stress-Strain Relationship Prof Zaffar M. Khan Institute of Space Technology Islamabad.
Elasticity by Ibrhim AlMohimeed
Design of Machine Elements
Chapter 3 – Stress and Deformation Analysis (ref MCHT 213!!)
Distribution of Microcracks in Rocks Uniform As in igneous rocks where microcrack density is not related to local structures but rather to a pervasive.
Shear Force and Bending Moment
Read Chapter 1 Basic Elasticity - Equilibrium Equations
Exp.4: Rubber in Shear Apparatus Eng. Ahmed Y Manama Eng. Saeed A Shurab Eng. Ahmed Al Afeefy.
SAFE 605: Application of Safety Engineering Principles Strength of Materials.
MAE 314 – Solid Mechanics Yun Jing
1st Progress Report Dan Ippolito
ENGR 225 Section 1.3 – 1.6.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
Copyright 2005 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited FIGURES FOR CHAPTER 3 TORSION Click the mouse or use the arrow keys to move to the next.
Assist.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Erklig
Beams: Pure Bending ( ) MAE 314 – Solid Mechanics Yun Jing Beams: Pure Bending.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
MACROMECHANICS Ahmet Erkliğ.
CE 579: STRUCTRAL STABILITY AND DESIGN
Subgrade Models for Rigid Pavements. Development of theories for analyzing rigid pavements include the choice of a subgrade model. When the chosen model.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
Structural Design. Introduction It is necessary to evaluate the structural reliability of a proposed design to ensure that the product will perform adequately.
Composite Strength and Failure Criteria
10 Pure Bending.
Shear Stress and Strain
Chapter 3 Micromechanical Analysis of a Lamina Ultimate Strengths of a Unidirectional Lamina Dr. Autar Kaw Department of Mechanical Engineering University.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008
Chapter 3 Micromechanical Analysis of a Lamina Elastic Moduli Dr. Autar Kaw Department of Mechanical Engineering University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
9 Torsion.
Load and Stress Analysis
STRUCTURES Outcome 3 Gary Plimer 2008 MUSSELBURGH GRAMMAR SCHOOL.
Materials Characterization
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 7. Transverse Shear 1 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Develop a method for finding the shear stress in a beam having a prismatic.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding axial.
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Overview of Mechanical Engineering for Non-MEs Part 2: Mechanics of Materials 6 Introduction – Concept of Stress.
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998) MATERIALS SCIENCE &ENGINEERING.
EML 4230 Introduction to Composite Materials
Subject: Composite Materials Science and Engineering Subject code:
Strength of Material-1 Introduction. Dr. Attaullah Shah.
Unit-5. Torsion in Shafts and Buckling of Axially Loaded Columns Lecture Number-3 Mr. M.A.Mohite Mechanical Engineering S.I.T., Lonavala.
Stress and Strain ( , 3.14) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components NC State University Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Stress.
EML 4230 Introduction to Composite Materials
Chapter 2 Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina Tsai-Hill Failure Theory Dr. Autar Kaw Department of Mechanical Engineering University of South Florida,
Chapter 2 Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina Maximum Stress Failure Theory Dr. Autar Kaw Department of Mechanical Engineering University of South Florida,
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
Conclusions on Transverse Shearing Stress Calculations Maximum Value at Neutral Axis – IF CROSS- SECTION IS NOT NARROWER ELSEWHERE –Depends on Shape of.
Strain Energy Lecture No-5 J P Supale Mechanical Engineering Department SKN SITS LONAVALA Strength of Materials.
Mechanics of Materials -Beams
Mechanics of Solids (M2H321546)
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Pure Bending.
Mechanics of Materials Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros
Engineering materials lecture #12
1.6 Allowable Stress Allowable Load < Failure Load
BDA30303 Solid Mechanics II.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Ch. 2: Fundamental of Structure
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
EML 4230 Introduction to Composite Materials
Presentation transcript:

Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Failure Analysis of a Fin Design for the Micro-Mechanical Fish By Michael Petralia Wood MicroRobotics Laboratory Fin Design by Kyla Grigg December 12, 2006

Design of the fin Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo GoalPrototype Design The final design will look like a fish fin, but to prototype the mechanical system, square elements are being used.

Design of the fin Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Brass Plate Carbon Fiber Tendon Glass Fiber Laminas Silicone Rubber Shape Memory Alloy (SMA)

Forces acting on the fin Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo F SMA F Tendon F Rubber F SMA

Forces acting on the fin Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo θ min F SMA θ min = 6.5 o Assuming the rubber stretches at most 1 mm, The SMA’s provide a maximum pull of, F SMA = 1.47 N The horizontal force from the SMA to the rubber will be, F rubber = 2F SMA sin(θ min ) = N Case 1: Maximum Deflection Assuming this load is equally distributed over the right edge of the fin, F rubber / A = N/mm 2

Forces acting on the fin Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo F SMA The maximum angle is, θ max = 22 o F max = F rubber = 1.10 N Though this would mean the fin has not moved, let’s take this as our worst case scenario. The maximum horizontal force from the SMA will be, Again, assuming this load is equally distributed over the right edge of the fin, F rubber / A = N/mm 2 Case 2: Maximum Force θ max

Forces acting on the fin Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo The force in the tendon is the force necessary to keep the fin in place during swimming. It will be the horizontal force from the SMAs for a given angle. Because the deflection will be relatively small, it should be safe to assume the force in the tendon will act parallel to the surface of the fin. Although it would mean there was no deflection of the fin, let’s use the maximum horizontal force provided by the SMA for analysis. Force from the Tendon F tendon = 1.10 N

Properties of glass fiber Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo According to Chou * unidirectional lamina can be treated as a homogeneous, orthotropic continuum. Additionally, for circular cross-section fibers randomly distributed in the unidirectional lamina, the lamina can be considered transversely isotropic. The result is that we only have five independent material constants: E 11, E 22, v 12, G 12, v 23 These values of these constants were provided by the manufacturer: * Chou, Microstructural Design of Fiber Composites (1992) + This value was not provided by the manufacturer, but it was necessary to assume a value in order to please ABAQUS. E 11 (GPa)E 22 (GPa)v 12 G 12 (GPa)v

Orientation of the glass fiber Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo + = Horizontal FibersVertical Fibers Crossed Fibers

List of Analyses Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo The following situations were analyzed for the cases of maximum deflection and maximum forces. To look at the worst case scenario, the tendon force was included in each analysis. One Layer:Horizontal fiber direction Vertical fiber direction Two Layers:Horizontal fiber direction Vertical fiber direction Crossed fiber direction

A Note on the Results Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo The maximum tensile and compressive stresses and strains in the 1 and 2 directions were compared to the maximum allowable values as provided by the manufacturer. The orientation of the fibers was considered, and the graphs are based on the stresses and strains with respect to the fiber orientation, not with respect to the fin orientation. Because of this, in the cross fiber analyses, the front and back square were considered separately.

Vertical Fibers - Max Deflection Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Deformation Scale Factor =100 σ t,max = 58.5 MPa σ c,max = 65.3 MPa

Horizontal Fibers - Max Deflection Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 53.2 MPa σ c,max = 52.3 MPa

Vertical Fibers - Max Deflection Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 25.5 MPa σ c,max = 32.6 MPa

Horizontal Fibers - Max Deflection Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 26.7 MPa σ c,max = 26.1 MPa

Crossed Fibers - Max Deflection Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Front Square: σ t,max = 27.5 MPa σ c,max = 33.1 MPa Back Square: σ t,max = 38.9 MPa σ c,max = 48.2 MPa

Vertical Fibers - Max Deflection Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 25.5 MPa σ c,max = 32.6 MPa

Vertical Fibers - Max Force Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Deformation Scale Factor =100 σ t,max = MPa σ c,max = 62.7 MPa

Horizontal Fibers - Max Forces Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 60.2 MPa σ c,max = 59.3 MPa

Vertical Fibers - Max Force Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 45.5 MPa σ c,max = 30.7 MPa

Horizontal Fibers - Max Force Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 28.6 MPa σ c,max = 28.4 MPa

Crossed Fibers - Max Force Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Front Square: σ t,max = 31.6 MPa σ c,max = 37.7 MPa Back Square: σ t,max = 37.5 MPa σ c,max = 44.8 MPa

Vertical Fibers - Max Force Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo σ t,max = 45.5 MPa σ c,max = 30.7 MPa

Table of Maximum Principal Stresses and Strains Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo Number of LayersFiber DirectionCase σ t,max σ c,max ε t,max ε c,max 1Vertical Horizontal VerticalMax Deflection Horizontal Crossed - Front Crossed - Back Vertical Horizontal VerticalMax Force Horizontal Crossed - Front Crossed - Back

Conclusions Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo As was previously thought, it is necessary to employ two layers of glass-fiber. The crossed-fiber configuration provides lower strains in the the 2 direction, but the horizontal stresses will approach the limit of the material in the vertical-fiber square. Despite the higher strains, the 2 layer, horizontal-fiber configuration does not experience any stresses or strains greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value. It is recommended that the fin be constructed using two horizontal-fiber squares.

Questions? Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Eng-Sci 240: Solid Mechanics Professor Zhigang Suo