Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Uncertainty in Ecosystem Production and Biomass of Amazonia Caused by Vegetation Characteristics Christopher Potter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
Modelling Australian Tropical Savanna Peter Isaac 1, Jason Beringer 1, Lindsay Hutley 2 and Stephen Wood 1 1 School of Geography and Environmental Science,
Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to drought
Xiangming Xiao Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Arts and Sciences Center for Spatial Analysis, College of Atmospheric.
Evergreen tree dynamics in tropical savanna
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
CENTURY ECOSYSTEM MODEL Introduction to CENTURY. WHY CENTURY Evaluate Effects of Environmental Change Evaluate Changes in Management.
Global Fire Emissions and Fire Effects on Biophysical Properties and the Associated Radiative Forcing Yufang Jin 1, James Randerson 1, G. R. van der Werf.
Amazonia and Global Change Editors: –Michael Keller –Pedro Silva Dias –John Gash 13 Section Editors 93 Authors and Co-Authors.
Scaling Laws, Scale Invariance, and Climate Prediction
References Ferreira, L.G. and Huete, A.R., 2004, Assessing the seasonal dynamics of the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation through the use of spectral vegetation.
Monitoring Effects of Interannual Variation in Climate and Fire Regime on Regional Net Ecosystem Production with Remote Sensing and Modeling D.P. Turner.
Estimating the contribution of agricultural land use to terrestrial carbon fluxes in the continental US Keith Paustian 1,2, Steven Ogle 2, Scott Denning.
US Carbon Trends March 17, USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium1 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of the Contemporary Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Ridge.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
Biomes 2/15/12. What is a biome?  A type of Ecosystem.
Carbon sequestration in China’s ecosystems, Jingyun Fang Department of Ecology Peking University Feb. 14, 2008.
Biosphere Modeling Galina Churkina MPI for Biogeochemistry.
DIFFERENCES IN SOIL RESPIRATION RATES BASED ON VEGETATION TYPE Maggie Vest Winter Ecology 2013 Mountain Research Station.
Climate change, land use and forests in India: research and institutional framework in the context of the Indo-US flux programme R. Sukumar & N.H.Ravindranath.
Global Emissions from the Agriculture and Forest Sectors: Status and Trends Indu K Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
MNV/RL 1 Developing historic land cover databases The BIOME 300-experience Prof. Dr. Rik Leemans [ Dutch Institute of Public Health.
ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION +How do we define ecosystem structure +Importance of ecosystem structure +Factors controlling ecosystem structure +Drivers.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
Global estimates of emissions from fires, Part 1: Emission estimates from fires in the Tropics and Subtropics, Guido R. van der Werf 1, James.
Improving the Representation of Fire Disturbance in Dynamic Vegetation Models by Assimilating Satellite Data E.Kantzas, S.Quegan & M.Lomas School of Maths.
Environmental controls and predictions of African vegetation dynamics Martin Jung, Eric Thomas Department of Biogeochemical Integration.
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
1 Land Cover Land Use Change Program and LBA Dr. Garik Gutman LCLUC Program Manager NASA Headquarters.
Using Land Use Change Models to Assess Biophysical and Biogeochemical Consequences: The Future is Not Like the Past R. DeFries, [ Department.
Lindsay Hutley (CDU) Jeremy Russell-Smith (NTG)
The impacts of land mosaics and human activity on ecosystem productivity Jeanette Eckert.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Science Mission Directorate Overview of NASA Research in Carbon Data Fusion and Data Assimilation Carbon Fusion Workshop, May, 2006 Bill Emanuel Program.
LBA ECO Synthesis Activities Summary of Current Activities Michael Keller NASA LBA-ECO Project Scientist.
Reconstruction of Inundation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Siberian Wetlands over the Last 60 Years T.J. Bohn 1, E. Podest 2, R. Schroeder 2, K.C.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
David Medvigy (Duke University) Amazon in Perspective: Integrated Science for a Sustainable Future Manaus, Brazil 20 November 2008 Hydroclimatic consequences.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel: (x24290)
Recent increases in the growing season length at high northern latitudes Nicole Smith-Downey* James T. Randerson Harvard University UC Irvine Sassan S.
AAG 2010 Washington DC Savanna Vegetation Changes as Influenced by Climate in East Africa Gopal Alagarswamy, Chuan Qin, Jiaguo Qi, Jeff Andresen, Jennifer.
The Effects of Historical Changes in Global Agricultural Land on the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Navin Ramankutty [ Center for.
Variations in Continental Terrestrial Primary Production, Evapotranspiration and Disturbance Faith Ann Heinsch, Maosheng Zhao, Qiaozhen Mu, David Mildrexler,
Deforestation and the Stream Flow of the Amazon River -- Land Surface Processes and Atmospheric Feedbacks Michael T. Coe1, Marcos Heil Costa2, and Britaldo.
Scaling Up Above Ground Live Biomass From Plot Data to Amazon Landscape Sassan S. Saatchi NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
Land use change and terrestrial carbon cycle Xiaojuan Yang April 17,2003.
A Project Linking In-situ and Satellite Measurements to Validate MODIS Terrestrial Ecology Products Warren B. Cohen, US Forest Service; Stith T. Gower,
Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice
Seasonal Emissions of N 2 O, NO, CO and CO 2 in Brazilian Savannas Subjected to Prescribed Fires Alexandre Pinto, Mercedes Bustamante, Laura Viana, Universidade.
Dr. Monia Santini University of Tuscia and CMCC CMCC Annual Meeting
Research and Discover Land-use History Brazil Heather Bain, College of the Holy Cross Dr. George Hurtt, UNH.
Estimating Soil Moisture, Inundation, and Carbon Emissions from Siberian Wetlands using Models and Remote Sensing T.J. Bohn 1, E. Podest 2, K.C. McDonald.
Whats new with MODIS NPP and GPP MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting May 20, 2015 Steven W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group College of Forestry.
THE FUTURE CLIMATE OF AMAZONIA Carlos Nobre 1, Marcos Oyama 2, Gilvan Sampaio 1 1 CPTEC/INPE, 2 IAE/CTA LBA ECO São Paulo / 2005 November.
Carbon Dynamics in Coarse Woody Debris Pools at the Tapajos National Forest in Brazil Hudson Silva Patrick Crill Michael Keller.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Response of the mean global vegetation distribution to interannual climate variability Michael Notaro Associate Scientist Center for Climatic Research.
Ecosystem Model Evaluation
Department of Atmospheric Sciences
Continental Modeling and Analysis of the North American Carbon Cycle
OGWC – Forest C Bev Law Prof. Global Change Biology & Terrestrial Systems Science Oregon State University Oct 6, 2016.
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Corn Soybean Wheat Overview: Methods The challenge:
The carbon cycle in the Amazon.
Presentation transcript:

Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Uncertainty in Ecosystem Production and Biomass of Amazonia Caused by Vegetation Characteristics Christopher Potter and Sassan Saatchi NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Steven Klooster and Vanessa Genovese California State University Monterey Bay LBA-ECO Science Theme LC - Carbon Dynamics

Existing Vegetation Maps for Model Input 1.JPL Amazon Basin Map Based on SPOT VGT 98-01, JERS , (Saatchi, et al., 2003) 2.UMD global classification Based on AVHRR data, (Hansen et al., 2000) 3.TREES Vegetation Map of South America Based on SPOT VGT, JERS-1, ATSR-1, AVHRR, GTOPO30 (Eva et al., 2002) 4.USGS Global Vegetation Map Based on AVHRR (Loveland et al., 2000) 5. Woods Hole Research Center Vegetation Map of South America Based on AVHRR LAC, GVI (Stone et al., 1994)

Evergreen Forest Deciduous Forest Woody Savanna Savanna Flooded Forest Flooded Nonforest Secondary Forest Pasture/Crops Vegetation Map of Amazon Basin Data Fusion (Saatchi et al., 2003)

Vegetation Map of Amazon Basin Data Fusion SPOT VGT, JERS-1 (Saatchi et al., 2003) Deforestation Pattern in Rondonia, Brazil Santarem Deforestation along Transamazonian Highway BR230

Deforestation Pattern in Rondonia, Brazil Santarem Deforestation along Transamazonian Highway BR230 UMD Global Vegetation Map Decision Rule, AVHRR Hansen et al., 2000 Santarem

Deforestation Pattern in Rondonia, Brazil Deforestation along Transamazonian Highway BR230 TREES Vegetation Map of South America Multi-Resolution, SPOT VGT, JERS-1, ATSR-1, AVHRR, GTOPO30 Eva et al., 2002 Santarem

Deforestation Pattern in Rondonia, Brazil Deforestation along Transamazonian Highway BR230 USGS Global Vegetation Map Standard Supervised, AVHRR Loveland et al., 2000 Santarem

Deforestation Pattern in Rondonia, Brazil Deforestation along Transamazonian Highway BR230 Woods Hole Research Lab. Vegetation Map of South America Clustering Approach AVHRR 88-91, LAC, GVI Stone et al., 1994 Santarem

Percent Cover of Land Cover Types in the Amazon Basin Percent Pixel-to-Pixel Agreement Between Land Cover Types

Percent Pixel-to-Pixel Agreement of Forest Type Between Maps Percent Pixel-to-Pixel Agreement of Nonforest Type Between Maps

Results From Map Comparison 1.Agreement between maps range from 60-75% averaged over all class types 2.Approximately 80% of the basin is covered by forest and the agreements among maps for forest class are above 90% 3.Major disagreement between maps are in nonforested areas. On the average the maps are only 30-50% in agreement. 4. Differences are due to the prediction of deforested and regrowth areas in 1-km resolution maps. Savanna pixels with different degrees of woody vegetation are misclassified as forest or nonforest in different maps. 5.Deforested areas covered with pasture and crops are better estimated by JPL and TREES maps because of the use of estimated by JPL and TREES maps because of the use of high resolution imagery. high resolution imagery.

NASA-CASA Model f(TEMP) f(WFPS) f(Lit q) (a) Soil Moisture Balance and Plant Functional Types (b) Ecosystem Production Nutrient Mineralization (c) Biogenic Trace Gas Flux Leaf Litter Root Litter Microbes Soil Organic Matter CO 2 Mineral N f(Lit q) Soil Profile Layers Heat & Water Flux PPT N 2 O NO f(WFPS) CH 4 Grass/Crop Shrub Tree PET FPAR NPP M 0 M 1 M 2 M 3 M 0 M 1 M 2 M 3 M 0 M 1 M 2 M 3 Soil Surface Biomass CO 2 NEP Rh f(TEMP) f(WFPS) f(SOLAR)

NASA-CASA Model Simulations Over Legal Amazon 1.Five land cover types are used as input layers in the model and all other variables are considered constant for each run 2.Land cover maps are resampled to 8 km x 8 km grid cells using a majority filter. Cover types are combined to four general classes of evergreen forests, wooded grassland and savanna, pasture and cultivated land, and other classes. Wetland classes are integrated into forest and savanna types. 3.Annual Net Ecosystem Production (NEP) are simulated for two extreme years: 1983 (dry condition) and 1990 (wet condition). 4. Total above ground wood biomass carbon is simulated for 1990.

NEP Simulations Over Legal Amazon Based on JPL Map (g C m -2 yr -1 ) g C m -1 yr -1

Changes in NEP Simulations 1983 JPL-UMD JPL-TREES JPL-USGS JPL-WHRC No Change > 0 < 0

Changes in NEP Simulations 1990 JPL-UMD JPL-TREES JPL-USGS JPL-WHRC No Change > 0 < 0

NEP Profile Across Basin, 1983 NEP Profile Across Basin, 1990

Percent Pixel-to-Pixel Agreement of Between NEP-83 Simulations

Percent Pixel-to-Pixel Agreement of Between NEP-90 Simulations

Summary 1.Differences in land cover maps cause pg C yr -1 uncertainty in total Net Ecosystem Production over the Legal Amazon 2.The impact of land cover uncertainties are higher during wet year (carbon sink flux) over the region. 3.Ratio of nonforest area over forest area explains the changes of total annual NEP. Relationship is significant in wet years and insignificant during the dry years (regional source flux). 4. The impacts of uncertainty in land cover types (e.g. deforested, pasture, crops) are the same magnitude of the NEP interannual variability. 5.During dry years other variables such as fire rainfall distribution anomalies dominate the impact of land cover differences

Above Ground Woody Biomass Carbon Derived from NASA_CASA Model Early 1990s 0 5,000 10,000 18,000 g C m -2

Changes in Biomass Carbon 1990 JPL-UMD JPL-TREES JPL-USGSJPL-WHRC No Change > 0 < 0

Percent Pixel-to-Pixel Agreement of Between Biomass Simulations

Summary 1.NASA-CASA model predicts pg C of above ground woody biomass across legal Amazon for the early 1990s 2.The impact of land cover differences are on the order of 1-3 pg C that are primarily due to misclassification of areas of nonforest types in land cover maps. 3.Total forest cover defines the above ground woody biomass carbon. All five maps show above 95% agreement on forest cover. Differences in normalized ratio of nonforest/forest explain changes of above ground woody biomass across the region. 4.Coarse resolution maps do not allow accurate classification of areas of disturbance on annual basis.