Long-term planning for design, implementation and maintenance of in-stream detection systems Chris Jordan, NOAA-NWFSC – moderator & A panel of experts.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#

Restore and Protect Red River Watershed BPA Project #

NOAA PIT Tag needs. NOAA needs to develop an internal PIT tag plan integrating research and monitoring objectives.

Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.

Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Management Implications of ISAB Tagging Report # Council Meeting June 9, 2009 Whitefish, Montana.

UW Offsite Habitat and Fish Survival Effectiveness Monitoring Objective: Assist in developing and applying central guidance and criteria for improving.

Fish and Wildlife Agencies and Tribes Program Amendment Recommendations June 12 Comments NPCC Meeting June 2008 Spokane, Wa.

Idaho Department of Fish and Game Clearwater Region Lewiston Idaho EVALUATE AND CONTROL BROOK TROUT POPULATIONS IN NORTHCENTRAL IDAHO WATERSHEDS : ADDRESSING.

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.

CHARACTERIZE AND ASSESS WILDLIFE-HABITAT TYPES AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS FOR SUB-BASINS WITHIN THE BLUE MOUNTAIN PROVINCE Project:

Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)

CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.

Rebecca Buchanan and John Skalski, University of Washington Gregory Mackey, Douglas County PUD Charles Snow, Washington DFW TRIBPIT: ESTIMATING SALMONID.

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.

Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.

Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.

In-Stream PIT-Tag Detection of Resident Salmonids in Washington's White Salmon River Watershed: One System ’ s Saga. Ian G. Jezorek 1, Patrick J. Connolly.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts, Inc. BioAnalysts, Inc.. BiOP RPA 52.6 = Monitoring Plan PIT data  Many RM&E RPAs Clarify needs, specifications (N, Populations,

Resident Fish Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Project No Kalispel Tribe of Indians Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Spokane.

Senior Design Project (COE 485) Group 2 Week 9. OUTLINE Tasks performed Tasks performed Snap shots Snap shots Tasks for next weeks Tasks for next weeks.

A. Giorgi J. Geiselman J. Tenney N. Tancreto. Database system: Forecast Columbia Basin PIT tag use Anadromous salmonids Integrated with PTAGIS Time step.

Recent Events in Water Law and Policy in the United States Portion of the Columbia Basin The Federal Columbia River Power System: Pacific Salmon and the.

Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.

Alternative Forms of Teaching English. Panel discussions Debates Presentations Talk shows Projects.

Protect & Restore Northeast Oregon/Southeast Washington Project Number ISRP – Geographic Review May 1, 2013.

Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.

A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)

Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.

StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

System Analysis (Part 2) The System Development Life Cycle Problem Selection and Feasibility Study.

Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field.

Defining CBFWA’s FY09 Workplan Members January 15, 2009.

July 2015 Proposed Final Report: State Recreation and Habitat Lands JLARC Staff Ryan McCord Rebecca Connolly Legislative Auditor’s Conclusion: Legislature.

Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed Division Mark Johnson-Project Leader

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

Habitat Status and Trend in the Upper Columbia ESU Chapter 3 John Arterburn.

Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management WATERSHED DIVISION FCRPS Biological Opinion Expert Panel “Gap Filling by Habitat Actions”

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

System Analysis (Part 3) System Control and Review System Maintenance.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) Presentation to PNAMP Steering Committee August 21, 2007.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts Inc.. FCRPS BiOp RPA 52.6 = action plan status monitoring- Hydro Many RM&E RPAs require PIT data Coordinated and Effective FWP.

Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.

Adult steelhead evaluations in Imnaha River tributaries William Young, Jocelyn Hatch Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC

I consulted with this teacher BEFORE I tried the MSS think-sheet / Instructional Routine I consulted with this teacher AFTER I tried the MSS think-sheet.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative (WLCI) GIS Data Integration CR GIO – Sky Bristol, Rick.

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

A Data Management Approach to Support Aquatic Resources Monitoring.

Adult Steelhead Abundance Estimates Based on PIT Tag Arrays in Idaho Rick Orme, Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management and Chris.

Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.

Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-

Okanogan River Fish Update for the IOLBC Okanogan Basin Monitoring and Evaluation Program (OBMEP) Osoyoos Lake Water Science Forum Presenter: John.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.

Steve Todd WetSAG co-chair Suquamish Tribe Ash Roorbach CMER Riparian Ecologist August 5, 2010.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Tips for Efficient Air Conditioning Maintenance

BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.

Friday – Day 5 Taking it Home!

Equitable Services Under ESSA

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

Social Practice of the language: Describe and share information

Presentation transcript:

Long-term planning for design, implementation and maintenance of in-stream detection systems Chris Jordan, NOAA-NWFSC – moderator & A panel of experts who actually know what they are talking about

Discussion Panel Gabriel Brooks – NOAA/NWFSC Rick Orme, Jason Vogel – Nez Perce Tribe John Arterburn – Colville Tribes Andrew Murdoch – WDFW Derrek Faber – ODFW Chris Beasley – QCI Pat Connolly - USGS

Why are we here? The 2008 FCRPS BiOp and the Fish and Wildlife Program have language directing the region to develop marking/tagging plans to better coordinate tagging options region-wide. FCRPS Hydro RME Workgroup tried to consolidate and address many of the PIT tag- based RPAs by producing the PIT status and needs document. In laying out a road map to get the assessments and evaluations described and the status and needs done, the issue of aging PIT tag detectors came up...

Discussion Topics (a start) Do we need to coordinate on the installation and maintenance of in-stream sites? Do we need to coordinate on locating new in-stream sites, or on replacing or relocating current in-stream sites as they wear out? Previously, a group met on the topic of in-stream site descriptions / metadata – is that work complete? What is limiting the most effective use of PIT tag data in the tributary environment – detection or analysis?