PUC of Texas EEIP Meeting Residential A/C Load Control Program ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 1 11.27.2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Distributed Generation (DG)
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Aggregating Small Loads to provide Ancillary Services
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
AMI Home Area Network Update SAG Meeting March 18, 2014.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
Comverge Comments on NPRR555 ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary Colin Meehan
Demand Response Task Force February 2008 Update. Bridge Solution Short Term Only: Use as “bridge” to long term solution Standardize Energy Impacts: Utilize.
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
Smart Meter. 2 Seattle City Light Vision Vision To set the standard and deliver the best customer service experience of any utility in the nation. Mission.
Smart Metering in ERCOT: Implementation Update CCET Board of Directors Meeting August 3, 2011 Presented by Christine Wright, Competitive Markets Division.
Incentives to achieve the future network and our DMIS strategy
Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Demand Response: Are Customers Ready to Change Their Ways? Confidential October 27, 2014.
Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities The Customer Viewpoint Rates on the Rise in a Rough Economy - Responding to New Realities Marketing.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
SMART METERING SOLUTIONS TO SHAPE OUR ENERGY FUTURE Empowering the Customer Experience Marketing Executives Conference Cranwell Resort Lenox, Massachusetts.
Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
CCET as a Forum to Help Resolve Interoperability Issues Grid-Interop Stakeholders Coordination Panel Nov 11-13, 2008 Atlanta, GA Milton Holloway, Ph.D.
Energy Efficiency Implementation Project # Load Management Subcommittee Report to: ERCOT Demand Side Working Group August 8, 2008.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Advanced Metering Implementation Team Update Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas October 2008.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Advanced Meter Settlement Background and NPRR. Overview PUC Rule (wholesale settlement) Project – Wholesale Settlement Project Filed Deployment.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
9/12/20071 CCET at Two Years Presentation to Demand Side Working Group Meeting of ERCOT Austin, Texas October 12, 2007 Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
© EnerNOC Inc. The Role of Aggregators in the Reliable Recruitment and Delivery of Demand Response Or “why do I need an aggregator anyway? 9 June, 2011.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities Presented to Marketing Executive Council Presented by Lynda Ziegler Southern.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
Building Blocks for Premise Level Load Reduction Estimates ERCOT Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup July 21, 2014.
Third Party DR Self-Deployment Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Sept. 18, 2015.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
Comverge Confidential & Proprietary 1 Marketing Demand Response Programs Pravin Bhagat, Senior Director Marketing Comverge Inc
Metering Americas April 24, 2006 Advanced Metering.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT HCDE, Facilitator and DRF Industries, LLC Consultants Energy Education, Energy Cost, TDU Charges, & Demand Reduction.
AMIT-DSWG Workshop ‘AMI’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Part 2’
SMECO Demand Response filing
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
Mass Market Demand Solutions in PJM
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Northwest Demand Response Symposium
Sustainability Leadership Forum - Dallas
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Presentation transcript:

PUC of Texas EEIP Meeting Residential A/C Load Control Program ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary

Comverge Introduction ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 2 Operating in Texas since 2001 –Austin Energy – Power Saver Free Thermostat Program –TXU Energy - iThermostat program –Utility C&I Standard Offer DR Programs –ERCOT C&I ERS Program (Formerly EILS) Equipment provider for other Texas energy service providers Active market participant at ERCOT

 World-leading provider of Intelligent Energy Management (IEM)/Demand Response (DR) solutions  Headquartered in Atlanta, GA  ~520 employees  Revenues: $136.4 million $119.4 million  Q1 2012: Revenue growth of 75% compared to 2011  Acquired by H.I.G. Capital – 5/2012 Highlights Leading Provider of Intelligent Energy Management/Demand Response Solutions Revenues From All Customer Classes (2011) Client Base Geography PPS CHART #3 USE RIDER A (next page) Residential 57% C&I 43% Grid Operators Electric Utilities C&I 43% Wide Range of Services  Program Design, Planning and Execution  Marketing Strategy & Execution  Installation  Measurement and Verification  Energy Audit  Customer Care © 2012 Comverge, Inc. 3

VPC Structure Description VPC™ – Virtual Peaking Capacity –Pay-for-Performance Payment is based on delivered Peak Load Reduction Paid through a $/kW-yr charge M&V Methodology is specified by contract –Fully Outsourced –Comverge takes the risk of performance Can be offered through REP’s, Utilities or Direct from Comverge or other third party Can be tailored to fit the market need ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 4

Demand Response is our Business 5 © 2012 Comverge, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.

Offer Summary 400 MW Residential Air Conditioning Cycling Pilot 2 pilot locales each 200 MW Pay for Performance – Comverge guarantees MW –Direct Air Conditioning Load Control – Smart Switches Communications over Paging & Zigbee using AMI –Residential & Small Commercial market –Creates jobs in Texas –Representative Implementation Costs $145/kW-yr Includes $50/yr Incentive per device & $50/customer sign on bonus –Pilot roll out over 4 years, Device life > 10 years ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 6

Switches Allow for Flexible Control - Load Guard Load Guard is a Comverge program implemented for Com Edison for their real time pricing program 7  Load Guard is an optional “set and forget” service that utilizes the already deployed load management switch population to allow participants (via a website) to make their own cycling option decisions for dynamic pricing events  Load guard enables customers to take advantage of dynamic pricing events automatically by pre-selecting a cycling level that runs during a high price event  Provides added value at little incremental cost to utilities

8 8 Real Time Pricing – Innovative Set & Forget Solution ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary

Measurement and Verification (M&V) Plan Basic Assumption – Use Customer’s or Aggregations of Customer’s individual AMI Meter data Two Options for Measurement and Verification (M&V) –Controlled/Comparison Methodology Performance calculated by statistical sample of Customers’ metered load prior to dispatch instruction compared to metered load at the reduction deadline This is a very common methodology for residential air conditioning load control –Baseline Methodology A baseline is defined as an estimated or predicted load in the absence of a DR deployment. Baselines are appropriate for loads or aggregations of loads that are predictable in nature Can be modeled based on their historical usage patterns This is an appropriate methodology for Weather Sensitive residential air conditioning load. Both Methodologies are recognized as applicable for DR programs by the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) Option ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 9

Comverge M&V Experience Comverge Energy Sciences team: –10 engineers and mathematicians –Oversee & shepherd the process –M&V processes have been evaluated and approved by numerous utilities and by PJM Responsible for M&V measurements & evaluation of many residential and small commercial DR programs since 2006 –Seven seasons of meter deployment and data acquisition for thirteen programs –Energy Sciences team creates a detail M&V plan annually –Per the plan, meters are deployed, baseline and event measurements are obtained during the summer season and a final report is prepared in the fall Comverge has used many different approaches for measurement –Direct metering of air conditioners and hot water heaters, including monitoring run times as determined by the thermostats and service meter measurements –For the proposed program, Comverge envisions using AMI service meters to calculate demand reduction –Estimates can be prepared for each event using a prior day(s) baseline based approach –The estimates from each premise would be aggregated to provide a system wide determination of the demand response ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 10

Summary of Results Residential programs produce reliable Demand Reduction Programs across the country producing perennial results –Emergency Curtailment, Ancillary Svc, Operating Reserves –Attacks the primary Contributor to annual Peak System Load Job Creation – as many as 85 Jobs if fully deployed (400 MW) –Potential for more during deployment phase (3-5 years) –Scales down by 30-40% after deployment phases Assumed Penetration Rates –6.7% Proposed Penetration –432,350 Proposed Enrollments –18 Months expected to reach the proposed penetration level Assumes Two largest TDSP service territories as target markets ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 11

Demonstrated Performance 12 14% Penetration 119,077 Enrollments 26 Months Utility 1

Demonstrated Performance % Penetration 56,604 Enrollments 16 Months 14% Penetration 119,077 Enrollments 26 Months Utility 1 Utility 2

Demonstrated Performance % Proposed Penetration 432,350 Proposed Enrollments 18 Months 9.4% Penetration 56,604 Enrollments 16 Months 14% Penetration 119,077 Enrollments 26 Months Utility 1 Utility 2

Applicability Demand Response is an integral component of several existing EE Program offerings –Oncor, CenterPoint, AEP – Load Management Standard Offer Program for Commercial & Industrial Customers –TNMP – Commercial Load Management Pilot Program –Other Texas Utilities – Various Load Management Standard Offer Programs Residential programs will be a valuable addition Program Structure fits well in the Texas Market –Ability to transition program to ERCOT when appropriate Comverge design reduces risk for the customer through experience and process –Example - in VPC, Comverge assumes risk for program dropouts and customer opt outs Allowances for these risks are designed into the program plan Allow customers to opt out of 2 control events per season Program is Voluntary – If customer wants to leave the program – accommodate the request Since contract is MW based we manage churn through the life of the program ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 15

Market Demand Response is a critical element in Texas Resource Adequacy Discussion Residential Price Responsive Demand is a desired end-state ERCOT making strides to facilitate products for loads to participate in Market –30 min Emergency Response Service Pilot in Second Season Load Aggregation Participation –Weather Sensitive Loads Product category Protocol changes currently in development –Aggregated Load Resources Draft White Paper Residential DR – Deployment through multiple channels –Third Party DR Providers –Retail Electric Providers –Channel Partners (HVAC, Security, Cable) ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 16

Conclusions Demand Response is our business –The estimates are achievable –The Resource is reliable –M & V is proven industry accepted practice Pay for performance structure ensures value 400 MW pilot offer –Large enough to provide system value –Small enough to fit the budget over roll-out period Next steps: –Meet with PUCT Staff and/of Commissioners to Answer additional questions –Road show to gauge interest from TDSP’s and Utilities –Advance the program concept to filing phase with Sponsor Utility ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary 17