1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
Advertisements

TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
ATLAS LHCC 28/11/00 A. Henriques/CERN 1 H8 : Pixel, SCT, TRT, Tiles, LAr em barrel, Muons SPS H6: EMEC, HEC, FCAL, Background studies GIF: Muons (MDT,
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Terzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE - LNF, Andrea Dainese 1 Preparation for ITS alignment A. Dainese (INFN – LNL) for the ITS alignment group.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
ACAT05 - DESY Zeuthen125/05/2005 Detector Description of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and H8 Muon Testbeam D. Pomarède CEA/DAPNIA/SEDI/LILAS - Saclay.
28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
20 Feb LVL1 muon trigger simulation meeting1 the OO codes for endcap muon trigger simulation Hisaya Kurashige KOBE Univ.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
The barrel reference system1 THE BARREL REFERENCE SYSTEM C.Guyot (Saclay) Goal: Provide a geometrical survey of the whole barrel muon spectrometer.
Muon System and Physics Performance Ludovico Pontecorvo CERN-INFN.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Projective Praxial =Proximity+Axial In-plane bil bml bol Muon Chamber Alignment (Saclay) goal: absolute 30um on sagitta sofar: relative movements (better.
LHC Upgrade: Evaluation of monitored drift tubes inclusion into the ATLAS level 1 muon end cap trigger ICEPP, KEK A Katarina Bendtz, Takayuki Kamiya, Tatsuo.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Performance and Physics Workshop Summary: Top and Muons Sarah Allwood-Spiers Glasgow ATLAS meeting June 2008.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
1 Possible setup for the H8 test beam F.Cerutti pIntroduction: from H8 Phase I to the system test pPossible setup in : Magnets on the H8 beam.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
Roberto Barbera (Alberto Pulvirenti) University of Catania and INFN ACAT 2003 – Tsukuba – Combined tracking in the ALICE detector.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
Atlas Muon Spectrometer: installation and commissioning L. Pontecorvo INFN Roma.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai, Kazuhiko Hara (Univ. of.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
THE H8 TEST STAND Conceptual Design Mechanical supports Status of preparation Project schedule 1 (Brandeis, CERN, MPI, Seattle - presented by Sandro Palestini)
1 ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alignment LHC Days in Split, 5-9 Oct J.Krstic, M.Milosavljevic Institute of Physics, Belgrade D.Fassouliotis,C.Kourkoumelis,
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
The ATLAS detector … … is composed of cylindrical layers: Tracking detector: Pixel, SCT, TRT (Solenoid magnetic field) Calorimeter: Liquid Argon, Tile.
Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.
HEP 2007 – 20 Jul 2007 · Manchester, England Commissioning with Cosmic Rays of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer F.Petrucci INFN Sezione di Roma Tre and Dipartimento.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
This document is a working document and a base for discussions. Everybody who thinks to have better ideas is warmly invited to change it ! Muon alignment.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Propagation of Reconstructed Tracks
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Tracking muons in Panda(Root)
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration
Low pt muon identification
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Presentation transcript:

1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon spectrometer 6.TGC w.r.t. EC MDT chamber. Not discussed here High p T means: Selected by High p T Level1 trigger + level2 cut p T >20GeV For items 1-4, the target precision transverse to the track direction in the bending plane is of the order 30  m. For item 5, a precision of the order 200  m in the toroid bending plane is sufficient. Not discussed here: alignment with field off (or cosmic) straight tracks (considered as an offline “one time” task) C.Guyot Saclay 30/ In parallel (or together) with R-T calibration stream, a track alignment stream has to be setup for the following alignment tasks:

2 Small-Large barrel chambers Track selection at level 2: High Pt muon in full overlap (BIS-BIL-BMS-BMLS-BOS-BOL tracks) Selected tracks rate at L=10 33 : ~3 Hz (barrel, 200 towers) Frequency : every 2 hours (~100 segments per chamber overlap) CPU requirement: ~ 3 PC (~3 Hz with ~1s per track reconstruction) Comments : optical alignment and track information are correlated in the final fit DCS condition database data have to be available ASAP optic A lines optic Track reconstruction in the large chambers + Segments in the small chambers Overlap Track digits Segments in the small chambers: Predicted from large Reconstructed in small ASAP fitter optic + segments A lines combined Optical sensors data ATHENA

3 STANDARD BARREL SECTOR BARREL FOOT SECTOR MDT overlap Trigger zone for overlaping tracks

4 BEE / EC chambers Excluded zone Track selection at level 2: High Pt muons in the overlap EIS-BEE-EMS-EOS Selected tracks rate at L=10 33 : ~10Hz (1.45<|  <1.70, 30% of 2  ) Frequency : every 2 hours (~1000 segments per BEE in the edge zones) CPU requirement: ~ 3 PC ( ~3Hz with ~1s per track reconstruction) Comments : Only tracks crossing the edges of BEE chambers should be considered BEE1 BEE2 ARAMYS optic A lines optic Track reconstruction in EIS-EMS-EOS + Segments in BEE Overlap Track digits Segments in BEE: Predicted from EI-EM-EO Reconstructed Segment fitter: Fit BEE positions A lines BEE Optical sensors data Edge zone

5 Endcap / Barrel (1) Track selection at level 2: High Pt muons in the overlap BIL6-EIL4-BML6-BOL6 Selected tracks rate at L=10 33 : ~4Hz (  ~0.05,  ~60% of 2  ) Frequency : every 2 hours (~1000 segments per EIL4) CPU requirement: ~ 4 PC ( ~4Hz with ~1s per track reconstruction) Comments : The final fit involves both barrel and EC optical data in additions to the segments in EIL4. The fitted objects could be barrel layers + EC bars. With EEL: tracks in the overlap BIL6-EIL4-EEL2-EML5 also possible.

6 Endcap / Barrel (2) ASAP optic A lines optic Track reconstruction in the barrel + Segments in EIL4 Overlap Track digits Segments in EIL4: Predicted from Barrel track Reconstructed from digits Global fitter optic + segments A lines combined Optical sensors data ARAMYS optic

7 BIS8 / BIS7 Segments Reconstruction In BIS7 and BIS8 Overlap Tracks digits Segments in BIS7 and BIS8 A lines of BIS8 Fit of BIS8 position w.r.t. BIS7 Track selection at level 2: High Pt muons in the overlap BIS7-BIS8 Selected tracks rate at L=10 33 : ~1Hz (  ~0.05,  ~20% of 2  ) Frequency : every 4 hours (~1000 segments per BIS8) CPU requirement: ~ 1 PC ( ~1Hz with ~1s per segment reconstruction) Comments : The segments could the same as those used for R-T calibration BIS7 BIS8 A lines of BIS7

8 Muon spectrometer w.r.t. inner detector Stand alone track recons In the spectro Digits in Muon spectro Segments in BI/EI Event selection at level 2: Event with a very high Pt muons (e.g. > 50 GeV) both in ID and muon spectro Selected event rate at L=10 33 : >10Hz (from W/Z events) + pre-selection Frequency : every 6 hours (~10000 tracks required to achieve the precision) CPU requirement: ~ 5 PC ( ~0.5 Hz with ~1s per track reconstruction) Comments : The final fit involves both barrel and EC optical data in additions to the segments in BI/EI. The fitted objects could be barrel layers + EC bars. Digits in ID ASAP optic A lines optic Optical sensors data ARAMYS optic Track recons in the ID + extrapolation to BI/EI Extapolated segments in BI/EI Global fitter optic + segments New A lines

9 Conclusions/comments At lower luminosity (or if a detailed analysis shows tat the rates are much lower than anticipated), tracks selected at level2 with a lower p T cut (e.g. >10GeV) can be used. Total rate of selected events for alignment with tracks should be ~ 20Hz (L=10 33 ) CPU time is dominated by the full track reconstruction: ~20-30 PC are required (<10% of calibration load) As expressed in the updated LOI, these alignment tasks would be worked out in tier-2 calibration centers. The various tasks could be split as follow:  Optical alignment (ASAP/ARAMYS) : at ATLAS Point1  Track + segment reconstruction: in Tier2  Combined fits using segments + optical information : Tier2 DC3/CSC simulation data with in a step first ideal detector geometry and later with “as built” detector geometry should be used as a starting point. Realistic rates and efficiencies have to be worked out. EDM should be updated to include the notion of extrapolated segment Alignment specific developments will start at MPI Munich tier2. A collaboration with Saclay has been started to cover the issues of trigger rates in the alignment stream (detailed study with full MC simulations), specific track/segment reconstruction, combined track/optical sensors fits,…