Tributary Workgroup Case Study. Outline for presentation Why Coordinate? Approach of SW Tributary workgroup SW Tributary Workgroup progress and next steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contaminants at the Estuary Interface Jon Leatherbarrow 1 Rainer Hoenicke 2 Lester McKee 1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 California Resources Agency.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
The LOWER DELAWARE MONITORING PROGRAM S WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS PROTOCOL Robert Limbeck Watershed Scientist, DRBC NJ Volunteer Monitoring Summit October.
Volunteer Water Monitoring Support through the UWSP Center for Watershed Science and Education Nancy Turyk Citizen-Based Monitoring Conference August 2004.
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Metadata Tool Proposals PNAMP Meeting Wednesday, December 15 th 2010.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries National Water Quality Monitoring Council October 31, 2006.
Anna Mathis, VA Program Coordinator RiverTrends: Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring.
Great Lakes Observing System GLRI Tributary Monitoring Project
1 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable April 26, 2006 Needs for Indicators.
Design Workgroup National Monitoring Network. Introduction n Overview of Progress to Date n Al Korndoerfer, Chair of Design Workgroup.
Water Action Volunteers’ Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Kris Stepenuck - UW EX/WI DNR Statewide WAV Coordinator Mike Miller - WI DNR Baseline Stream.
Monitoring Agriculture – Strategy and Results Margie Read, REAII Senior Environmental Scientist Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program California Central Valley.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
Water Quality Data Elements (WQE) Workgroup Workgroup Co- Chairs Chuck Job, USEPA LeAnne Astin, ICPRB Glenn Patterson, USGS.
CWQMC Data Swaps Dr. Holly L.O. Huyck CWQMC Coordinator
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
November 27, 2007Pebble Project Agency Meetings Pebble Project Data Management Data Management Responsibilities Ensure complete and accurate field and.
Claytor Hydroelectric Project Water Quality Study Mark Hutchins, Project Manager January 25, 2007.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
What is a Watershed? Goals for this module Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Learn who.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
1 Proposed Adoption of Biological and Toxicological Water Quality Data Elements and WQDE Guide LeAnne Astin Interstate Commission on the Potomac River.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
Standards and Practices of Monitoring or Monitoring Standards of Practice Discussion of Potential Work Products At NWQMC Meeting 7/18/06.
Overview of National Monitoring Network (NMN) Project Update for NWQMC April 12, 2005.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Who We Are What I Do Great Lakes Commission. Great Lakes Basin.
DWA: WATER QUALITY MONITORING TASKS. TENDER DOCUMENT Aim: develop a systematic monitoring protocol that will determine possible impacts of natural and.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Coordinating Monitoring in the Great Lakes Basin Ric Lawson Project Manager Great Lakes Commission National Water Quality Monitoring Council meeting Ann.
Proposed Lake Michigan Rivers Network NMN proposed 17sites. Lake Michigan group added 3 additional sites that already conduct flow and quality monitoring.
OHIO RIVER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT Program Overview.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Summary Overview Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment.
What is Snapshot Day? An estuary wide sampling event for students, teachers and educators. What makes it so special? Same Day Sampling - A single Fall.
Quality control and audit visit: process & actions.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and Their Tributaries Briefing For IOOS EXCOM September 13, 2005.
Integrating Information Management with Research Margaret O’Brien.
USGS Water Quality Programs and the Water Quality Monitoring Framework CONTACTS: Herb Buxton (609) Tim Miller
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
Actions from previous meeting EMODnet Chemistry Alessandra Giorgetti (OGS, Italy) 3 rd EMODnet-MSFD Coordination Meeting 8-9 December 2015, DG MARE, Brussels.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Chelan County Lead Entity Presentation SRFB 2005 Salmon Habitat Grant Cycle.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
THE GREAT LAKES MONITORING INVENTORY: A Brief Update...
1 UNECE Inventory of main standards and parameters of the E Waterway network: state of play and next steps UNECE TRANS/SC.3/WP.3 39th session, 16 June.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Water Quality Monitoring -Sampling Design-
Status of Carbon Action Items
Recommendations from the SMC Bioassessment Workgroup
Progress SOE –drafting group
State of the Bay Conference
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
Marine Biology Station Piran(NIB)
Presentation transcript:

Tributary Workgroup Case Study

Outline for presentation Why Coordinate? Approach of SW Tributary workgroup SW Tributary Workgroup progress and next steps NAWQA/CMI example What mutually beneficial steps to coordinate these programs Which programs do we look at next?

Why Coordinate Monitoring? Many entities collecting information to meet a variety of objectives Goals, locations, constituents may overlap Without coordination expenditures aren’t as efficient as possible to meet multiple goals Must be mutually beneficial

Approach to Coordinating Develop Broad Based monitoring entities membership Develop inventory of locations, constituents, protocols Determine overlaps and gaps Determine how similar and different objectives can be met while filling gaps and reducing overlaps Determine means to share data

SW Tributary Progress Broad based monitoring workgroup membership discussed and contacts made Workgroup questionnaire completed leading to a draft strategic plan Limited inventory begun, detailed objectives and protocol inventory form prepared

Next Steps Continue to work on membership Complete detailed inventory of objectives, locations, protocols Determine overlaps and gaps between individual programs Agree on parameters, protocols, data sharing approaches for coordination Connect as many entities as possible

NAWQA/CMI Example Objectives Network Design – temporal and spatial Constituents sampled Protocols – field, laboratory, QAQC Database – metadata standards, national database Compare and determine gaps and overlaps and how to address

NAWQA/CMI Objectives NAWQA – determine occurrence and distribution, trends, and understanding of sources, transport and effects CMI – (Gary fill in)

NAWQA/CMI Network Design NAWQA Basic Fixed Sites (now trend sites), frequency varies over high and low phases topical/synoptic study sites – frequency varies CMI (Gary fill in)

NAWQA/CMI constituents CMI (Gary Fill in) NAWQA Physical measurements – flow, sediment Field Parameters – pH, SC. DO, alkalinity Chemistry – nutrients, pesticides, trace elements, etc Biology – habitat, algae, fish, macro-invertebrates, microbes Sediment chemistry – organics and trace elements (in lake cores) Tissue Chemistry - mercury

NAWQA/CMI Protocols NAWQA –Published for Field and Laboratory, biology and chemistry and lake coring –QAQC samples collected, laboratory QAQC available –EWI for chemistry CMI –(Gary fill in)

NAWQA/CMI Data Management NAWQA –On-line database –Metadata provided with data CMI –(Gary fill in)

NAWQA/CMI Overlaps Overlaps (list examples here for each of these facets) Objectives Locations Sampling Frequency Consituents Protocols Database

NAWQA/CMI Gaps Gaps (list examples for each of these facets Objectives Locations Sampling Frequency Consituents Protocols Database

What can be done to mutual benefit? Location changes or concurrence on approach Frequency changes or concurrence on approach Constituent changes or concurrence Protocol changes or tests or concurrence Metadata agreement, database linkages