Governors Data Analysis Report 2011-12. Targets and Results Target for 2012 Results 2012 DifferenceBromley Results Difference WR & B English Level 4 +

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Attainment Foundation Stage 43%the percentage of children achieving a good level of development in East Sussex in %less than the.
Advertisements

July 2013 End of Year 6 Results For the first time in 7 years, above the new government floor targets for Maths and Writing and in line for Reading (two.
South West and Mid Wales Consortium Addressing Deprivation Briefing Update September 9 th 2013.
Sue Rogers Director of Education KGA Presentation GCSE and Post 16 plus Closing the Gap.
Understanding School Performance Data (Secondary) to improve effectiveness John Mc Cann Assistant Director of Schools Diocese of Shrewsbury Department.
Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
Data Analysis Basic Characteristics of Hockley Primary School.
Data – a focus on vulnerable groups and how governors can use data to positively challenge Directorate Support Team (Data & Statistics) Cornwall Council.
RAISEonline. Our school NB Please remember this data is historic for last year. We are a growing and larger then average primary school (current NOR 325)
 A New School System A Guide for Parents and Carers.
Crampton OFSTED “The school vision is evident everywhere and mutual respect and success for all are at the heart of the school’s work”.
 A New School System A Guide for Parents and Carers.
APP Middle School’s Project Kirklees. The Vision Every child knows how they are doing and what they need to do to improve and how to get there. They get.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Extracts from a presentation to Governors in July 2012 on the schools’ results for the academic year which show improvements in results: Above.
Assessment at Trinity St Stephen First School October 2014.
Evelyn CP School Foundation Stage Results (Specific Learning Goals – Reading, Writing and Number) Reading (Expected) 77%85% Writing (Expected)
© Crown copyright 2006 Primary National Strategy Pupil Tracking Systems Tutorial © Crown Copyright 2006.
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development Flexible, real purpose, independent thinking Fun, engaging, exciting and relevant Supports.
Feyisa Demie Adviser for school self-evaluation and
Summary and analysis of school data on pupil achievement 2012 ‘How are we doing?’
Scrutiny Report Reducing Persistent Absence. What is Persistent Absence? Persistent Absentee – 52 or more sessions missed at the end of half term 4 or.
Bradfield CE (VA) Primary School School Development Priorities
STATISTICS IN SCHOOLS Vinay Bhardwaj Kim Jackson Catherine Rich Amy Zaffarese.
Salford: How well are we doing?. Early Years Foundation Stage.
Educational Standards Cabinet January Early Years Performance  The percentage of pupils achieving the target expectations in the Early Years Foundation.
30 th September * The new national curriculum, which was introduced in September 2014, sets high expectations for what teachers should teach, and.
Key Stage Analysis and Trends Education and Performance Analysis Team Data source: Statistical First Release: GCSE and equivalent attainment by.
EYFS – and the OFSTED Framework Sue Monypenny Senior Education Standards and Effectiveness Officer.
Early Years Foundation Stage Profile data 3 July 2013.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-05 Workshop 3S (Secondary) Analysing progress data.
Margaret McMillan Primary School Whole School Data From RAISE online 2012 and LA data.
Manor School Progress Tracking Contents Introduction3 Summary of Findings Free School Meal Progression5 Gender Progression6 Special.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness
Assessment Without Levels December National Curriculum Levels From 1988 until July 2015, National Curriculum Levels were used from Y1 and through.
The Coseley School A Co-operative Trust Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve, Excel Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve,
Holy Family Catholic School Assessment in 2015/6 Plan for the Workshop: 1)Why Levels have gone 2) Our New Assessment Model 3) Monitoring and Assessment.
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development At Reepham Primary School we aspire to be confident and ambitious learners who care for.
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
Achievement Attainment and Progress What evidence will you need?
Data Analysis Basic Characteristics of Hockley Primary School 2.
Context – more pupils, increased challenges Sep Sep Trend Number of pupils ↑ Attendance rate95.9%96% ↑ % of free school meals children5.2%7.5%
SEF Describing good or better achievement and standards What is laid down, ordered, factual is never enough to embrace the whole truth: life spills over.
Nikki Tilson – Assessment and Achievement Adviser (Nursery and Primary) Assessment Update September 2015.
RAISEonline Data Analysis St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School (c)
Empowering Informed Decisions Using RAISEonline data to improve governor effectiveness Dave Thomson Head of Data Analysis, RM Education.
Statutory Target Setting 2006 Governors’ Meeting 5 th December 2006 KS (Current Year 8) GCSE 2008 (Current Year 10) St John Plessington Catholic.
NEW CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT. GOODBYE TO LEVELS! Levels will cease to exist after the end of this current academic year. Year 2 and 6 pupils will be given.
ADDREFNUMBER - © Crown copyright NATT+ Conference October 12 th 2010 Jane Gaffney.
Data informing the Herefordshire Closing the Gap pilot January 2013 Key Stage Pilot Cohort – Current Year 4.
Towards Good Achievement for All Chris Snudden June 2013.
Governor Data Training. Secondary National Standards National Floor Standards 5 A*-C including English and maths above 40% rising to 50% in Progress.
Standards report Standards Report CT Board 18 th March 2016.
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
‘A Flying Start’ Achievement Update November 2014 Chris Snudden Head of Education Achievement Service Head of Virtual School for Children in Care John.
2008 Exam Performance Summary Issues and Trends. Key Stage 2.
FFT Data Analysis Project Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Jacqui Cant Stephen Turp Primary Headteacher Meetings Assessment Update June 2013.
1. 2 Devon Joint School Improvement Partner CPD 9 th October 2008 Tiverton Hotel Target Setting 2010 Hilary Jones.
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
Analysing the Primary RAISE
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
Adroddiad Asesu Cwm Derwen
EYFS and KS1 Parent Meeting November 2016
Sheffield Performance Overview
Pupil Tracking Systems
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
WFIS & Nursery Data Results
Presentation transcript:

Governors Data Analysis Report

Targets and Results Target for 2012 Results 2012 DifferenceBromley Results Difference WR & B English Level % 088%+4 English Level 5+ 54%48%-6%44%+4 Reading Level 4+ 93%92%-1%90%+2 Reading Level 5+ 66%64%-2%54%+10 Writing Level 4+ 85%89%+4%84.5%+4.5 Writing Level 5+ 37%33%-4%33.6%-0.6 Maths Level 4+ 90%95%+5%86%+9 Maths Level 5+ 55%64%+9%44%+20 Percentage achieving Level 4+ in both English and maths 87%90%+3%83%+7 Science Level 4+ 93%98%+5%90%+8 Science Level 5+ 68%64%-4%41%+23 Percentage making 2 Nat. CC levels progress in English from KS1 91% APP = Percentage making 2 Nat. CC levels progress in Maths from KS 1 91%95% APP = %13+1.9

Graph comparison Warren road and Bromley

Average Point progress

5 Year trend

Bromley League Tables by percentage out of 64 schools L4 English 22 nd Maths 15 th Science 12 th English and maths 17 th Bromley League Tables by percentage out of 64 schools L5 English 20th Maths 7 th Science 10 th Level 6 maths = Warren Road = 1 st = 25 children.

FFT Significant improvement/decline

Pupil Level FFT.

Showing Intervention Success APS ReadingY2Y5Y6 Y2- Y6 Y5- Y6 Y Y Y Y APS WritingY2Y5Y6 Y2- Y6 Y5- Y6 Y Y Y Y APS MathsY2Y5Y6 Y2- Y6 Y5- Y6 Y Y Y Y APS SciY2Y5Y6 Y2- Y6 Y5- Y6 Y Y Y Y

Gender Differences In writing girls performed above the boys, gaining 93.1% against the boys 85.2% 11 boys didn’t get a level 4 in writing. Of that 11, 2 were statements and 4 were either school action or school action +. 7 boys from that group were only L1 at the end of KS1.

Key Stage 1 Although we experienced a drop in Level 2+ in 2012 our level 3C in Reading, Writing and Maths showed an increase. The drop was cohort led; this year group has the highest percentage (16%) of SEND children throughout the school. Taking these issues into account the Y2 teaching team have managed to sustain a 90%+ overall and should be commended for this. The impact of setting more challenging targets for the most able Y2 pupils is evident in our Level 3C results.

Graph Comparison between Warren Road and Bromley

Gender Differences When comparing results by Pupil Characteristics the gap continues to narrow between the genders. There appears to be a small gap opening between girls and boys in literacy skils although it should be noted that of the SEND children in the cohort 68% are boys, and the gap is not significant, but will be monitored.

Foundation Stage The Foundation Stage Profile results show an increase on previous years. In the Governors 2011 report particular concern was noted about five areas, Dispositions and Attitudes, Reading, Writing, Linking Sounds and Letters, and Physical Development. All areas showed significant improvement. Books began to go home with the Reception children for the first time in the summer term. The children’s progress in Letters & Sounds which was closely monitored and tracked, and there is no doubt that both these had a significant effect on Reading and Writing.

Predictions 2014 Estimate Basis: PA - Rank: 15 - Year: 2013/2014Bromley (305) School DetailsKS2 Estimates Pupil Est % of pupils estimated to achieve KS2 Level School NameGroup Num ber Bas is Ran k Subject EP Warren Road PriAll Pupils119PA15English100.%99.2%94.7%50.1%92.6% Warren Road PriAll Pupils119PA15Reading100.%98.6%94.9%62.4% Warren Road PriAll Pupils119PA15Writing100.%99.4%91.6%37.9% Warren Road PriAll Pupils119PA15Mathematics100.%99.2%93.7%54.9%93.3% Warren Road PriAll Pupils119PA15Science100.%99.7%96.7%59.1% Warren Road PriAll Pupils119PA15 English & Maths 100.%98.9%91.5%39.2%

2012 Results % % Current results Y4 Recommended Past results + top 10% English Level %93% 91%95%90%94% English Level 5+ 48%47% 50%50%48%55% Reading Level 4+ 92%94% 95%92%95% Reading Level 5+ 64%61% 62%52%66% Writing Level 4+ 89% 92%88%92% Writing Level 5+ 33%32% 34%38%25%43% Maths Level 4+ 95%92% 94%92%95% Maths Level 5+ 64%51% 61%55%32%61% Percentage achieving Level 4+ in both English and maths 90%89% 88%92%89%92% Science Level 4+ 98%95% 97%96%97% Science Level 5+ 64%53% 69%59%27%71% (top 5%) Percentage making 2 Nat. CC levels progress in English from KS1 91% APP = % 94%94%92%94% Percentage making 2 Nat. CC levels progress in Maths from KS 1 95% APP = % 92%94%92%94%