Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Administrative Structure & Communication Subcommittee Members: Sherrilyn Billger (chair), Daniel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
Advertisements

Academic Rigor: What is it? How do we attain it? How do we know when we have it? Reporting Group: Tace CrouseSheri Dressler Ruby EvansBobby Jeanpierre.
THE DIVERGENT BUT COMPLEMENTARY PATHS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation At the 2004 AAHE.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
The Pennsylvania State University Service Learning- Engaged Scholarship Task Force Sponsored by Interim Provost Vice President, Student Affairs Vice President,
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.
Development of Student Learning Outcomes for GE: lessons from a collaborative approach A Lawson General Education in California Conference, CSU Fullerton.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
1 Department review (Faculty and Chair) Academic Programs Council Faculty Council and CAS Dean Undergraduate/Graduate Academic Council UAC Report to Senate.
About Administration Requirements/ Processes Particulars Master of Engineering Degree Designed for Distance Learning A collaborative program designed by.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
UST Exempt Staff Council A series of forums for exempt staff to discuss a proposed new university committee Richelle Wesley, Associate University Registrar.
Institutional Effectiveness at CCC The Journey The Priority  It is always important to know if what you are doing is effective. This is the story of.
Catalog & Program Changes “A meeting to discuss proper submissions to the undergraduate and graduate catalogs.” March 31, 2014 Southern Illinois University.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Notes by Juan Manfredi February 11,  Passed by Arts and Sciences faculty in April 2002 and published in the A & S Gazette on April 15, 2003 (Vol.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: English, Undergraduate Chair: Jennifer Haytock Date of Presentation: 1 October 2013.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
February 24, 2012 Pedagogy & Professional Development Subcommittee P EDAGOGY & P ROFESSIONAL D EVELOPMENT S UBCOMMITTEE February 24, 2012 Jennifer McDade.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 29 August 2011 Dr. Chula King Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
The Issues and The Action Plan August 2008 Partneringfor Student Success.
5 Sept 2013 Graduate Studies Committee  Overall GSC  Curriculum Sub- Committee: Issues and Directions.
Getting to Know Your Academic Senate A Guide for Faculty, Staff, and Students of SJSU Why you need to know about the SJSU Academic Senate.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Organization, Administration, and Improvement of Graduate Education Daniel Denecke, Ph.D. Program Director, Best Practices and Publications The Council.
1 Governance: L&T Faculty L&T committee (QE) –Chair L&T committee of each Department –Director, Students –Representative of LTC –BESS coordinator –Associate.
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12 th by F.A.Neto Semester Conversion Director 3/12/20141FAN.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
1 PENN STATE HARRISBURG CAPITAL COLLEGE Curricular Cooperation at Penn State: Major Themes and Goals
02 April 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
PRESENTATION TO ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING OFFICERS BUFFALO, NEW YORK JUNE 11, 2009 How Campuses are Closing the GE Assessment.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
FACULTY LEADING ACADEMIC PROGRAM STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation 2004 IUPUI Assessment Institute November 1, 2004 Val Whittlesey,
Enrollment Management Council (EMC) Overview July 8, 2008.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.
Honors Program Presentation for Academic Senate May 21, 2013.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
GAPS OF PRACTICE OF ACADEMIC ADVISING IN YOUR CAMPUS? HOW TO BRIDGE THEM? SPEAK TO THE NACADA ACADEMIC ADVISING CONSULTANT AND SPEAKER SERVICE Selma Haghamed.
Dean’s Overview Spring 2016 Karen Merriman. The Department of Professional Development & eLearning facilitates educational experiences to all employees.
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
New Faculty Orientation College of Graduate Studies and Graduate Education at Idaho.
1 GOAL: Provide students with a quality educational experience that enables them to complete their educational goals in a timely fashion. Review and restructure.
Conversation on University Structure
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
Re-framing Career Development at Illinois State
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Tippie RISE Colleen Opal Assistant Director, Experiential Learning
Conversation on University Structure
HLC Day February 13, 9:30am - 2:00pm, TUC Great Hall.
Committee Purpose Roles COR Standards Curriculum Review Process
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Learning Outcomes All CITE programs will include critical reflection. Use problem-solving strategies to resolve real-world issues Communicate effectively.
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Cyclical Program Review
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Administrative Structure & Communication Subcommittee Members: Sherrilyn Billger (chair), Daniel Holland, Catherine Kaesberg, Jonathan Rosenthal, Stewart Winger Resources: d=215086&sid= d=215086&sid=

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Administrative Structure and Communication Main Recommendations Administrative Structure Current Structure Recommended Structure Communication Current Communication Recommendations for Improvement

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Main Recommendations 1.Move Director of General Education position into the Provost’s Office, to support all important aspects of the program. 2.Add three more workgroups to the existing structure which has a workgroup for Critical Inquiry. These workgroups should be discipline-focused: Science and Numeracy, Arts and Humanities, and Social Sciences. 3.Change the current institutional structure surrounding the General Education program with consistent, enticing, and effective communication across all constituents. 4.The General Education Director should coordinate improved communication about the General Education program, including advising, Preview, web page, course syllabi, etc.

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Current Structure

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Director’s Current Responsibilities Monitor enrollment patterns Work with department chairs to have enough seats for GE courses Work with the Provost to gather and allocate resources for teaching GE courses Facilitate the Council on General Education Manage assessment for the GE program Chair the Interdisciplinary Studies program Serve as primary articulator for GE and Illinois Articulation Initiative coursework

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Council on General Education (CGE) Coordinate the undergraduate curriculum for General Education and Interdisciplinary Studies (IDS), ensuring that the spirit of the philosophy of General Education is maintained by the program. Periodically review and analyze existing General Education and IDS courses and program, based on program objectives and student outcomes. Report recommendations to the Academic Senate regarding program modifications. Provide consultation to departments, colleges, and other faculty groups who are planning new additions to the undergraduate curriculum for General Education and IDS. Review and approve or disapprove all proposals for new programs, courses, and changes in existing programs/courses connected to GE and IDS in consultation with the Director of General Education. Provide the Academic Senate each year with a report of Council on General Education’s proceedings.

Administration and Communication Subcommittee The Good, The Not So Good, & There’s no Ugly Advantages Council on General Education works well GE Director is also CAS Associate Dean (facilitates working with chairs) Disadvantages Insufficient professional development Insufficient collaboration between Assessment and GE Insufficient focus on strategy for GE Lack of effective communication about GE

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Recommended Administrative Structure Director of General Education (within Provost’s Office) Council on General Education Workgroups for disciplinary areas, with one Facilitator for each group: Science and Numeracy, Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, and Critical Inquiry

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Current Communication about GE Advising, Preview, web page Chairs: assignments and evaluation “get GE courses out of the way” “General Education change is not just a task of curricular change: it is also cultural change” (Awbrey, 2005, p.4)

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee To Improve Communication Enticing language: Rename the program? Rename the courses? Syllabi relate to GE goals Be consistent Professional Development: TT & NTT Testimonials from employers & alumni

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee To Improve Communication, Cont’d Preview “marketing” e.g., student-made video about GE Student evaluations and course rigor?, hold student focus groups Longer-term contracts for NTTs teaching in the program GE Symposium or more involvement at T&LS

Administrative Structure and Communication Subcommittee Create a Slogan / Tagline for the program