Public Policy Role in Implementing Intelligent Vehicle Technology Eric Sauck BSE 2009, Mechanical Engineering University of Michigan WISE Intern, SAE International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Definition  Goals  Elements  Roles and Responsibilities  Accomplishments.
Advertisements

1 IntelliDrive SM IntelliDrive SM for Transit 101 ITS America Annual Meeting May 4, 2010 Jeffrey L. Spencer FTA.
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
ITS Joint Program Office 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 24, 2013 Walton Fehr.
FGDC Coordinaton Group Connected Vehicles & Digital Infrastructure Carl K. Andersen U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 21.
THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR John Capp & Bakhtiar Litkouhi IEEE Spectrum May 2014 IS 376 September 4, 2014.
Connected Vehicles: The Future of Transportation Safety and Efficiency.
Digital Map Data from Vehicle Probes
User outreach and eSafety awareness Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications ETSC Conference, Brussels 21 February 2006.
1. Overview Background Introduction to IntelliDrive SM Preliminary Research/Proof of Concept Potential Applications –Safety –Mobility –Commercial The.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. Statewide ITS Program Manager Michigan Department.
Caitlin Motsinger ● Sure Program ● Summer 2007 Advisor: Dr. Todd Hubing ● Graduate Student Assistant: Robert Clippard Clemson University ● Clemson, South.
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Presentation for the ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting May 9,
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
People Saving People Dec. 4, 2000 Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment Louis V. Lombardo Office of Human-Centered Research.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
ITS ePrimer Module 13: Connected Vehicles September 2013 Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
IntelliDrive SM Strategic Plan 2009 Ted Trepanier SSOM – SCOTE Manchester The IntelliDrive SM logo is a service mark of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
ITS Program Update Moving Towards Implementation of Wireless Connectivity in Surface Transportation Talking Freight Webinar January 19, 2011.
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Transportation Working Group ITS Experts Group Busan, South Korea September 2, 2003 Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Role of universities in ITS research January Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
Shelley Row Director, ITS Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Surface Transportation.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Chris Pangilinan, USDOT Research and Innovative Technology Administration Applications for the Environment: Real- Time Information Synthesis (AERIS) State-of-the-Practice.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Drivers’ attitudes towards driver assistance systems presented by Juliane Haupt.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Briefing to OFCM CEISC James Pol USDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office May 17, 2005.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
1 IntelliDrive SM Connectivity − the Future of Surface Transportation June 7, 2010 AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport Kate Hartman Research and Innovative.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
FHWA Perspectives on VII Pat Kennedy Road Weather Management Program Federal Highway Administration VII Weather Applications Workshop II June 21, 2006.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
VII Applications Mike Schagrin, VII Applications Manager ITS Joint Program Office Research & Innovative Technology Administration USDOT Mike Schagrin,
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
DriveSense’14 NSF Workshop on Large-Scale Traffic and Driving Activity Data DriveSense’14, Oct 30-31, Norfolk, VA.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives Safety Summit Lansing, MI February 28, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger ITS Program Manager Michigan Department of Transportation.
2005 ITS Georgia Annual Meeting 1 MDOT VII Vision and Test Bed Plan States and OEM’s Working Together Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. MDOT ITS Program Manager.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
2 ITS Facts and Figures Founded in 1948 by the California state legislature in response to the deferred maintenance of transportation facilities during.
Connected Vehicles Workforce FHWA Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
VII Applications Mike Schagrin, VII Applications Manager ITS Joint Program Office Research & Innovative Technology Administration USDOT Mike Schagrin,
Self-driving cars Connelly Barnes CS 6501 – Large-scale data-driven graphics and vision.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Traveler Information Applications: How Can VII Improve the Quality of Travel? TRB Session 644: Using VII Data, Part 1 Ben McKeever, US DOT, ITS Joint Program.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
Digital Highway Measurement System Qatar Ministry of Transportation August 15, 2007 Dr. Kunik Lee Chief Safety Scientist, Office of Safety R&D TFHRC, FHWA,
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
ITS: The Next Generation Shelley Row Director Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
ESafety WG “Digital Maps” Ad Bastiaansen (Tele Atlas) - Chair Yiannis Moissidis (NAVTEQ) - Co-Chair The 4 th Plenary Session of eSafety Forum Thursday,
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment
DIRECTOR, ROAD SAFETY ANALYSIS
Road Safety Behaviour Symposium: New technology, new connectivity
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
Connected Vehicle/Infrastructure UTC Tier 1 Center
Presentation transcript:

Public Policy Role in Implementing Intelligent Vehicle Technology Eric Sauck BSE 2009, Mechanical Engineering University of Michigan WISE Intern, SAE International 6 August 2008

Overview Definition of technologies Definition of technologies Motivation Motivation Capability of technologies Capability of technologies Government role Government role Recommendations Recommendations

Intelligent Vehicle Technology? Wikipedia definition: “electronic, electromechanical, and electromagnetic devices - usually silicon micromachined components operating in conjunction with computer controlled devices and radio transceivers to provide precision repeatability functions” Non-traditional features that enhance SAFETY SAFETY MOBILITY MOBILITY COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS NOT YET!

Motivation Traffic deaths Traffic deaths 42,000 per year 42,000 per year Cost $236B in 2000 Cost $236B in 2000 Traffic jams Traffic jams +3% lane-miles, +21% VMT from % lane-miles, +21% VMT from $78B in 2005 (4.2B hours, 2.9B gallons) $78B in 2005 (4.2B hours, 2.9B gallons) Environmental impact Environmental impact Efficient driving at MPH Efficient driving at MPH Jams unnecessarily burn fuel Jams unnecessarily burn fuel Sources: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Texas Transportation Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

In other words… 88 jumbo jets of people gone every year

In other words… #1 cause of death for ages 2-34 in 2004 #1 cause of death for ages 2-34 in 2004 Total cost is equivalent to $1000 per man, woman, and child in the U.S. every year Total cost is equivalent to $1000 per man, woman, and child in the U.S. every year Source: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration

1. Driver aids warn or intervene Based on own vehicle’s sensors Based on own vehicle’s sensors Current Intelligent Vehicle Tech

Sources: Volvo, Citroën, Popular Science, Toyota, Wards Autoworld Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Blind Spot Warning (BSW) Lane Departure Warning (LDW) Lane Keep Assist (LKA) Parking Assist Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

1. Driver aids 2. V2V makes vehicle “aware” Based on other vehicles’ actions Based on other vehicles’ actions IEEE p IEEE p ACC + V2V = Cooperative ACC ACC + V2V = Cooperative ACC With 100% CACC, roads can handle 2x the traffic With 100% CACC, roads can handle 2x the traffic Near-term Intelligent Vehicle Tech Source: California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways – UC Berkeley

1. Driver aids 2. V2V 3. VII adds more capability Adds roadside equipment Adds roadside equipment Warnings: red-light, collision, overspeed Warnings: red-light, collision, overspeed Re-routing: weather, traffic, emergencies Re-routing: weather, traffic, emergencies On-board connectivity On-board connectivity Management and tolling Management and tolling Long-term Intelligent Vehicle Tech

What accidents can be affected? Related factor and percent in fatal accidents Current Driver aid + V2V+ VII Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road: 28.5% LDW, LKA Driving too fast for conditions or speeding or racing: 21.3% Under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or medication: 12.7% Inattentive (talking, eating, etc.): 7.9% LDW, FCW Failure to yield right of way: 7.3% BSW Overcorrecting/oversteering: 4.6% (ESC) Failure to obey traffic signs, signals, or officer: 4.2% Swerving due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle/object/person: 3.7% Driving in erratic, reckless, careless, or negligent manner: 3.6% Vision obscured (rain, snow, glare, lights, building, trees, etc.): 2.7% ACC Source: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration

Technical and Human Challenges Technical Technical Develop efficient algorithms Develop efficient algorithms Bring down cost of accurate sensors Bring down cost of accurate sensors Human Human Driver role vs. vehicle role - work in parallel Driver role vs. vehicle role - work in parallel Educate drivers as technology evolves Educate drivers as technology evolves

Government Players Dept. of Transportation Dept. of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Dept. of Defense Dept. of Defense Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Dept. of Commerce Dept. of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) State DOTs State DOTs Local road commissions Local road commissions

Government Involved in Development Research Research Prize competitions Prize competitions Technology transfer Technology transfer Pilot projects Pilot projects Incentives for deployment Incentives for deployment

Federal Highway Administration Federal Highway Administration Researching in-vehicle vs. out-of-vehicle warnings Researching in-vehicle vs. out-of-vehicle warnings Research and Innovative Technology Administration Research and Innovative Technology Administration Grants to University Transportation Centers: $76.7M/yr Grants to University Transportation Centers: $76.7M/yr Research Research ›› Prize Competitions ›› Tech Transfer ›› Pilot Projects ›› Incentives for Deployment

Prize Competitions Research ›› Prize Competitions ›› Tech Transfer Pilot Projects ›› Incentives for Deployment DARPA Urban Challenge DARPA Urban Challenge 60 miles, 6 hours, no driver Mock-urban environment Win-win for military, industry, academia Source: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Capabilities are evolving 2004 (142-mile desert) → 0 of 15 finalists finished 2005 (132-mile desert) → 4 of 23 finalists finished 2007 (60-mile urban) → 6 of 11 finalists finished Source: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Tech Transfer Research ›› Prize Competitions ›› Tech Transfer ›› Pilot Projects ›› Incentives for Deployment Intelligent Vehicle Technology Transfer Sponsored by Depts. of Defense, Transportation, Commerce Sponsored by Depts. of Defense, Transportation, Commerce Third IVTT in February 2008 Third IVTT in February presentations 20 presentations Networking, plenary, tour of NIST Autonomous Intelligent Vehicle Laboratory Networking, plenary, tour of NIST Autonomous Intelligent Vehicle Laboratory

Pilot Projects Research ›› Prize Competitions ›› Tech Transfer ›› Pilot Projects ›› Incentives for Deployment Phase I: Proof-of-Concept Test (11/2006 to 7/2008) Phase I: Proof-of-Concept Test (11/2006 to 7/2008) Detroit, Michigan - 57 sites VII equipped Detroit, Michigan - 57 sites VII equipped Palo Alto, California - 40 sites VII equipped Palo Alto, California - 40 sites VII equipped Phase II: Field Test (12/2007 to 12/2009) Phase II: Field Test (12/2007 to 12/2009) Other tests in 14 states and 10+ countries Other tests in 14 states and 10+ countries Sources: VII Coalition, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 16 10

Incentives for Deployment Research ›› Prize Competitions ›› Tech Transfer ›› Pilot Projects ›› Incentives for Deployment Future options for federal government: Incentives for consumer Incentives for consumer Retrofit existing vehicles Retrofit existing vehicles New vehicle options New vehicle options NHTSA star ratings NHTSA star ratings Incentives for state and local governments Incentives for state and local governments FHWA bonus or penalties FHWA bonus or penalties Interstate tolling Interstate tolling

Challenges to come Involving the automotive aftermarket Involving the automotive aftermarket Funding through public/private partnerships Funding through public/private partnerships Safeguarding privacy Safeguarding privacy

Conclusion Safety, Congestion, Efficiency = national priorities Safety, Congestion, Efficiency = national priorities All levels of government and auto manufacturers are sponsoring IV research All levels of government and auto manufacturers are sponsoring IV research Federal government should consider to Federal government should consider to Update NHTSA safety ratings for preventive safety Update NHTSA safety ratings for preventive safety Subsidize vehicle aids and V2V, as in Digital TV transition Subsidize vehicle aids and V2V, as in Digital TV transition Encourage states to adopt unified VII through FHWA Encourage states to adopt unified VII through FHWA Pressure states to reinvest toll funds into highways Pressure states to reinvest toll funds into highways

Questions?