2013 SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation Dr. Stephen George DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest Dynamic Pricing Program Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest.
Advertisements

Demand Response Forecasting, Measurement & Verification Methods/Challenges/Considerations National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC - June.
PG&Es 2013 SmartAC Program Evaluation Dr. Stephen George DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
Load Impact Estimation for Demand Response Resources Nicole Hopper, Evaluation Manager July 14, 2009 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
2013 Statewide BIP Load Impact Evaluation Candice Churchwell DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING ©2014 Navigant Consulting, Inc. May 7, 2014 Navigant Reference: Impact.
Empirical Data on Settlement of Weather Sensitive Loads Josh Bode, M.P.P. ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Austin, TX September 20, 2012.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
Energy and Environmental Economics 1 Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
California Energy Commission Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments R Resource Adequacy Workshop January.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.
Resource Adequacy Forecast Adjustment(s) Allocation Methodology
Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand
Presentation Overview
Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Demand Response: Are Customers Ready to Change Their Ways? Confidential October 27, 2014.
SDG&E Small Business Energy Efficiency (SBEE) SoCal Gas Non-Residential Financial Incentives Program (NRFIP) Evaluation Results Steve Grover ECONorthwest.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Baseline Analysis CBP, AMP, and DBP Steve Braithwait, Dan Hansen, and Dave Armstrong Christensen Associates Energy Consulting DRMEC Spring Workshop May.
The Demand Response Baseline Alberta Electric System Operator – Demand Response Working Group December 9, 2008 Kenneth D. Schisler Senior Director, Regulatory.
2011 Residential HAN Pilots Evaluation Results © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Research Plan Public Workshop #1 February 20, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Draft Report Public Workshop #2 August 7, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
Bill Savings Public Workshop Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2003 to 2005 April 21, :00 AM to Noon 77 Beale.
BPA M&V Protocols Overview of BPA M&V Protocols and Relationship to RTF Guidelines for Savings and Standard Savings Estimation Protocols.
2013 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation Josh L. Bode Candice A. Churchwell DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco,
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Pilot Design and Load Impact M&V Dr. Stephen George Senior Vice President.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Load & Bill Impacts, Role of Technology & Operational Consideration Dr. Stephen.
EMV Results for online Energy Education Study conducted by Lei Wang, PhD October 2011.
Bill Savings Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2002 to 2004 Bill Savings Public Workshop April 15, San Diego.
March 1, 2011 Load Analysis Update Calvin Opheim Manager, Load Forecasting and Analysis.
UFE 2005 Analysis 1 UFE 2005 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Summer 2003 Impact Evaluation 17 th Annual Western Conference, San Diego, California Ahmad Faruqui and Stephen S.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS LOAD FORECAST.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Workshop on the Staff Draft 2006 Summer Outlook Report December 8, 2005 Hearing Room B.
A Reliable but Simplified Method for Measuring the Savings from Advanced RTU Control Retrofits February 13, 2013 Presentation to: RTF Commercial Rooftop.
Regional Technical Forum Recommissioning commercial retail facilities: A whole building approach to energy savings April 7th, 2009 Presented by: Jeremy.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Building Blocks for Premise Level Load Reduction Estimates ERCOT Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup July 21, 2014.
Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.
2015 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May, 2016 Prepared.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation Capacity Bidding Program (CBP) Steve Braithwait, Dan Hansen, and Dave Armstrong Christensen Associates Energy Consulting DRMEC.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profiling Methodology ERCOT Load Profiling March 4, 2008.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
2015 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program May 11, 2016 Prepared by: Eric Bell Jenny Gai.
Customer Specific Regression Overview DRMEC Spring 2016 Evaluation and Enrollment Workshop – Session 3 Kelly Marrin, Director, Applied Energy Group.
Emergency Response Service Baselines
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Highlights from SMUD's SmartPricing Options Pilot
Workshop Presentation
Py2015 California statewide on-bill finance
Introduction to Statistics
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Presentation transcript:

2013 SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation Dr. Stephen George DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014

 Summer Saver program overview  Ex post methodology and results  Ex ante methodology and results  Relationship between ex post and ex ante 1 Agenda

 The program is available to both residential and small commercial customers  Participants can select from multiple cycling options with corresponding variation in the annual incentive payment  Enrollment is expected to stay relatively constant in the near future  The number of enrolled customers increased by less than 3% from 2012 to SDG&E’s Summer Saver program is a CAC direct load control program Customer Type Cycling Option Enrolled Customers Enrolled Control Devices Enrolled Tons Commercial 30%1,4693,91115,148 50%3,4017,68429,863 Total4,87011,59545,011 Residential 50%12,15814,29050, %11,44414,10851,140 Total23,60228,398101,173 Grand Total28,47239,993146,184

 Residential ex post impact estimates were developed using two randomly selected groups, with each group alternating as the treatment and control group during load control events  Total sample of 1,460, split roughly evenly into A and B groups – group sizes were limited due to desire to minimize M&E’s impact on DR capability  Impacts estimated as difference between A and B groups for each event, adjusted slightly for differences between the groups during hours leading up to the event period  Based on whole building interval data  Due to small commercial population and the desire to maximize the aggregate load impacts (e.g., not hold back a large control group), the commercial ex post impact estimates were developed using the difference in loads between cycled customers and a statistically matched control group from the non-participant population 3 The ex post evaluation methodology differs between the residential and commercial program segments

4 The randomly assigned residential A/B groups are well- matched on the 5 highest nonevent system load days in 2013

5 Loads for the statistically matched control group and the participant population of commercial customers are also similar on the five highest system load days in 2013

6 Ex post load impacts were based on a simple difference calculation with a small same-day adjustment Unadjusted Adjusted Residential 50% cycling average kW load impact per premise on 9/6/2013

7 Average 1-5 PM event load impact was 20.8 MW – two events covering later hours of the day delivered fewer MW

8 The same methodology was used to produce ex ante impacts for both residential and commercial participants Average Ex Post Load Impacts and Ex Ante Predictions from 2 to 4 PM for Residential 50% Cycling Participants

9 The largest ex ante aggregate impacts for Summer Saver are predicted to occur in September under both 1-in-2 and 1-in-10 year weather conditions

FactorAggregate Load Impact (MW) Explanation Ex post aggregate impact18.9*All sectors, all cycling options, 97% of participant population Scaled to 100% of Summer Saver population 19.43% difference when control group customers are not held back Ex post weather and event window, ex ante model 20.1In aggregate, model predicts well – some over and under for sub-segments Ex post weather, ex ante event window, ex ante model 20.0Most ex post events were from 1 to 5 PM which is similar to the RA window from 1 to 6 PM 1-in-2 year weather, typical event day 16.2**Mean17 for ex ante weather equal to 77°F compared with mean17 for 2013 events equal to 80.1°F 1-in-10 year weather, typical event day 19.4**Mean17 for ex ante weather equal to 79°F compared with mean17 for 2013 events equal to 80.1°F Relationship Between Ex Post and Ex Ante Estimates *This value is less than the ex post value in table on slide 7 because value on slide 7 is only for the four events with common hours from 1 to 5 PM whereas this is based on all 6 ex post 2013 events **Nexant has recommended that SDG&E re-examine their development of ex ante weather values prior to next year’s evaluation 10

For comments or questions, contact: Stephen George Senior Vice President, Utility Services or Candice Churchwell Senior Consultant Nexant, Inc. 101 Montgomery St., 15 th Floor San Francisco, CA