1 WELCOME MAP “TUNE-UP” WORKSHOP September 19-20, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone, Federal Policy II: Coastal Zone Management Act; Slide 29.1 Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Levee Decertification & CRS: How a Catch-22 Can Catch You! ASFPM 2011 National Conference Louisville, KY Wednesday, May 17, 2011 ASFPM 2011 National Conference.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Sections 10 and 404: NMFS’ Oversight, Concerns and Actions
 WELCOME  Welcome to the home page for the Louisiana Mapping Project (LaMP). The LaMP effort is being undertaken by Department of Homeland Security’s.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 3, 2014.
2013 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2013 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE LITE.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Connecticut Applicants’ Briefing DR-SAMPLE ###-CT Declared Date #### Incident Period DATE ####
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
1 Flood Insurance. 2 Flood - History History of the Law –National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Federally subsidized insurance became available Voluntary.
Flood Training by Brad Bullock CRCM, First National Bank of Midland This tool can be found in the Banker Tools section of BankersOnline.com.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
Rural Development Water and Waste Projects: Environmental Requirements John Helgren, P.E. – State Environmental Coordinator Madeline Crowe – Assistant.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program Information Workshop Monday, February 1, 2010.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 20 Risks to Human Settlements Mitigation Programs Prepared By Rod Emmer CFM, PhD Larry Larson, CFM, PE.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Shoreline & Waterway Management Section Regulations Governing Beach Protection and the Use of Beaches December 27, 1983 Beach – is that area which extends.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
The Status of NFIP Reform and Floodplain Mapping Mayors’ Water Summit December 8, 2010.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
©2011 Cengage Learning. Chapter 15 ©2011 Cengage Learning REQUIRED GOVERNMENT REPORTS.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Waterway Permits Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
FLOODPLAIN ADMINSTRATOR DAILY GRIND Roles, Process, Review
Floodplain Management Program Benton County
Flood Damage Prevention Code Update
January 14, 2016 Approval of a Coastal, Piedmont and Mountain Region for Purposes of Regulating Isolated Wetlands Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Oklahoma Floodplain Managers Association
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Waterway Permits Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Presentation transcript:

1 WELCOME MAP “TUNE-UP” WORKSHOP September 19-20, 2007

2 Coastal Zones Designated by CZM State Agency Applies to: ▪ ▪ New construction ▪ ▪ Conversion of land use ▪ ▪ Major Rehabilitation ▪ ▪ Acquisition of undeveloped land

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT ● ● ANY ACTIVITY PROPOSED IN A COASTAL ZONE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH AN APPROVED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PLAN.

4 Coastal Zone Management Act Is the site in CZM?   Check with CZM Agency If yes:   Project Consistent with CZM Plan?   Obtain “letter of Consistency”

5 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PLAN Beaufort Bertie Brunswick Camden Carteret Chowan Craven Currituck Dare Gates SC COUNTIES Beaufort Berkeley Charleston Colleton Dorchester Georgetown Horry Jasper The SC Coastal Management Program. Lead agency is the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Division (OCRM) within the SC Department of Health and Environmental Control. Hertford Hyde New Hanover Onslow Pamlico Pasquotank Pender Perquimans Tyrell Washington NC Counties The NC Coastal Management Program. Lead agency is the Division of Coastal Management within the NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources.

6 Coastal Barriers Coastal Barrier Resources Act Prohibits Federal funding for projects in coastal barriers. Consult DOI Maps

7 Coastal Barrier Resources Designated by:   US Fish and Wildlife   Coastal Barrier Maps and FEMA Maps Administered by:   NOAA with local CZM Agencies Covers:   Gulf of Mexico   Atlantic   Great Lakes

8 Floodplain 24 CFR Part 55

9 Executive Order Required: Federal Agencies to : avoid development in the Floodplain develop regulations (24 CFR Part 55)

10 Floodplain Management Purpose: Federal Agencies should: avoid development in FP avoid adverse effect to FP study alternatives to project

11 Why?

12

13 The Basics The Firm Commitment cannot be issued prior to the completion of environmental process

FLOODPLAIN REJECT IF IN FLOOD WAY OR COASTAL HIGH AREA. LOWEST FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION WILL HAVE TO BE OUT OF THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. COULD BE COSTLY!

15 HUD’s Floodplain Management 24 CFR Part 55 Incidental to The site

AREAWIDE COMPLIANCE CHARLESTON, BERKELEY, AND DORCHESTER COUNTIES ARE COVERED UNDER THE AREAWIDE COMPLIANCE PROCESS. THIS MEANS THERE IS NO OTHER PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE EXCEPT DEVELOP IN THE FLOODPLAINS.

17 Alternatives Redesign Existing Site New Site Obtain LOMA or LOMR Conduct 8 step to study alternatives

18 The 8-Step Process Step 1 ● ●Is the site in the 100 yr Floodplain ● ●IF no, to building or construction ▪ ▪ Photo Copy FIRM Map and panel ▪ ▪ Mark the site ▪ ▪ Use to document the ER ● ● (24 CFR Part 55.12(b)(6)) ● ● create covenant or Restriction & drainage plan ● ● Proceed with project floodplain Structure

19 The 8-Step Process Step 1 Is the site in the 100 yr Floodplain? site? building? both? IF yes to building or both: Continue to Step Two floodplain Structure

20 Step 2 Early Public Notice allow 15 DAY comment period shall state ▪ ▪ The name of the project ▪ ▪ Proposed location ▪ ▪ Describe the activity ▪ ▪ Amount of property in the FP ▪ ▪ Location of the environmental record ▪ ▪ Name the Official to send comment to

21 Step 3 Evaluate Alternatives What are the alternatives? ▪ ▪ Alternative sites? natural conditions social demands/needs economic cost legal limitation ▪ ▪ Alternative methods to achieve project goals ▪ ▪ A “no project” alternative

22 Step 4 Identify Impacts impact to the floodplain impact to people and property Types of impact: ▪ ▪ Positive and Negative ▪ ▪ Concentrated and Dispersed ▪ ▪ Short and long term

23 Step 5 Minimize Restore and Preserve minimize harm to lives and property   limit fill of floodplain   minimize grading   relocate non-conforming structures   preserve natural drainage   maintain buffers   use detention ponds   minimize tree cutting

24 Step 6 Reevaluate the Project is project still feasible considering:   exposure to floods   potential to increase hazards   new information gathered in step 4 and 5

25 Step 7 Publish the Final Notice If it is determined there is no alternative:   Publish Final Notice justify location in Floodplain list alternatives considered list all mitigation measures WAIT seven days

26 Step 8 Implement the project HUD Program Staff Must:   continue to monitor and   ensure mitigation measures are implemented

27 HUD’s 8-step Decision-Making Process for Floodplains and Wetlands Is the site in a floodplain? Serve public notice Review alternatives: accept project as submitted, accept with modifications as dictated by HUD, or reject Consider impacts Consider mitigation of impacts Reconsider alternatives Serve 2nd public notice with decision to proceed Approval of firm commitment

28 Resolve Issues at Pre-application Stage FLOODPLAINS If any part of the site or integral offsite development is located within the 100-year floodplain according to the applicable FEMA map, this should be discussed with HUD at the pre-application stage New construction in mapped 100-year floodplains is strongly discouraged Proposed rehabilitation, refinancing, or new construction for facilities housing or serving mobility-impaired individuals in mapped 500-year floodplains is strongly discouraged

29 Resolve Issues at Pre-application Stage FLOODPLAINS Any existing building accepted for mortgage insurance which is located within a FEMA mapped floodplain is required to carry floor insurance: In the amount of the loan   For the term of the loan   Subject to available maximum coverage ALL leases must contain Acknowledgements signed by tenants indicating that they have been advised that:   The property is in the floodplain, and   Flood insurance is available for their personal property

30 Flood Insurance Purchase of Flood Insurance is mandatory for properties assisted with HUD funds & located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) 100 year flood plain Purchase of Flood Insurance is mandatory for properties assisted with HUD funds & located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) 100 year flood plain

31 Flood Insurance How Much – How long? Grants: Life of the property  Even if title is transferred Amount of the project cost Loans: Life of the Loan Amount of the Loan

FLOOD DISASTER PROTECTION ACT COMMUNITY MUST PARTICIPATE IN NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. FLOOD INSURANCE OBTAINED AS CONDITION. AVOID SITE WITH FLOODPLAINS AND WETLANDS.

33 Wetlands Protection

34 Protection of Wetlands EO Required Federal Agencies to develop regulations to avoid :   destruction /modification of wetlands   long and short term adverse impacts

35 Protection of Wetlands Purpose: Federal Agencies should:   avoid long and short term impacts (destruction and /or modification of wetlands)   avoid support of construction in wetland   requires 8-step process

36 Requires Federal Agencies to avoid assistance for New Construction in Wetland Unless: 8-step process completed:   there is no alternative,   minimize harm to wetland,   consider economic & environmental impact Protection of Wetlands EO 11990

37 24 CFR Part 55 Currently Only Covers Flood Plain HUD’s wetlands regulation similar to Floodplain regulation requires 8-step process can be conducted jointly for Floodplain and Wetland

38 Protection of Wetlands Limits EO is NOT Corps of Engineers Section 404 permitting required by the Clean Water Act National Wetlands Inventory Map (published by US fish and wildlife)

WETLANDS MUST NOTIFY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR WETLAND DELINEATION. ONLY THE CORPS CAN MAKE FINAL DECISION. CONSULTANTS MAY DO WORK, BUT CORPS MUST ACCEPT THEIR WORK. WETLANDS ARE DISTINGUISHED BY WATER, VEGETATION, AND SOIL CONDITIONS.

40 The End

41