WILLIAM E. PRENTICE THE EVALUATION PROCESS IN REHABILITATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNIT 7- INJURY MANAGEMENT
Advertisements

Principles of Examination
Orthopaedic Medicine Mazyad Alotaibi.
HOPS. HOPS Systematic and standardized procedure used to evaluate injuries. Why? –Reduces risk of “missing something” –Allows easy communication of findings.
Assistant professor, Sports medicine Department, IUMS
Shoulder Injuries.
Assessment and Evaluation
Musculoskeletal Assessment. History This is the information gathering and recording phase of the assessment. The history should give a clear idea of what.
Injury Classification What’s wrong? What’s wrong?.
Injury Evaluation Process
Assessment Protocol Dr. Michael Gillespie Doctor of Chiropractic.
Soft Tissue Injuries. Daily Objectives Content Objectives Review the skeletal and muscular system. Gain a basic foundational knowledge regarding soft.
Chapter 12: On-the-Field Acute Care and Emergency Procedures.
BASICS OF INJURY REHABILITATION
Off-Field Injury Evaluation. Evaluation vs. Diagnosis O By law, ATC’s cannot diagnose O Education and training allow them to make quick and accurate judgment.
Off-the-Field Evaluation Athletic Medicine I. Objectives ● Know: o The organs located in each abdominopelvic quadrant. o Difference between clinical and.
Tendons, Ligaments, & Cartilage
© 2011 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 13: Off-the-Field Injury Evaluation.
Injury Assessment & Evaluation. Today’s topics...  Principles of range of motion testing, neurological testing, and special tests  Functional testing.
Muscle Injuries SHMD /5/2013. Hard Tissue Injuri es Dislocation: Dislocation: displacement of a joint from its normal location. Occurs when a joint.
Examination of Orthopedic and Athletic Injuries, 3rd Edition Copyright © F.A. Davis Company The Injury Examination Process Chapter 1.
Injury Assessment & Evaluation Procedures
Injury Assessment & Evaluation 10/8/20151
ORTHOPEDIC PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT BY Dr:Osama Ragaa Assistant prof. of physical therapy Batterjee college for medical sciences&technology.
The Injury Examination Process ATHT 305 Fall 2015.
1 Classification of Injuries. Sign: a finding that is observed or that can be objectively measured (swelling, discoloration, deformity, crepitus) Sign.
4 Evaluation and Assessment. The means by which one seeks information on severity, irritability, nature, and stage of injury Evaluation Subjective elements.
Chapter 2 Injury Nomenclature. Soft Tissue Injuries  Most common form of orthopedic trauma  Injuries to: Muscles, Tendons, Skin, Joint Capsules, Ligaments,
Chapter 28 and 29 Post Surgical Rehabilitation. Overview Although many musculoskeletal conditions can be treated conservatively, surgical intervention.
Examination and Management of Acute Pathologies ATHT 305.
CLINICAL EXAMINATION. Diagnostic approach depends upon assessment of function.
Assessment of Injuries Lecture 6. Assessment with a sports related injury the athletic therapist is expected to evaluate the situation, assess the extent.
Examination and Management of Acute Pathologies ATHT 305.
2 Principles of Assessment. Rule out life-threatening and serious injuries. On-Field Assessment: Goals Determine the nature and severity of the injury.
 Student will be able to describe the step by step process of evaluating injuries.
Sports Injury Assessment
Athletic Training.  Injury History  Inspection and Observation  Pain and Palpation  Range of Motion  Manual Muscle Testing  Special Test  Functional.
Care and Prevention of Athletic Injuries Ms.Herrera ATC/L
Sports Medicine II.  Determination of serious life threatening injury  Done on field immediately after injury  Life-threatening conditions ◦ Airway.
Dr. Michael Gillespie Doctor of Chiropractic. It is necessary to understand normal anatomy and healthy biomechanical relationships to accurately evaluate.
Evaluation Process MS. Bowman. Evaluation Process  Many evaluation models  The model you use should be systematic and follow a logical process.
Off-the-Field Injury Evaluation. Overview Injury evaluation is an intricate part of sports injury care. Though on-site injury assessment is important,
Chapter 1 The Injury Evaluation Process. Introduction  Accurate initial assessment is essential for successful management and rehabilitation of an injury.
Recognizing Different Sports Injuries Chapter 13 Pages
The Elbow Chapter 17. Anatomy Major Bones - humerus, radius, ulna, and the olecranon. -The distal end of the humerus becomes wider forming the medial.
The Concept of Sports Injury Injury continues to be unavoidable to a number of active individuals.
Recognizing Different Sports Injuries Color of the Day!
Physical therapy for orthopedic and rheumatology Salameh Al dajah PhD PT.
Injury Evaluation Process Color of the Day Why have a process for evaluation?
Off Field Evaluation of Athletic Injuries. Evaluation of Sports Injuries  Evaluation is an essential skill  Four distinct evaluations Pre-participation.
Injury Evaluation Athletic Training Mr. Frey. The Step by Step Injury Evaluation Process Injury History Inspection and Observation Pain and Palpation.
Systematic Evaluation Process. What need to know for successful evaluation and impression? –ANATOMY –Pathomechanics –Biomechanics of Sport –Pathologies.
Basic Athletic Training Chapter 6 Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg
IN THE NAME OF GOD FARAJI.Z.MD.
Documentation SOAP Notes.
The evaluation process in rehabilitation
Injury Evaluation Process
UNIT 7- INJURY MANAGEMENT
Hip, Thigh & Pelvis Injuries
Unit 1: Evaluation.
HOPS.
Physical Assessment of the Injured Athlete
UNIT 7- INJURY MANAGEMENT
INJURY REPORTS & MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY
HOPS.
Evaluation Procedures for Athletic Injuries
HOPS.
Evaluation & Assessment
Presentation transcript:

WILLIAM E. PRENTICE THE EVALUATION PROCESS IN REHABILITATION

INTRODUCTION Injury evaluation is the foundation of the rehabilitation process The athletic trainer determines the appropriate rehab goals and plan based on info gathered from the evaluation. Must consider the severity, irritability, nature and stage of the injury A.T. must continuously re-evaluate the status of pathological tissue throughout rehab to make appropriate adjustments

INTRODUCTION On-site evaluation: Quickly, but thoroughly evaluate the patient to determine the injury severity, whether immobilization is needed, medical referral need, manner of transportation from field Off-site evaluation: More detailed Used to gain info to effectively design rehab plan

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION Subjective evaluation: History and symptoms experienced by the patient Relate info gathered to objective findings Objective evaluation: Observation and inspection Acute injury palpation Range of Motion (ROM) Assessment (Active and Passive) Muscle strength Special test Neurological assessment Functional testing Pg. 48 and 49 (Figure 3-1)

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION History Patients impression of the injury Site of injury (pain) Mechanism of injury Previous injuries General health Open-ended, non leading questions Use of simple terminology

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION Mechanism of Injury Identify nature of forces acting on body Single traumatic force (macrotrauma) vs. accumulation or repeated forces (microtrauma) Identify body position at time of injury Direction, point of application and magnitude of applied force Changes in training, routine, equipment use and posture Sound or sensation Pop=joint subluxation or ligament tear Clicking=cartilage or meniscus tear Locking=cartilage or meniscal tear (loose body) Giving way=reflex inhibition of muscles in an attempt to minimize muscle or joint loading

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION Objective Evaluation Observation and Inspection Swelling, deformity, and discoloration Overall appearance of athlete Observe posture : especially in chronic overuse type injuries Postural malalignment creates repeated stress on specific tissue Cause muscle imbalances: tight vs. weak tissue Figure 3-2 (pg Compensatory patterns, muscle guarding, facial expressions Lower extremity: Observe athletes gait (walking pattern) Upper extremity: observe carrying pattern of injured extremity

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION Palpation Identify damaged tissue Point tenderness, trigger points (small nodule or muscle spasm), tissue quality, crepitus, temperature, symmetry Use pain scale of 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) Start with gentle superficial touch progress to deeper tissue palpation Palpate unaffected side to identify normal tissue Helpful to develop specific sequencing of tissue palpated Bones then ligaments then muscle &tendon

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION ROM: Ability to move limb through specific pattern of motion Compare bilaterally: unaffected side first to determine athletes individual range AROM, PROM, RROM in that order Differentiate between contractile tissue (muscle & tendon) and inert tissue (bone, ligament, capsule, bursae, periosteum, cartilage, fascia) Pain with AROM in one direction and PROM in the opposite direction=contractile tissue Pain with both =inert tissue Pain at end range =inert tissue injury because of compression of tissue between bony structures Crepitus or clicking during PROM may indicate damage to articular surface or loose body or in muscle tissue adhesions or tendon subluxation

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION End feels (figure 3-1, pg. 57) Normal End feel Soft tissue approximation=soft and spongy, a gradual painless stop (elbow flexion) Capsular=an abrupt, hard, firm end point with only a little give (shoulder rotation) Bone to bone=a distinct and abrupt en point where 2 hard surfaces come in contact with another (elbow extension)

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION End feels (figure 3-1, pg. 57) Abnormal End Feels Empty=movement definitely beyond the anatomical limit, or pain prevents body part from moving through normal ROM (ligament rupture) Spasm=involuntary muscle contraction that prevents normal ROM due to pain (muscle spasm) Loose=extreme hypermobility (chronic ankle sprain) Springy Block= a rebound at the end of motion (meniscal tear or loose body formation )

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION Strength testing Used to asses state of contractile tissue (muscle, tendon, nerve) Mid-range muscle testing (isometric or “break test”) Table 3-2 pg 59 Specific muscle testing (Table 3-3 pg 59) Assess pain and strength Used at eval and throughout rehab progression May identify muscle strain, pain/reflex inhibition, peripheral nerve injury, nerve root lesion, tendon strain, or psychological overlay

MUSCLE IMBALANCES Imbalances between agonist muscle and functional antagonist Disrupt normal force-couple relationship Action of 2 forces in opposing directions about same axis of rotation Muscle tightness or hyperactivity often the initial cause of muscle imbalance. Shortened agonist muscle vs. lengthened antagonist muscle Reciprocal inhibition causes decreased neural drive which facilitates functional weakness of antagonist To compensate for weakness patient relies on synergist or secondary muscles to specific movements Synergistic dominance Increases risk of injury to the synergist muscles Janda Classification of functional muscle grouping Table 3-4 pg. 61

SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENTIAL EVALUATION Special Test Joint stability or stress test Joint compression test Neurological test Dermatome testing Sensory distribution is innervated by specific nerve root Myotome testing Muscles innervated from specific nerve root Reflex testing Deep tendon, superficial, and pathological reflexes

INJURY PREVENTION Functional Movement Screening NASM Video Overhead Squat Test Figure 3-5 (Pg. 65) In-Line Forward Lunge Test Figure 3-6 (Pg. 66)

DOCUMENTING FINDINGS SOAP Notes Subjective Objective Assessment Plan Progress Reports Athletes treatment, goals reached, performance, symptoms, pain, etc Subjective Objective Assessment Plan

DOCUMENTING FINDINGS Setting Rehab Goals

DOCUMENTING FINDINGS Progress Evaluations