PAT/PPS Evaluation Workgroup 2010-2011. Appendix I Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers agree to form a committee to update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Teacher Performance Assessment System The Processes.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Education Improvement 2014 Meeting of State Superintendents August, 7, 2014.
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Differentiated Supervision
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CAIU 15 October 14,  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 14/15 Governing Board Presentation May 13, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Improving the Craft of Teaching: Training & Implementation of Idaho’s Teacher Evaluation Framework Nick Smith, Deputy Superintendent School Support Services.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project:
Hello Adam Cibulka Chuck Syperski
Teacher Performance Evaluation
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

PAT/PPS Evaluation Workgroup

Appendix I Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers agree to form a committee to update the Teacher Evaluation Process Handbook. The committee will be comprised of five representatives appointed by each party. The goal of the committee will be to make recommendations to the superintendent by the end of the school year. The recommended changes to the Handbook shall be mutually agreed upon by the District and the Association.

Members of the Workgroup PATPPS Dee SimmonsCynthia Gillam Rebecca LevisonCharlene Williams Vangie ShawLori Clark Emily TollSascha Perrins Kevin MechlingAntonio Lopez

Overview of the Work Began meeting in late September Reviewed purpose of evaluation and beliefs Reviewed other evaluation tools locally, statewide and nationally Honed in on Roosevelt’s model Honed in on Rubric using Charlotte Danielson’s work

Purpose of Evaluation The workgroup wants to change the dynamics of the evaluation process The purpose of evaluation is to improve instruction and/or performance Gathering evidence to improve professional practice Improve collegiality between administrator and employee Supportive and helpful Not an “I gotcha” model

Evaluation Changes The only changes in the School Year will be the new rubric The Workgroup will continue to meet to work on the evaluation process during the school year The same Evaluation process will be used for the school year to include pre and post observation meetings, goal setting and formal observations

Change in the Rubric Former Evaluation Nine areas to evaluate New Evaluation Four domains to evaluate Each domain has multiple components. Each component has multiple elements.

Change in Standards Former Standards Improvement suggested Meets minimum standards Commendation for consistently exceeding minimum standards New Standards Unsatisfactory Developing Proficient Distinguished