Development of a National Research and Development Network for Agricultural Uses of FGD Gypsum Warren Dick, The Ohio State University Ken Ladwig, EPRI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
Advertisements

Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
1 Planning and Environment Linkages: Case Studies Michael Culp and John Humeston FHWA November 2, 2006.
AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA PRESENTATION TO : The Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry February 24, Regina.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
The Agricultural Research Service Steven R. Shafer Deputy Administrator Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems.
Introducing the Knowledge Management System
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Fermilab Environmental Management System (EMS)
Successful Graduation Projects
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
ORGANIZATION MODELING OVERVIEW Dr. Denice D. Withrow, ISC May 20, 2013 Cleveland Chapter Presentation.
NITROGEN TRACKING AND REPORTING TASK FORCE A Summary Agricultural Expert Panel Public Meeting #1 May 5, 2014 Amrith Gunasekara, PhD Science Advisor to.
The Importance of FGD Gypsum To the CCP Industry By David Goss, Executive Director American Coal Ash Association OSU – EPRI Workshop St. Louis, September.
DEVELOPMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS D E V E L O P M E N T O F C O N T R I B U T I O N S JESSICA CLARK, BUFFALO NCF CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA KARPF, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
Formed in 1995, the Extension Agronomic Crops Team provides accurate and timely information, educational opportunities and conducts research projects addressing.
California Integrated Waste Management Board The Compost Solution Workshop Agricultural Compost Specifications February 28, 2007 Ronald Lew
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
WP5 - Mapping Indian Research Potential Sourabha Rani, ITSMA, INDIA Activities for Year 5 & 6.
Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project (PINEMAP) is a Coordinated Agriculture Project funded by the USDA National Institute.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Board of Trustees Orientation September 23, 2014 Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor of Educational Services and Institutional Effectiveness 1.
BISCAYNE BAY REGIONAL RESTORATION COORDINATION TEAM Development of Overarching Objectives: Dreams and Realities March 12, 2004.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Reclamation provides water to more than 31 million people and is the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the west We are a water management.
WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE? The Water Resources Management Committee of the American Public Works Association.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Plan for Phase V of the Malé Declaration ( ) The Secretariat.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
Scientific Merit Review René St-Arnaud, Ph.D. Shriners Hospital and McGill University CCAC National Workshop May 13, 2010, Ottawa (Ontario)
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Series 2013 Data Management at the National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center.
Preparing for 2017 RA Update March Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
In April l993, the URC began reviewing NCAR's non-core proposals. UCAR Office of Programs (UOP) non-core proposals were added in 1995 and UCAR Education.
Surveys, Proposed Mining Regulations and other things… Presented to ARIPPA on April 24, 2007 by Dave Goss, Executive Director American Coal Ash Association.
ENERGY STAR® WORKSHOP Riffe Center Columbus, Ohio April 26, 2007.
Value to Utilities of Agronomic Uses for Gypsum Lamar Larrimore Southern Company September 13, 2006.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Request for Information & Capability Statements Richland Acquisitions Post-FY 2018 November 17-19, 2015.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
State Alliance for e-Health Michelle Lim Warner, MPH Senior Policy Analyst NGA Center for Best Practices
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
MICHAEL E. SCOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Available Information on the Beneficial Reuse of Coal Combustion Products 1.
Agricultural Research Service Office of Technology Transfer Agricultural Research Partnerships (ARP) Network.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Recommendations From the New Jersey Climate Adaptation Alliance Marjorie B. Kaplan, Associate Director Rutgers.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Planning for a Team Science Evaluation ∞ NIEHS: Children’s Health Exposure Analysis.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS PLAN DEVELOPMENT March, 2016.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
LTAR Cropland Design Meeting
Opportunities for Growth
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Council Disabilities Awareness Committee
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE?
General Discussion Conclusions:
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

Development of a National Research and Development Network for Agricultural Uses of FGD Gypsum Warren Dick, The Ohio State University Ken Ladwig, EPRI

1.What FGD materials can be used? 2.What are the potential benefits of FGD gypsum that can be captured for agriculture? 3.What soils/crops are responsive to FGD gypsum? 4.Where are the responsive soils and crops located in the United States? 5.How do we come up with the proper recommendation rates? Questions/Issues to be Addressed by Workshop

6.How will scrubbing processes and boiler additives affect FGD gypsum quality? 7.How can a consistent supply and quality of FGD be guaranteed? 8.What are potential environmental issues? 9.What are the regulatory barriers? 10.What are the scientific/technological barriers Questions/Issues to be Addressed by Workshop

11.What are the education/extension barriers? 12.What is the monetary value of a ton of FGD for agricultural use? 13.What are the marketing barriers? 14.Other? Questions/Issues to be Addressed by Workshop

Review of Themes form the Past Two Days 1.Hg / Trace Element Information Needed 2.Soil / Crop Variables that Affect Performance and Environmental Quality 3.Web Site for Archiving Agriculturally- Related Information 4.Standards of FGD Materials for Agricultural Use

Review of Themes from the Past Two Days 5. No-Tillage and Carbon Credits 6. Education / Extension 7. Other Themes?

Review of Themes from the Past Two Days

Proposal for An Agricultural FGD Research Network

What is the Value of a Community With Common Goals? A community with common interests and common goals can more effectively solve problems and create new opportunities than a single entity working alone.

Why is There a Need for a National Network? Currently information related to agricultural uses of FGD gypsum and other FGD products is scattered and not easily accessible. The purpose of the network is to easily facilitate information retrieval and transfer and to enhance all aspects of work related to beneficial agricultural reuse of FGD products.

What are the Goals of the National Network? The network will serve as (1) a resource for solving technical questions (2) a place for demonstration of agricultural benefits (3) an aid in marketing (4) a source of information obtained via accepted scientific means. The network will also be important as an archive of information that can be shared across states.

How Will Members in the National Network Benefit? Members will have research conducted on their FGD materials under local climatic and cropping conditions. Members will also have access to data from other studies conducted as part of the network. Members will have access to research sites for use in demonstration/marketing efforts.

How Will the National Network Operate? This has yet to be worked out in detail but will involve an advisory committee comprised of various people interested in safe and beneficial use of FGD gypsum in agriculture. The Ohio State University will serve as the hub of network activities. Dr. Warren Dick has extensive experience in management of large projects and in working with FGD gypsum.

What Activities will be Conducted by the Network 1. Specialty Report Needs - Plant Uptake Data - Mined Gypsum vs. FGD Gypsum - Other? 2. Advisory Committee 3. Involvement of USDA 4. Setting up of Research Protocols 5. Research to be Conducted In-House or Through the Network

What Will be EPRI’s and The Ohio State University’s Role in the National Network? The Ohio State University, EPRI, DOE and CBRC are sponsors of this workshop. EPRI and CBRC will contribute funds to the network along with expertise and guidance. The Ohio State University, hopefully with help from USDA-ARS, will coordinate all of the activities of the network including the following:

Ohio State University’s Role Identify research partners / approve plans Conduct analysis of samples in a nationally approved laboratory Create an archive of research data Write reports as requested by funding agencies Coordinate network activities (e.g. help organize workshops, comparison of results across various states, etc.)

When Will the National Network be Initiated? Research at field sites should begin this fall. The goal is to have as many field research sites in operation by next spring as possible. New members can join the network at any time, but field work is seasonally oriented. It is impossible to start projects other than during normal crop production times.

Setting Up a Field Experiment T1T2T3T4 T5T6T7T8 T9T10T11T12 Summary of a Proposed Single Replicate of a Field Study 2 materials 5 rates 2 checks (+ -) 12 Treatments

Setting Up A Field Experiment Field Experiments will Include: Complete Analysis of FGD Sample Soil Sample Analysis of Pooled Sample from Each Replicate Before Treatment Soil Sample Analysis at Crop Harvest Agronomic and Climatic Data Plant Analysis Soil Water Analysis Specialty Analysis Per Prior Agreement (Soil Physical Properties)

How Much Will It Cost to Participate? We don’t have a specific figure determined as yet. It will depend on several factors such as: 1.Amount of Research Activity 2.Whether Research is In-House 3.Specialty Considerations

How Will Specific Research, Technology, Marketing, and Regulatory Issues be Addressed? Agriculturally-related research topics that address a specific need will be identified and developed. The Ohio State University will help identify the most appropriate research partner and coordinate the work among network participants.

Final Comments A network, as is proposed here, is only as strong as its individual members make it. Active participation will be needed to create the most effective network possible. Comments and suggestions to improve the network can be made to Ken Ladwig ( ) and Warren Dick