Law 243 Current Legal Issues: The use of force in international law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Concept of Law and Sources of Law
Advertisements

The US Constitution.
TEST REVIEW FOR PAGE 4 TEST.  What documents/people gave us the idea to create a Bill of Rights for our new Constitution?
The Ethics of War Spring Main normative questions When, if ever, is resort to war justified? What can we permissibly do in war? Who are responsible.
Mr. Marquina Somerset Silver Palms Civics
The Legal Character of International Law. International Law Public and private international law Public and private international law Sources of international.
CLU3M - Law Unit 1 International Law. PP#6 Ms Pannell Source: Gibson, Murphy, Jarman and Grant,. ALL ABOUT THE LAW Exploring the Canadian Legal System.
Basic notions and sources of law
Political Dimension What are the forms of external intervention in conflicts?
The Structure and Function of Texas Government
The United Nations.
The United Nations ‘a collective security organisation’
Constitutional and Administrative Law
International Law Unit 9: Use of Force Fall 2005 Mr. Morrison.
European Law.
Human Rights Lecture 18.
Formation of the United Nations
CLU3M- Introduction Unit 1.
History and Functions of the United Nations
Chapter 3: The Constitution
What is Government? Government is how society chooses people to make and enforce its public policies. So what are public policies? Public policies are.
The Federal Court System
ORGANIZATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. Preamble – The Preamble states the purpose of the document.
Chapter 8.3 The United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justices The main job of the nation’s top court is to decide whether laws are allowable.
World Organizations. GLOBALIZATION Advancements in transportation and Technology (communication) Exchanges of culture and resources Economic interdependence.
International Law The Auction. International Law? Does not exist in a formal justice system Differences: Creates binding rules – No parliament to pass.
THE UNITED NATIONS OUR ONLY HOPE FOR PEACE? WHAT IS THE UNITED NATIONS? The United Nations officially came into existence on October 24, 1945 with 51.
Three Branches of Government. Section 1 The Legislative Branch.
Chapter 8 International Law And Human Rights. International Law Anarchic System Primitive and evolving process No formal rule-making process No police.
INT 3131 INT 313: INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Fall November 2002 The United Nations I: An Introduction.
Unit 3 Legal Studies Law Making AOS 1 – Parliament and the Citizen.
Chapter 8 Section 3 The United States Supreme Court.
The Executive Branch. “The Role of the President”
1 Introduction to Law Introduction to Law – Part 1 (Categories and Sources of Law)
Six Basic Principles of the Constitution
The United States Supreme Court
Introduction to International Law Lecture # 1, 14 Sep
The Powers and Roles of the President Presidential Leadership.
1. common courts military courts administrative courts tribunals The Supreme Court The Supreme Administrative Court The Constitutional Tribunal and The.
Introduction and background - The nature and development of international law.
Review of Previous Lecture: International Law Definition and Concept Need of International Law: peaceful relations, preventing use of force, solution to.
Chapter 8 Note Packet Government, Citizenship, and the Constitution.
SOLVING PROBLEMS IN THE REAL WORLD. THE UNITED NATIONS Founded in 1945 at end of WWII World governments saw how the League of Nations failed, tens of.
End of Course Exam Review. The purpose of a government is to create and enforce the public policies of a society. Every government has 3 types of power:
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 3 The Constitution.
Constitutional Convention Philadelphia May – September 1781.
Executive Branch.  Main job is to enforce the laws  Leader of the Executive Branch is the President  Executive Branch consists of many departments.
The United Nations. What is the mission for the U.N.? Founded in 1945 Mission – to maintain peace, develop good relations between countries, promote cooperation.
LECTURE 11 ICJ INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE The statute of the ICJ consists of 70 articles and is annexed to the UN Charter. A UN member is an automatic.
Law LA1: European Union Institutions European Union Institutions AS Level Law: Unit 1.
Chapter Two Classifying Law. Key Terms and Concepts administrative law p. 43 administrative law p. 43 bylaws p. 37 bylaws p. 37 civil law p. 44 civil.
LEGALITY OF THE THREAT OR USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS ICJ, Advisory Opinion,
International Law and the Use of Force (LG566) Topic 1: Introduction.
Article 2(4) of the UN Charter A textual analysis.
University of Colorado – Denver
Public International law
Administrative law Ch1 scope and Nature of Administrative Law.
Sources of international law
The United States Supreme Court
International Law.
History and notion of international law
The US Constitution.
Chapter 3 Section 2: Three Branches of Government
The US Constitution.
The Legal Character of International Law
Legal Environment for Business in Nepal 26 February 2017
Constitution and I’ll Law
International Law.
Mesleki İngilizce 2 Kisim 4.
Presentation transcript:

Law 243 Current Legal Issues: The use of force in international law Slideshow #2 Introduction and background - The nature and development of international law

Summary of this lecture What is law? What is international law? Law and politics Domestic law v international law The role of force The international system Historical development (continued in next presentation)

What is law? “In the long march of mankind from the cave to the computer a central role has always been played by the idea of law – the idea that order is necessary and chaos inimical to a just and stable existence” Malcolm Shaw, International Shaw 6th ed, 1 Every society, whether small and weak or strong and powerful, has created for itself a framework of principles – what can be done, what cannot be done, what is permissible, what is forbidden. These principles are essential for the group’s success – whether that be in terms of gathering food, hunting animals, growing crops or making money. Law is that element which binds the members of the community together as they adhere to recognised values and standards Every society, whether small and weak or strong and powerful, has created for itself a framework of principles – what can be done, what cannot be done, what is permissible, what is forbidden. These principles are essential for the group’s success – whether that be in terms of gathering food, hunting animals, growing crops or making money. Law is that element which binds the members of the community together as they adhere to recognised values and standards

What is law? cont’d… “Law” – a series of rules regulating behaviour, and reflecting, to some extent, the ideas and preoccupations of the society within which is functions (see Shaw, 1) Law is both permissive (that means it allows people to do things) and coercive (that means it punishes those who infringe) Question: Within a state who are the subjects of the law? Answer: individual citizens

What is international law? It’s a set of rules, principles regulating behaviour BUT… Question: who are the main subjects of international law? Answer: Nation-states (mainly) – not individuals Although this is subject to exceptions (nation-states are also joined by international organizations as subjects of international law; and individuals are the subject of international criminal law even if they are not the main subjects of international law)

Types of international law There are two types of international law: Private international law This is also known as “conflict of laws” Public international law This is sometimes called just “international law”

Two types of international law Two main branches of international law: Private international law (aka “conflict of laws”) Private international law deals with cases within particular legal systems which involve foreign elements Revolves around issues of which country’s law applies or which country should hear the case Domestic law Public international law Also called “international law” – we’re talking about this type of law in this course Not concerned with questions of law within a state Covers relations between states** Regulates international institutions *An examples of a conflict of laws/private international law question: two Englishmen enter into a contract in France for the sale of goods in France. An English court would apply French law to determine the validity of that contract. ** An example of public international law: two states argue over the ownership of an island, both claiming that it belongs to them. They could take their case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for a decision.

A question to think about Is “international law” really law? Why do we consider international law to be “law” at all? Think about this question during the rest of the class/course

Law and politics Law and politics are closely related For example – how is law made? By a legislative body (eg a Parliament). How is that Parliament created? Usually by elections (sometimes by appointment) Politics plays a role - how do people get elected to Parliament? Discuss elections How are elections won and lost? Discuss parties and policies So…there’s a close and inseparable relationship between law and politics

Domestic v international law Domestic (also known as “municipal”) law What do you remember from your Constitutional Law courses? There is a recognised body to legislate (create laws) There is a hierarchy of courts: first instance, appeal courts There is an accepted system of settling disputes and enforcing the laws – punishing the transgressors There is a “Separation of powers” judiciary, executive, legislature eg. The UK: “Parliament legislates, courts adjudicate”

Domestic v international law Domestic legal system International legal system Legislature (a body that makes laws) Executive (a body that executes or carries out the laws including govt depts) Judiciary (a hierarchy of courts that has compulsory jurisdiction to hear cases and settle disputes) No Legislature The UN General Assembly passes resolutions but they’re not binding – Art 17(1) UN Charter No Executive The UN Security Council is supposed to fill that role BUT the veto power of the P5 (UK, USA, Russia, China and France) means it fails to fulfil it No Judiciary The ICJ in The Hague can hear cases BUT only when both sides agree – and there’s no way to enforce its judgments

Domestic v international law cont’d… System is hierarchical Authority is vertical - police force has authority over individuals Authority exists above and beyond every individual Individuals only choose whether to obey the law or not – they don’t create it (there are institutions who have this job) “the law of subordination”* System is not hierarchical Authority is horizontal ie. 190 or so states with ‘equal’ legal authority (no international police force) There is no authority that is recognised above and beyond all states – the law only exists as between states States choose whether to obey the law BUT they also are the ones that create it “the law of co-ordination”* * These two phrases are from an academic, Rosenne, who described internal or domestic law as “the law of subordination” and the international system as more of a “law of co-ordination”

So…Is international law really “law”? If there’s no institution to create laws, to clarify laws or to enforce laws, is it a legal system at all? Is it even fair to compare the domestic with the international? John Austin (English legal philosopher): Law is “commands backed by the threat of sanctions” so his answer would be “No, international law is not “law”, it’s merely “positive morality” Talking point: how important is coercion (force) in shaping a legal system? Would people obey the laws/commands even without sanctions?

The use of force There is no unified system of sanctions in international law But there are situations where the use of force is justified and legal: 1. Collective security – force authorised by the Security Council: The SC can impose measures if there’s a “threat to the peace, breach of the peace or an act of aggression” (Chapter VII of the UN Charter) 2. Self-defence: individual states can use force in self-defence (Article 51 of the UN Charter) (Note: there used to be a 3rd exception under Article 107 for using force against former enemy states but that is now obsolete)

Use of force cont’d… 1. Collective security: action authorised by the Security Council Coercive action within the framework of the UN is rare. Why? Because it requires the agreement of the Security Council – and the permanent five (“P5”) members have the veto When the Security Council takes measures that involve the use of force, it is often referred to as “collective security” and it is authorized by the SC under Chapter VII (articles 39-42) of the UN Charter When an issue affects the vital interests of one of the P5, they’ll use their veto to block any resolution under Chapter VII Examples: force against Korea in 1950 only possible because USSR was absent; Recently - Syria (China and Russia using their veto power)

Use of force cont’d… 2. Self-defence by Individual states States can and do resort to force in “self-defence” - there are unclear rules around this but there is a lot of academic writing in this area There’s no supreme body to rule on the legality of the state’s actions The right to use force in self-defence has been used and abused by states Examples: Israel - historically against its neighbours Israel against Iraq (pre-emptive strike against “Osirak” nuclear reactor in 1981) US and NATO allies against Afghanistan in 2001?

The international system If our definition of law depends on the existence of sanctions (ie. punishment for breaking the rules) international law doesn’t ‘fit the bill’ – it’s not a legal system, is it? What is the international order based upon? Do states feel obliged to adhere to laws? If so, why and to what extent?

The international system cont’d… What is international all about? It’s mainly based on international agreements (ie binding between the states that sign them) and customary rules (state practices recognised by the community at large as laying down patterns of conduct) States do usually adhere to the rules States do not generally ignore international law Occasional lawlessness occurs (eg armed attacks) but it does not undermine the whole system Analogy with domestic law: laws are sometimes broken but the overall system remains in place

Why do states obey international law? QUESTION: If international law has no set of sanctions (ie. No international police force, no judicial system), why do states generally obey the law? ANSWER: Predictability Stability A shared set of rules Common language Reciprocity* The individuals involved accept and respect the law** (an “international legal habit”) Consent – states consent to or accept the system of international laws *Reciprocity is a powerful motivator. States often do not take one course of conduct because although it might bring short-term gains, the long-term advantages disappear because other states will also take such action. For example, countries everywhere protect foreign diplomats on their soil. To do otherwise would risk their oen diplomats’ lives so its not in their own best interests to harm diplomats. But note that this doesn’t always work (recall example of Libyan agents shooting dead a British policewoman from their embassy in London) ** This refers to the fact that international law is taken as acceptable and binding by the actual individuals – working within ministries of foreign affairs, international organizations etc. They are versed in international law and they carry on the everyday functions of government in a law-oriented way.

So back to politics…and law In domestic jurisdictions, there’s a close connection between law and politics This is even closer in the international sphere International law aims for harmony & the regulation of disputes It tries to create a framework – a sort of ‘shock-absorber’ to clarify and moderate claims It sets out a series of values and principles which cannot be perfectly attained International law is not a source of instant solutions to problems of conflict and confrontation

Historical development International law (also known as the ‘law of nations’) has a long history European notions of ‘sovereignty’ and the nation- state are at the heart of the current system But the origins of the current Euro-centric system have much older roots…

Historical development… Ancient origins Mesopotamia – a treaty from 2100BC between Lagash and Umma (city-states) regarding a shared border Even older? Ebla (modern Syria) has evidence of a treaty between Ebla and another city – this civilisation is at least 4500 years old India, China Greece – 6th century BC onwards – limited mainly to their own city-states and colonies (foreigners were “barbarians”) Some rules about the sanctity of diplomatic envoys Was there an international community? No, probably not Rome… to be continued…