Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines
Advertisements

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
Chapter 1: An Overview of Program Evaluation Presenter: Stephanie Peterson.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Chapter 2 Flashcards.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs MCH in Developing Countries January 25, 2011.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
WRITING the Research Problem.
Program Evaluation In A Nutshell 1 Jonathan Brown, M.A.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
Introduction to Behavior Change Communication
Developing Earmark Grant Performance Measures: Grant Proposal Section 3 Deanna Khemani.
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Results-Based Management
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
PRECEDE/PROCEED.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
URBDP 591 I Lecture 3: Research Process Objectives What are the major steps in the research process? What is an operational definition of variables? What.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
PRECEDE/PROCEED.
Program Evaluation Overview. Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
IDEV 624 – Monitoring and Evaluation Evaluating Program Outcomes Elke de Buhr, PhD Payson Center for International Development Tulane University.
Basic Concepts of Outcome-Informed Practice (OIP).
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
Chapter 23: Overview of the Occupational Therapy Process and Outcomes
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Stages of Research and Development
Building an ENI CBC project
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Program Evaluation ED 740 Study Team Project Program Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Introduction to Program Evaluation
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Evaluation
Title of Your Thesis Your name
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
CATHCA National Conference 2018
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN TB/HIV PROGRAMS
Presentation transcript:

Program Evaluation

Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive Quality Programming  Empowerment Evaluation  Group Activity

Program Development  refers to the planning and implementation of a program determining its purposes and setting goals and outcomes, evaluating program process, and evaluating attainment of desired program outcomes and wider impacts.

History of Program Evaluation  1930’s human service field grew (post depression)  WWII programs were launched to meet the needs for urban development and housing, technological and cultural education, occupation training, and preventive health activities.  By the end of the 1950’s program evaluation was commonplace  1960’s increased papers on evaluation research  1970’s, evaluation was a distinct field  1980’s benefits and costs of programs  1990’s new social problems and booming economy

Program Evaluation  Refers to the collection of evidence to judge the effectiveness of a community programs or other community interventions (com psych definition)  The use of social research procedures to systematically investigate the effectiveness of social intervention programs (research definition).

Project Drug Abuse Resistance Education D.A.R.E.  Most popular school based intervention  Little evidence on its effectiveness  Limited positive influence on psychological factors (self-esteem)  How can this lack of measurable outcomes in a popular intervention be explained?

Reasons Why Programs May Be Unsuccessful  Theory Failure: concerns program theory which is the rationale for why a particular intervention is considered appropriate for a particular problem with a specific target population  Implementation Failure: concerns quality of program implementation (ie: program may not be generalizable)

Effects do not occur when…….  The underlying assumptions of program theory are incorrect.  The program, even if implemented well, doesn’t affect the variables specified by program theory.  Or the activity or program is not implemented adequately

Logic Model  Graphic representation of the program.  Shows the logical connections between the conditions that contribute to the need for a program in a community, the activities aimed at addressing these conditions, and the outcomes and impacts expected to result from the activities.

Evaluation “Terminology”  Stakeholders  Fiduciary  Funding sources  Need Assessment  Evaluation Instruments

Four Step Model of Program Evaluation (Lindsay & Wandersman, 1991)  Step 1: Identify Goals and Desired Outcomes  Step 2: Process Evaluation  Step 3 Outcome Evaluation  Step 4: Impact Evaluation:

STEP 1) Identifying Goals and Desired Outcomes  What is your project striving for?  Goals set a framework for specific outcomes. Program Developers MUST describe:  The primary goals of the program  Target population  Outcomes desired

STEP 2) Process Evaluation  Monitoring program activities helps organize program efforts  Provides information to help manage the program accountability that the program is conducting what was done and who was reached  After an evaluation of outcomes and impacts, the evaluation can provide information about why the program worked or did not work  Can help decide whether or not you are ready to assess the effects of your program  What were the intended and actual activities of the program/ Did you learn anything.

STEP 3) Outcome/Impact Evaluation  Assess the immediate effects of a program “the bottom line”  Looks at the desired outcomes defined in Step 1 and seeks evidence regarding the extent to which those outcomes were achieved  Should be closely linked to goals, but more specific

STEP 4) Impact Evaluation  Concerned with the ultimate effects of the program  Impacts are ultimate or longer-term effects of the program

Comprehensive Quality Programming: 9 Strategies  Why is the intervention or program needed?  What are the program’s goals, target populations and desired outcomes?  How does your program use the scientific knowledge and best practice of what works?  How will this new program fit in with existing programs  How will you carry out the program  How well was the program carried out  How did the program work?  What can you do to improve the program the next time you do it?  If the program or parts of the program were effective, what are you doing to continue institutionalize the program

Accountability Questions & Corresponding CQP Strategies  Why is the intervention or program needed?  What are the program’s goals, target populations and desired outcomes?  How does your program use the scientific knowledge and best practice of what works?  How will this new program fit in with existing programs  How will you carry out the program  How well was the program carried out  How did the program work?  What can you do to improve the program the next time you do it?  If the program or parts of the program were effective, what are you doing to continue institutionalize the program Needs and assets assessments Identifying goals and desired outcomes Review research literature and best practices Community feedback and planning Planning, implementation Process evaluation Outcome and impact evaluations Continuous program improvement Institutionalization strategies

Empowerment Evaluation  Program planners and developers learn the basics of program evaluation in ongoing program improvement.  Help program developers and staff to achieve their program goals, by providing the with the tools for assessing and improving the planning, implementation, and results of their program.

Limitations of Evaluation  Use of an outside evaluator  Evaluation feedback is provided at the end of the program  Evaluation findings are perceived as being too complex

Conclusions  Program evaluation is necessary to find out whether a program is working  Evaluation can be used for program planning and program implementation  As society becomes more concerned about accountability and results, evaluation will become more necessary.

Group Activity  Apply 4 step model in terms of your group project.  Answer CQP questions