QPSC Overall KDA Job Engagement. Contents  Introduction  What is Key Driver Analysis?  Methodology  Factor Analysis Solution  Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Enterprise Skills Story
Advertisements

Performance Management
QPSC Overall KDA Based on Q38 – Intention to Leave.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Leadership MOT Version 1. The Leadership MOT survey is a tool which will help leaders to benchmark their leadership capabilities within Nuffield Health.
Leadership Development Nova Scotia Public Service
©Copyright Kenexa ® 2008 Kenexa EMPLOYEE SURVEYS: More than a temperature check? How can surveys affect the bottom line? 1.
2014 Employee Engagement Survey Results ILI 33 – Sept 11 & 12, 2014.
Budgeting for Results Outcomes Based Budgeting
Employee Engagement.
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
Questions from a patient or carer perspective
Performance Evaluation Process June 19th and June 26 th.
Human Resources Office of Summary of Results 1 University of Minnesota Morris.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
“How” We Do It An Introduction to NSLIJ’s Behavioral Expectations Model.
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Imran Ghaznavi Course Code: MGT557 COMSATS Strategic Human Resource Management.
TNS Proprietary: © Linking Employee Compensation to Survey Metrics High-Level Considerations and Best Practices January, 2006.
Assessment GroupDepth of analysis and clarity of issues (4) Contextuality Practicability, Novelty of recommendtns (4) Quality of Presentation (Consistancy.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Out of Office: A Toolkit for an Agile Future. The Research Survey 13 organisations in public and private sectors 1219 team members: 55% female and 45%
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
Evaluation: A Necessity for the Profession, an Essential Support for Practitioners Linking Intervention with Outcome Bryan Hiebert University of Victoria.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
Presented by: Susan Walker Communication Alignment Evaluation Solutions e mail:
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
QPSC Overall KDA Agency Engagement. Contents  Introduction  What is Key Driver Analysis?  Methodology  Factor Analysis Solution  Results.
Satisfaction with the quality of the sporting experience survey (SQSE 3) Results for: Swimming July 2011 Creating sporting opportunities in every community.
SALESMAX DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP
BBA 229 Training and Development
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
A COMPETENCY APPROACH TO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
The State of Maine Managerial Effectiveness Survey Results.
Human Resources Office of FACULTY Summary of Results _College of Design_FACULTY.
Highlights of the Staff Survey 2011 Cheryl Kershaw Director of Surveys and Research.
C ULTURE & C LIMATE S URVEY. Sample Employee Survey Report Findings ACME Widgets.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Introduction Motivating others in the workplace is being able to identify the reasons which make employees behave a particular way. In most cases this.
Barbara Moely and Vincent Ilustre Tulane University International Society for Research on Service Learning and Community Engagement Baltimore, September.
HAVE YOU GOT PROOF? A LOOK AT THE DATA ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE KEN WALLIS.
Overview What do we mean by a Learning Organisation? Why did we develop a People Development Framework? What was the process involved in building the.
A. P. Moller - Maersk Employee Engagement Survey 2011 MDSI Corporate IT-Admin; RVA018 - Roberto - Valenciano Report.
The AUA CPD Wheel Activity Introduction Based on the coaching wheel, this activity is designed to help individuals, managers and teams self-assess against.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Team assignment 12 TEAM 3 – K15T1 Hanh Luong – Leader – T Hao Tran – T Huy Nguyen – T Hieu Le – T Quang Nguyen – T
Competency based learning & performance Ola Badersten.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
Employee Engagement Survey Renorta R. Heard Deputy Commissioner Stronger Families for a Stronger Georgia 02/17/2016.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Selection III: Interviewing.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
1 CAREER PATHWAYS Welcome to…. Module 6 Performance Management.
Engage 2 Perform Mark Horton MBA How managers should engage with their staff.
Items in red require your input
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Presentation transcript:

QPSC Overall KDA Job Engagement

Contents  Introduction  What is Key Driver Analysis?  Methodology  Factor Analysis Solution  Results

Introduction  Key Driver Analysis is a statistical method used to describe the relationship between questions in a survey and a 'key driver' question, such as overall satisfaction, loyalty or engagement  The derived importance scores for each survey attribute is plotted along with standard survey performance scores on a quadrant plot. Where the attribute is located on the quadrant plot is used to determine if it is a "driver" of the dependent (variable) measure. The quadrant plot is accompanied by an impact bar chart so that the relative importance of the survey attributes can be more easily compared  Impact on Engagement: In order to see the biggest change in employee engagement, action should be focused on improving the issues that have the greatest impact on engagement.  About this report: Please refer to the spec and Excel tool for this project for the client specific methodology. The plots in this report have been created by exporting outputs from the Excel tool. To recreate any plots go to the Excel tool and export the models

What is Key Driver Analysis? Key Driver Analysis (KDA) is a statistical approach to identifying the factors most strongly linked to employee engagement, and hence which aspects should be targeted for improvement Step 1 Review the questionnaire to identify which questions can be used in the analysis Calculate the engagement index, followed by factor analysis and regression analysis Graphical output that illustrates the relative importance of the key drivers compared with their performance Step 2Step 3 Low Impact Strong Performance Maintain and Support High Impact Strong Performance Promote Low Impact Low Performance Area to Monitor High Impact Poor Performance Need to improve Impact on Engagement Performance STRENGTHS IMPROVEMONITOR MAINTAIN

Methodology  The statistical techniques used in Key Driver Analysis are fundamental in the area of multivariate analysis and consist of factor analysis and multiple regression analysis. Each technique is described below Factor Analysis: is used to identify patterns in batteries of attitude questions, allowing one to assess whether the attitude questions are measuring the same underlying characteristic or, to discover whether amongst the range of responses there are any particular patterns. The use of factor analysis is based on the view that responses to particular questions are caused or affected by underlying factors. The assumption is that, if this is the case, such questions will be answered similarly and hence will correlate with each other Regression analysis: used to identify attributes most likely to influence and drive employee engagement. This is achieved by constructing a statistical model which assigns importance weights to the attributes that have been measured. These weights can then be used to identify which attributes have an impact on engagement Engagement=Line manager +Learning & development +Senior manager +Reward & recognition +Job role Outcome variable (also known as the dependant variable) Is made up of One or more input variables (also known as independent or predictor variables)

Factor Analysis Solution (1/3) Factor analysis was conducted to help to identify the employee engagement index and group the other survey questions into underlying factors (themes) that are measured across the questionnaire. The Key Driver Analysis follows the structure provided by the factor analysis to build a series of statistical models to help determine which factors drive employee engagement and then which questions are the "key drivers". The table below illustrates the employee engagement index and the factors confirmed by the factor analysis for this organisation

Factor Analysis Solution (2/3) Factor analysis was conducted to help to identify the employee engagement index and group the other survey questions into underlying factors (themes) that are measured across the questionnaire. The Key Driver Analysis follows the structure provided by the factor analysis to build a series of statistical models to help determine which factors drive employee engagement and then which questions are the "key drivers". The table below illustrates the employee engagement index and the factors confirmed by the factor analysis for this organisation

Factor Analysis Solution (3/3) Factor analysis was conducted to help to identify the employee engagement index and group the other survey questions into underlying factors (themes) that are measured across the questionnaire. The Key Driver Analysis follows the structure provided by the factor analysis to build a series of statistical models to help determine which factors drive employee engagement and then which questions are the "key drivers". The table below illustrates the employee engagement index and the factors confirmed by the factor analysis for this organisation

Results Overview  The Overall model shows the significant factors only  For each significant factor a question level is shown  The scale for the impact axis is set at the minimum of zero  For the performance axis a relative scale is used and this may vary for each plot  Please refer to the excel tool for information on the R-squared and Base size for each model 9

Quad Plot: Overall Model: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: Overall Model: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: Overall Model: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text f9Job empowerment f4Role clarity and goal alignment f6Learning and development f8Workload and health f2My workgroup f13Innovation f3My manager

Quad Plot: f2 My workgroup: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f2 My workgroup: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f2 My workgroup: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q24bI receive help and support from other people in my workgroup q24gPeople in my workgroup do their jobs effectively q24cPeople in my workgroup are honest, open and transparent in their dealings q24fPeople in my workgroup are committed to delivering excellent service to customers

Quad Plot: f3 My manager: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f3 My manager: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f3 My manager: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q31gMy manager draws the best out of me q31eMy manager creates a shared sense of purpose

Quad Plot: f4 Role clarity and goal alignment: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f4 Role clarity and goal alignment: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f4 Role clarity and goal alignment: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q21fI feel I make a contribution to achieving the organisation q21dI am committed to my organisation s goals q21bI understand what is expected of me to do well in my job

Quad Plot: f6 Learning and development: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f6 Learning and development: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f6 Learning and development: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q33cMy organisation is committed to developing its employees q28dIn my organisation, there are opportunities for me to develop my skills and knowledge q28gI am satisfied with the opportunities available for career development q28f Learning and development activities I have completed in the past 12 months have helped to improve my performance

Quad Plot: f8 Workload and health: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f8 Workload and health: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f8 Workload and health: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q23hMy work has a negative impact on my health q23bI feel burned out by my work

Quad Plot: f9 Job empowerment: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f9 Job empowerment: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f9 Job empowerment: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q22eMy job gives me opportunities to utilise my skills q36bYour ability to work on your own initiative q22cI get the information I need to do my job well q22aI have a choice in deciding how I do my work q22dI have the authority necessary to do my job effectively q22bI have the tools I need to do my job effectively

Quad Plot: f13 Innovation: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores)

Bar Chart: f13 Innovation: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) Relative Impact Percent

Question\ Attribute Key: f13 Innovation: EEI Job engagement (Positive Scores) QIDQuestion Text q27aI get the opportunity to develop new and better ways of doing my job q27eMy workgroup always tries to improve its performance q27fMy organisation is open to new ideas q27cManagement is willing to act on suggestions to improve how things are done q27bI am encouraged to make suggestions about improving work processes and/or services q27dMy workgroup uses research and expertise to identify better practice