What are the economic influences that large wildlife mammal management activities have on local communities?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

Aspen Falls Park Development Land Acquisition for Parks One Minute to Start.
Chesapeake Bay Commission Meeting November 8, 2012 Vienna Community Center Protecting the Nanticoke River: Saving the Landscape Tim Brower Land Acquisition.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Clean Water Fund Interagency Leadership and Coordination Rebecca Flood MPCA Assistant Commissioner MN Water Resources ConferenceOctober 20, 2010.
WMA and AMA Programs Implementation of Public Land Development Programs Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Dennis Simon, DNR Wildlife Management Chief January.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Farmland Preservation is essential to our Polk County lifestyle.
Minnesota Prairie Plan Working Group June 14, 2011
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
Statewide Resource and Species Plans Guide for Restoring, Protecting, and Enhancing Wetlands, Prairies, Forests, and Game, Fish, and Wildlife Habitat -
Wisconsin’s Grassland Program Priorities Restoring prairie and oak savanna remnant plant communities Plant native grasslands to benefit grassland.
Utah’s Blue Ribbon Fisheries An overview Craig Walker Special Projects Coordinator Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
Statewide Resource and Species Plans Guide for Restoring, Protecting, and Enhancing Wetlands, Prairies, Forests, and Game, Fish and Wildlife Habitat -
2014 Federal Farm Bill Overview 3/14/14. Conservation Compliance 2 “Recoupling” federal crop insurance premium support benefits to HEL and wetland conservation.
National, State and Local Funding Sources for Conservation Easements Montana Association of Land Trusts Montana Conservation Easement Conference for Financial,
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Conversion of Pine Lands to Irrigated Row Crops; Who Would Have Guessed? Large losses of native and grassland habitats across the state has received a.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Protecting Pinelands Sands Forest and Aquatic Habitats A landscape scale approach to habitat protection Thank you Mr. Chair: For the record, I am Richard.
The Georgia Land Conservation Program glcp.org Preserving our natural resources for generations of Georgians to come.
Palmetto-Peartree Preserve: Community Forestry in Eastern North Carolina Community-Owned Forests Conference Missoula, MT June 16-19, 2005 Mikki Sager,
Georgia Land Conservation Program Carl Vinson Institute of Government Community Rating System (CRS) Workshop Savannah, GA Michael Roberts August 28, 2014.
Board of Water and Soil Resources Senate Environment, Economic Development and Agriculture Division Sarah Strommen, Assistant Director John Jaschke, Executive.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Land & Water Conservation Fund Reauthorization Working Group Thursday March 13, 2014.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
The Nooksack Watershed Flying for Fish Habitat Tours December 2007.
Public Funding sources in MT State Funding Sources 3 Partnerships Examples.
State Wildlife Action Plans
National Wildlife Refuges in Mississippi face an immediate $69.3 million budget shortfall Mississippi is home to 15 national wildlife refuges encompassing.
History of Wildlife Conservation. First practiced in England during the Middle Ages Ignored by European settlers to the United States due to the abundance.
Minnesota Buffers Initiative September 16, 2015 Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources John Jaschke, BWSR Executive Director Sarah Strommen,
MICHIGAN’S COASTAL AND ESTUARINE LAND CONSERVATION PROGRAM (CELCP) Alisa Gonzales-Pennington Matt Warner Michigan Coastal Management Program Environmental.
1 Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG) A Program that works to: – Streamline assistance and $$ to landowners – Coordinate activities of federal and state.
MARYLAND’S SMART GROWTH and LAND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS/PARTNERSHIPS State of Maryland Parris N. Glendening, Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Lt. Governor.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
THE ADMINISTRATION OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Wildlife Management Unit 1 Part 2.
Mission Statements of Some Federal Land Management Agencies U.S. Forest Service The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity.
Wetland Wetland San Francisco Bay & Delta San Francisco Bay & Delta Wetland Wetland Steven Ortiz Per.1.
 Forestry is Georgia’s second largest industry. ◦ Forest products are the number one export for Georgia. ◦ Forestry employees at least 120,000 Georgians.
1 Food, Conservation and Energy Act of Information on NRCS Conservation Programs EQIP-Environmental Quality Incentives Program WHIP-Wildlife Habitat.
The only National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) located solely within the State of Kentucky faces a budget shortfall of $1.5 million. Clarks River NWR was established.
National Wildlife Refuges in Tennessee face a $57 million budget shortfall Tennessee is home to 7 national wildlife refuges encompassing 120,400 acres.
Natural Resources Working For Wildlife Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Watershed Protection Land Trust Partnerships to Meet Your Goals.
+ Funding Fish and Wildlife Conservation - Implications for Recreational Uses of DNRE Lands 12/1/2010 MSTAC and ETS Meeting.
Building the Future Of Waterfowl Together. What Is It? The Michigan Waterfowl Legacy (MWL) is a cooperative partnership to restore, conserve, and celebrate.
Mississippi Headwaters Board Land Protection Process Mississippi River Protection Through Partnership.
Building the Future Of Waterfowl Together. What Is It? The Michigan Waterfowl Legacy (MWL) is a cooperative partnership to restore, conserve, and celebrate.
2013 Legislative Briefs. African Heritage Arts and Culture in the State of Minnesota The Council on Black Minnesotans wants recommendations on how to.
Natural Resources: An economic driver Jon Spieles, Acting UP Regional Coordinator.
Success of Flathead River to Lake Initiative. Non-profit organization implementing land conservation to protect the Flathead Valley’s natural beauty,
Art. X, Section 28, Fla. Const. Amendment I 2015 Cari L. Roth, Esq. July 20, 2016.
NO NET LOSS of PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS in FLORIDA June 2008 Update.
State Funding for Conservation Lands
State Funding for Conservation Lands
2001 Foothills Levy Protect public open space through acquisition, donation, conservation easement, or land exchange 59% of voters approved $10 million.
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Patti Cale-Finnegan, Iowa Department
H U N T I N G W O R K S F O R A R I Z O N A
The Land and Water Conservation Fund What is Happening, Why It Matters, and What Land Trusts Can Do To Help Presented By: Graham Chisholm, Conservation.
Water Supply and Water Quality Act of 2018
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
IMPLEMENTING AMENDMENT 1
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) &
Mississippi Headwaters
Government Conservation Programs
Presentation transcript:

What are the economic influences that large wildlife mammal management activities have on local communities?

What is the economic value of Livestock Economic Value – The dollar amount that the public is willing to pay for a good or service rather than be without it. Willingness to pay Based on wants and preferences Assumes that preferences can be expressed in monetary terms

What are ways large mammal wildlife contribute to the economy of local communities and to the state of Minnesota? 477,000 people hunt in Minnesota Hunting generates $417 million in salaries and wages Yearly spending by hunters in Minnesota is $733 million The average Minnesota Hunter spends $1,500 each year

AMERICA’S 13.7 MILLION HUNTERS COULD FILL EVERY NASCAR TRACK 5½ TIMES.

Hunters spent 38.3 Billion in 2011 Hunters spending Amazon.com revenue USFWS reported 13.7 million people (16 & over) went hunting in 2011 and spent $2,800 per hunter; which created 680,300 jobs and $11.8 billion generated in taxes

Hunters have provided Since $7.2 to state conservation efforts through excise tax on guns and ammunition $796 million on licenses each year $1.6 billion donated to conservation and sportsman's organizations

States Ranked by number of resident hunters

What are the five funding sources that contribute dollars in Minnesota? Reinvest in Minnesota Game and Fish Fund Lottery Legacy Funding Wildlife Sports clubs/organizations

Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) A Conservation program that protects and restores the health of Minnesota’s natural resources Started in 1986 Compensates landowners for placing a permanent easement on land

RIM Since 1986 over $200 million in state funding has resulted in 5,500 permanent easements protecting 230,000 acres Keeps private land in private ownership and on tax rolls

RIM Funding From 1. Clean Water Funds 2. Outdoor heritage Funds 3. Bonding by the State Legislature 4. Leveraged $90 million in Federal Funds

Administered by County SWCDs and NCRS Funding impacts: Water Quality- Decrease erosion and sedimentation Wildlife – Restore habitat Rare Species & Habitat – protects Soil – replants and protects drained farmland and wells Fishing – prevents erosion from flowing into lakes and streams Wetlands – pays owners to restore previous previously drained wetlands Flooding – reduces Contributes to job creation and local economies

Game and Fish Fund Largest source of funding for Minnesota DNR The revenue is primarily the product of hunting and fishing license sales, federal reimbursements and a sales tax on state lottery tickets Established in 1927 to ensure that hunting and fishing license fees would be used for conservation

Sources of Funding

Game and Fish Funds Uses Minnesota now has 1,440 public wildlife areas with 1.29 million acres of habitat, from prairies and wetlands to forests and swamps, for Minnesota's wildlife species MDHA partnering with Legacy Grant Program to establish this WMA Development of Wildlife Management Areas

Game and Fish Funds Uses Hunting and trapping regulations and research Promotion of wildlife habitat protection Endangered species management Non-game program Scientific & Natural areas protection Natural heritage program Promotion of Wildlife Habitat

Minnesota Lottery Funding Approximately.07 cents of every dollar spent on the lottery goes to the environment Natural Resources Trust Fund. Established by voter approval of a constitutional amendment in 1988

Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) The LCCMR is made up of 17 members: 5 Senators, 5 Representatives, 5 citizens appointed by the governor, 1 citizen appointed by the Senate, and 1 citizen appointed by the House. The function of the LCCMR is to make funding recommendations to the legislature for special environment and natural resource projects, Since 1963, over $735 million has been appropriated to more than 1,700 projects recommended to the legislature by the Commission to protect and enhance Minnesota's environment and natural resources.

2013 Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Appropriations The LCCMR selected 46 proposals to be recommended to the 2013 MN Legislature to collectively receive $38.2 million in funding from the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund.46 proposals The Legislature adopted all 46 of these project recommendations and added one additional project. All 47 appropriations were signed into law by the Governor on 05/09/13.

Where do the LCMR Funds Go?

Minnesota Legacy Amendment On Nov. 4, 2008, Minnesota voters approved a proposed Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment which added 3/8 of 1 % onto the Minnesota Sales Tax with the proceeds going to:

Amendment dollars

Funding through 2013

Constitutional Legacy Funding for clean water activities The Legislature appropriated $ million of Clean Water Funds for water activities during fiscal years

Example of a Legacy Funded Project MN Forests for the Future / Upper Mississippi Project The Upper Mississippi Forest Project is the largest conservation project ever undertaken by the state of Minnesota. It protects more than 187,876 acres of Northwood's forests, wetlands and shoreline in the Grand Rapids area North- central Minnesota

Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Funds Council makes recommendations to Legislature who finalizes the funded projects Former Minnesota Senator Bob Lessard with Bud Grant promoting the Amendment Funs to be used for the restoration, protection, and enhancement of wetlands, prairies, forests, and habitat for fish, game, and wildlife, and that prevent forest fragmentation, encourage forest consolidation, and expand restored native prairie

Lessards-Sams Heritage Council Minnesota Law specifies, “The council shall use the regions of the state based upon the ecological regions and subregions developed by the Department of Natural Resources and establish objectives for each region and sub-region to achieve the purposes of the fund outlined in the state constitution”

Priority Actions for the Northern Forest Section 1. Protect shoreland and restore or enhance critical habitat on wild rice lakes, shallow lakes, cold water lakes, streams and rivers, and spawning areas. 2. Protect forest land though acquisition or easement, to prevent parcelization and fragmentation and to provide the ability to access and manage landlocked public properties. 3. Restore and enhance habitat on existing protected properties, with preference to habitatfor rare, endangered or threatened species identified by the Minnesota County Biological Survey. 4. Restore forest-based wildlife habitat that has experienced substantial decline in aerial extent in recent decades.

Priority Actions for the Forest/Prairie Transition Section 1. Protect, enhance and restore wild rice wetlands, shallow lakes, wetland/grassland complexes, aspen parklands, and shoreland that provide critical habitat for game and non-game wildlife. 2. Protect, enhance and restore rare native remnant prairie. 3. Protect, enhance and restore migratory habitat for waterfowl and related species, so as to increase migratory and breeding success.

Priority Actions for the Metropolitan Urbanizing Area 1. Protect, enhance and restore remnant native prairie, Big Woods forests and oak savanna with an emphasis on areas with high biological diversity. 2. Protect habitat corridors, with emphasis on the Minnesota, Mississippi and St. Croix rivers (bluff to floodplain.) 3. Enhance and restore coldwater fisheries systems. 4. Protect, enhance and restore riparian and littoral habitats on lakes to benefit game and non- game fish species.

Priority Actions for the Southeast Forest Section 1. Protect forest habitat though acquisition in fee or easement, to prevent parcelization and fragmentation and to provide the ability to access and manage landlocked public properties. 2. Protect, enhance and restore habitat for fish, game and non-game wildlife in rivers, cold water streams and associated upland habitat. 3. Protect, enhance and restore remnant goat prairies. 4. Restore forest-based wildlife habitat that has experienced substantial decline in aerial extent in recent decades.

Priority Actions for the Prairie Section 1. Protect, enhance, or restore existing wetland/upland complexes, or convert agricultural lands to new wetland/upland habitat complexes. 2. Protect, enhance and restore remnant native prairie, Big Woods forests and oak savanna. 3. Convert agricultural land to wetland/upland to protect, enhance, or restore existing habitat complexes, such as existing WMA’s. 4. Restore or enhance habitat on public lands. 5. Protect, restore and enhance shallow lakes. 6. Protect expiring Conservations Reserve Program (CRP) lands. 7. Protect, enhance and restore migratory habitat for waterfowl and related species, so as to increase migratory and breeding success.

Clean Water Fund Those funds may only be spent to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams and to protect groundwater from degradation. At least five percent of the clean water fund must be spent to protect drinking water sources.

Clean Water Fund Those funds may only be spent to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams and to protect groundwater from degradation. At least five percent of the clean water fund must be spent to protect drinking water sources.