© Crown copyright Met Office Stochastic Physics developments for the Met Office ensemble prediction system Richard Swinbank, Warren Tennant, Anne McCabe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent & planned developments to the Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS) Richard Swinbank, Warren Tennant, Sarah Beare,
Advertisements

Ensemble Forecasting of High-Impact Weather Richard Swinbank with thanks to various, mainly Met Office, colleagues High-Impact Weather THORPEX follow-on.
What’s quasi-equilibrium all about?
Some questions on convection that could be addressed through another UK field program centered at Chilbolton Dan Kirshbaum 1.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Operational and research activities at ECMWF now and in the future Sarah Keeley Education Officer.
Training course: boundary layer IV Parametrization above the surface layer (layout) Overview of models Slab (integral) models K-closure model K-profile.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006ESWWIII, Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels, Nov 15 th 2006 Forecasting uncertainty: the ensemble solution Mike Keil, Ken Mylne,
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
CHOICES FOR HURRICANE REGIONAL ENSEMBLE FORECAST (HREF) SYSTEM Zoltan Toth and Isidora Jankov.
Challenges in data assimilation for ‘high resolution’ numerical weather prediction (NWP) Today’s observations + uncertainty information Today’s forecast.
© Crown copyright Met Office GloSea4: the new Met Office Seasonal Forecasting System A. Arribas, M. Glover, D. Peterson, A. Maidens, M. Gordon, C. MacLachlan,
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Introduction to Numerical Weather Prediction and Ensemble Weather Forecasting Tom Hamill NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center Boulder, Colorado USA.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
© Crown copyright Met Office Adaptive mesh method in the Met Office variational data assimilation system Chiara Piccolo and Mike Cullen Adaptive Multiscale.
Operational Global Model Plans John Derber. Timeline July 25, 2013: Completion of phase 1 WCOSS transition August 20, 2013: GDAS/GFS model/analysis upgrade.
SRNWP workshop - Bologne Short range ensemble forecasting at Météo-France status and plans J. Nicolau, Météo-France.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
Page 1© Crown copyright Distribution of water vapour in the turbulent atmosphere Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer & Richard.
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
“Spatial ensemble characterisation for summer convective cases” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini Mesoscale group 03/06/2014.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
“New tools for the evaluation of convective scale ensemble systems” Seonaid Dey Supervisors: Bob Plant, Nigel Roberts and Stefano Migliorini.
“A view of the 2 nd and 3 rd August COPE cases using storm-permitting ensemble MOGREPS-UK” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini COPE.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
Sensitivity Analysis of Mesoscale Forecasts from Large Ensembles of Randomly and Non-Randomly Perturbed Model Runs William Martin November 10, 2005.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Data assimilation, short-term forecast, and forecasting error
For more information about this poster please contact Gerard Devine, School of Earth and Environment, Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT.
© Crown copyright Met Office Data Assimilation Developments at the Met Office Recent operational changes, and plans Andrew Lorenc, DAOS, Montreal, August.
© Crown copyright Met Office Implementation of a new dynamical core in the Met Office Unified Model Andy Brown, Director of Science.
NCEP Models and Ensembles By Richard H. Grumm National Weather Service State College PA and Robert Hart The Pennsylvania State University.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Impact of the backscatter kinetic energy on the perturbation of ensemble members for strong convective event Jakub Guzikowski
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 WP5.3 Assessment of Forecast Quality ENSEMBLES RT4/RT5 Kick Off Meeting, Paris, Feb 2005 Richard Graham.
Production of a multi-model, convective- scale superensemble over western Europe as part of the SESAR project EMS Annual Conference, Sept. 13 th, 2013.
© Crown copyright Met Office Uncertainties in the Development of Climate Scenarios Climate Data Analysis for Crop Modelling workshop Kasetsart University,
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
APR CRM simulations of the development of convection – some sensitivities Jon Petch Richard Forbes Met Office Andy Brown ECMWF October 29 th 2003.
Page 1 Developments in regional DA Oct 2007 © Crown copyright 2007 Mark Naylor, Bruce Macpherson, Richard Renshaw, Gareth Dow Data Assimilation and Ensembles,
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
© Crown copyright Met Office Recent [Global DA] Developments at the Met Office Dale Barker, Weather Science, Met Office THORPEX/DAOS Meeting, 28 June 2011.
Incrementing moisture fields with satellite observations
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Xiujuan Su 1, John Derber 2, Jaime Daniel 3,Andrew Collard 1 1: IMSG, 2: EMC/NWS/NOAA, 3.NESDIS Assimilation of GOES hourly shortwave and visible AMVs.
Current Issues and Challenges in Ensemble Forecasting Junichi Ishida (JMA) and Carolyn Reynolds (NRL) With contributions from WGNE members 31 th WGNE Pretoria,
© Crown copyright Met Office Mismatching Perturbations at the Lateral Boundaries in Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasting Jean-François Caron … or why limited-area.
Characteristics of precipitating convection in the UM at Δx≈200m-2km
Predictability of orographic drag for realistic atmospheric profiles
Met Office Ensemble System Current Status and Plans
Nigel Roberts Met Reading
Case study of an urban heat island in London, UK: Comparison between observations and a high resolution numerical weather prediction model Siân Lane, Janet.
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
COPE: The COnvective Precipitation Experiment. Met Office interests
Mohamed Jardak (presenter), N. E. Bowler, A. M. Clayton, G. W
Science Objectives contained in three categories
Ensemble tropical cyclone and windstorm forecast applications
MOGREPS developments and TIGGE
AGREPS – ACCESS Global and Regional EPS
The Impact of Moist Singular Vectors and Horizontal Resolution on Short-Range Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Weather Events A. Walser1) M.
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office Stochastic Physics developments for the Met Office ensemble prediction system Richard Swinbank, Warren Tennant, Anne McCabe and Claudio Sanchez WWOSC August 2014

© Crown copyright Met Office Contents Introduction to MOGREPS Stochastic Physics in MOGREPS-G Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter MOGREPS-UK developments Revised Random Parameters scheme

© Crown copyright Met Office MOGREPS overview UK 2.2km grid Up to 36hr 03, 09, 15, 21 UTC Global 33km grid Up to 7 days 00, 06, 12, 18 UTC Uncertainties in the prediction are represented using ETKF for (global) initial condition perturbations Stochastic physics 12 members of each ensemble are run every 6 hours Many probabilistic forecast products are based on a lagged pair of ensemble runs (24 members) The Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS) is designed to quantify the risks associated with high- impact weather and uncertainties in details of forecasts.

Stochastic physics schemes used by MOGREPS-G Random Parameters (RP): Knowledge uncertainty in values of physics parameters (entrainment rate, fallspeed, gravity-wave drag coefficient etc) Parameters vary during the forecast to sample uncertainty in the model evolution No convective parameters are currently included Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter (SKEB): Injects wind increments proportional to the SQRT of diagnosed kinetic energy dissipation from semi-lagrangian advection and missing sources from deep convection Plan to include Stochastic Perturbation Tendency (SPT) (replacing RP) and SKEB in future standard Global Atmosphere model physics (GA7). © Crown copyright Met Office

SKEB random forcing pattern and wind increments Power spectrum: g(n)  {20;60} (was {5;60}) Deduced using coarse- graining methodology applied to a cloud- resolving model to give the power in a single mode as  (n) = n This random forcing pattern modulates the diagnosed energy dissipation so energy is injected at selected scales.

© Crown copyright Met Office SKEB Changes in ENDGame ENDGame dynamical core is more active than New Dynamics SKEB energy injection had to be turned down to compensate Energy input wave numbers: > Numerical dissipation component halved

Biharmonic SKEB The current version of SKEB uses a “Smagorinsky” formula to model numerical diffusion. A new version of SKEB uses “biharmonic” diffusion – closer to behaviour of semi-Lagrangian advection. Comparison of Dnum at approx. 10km (1-day average)

Biharmonic SKEB The Smagorinsky version mainly targets jets, but is excessive at high latitudes The Biharmonic version also maximises around jets, but is more evenly distributed with latitude. Comparison of zonal-mean Dnum (3-day average)

© Crown copyright Met Office Surface Perturbations Surface fields in each ensemble member had identical initial conditions, so to improve surface spread we trialled two schemes: SST perturbations are generated with a random pattern of prescribed spatial structure (implemented) SMC perturbations are formed through a simple breeding method (future) Both schemes help to address the under-dispersive T2m forecasts.

MOGREPS-UK MOGREPS-UK is currently just a downscaler of the MOGREPS-G ensemble forecast. Initial & boundary conditions from global forecast. Model physics as 1.5km UKV with no stochastic physics 4 cycles per day, 12 members to T x 4 km 4 x 2.2 km 4 x 4 km 2.2 x 2.2 km Transition zone

Random Parameters in MOGREPS-UK A first step to representing the uncertainties in convective-scale forecasts Motivation: to better represent uncertainties in low cloud and visibility Based on MOGREPS-G version but: Targeting appropriate BL / microphysics parameters, following advice from APP Combining associated parameters so that they vary together. Improved algorithm for time variation of parameters

Random Parameters for MOGREPS-UK SchemeParameterDescriptionRange BL lam_meta Replaces par_mezcla & lambda_min Combines parameters par_mezcla and lambda_min to modify neutral / asymptotic mixing length par_mezcla -> lam_meta par_mezcla lambda_min -> lam_meta lambda_min 0.2 / 1 / 3 BL g0_rp Added to Ri_crit Used to calculate stability functions and critical Richardson number Ri_crit -> 10 Ri_crit / g0_rp 5 / 10 / 40 BLA_1 Added to a_ent_shr Used in entrainment rate calculation and now included in a_ent_shr 0.1 / 0.23 / 0.4 BL charnockSea surface roughness0.01 / / BL g_1Used to calculate cloud top diffusion coefficient0.5 / 0.85 / 1.5 MP m_ciParameter controlling ice-fall speed0.6 / 1 / 1.4 MPRH_critThreshold of relative humidity for cloud formation (level 3) 0.90 / 0.92 / 0.94 MP nd_minDroplet number concentration near the surface20 / 75 / 100 MP x1_rControls shape of rain particle size distribution0.07 / 0.22 / 0.52 MP ec_autoControls auto-conversion of cloud water to rain0.01 / / 0.6

Sensitivity of visibility to parameters Visibility forecasts for 02UTC on 12 th Dec 2012 (data time 00 UTC 11 th Dec) Standard parametersMinimum A_1Minimum nd_min

Time variation of parameters Each parameter value is applied for whole domain, but is varied in time Apply frequent, but small, parameter changes (AR1 process) Range defined by 3 values: minimum, nominal, maximum. Parameters are equally likely to be in each half of the range. Parameters no longer “stick” at min or max values.

Increased variability of fog The new MP and BL parameters lead to a wider range of low-visibility points, compared with no RP scheme. Number of points with visibility < 1km, for each member

Impact on fog probability No RP schemeWith RP scheme Forecast probability of visibility less than 1km Observations

MOGREPS-UK plans Short-term Use UKV analysis combined with perturbations from MOGREPS-G. First phase of stochastic physics – version of “random parameters” scheme suited for MOGREPS-UK. Longer term – (on new HPC) Hourly UK ensemble; combine several runs to make larger lagged ensemble Higher resolution (horizontal and vertical) Convective-scale ensemble data assimilation (needing much larger ensemble for DA cycling). Consider possible KE backscatter scheme for MOGREPS-UK

© Crown copyright Met Office Summary MOGREPS is designed to quantify uncertainties in the forecast – with a focus on the short-range and UK Current MOGREPS-G schemes are Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter & Random Parameters Plan to introduce bi-harmonic SKEB, and include SPT scheme in standard Global Atmosphere Physics A new version of Random Parameters has been developed for MOGREPS-UK, with promising results.

Thank-you any questions…? © Crown copyright Met Office