EVALUATION OF RADAR SENSING IN REDUICING VEHICLE-DEER COLLISIONS ON INDIANA TOLL ROAD I-80 Sedat Gulen Statistical Research Engineer Samuel E. Wolfe Road.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trisha Muñoz, E.I.T Civil Engineering Department Cal Poly Pomona.
Advertisements

Transportation Safety. Objectives Introduce students to the TDL Career Cluster: Transportation Systems/Infrastructure Planning, Management, and Regulation.
Industry Benchmarks How do you measure up?. Driver Qualification Standards For years insurance companies have been tightening up their driver MVR standards.
South Dakota Deer- Vehicle Collision Data Art Smith Dept. of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol Ave, Pierre
Addressing Deer Vehicle Accidents at the Community Scale Elizabeth I. Rogers, Ph.D. Dean B. Premo, Ph.D. White Water Associates, Inc. Amasa, MI.
Western Transportation Institute Montana State University-Bozeman Marcel P. Huijser, PhD Challenges of Advanced Signing Technology Applications.
Indiana Whitetail Deer Created by Duane Malloy. Indiana Whitetail Deer Very likely to be seen at O’Bannon Woods. Close to extinction in Indiana in the.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY Vehicle rollovers are dangerous! Have you seen a rollover accident or have you experienced a rollover crash.
Early 2008 Highlights Office of Accident Records Lee Axdahl.
Sequential Dynamic Curve Warning System. Project Partners Technology Provider:  Traffic and Parking Control Co., (TAPCO) Evaluation Team:  CTRE (Iowa.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
Car Accidents Caused by Deer Joe Patava English 108 Des Moines Area Community College December 2, 2009.
INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4 th, 2015.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
The Rural NTD – What Have We Learned? Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor Office of Program Management Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor.
BOO!. DRIVER AWARENESS UPCOMING SEASON CHANGES Fall Deer-vehicle collisions are most common during the fall, keep your eyes moving (Key 3) Farm machinery.
~~~~EVAS~~~~ EMERGENCY VEHICLE ALERT SYSTEM
Safe Driving Jiahui Lu. Statistics for Young Drivers Traffic crashes are the number one cause of death among children and young adults 16-year-olds are.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
The Nature and Dimensions of the Road Safety Problem Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety January 2003.
Wildlife Vehicle Collision Reduction Study
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 9 New Technologies Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
ODOT Wildlife Collision Hotspots Study RESULTS OF STATEWIDE ANALYSIS August 26, 2008 Melinda Trask Oregon Department of Transportation, Geo-Environmental.
Predictive Modeling Project Stephen P. D’Arcy Professor of Finance University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ORMIR Presentation October 26, 2005.
Butte Creek Ice Detection and Warning System Evaluation Roger Lindgren Associate Professor – Oregon Institute of Technology June 4 th, 2009 ODOT Traffic.
ODOT Wildlife Program_RTL_ Initiating the Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy Melinda Trask, ODOT Geo-Environmental Section,
1. Vehicle CrashesSuicides Falls Drownings Youth Violence Homicides Sports InjuriesBullying These are a few examples of a growing area in public health…
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
A SAFER FUTURE Lex Robbins Section 6. Technology  Google’s robotic test cars have about $150,000 in equipment installed  $70,000 LIDAR (laser radar)
Against Cell Phone Use While Driving Sylmarie Nunez-Luna Section 7.
11. 2 Recall from the Lecture on Epidemics and Substance Abuse The importance of road traffic collisions determining the index of disabilty adjusted life.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Highway Deer Identification System Matthew Bonneau Tony DeLouis Nathan Schoening Steve Schreiber May07-11 Team Information: ClientMembersAdvisor October.
Occupational Safety & Health The nature & extent of workplace safety and health problems The organization and functions of OSHA Accident behavior Safety.
Wildlife Vehicle Collision Reduction Study. Why this Study.
Response Time Transportation: Ch. 1, Act. 1. What do you think? How fast do you think you would be able to respond to an emergency situation on the road?
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 1 – Fundamentals CEE 763.
Task Force on Safe Teen Driving Joint Transportation Committee January 10, 2013.
October 25, 2015 Funding Your Program October 20, 2008 ATSSA Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Addison, Texas.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Total Fatalities in Drunk Driving Crashes Vehicle Miles Traveled Total Drunk-Driving Fatalities Down 39% Despite an 86% Increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled.
Safe Driving Presented by La’Tara Smith. Statistics for Young Drivers 16 year-olds have higher crash rates than drivers of any other age. 16-year-olds.
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
E MESE MAKÓ, PhD Associate professor Department of Transport Infrastructure Szechenyi Istvan University, Gyor, Hungary Evaluation of Human.
Transportation.  A chance to look at combining several ideas in a larger problem  What are the HF issues in driving?
Driving Schools in Virginia - Market 200 Driver Training schools Driver Improvement clinics 2 –Average repeat offenders per clinic every year: 32.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
California’s Experience with HFST 1.  Overview  Challenging Locations  Collision Reduction (State and Local Roads)  Typical Placement and current.
When you are behind the wheel of a car, being sleepy is very dangerous. Driving drowsy slows your reaction time, decreases awareness, and impairs judgment,
APPLICATIONS OF POISSON AND CHI-SQUARED (χ 2 ) DISTRIBUTION FOR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENT FREQUENCIES ON HIGHWAYS Dr. S.S. Valunjkar Prof. P. M.
Disclaimer: The contents of this presentation are general in nature. Please use your discretion while following them. The author does not guarantee legal.
Driving Rules & Regulations
How Marvin A. Cooper P.C. Can Help in a Vehicle Accidents Case in White Plains, NY Ph. No.: ​ ,
Personal Automobile Insurance More Accidents, Larger Claims Drive Costs Higher October 2016 Insurance Information Institute  110 William Street  New.
Don’t Text While Driving !
The Dangers of Texting While Driving
Chapter 9 New Technologies
ROAD SAFETY STATISTICS FROM 1 JANUARY -26TH APRIL,2016
Driving Drowsy... is a FATAL mistake!.
Response Time (Reaction time)
Auto Insurance Trends Nationwide and in N.J.
Transportation Engineering Basic safety methods April 8, 2011
May Highway Deer ID System
Evaluating the Long Term Effects of Saskatchewan’s Legislation Banning the Use of Hand-held Cell Phones while Driving in Reducing Distracted-Driving Related.
The safety problem: nature of the problem, extent (partially covered already), factors CE 552 week 4.
Do Now 10/4/11 In your notebook, answer the following question:
Effect of Crashes on Traffic Congestion and Travel Reliability
Reducing Deer Vehicle Collisions: What Works and What Does Not
Presentation transcript:

EVALUATION OF RADAR SENSING IN REDUICING VEHICLE-DEER COLLISIONS ON INDIANA TOLL ROAD I-80 Sedat Gulen Statistical Research Engineer Samuel E. Wolfe Road Operations Engineer INDOT - Toll Road Professor George McCabe Department of Statistics Purdue University Joint Transportation Research Program Project No. SPR-2495

CRASH COST State Fatal Injury A Injury B Injury C PDO Arizona $3,000,000 $210,000 $42,000 $22,000 $3,000 Iowa $1,000,000 $150,000 $10,000 $ 2,500 $2,500 Louisiana $3,000,000 $ 63,000 $63,000 $ 63,000 $2,300 Maine $2,600,000 $180,000 $36,000 $19,000 $2,000 Nebraska $3,770,000 $316,000 $66,900 $34,900 $6,200 Oregon $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $55,000 $55,000 $13,000 Texas $ 854,000 $854,000 $41,000 $41,000 $1,400 Vermont $3,400,000 $260,000 $56,000 $27,000 $4,000 INDIANA: Yearly: 16,000 deer-vehicle collision; $22 million Property damage; 3 Fatalities. State Farm Reports nationwide from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005: 1 million deer_vevicle collisions; 150 deaths; $1.1 Billion in vehicle damages: (Average PDO Claim=$11,100)

OBJECTIVE The overall objective of this project is to evaluate The Radar Sensing Approach developed by “Sensor Technologies & Systems, Inc.” in reducing vehicle-deer collisions on Indiana Toll Road

Year Year JFMAMJJASONDTotal Accumulative Deer Kill Reports on Toll Road

. There are two Peaks as seen in the graph: 1)Smaller peak ( May to June); more probably due to: -Fawning and -Increased nutritional requirements of razing young cause females to travel more. -Availability of high quality of food cause travel 2)Larger Peak ( October to November): more probably due to: -Breeding season; animals are more active and careless -Hunting season cause extensive movement -Lack of food can cause greater travel.

Location of the the experiment on I-80/90 between Mile Markers 130 and 143.

The Following is the Design of Experiment actually used to place radar sensors and the control sections in between on I-80/90 Toll Road in Indiana. There is two replicates and this design is statistically sound and valid. The radar system has been functional since October 2004 and deer-vehicle accident data has been collected daily and reported monthly. The unit of data for the Poisson Regression is the total amount of Deer-Vehicle collisions per mile. DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT

Typical Layout of the radar sensing systems

Deer Sensors Milepost 130 – Milepost 142 I-80/90 Indiana Toll Road The Indiana Toll Road in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Transportation Research Division, Purdue University and the University of Montana installed 72 sensors ( 6 per mile rather than 4 due to over-pass bridges and curving) and are testing an animal detection/warning system. The system uses radio frequency transmitters and receivers to send a beam parallel to the road. If an animal (most likely a deer) breaks the beam, the flashing yellow beacons turn on and flash for two minutes to warn the drivers.

STATISTICAL APPROACH Poisson Regression

The Following Warning Sign was used.

This sign was used in Europe

Radar Systems in Place

The system is 100% solar powered and each mile of the test area operates independently from the other locations. Each system is connected to a cell phone for remote monitoring, checking and data collection. The system was activated in 10/2004.

YEAR MONTH GROUP DEER-VEHICLE COLLISION 2004 OctoberControl OctoberRadar NovemberControl NovemberControl MayControl MayRadar JuneControl JuneRadar OctoberControl OctoberRadar NovemberControl NovemberRadar 18 PRELIMINARY STATISTICS

2006MayControl MayRadar JuneControl JuneRadar OctoberControl OctoberRadar 7 PRELIMINARY STATISTICS

PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 1.High Accident Months Data (May to June& October to November) will be used in the statistical analyses. 2.Current data from 2004 to 2006 was not enough to make any statistical conclusion 3.Data collection will continue for another 2 or 3 years. 4.Following variables were selected for Poisson Regression Models: a.Dependent variable: Number of Deer_vehicle collisions per mile per month. 2.

b. Independent Variables Months, Years and Treatments, 14 of them: ( 1-mile long radar sections, total of 6 and 1-mile long control sections, total of 8). 5-The Vehicle-Deer collisions data will be used to compare these 14-treatments to evaluate the effectiveness of radar sensing systems combined with reactions of drivers.

East Chaparral Road, Scottsdale, Arizona Phone: (480) Fax: (480) RADAR SPECIFICATIONS & CONTACT INFORMATION

QUESTIONS