Law, Societies and Justice 332 May 22, 2007 Group Two April Monastrial Carolyn Thayer Corrina Emerick James Malone Leisl Bauman Megan Hanse Kane Hall Architectural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Considerations for Special Needs Users Universal Design.
Advertisements

Architecture CAD living sleeping service SPACE PLANNING
Supporting Aging adults with Developmental Disabilities Home Adaptations.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION Ronald L. Lynn, Director/Building Official Gregory J. Franklin, Assistant Director Neil Burning, Manager.
Building CODES Arch 3011 Design Studio 1 Prof. Sargent Architecture Southern Polytechnic State University.
Proposed Changes to the ADA & ABA Accessibility Guidelines This presentation was prepared by the U.S. Access Board for the ADA Distance Learning 2000 program.
Architecture Hall Assessed By: Jillian Petrin, Julia Terlinchamp, Gabriel Wan, Brian King, & Amelia Albert.
ACCESSIBILITY: A CODE COMPLIANCE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT AND SURVEY OF THE LIMERICK TOWN HALL MAIN STREET LIMERICK, ME ttl-Architects LLC 28.
Accessibility.  A building code is a set of rules that specify the minimum acceptable level of safety for buildings. The main purpose of building codes.
10-Point Facility Accessibility Check List. Overview 10-Point Accessibility Check List Overview of how welcoming your facility/site is to a variety of.
Visitability Standards Dan McNabb, Deputy Building Official Planning and Development Review Department.
Proposed Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Scott J. Windley Accessibility Specialist US Access Board.
Hutchinson Hall Presented by: Amy Paek Seth Leavitt Tiffany Ng Taryn Feenstra Jeanne Foy.
Blue Prints.
Eileen Leblanc, Kim Morrissey, Leah Nyberg, Michael Wright, Chris Varney OCT 622 Salem State University.
Proposed Alternative to the Curved Wall Concept Friends of the Orange Depot By J David Derosier 1.
Director of Buildings' Office Slide no.1 January 2010 Trinity College Universal Design Issues Access 2010 Cobble Reduction Access to Historic (Protected)
PERFORMANCE & CODE ANALYSIS TIMBer Inc. ·Brooke Fedder · Marie Rottschaeffer· Izzie Molinuevo· Tena Pettit·
Building Codes and Interior Design
1 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center ADA Upgrade Overview.
1/05 Means of Egress WAC School Safety Training.
ENJOY Click here to begin Good Day! This is your 30-Second Training: ACCESS SERIES.
Safety Training Presentation
Means of Egress Chapter 4.
1. 2  Place sharp objects away from the edge of workstation surface area  Store pencils flat  Use staple remover--not finger nails  Don’t eat or drink.
SCHOOLS-II PRESENTED BY: PEARL SIDHU G.P.C.G. PATIALA.
Printed by Making Salem State University South Campus Accessible to All OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY DEPARTMENT The occupational therapy.
Tourist attractions and accessible space. Key elements of tourism space Tourist attractions and outdoor space (hotels, restaurants, tourism information.
Accessible Student Services Rights, responsibilities, and needs of students with disabilities Campus rights and responsibilities for ensuring equal opportunities.
12/14/2011AEG Associates for the LTC Discussion Group  Presentation by Albert E. Graf, AIA AEG Associates, Annapolis, MD Building a Home Considering Universal.
Revised Edition 2005 A Guide to the Accessibility of Buildings and Sites with References to ADAAG A PowerPoint Overview of.
Objective 1.03: Explain ways to adapt housing to meet special needs.
Cherry Engineering Support Services, Inc. (CESSI) A Private Employer’s Perspective on Workplace Accommodations.
TaxAccess Making VITA Sites Accessible to Persons with Disabilities.
Access and Accommodation Audio Conference Series Session II Sponsored by: Law, Health Policy & Disability Center University of Iowa, College of Law In.
Director of Buildings' Office Slide no.1 April 03-June06 Trinity College Universal Design Issues Access Cobble Reduction Access to Historic (Protected)
Wide Open Spaces: Accessible Conference and Meeting Spaces for All Presenters: Meredith Aalto & Mat McCollough National Service Inclusion Project 6 September.
Objective 1.03: Explain ways to adapt housing to meet special needs.
Objective 1.03: Explain ways to adapt housing to meet special needs.
Maine State Fire Marshals Office1 Laws and Codes Relating to Existing Apartment occupancies in the State of Maine Mark Stevens CFI-II, CFPS, CFPE Inspections.
Chapter 2 Special Considerations in Design Special Populations The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Landmark Civil Rights case that represents.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH Do you remember those school fire drills ? Well, here you go again !
Toilet design Many different regulations 1. guess what toilet features might be regulated? building code? accessibility code? universal design?
Means of Egress Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
Fundamentals of Accessibility AIA Connecticut Presented by.
8 Planning the Sleeping Area Chapter. Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Objectives Discuss factors.
 Do you know the number of people with disabilities in China?  What should our society do to help them to live a meaningful life? over60 million persons.
New Construction and Alterations in Title III 1 ADA Trainer Network Module 6d Trainer’s Name Trainer’s Title Phone /Website.
NJLA Conference – May 16, 2016 Cindy Czesak, Library Director Paterson Free Public Library.
How easy is your building to use?
Accessible Environment
COMMUNITY ACCESS MONITOR TRAINING
Montana Emergency Shelters Workshop
Sleeping Area and Bath Facilities
Wilson Hall Fire Protection Features
POLLING PLACE ACCESSIBILITY
Juvenile Justice Center 1200 Congress
Concord, New Hampshire September 2, 2010
Seattle Public Library
Campus Ministry Accessibility
Hitchcock architectural barriers: Part 1
Architectural Drawing
ACCESSIBLE SPECIAL EVENTS...YOU GOT THIS?
Brandeis Hall Cafeteria: An Architectural Barrier Assessment
Hannah Ehresman, Kelsey Russell, Kaitlyn Higgins, Lynette Akai
How easy is your building to use?
Criminal Justice Center 1201 Franklin
Art Building Assessment
Keeping Campus Events Accessible: It’s about Inclusion
Odegaard Undergraduate Library:
Presentation transcript:

Law, Societies and Justice 332 May 22, 2007 Group Two April Monastrial Carolyn Thayer Corrina Emerick James Malone Leisl Bauman Megan Hanse Kane Hall Architectural Accessibility Survey

Kane Hall Overview Kane Hall is a classroom-auditorium building Kane Hall was built in 1971 Kane Hall has the largest lecture halls on the UW campus; some rooms can seat more than 720 people In addition to classrooms, Kane Hall also houses the Walker-Ames Reception Room for large gatherings Kane Hall also houses a number of departments: -Classroom Support Services (CSS) -UWTV

Kane Hall is intended for large classes, lectures, gatherings and receptions Many entry-level undergraduate courses are held in Kane Hall Kane Hall houses both UW and non-UW activities, such as SAT testing and outside conferences Kane Overview, Cont.

Kane Hall Location Kane Hall is located in the “North Central” area Kane Hall sits at the northeast end of Red Square Kane Hall is above the Central Plaza parking garage and is relatively close to 15th avenue

Kane Hall Classroom Overview The following table shows the size of each classroom in Kane Hall. This does not include the Walker-Ames room or any other rooms. LevelRoomSeats

Kane Hall Accessibility Survey Our survey of Kane Hall is founded on the “Facility Checklist” worksheet Survey took place on May 1, 2007 Survey was conducted during normal building hours between 14:00-16:00 Questions on ADA building practices were addressed by referencing a professional interior designer and an ADA text

Kane Hall Accessibility Overview Kane Hall meets most though not all ADA requirements Most requirements are met at minimum level For such a large and central building, Kane is not nearly accessible enough Remodeling projects in Kane have failed to rectify many major problems Many problems are not necessarily specific to Kane Hall

Cultural Construction of Disability through Kane Hall Kane Hall is created with able-bodies individuals in mind; persons with disabilities have been “retrofitted” into the building as needed As Mutua observes, accessibility and spontaneity are almost inversely related; in Kane Hall one must follow a very rigid and set path Therefore, we must question why Kane is constructed in such a way - surely it seems not to be out of consideration for individuals with disabilities Most accessible areas are in the basement of Kane Hall; this puts individuals with disabilities outside of the public sphere into a less visited place Accessibility features and devices are often camouflaged which makes them harder to see as distinct from the environment If disability is culturally constructed, what can we say about only doing the bare minimum as required by law?

Approach and Entrance to Kane Hall

NOT stable, firm and slip- resistant Route of travel

Too long, poorly designed Ramps

Sign for Kane Hall is poorly placed and designed Kane Hall Signs

Cuts are poorly placed Curbs

Unclear, possibly dangerous Parking and Drop-Off

Van-accessible spots not marked well, confusing signs Parking and Drop-Off, Cont.

Loading dock a possibility; poorly marked, shady Parking and Drop-Off, Cont.

Some inaccessible doors have no signs Entrance

Some entrances are poorly designed and lit Entrance, Cont.

Lacks needed information, flat print text only Accessibility Sign

Most entry doors, when open, are 31” wide; poor signs; likely take more than 5lb/f to open Entry Doors

Some alarms do not have light indicators; very poor switch placement Emergency Egress

Signs are poorly designed; no raised text Emergency Signs

Access to Programs/Services in Kane Hall

Door pulls likely require > 9lb/f and are hard to open with closed fist Doors to rooms

Some objects protrude into the route of travel; hard to find with cane Obstacles in Route of Travel

Poor design and placement Signs

Poor design and placement Signs, Cont.

Wheelchair seating at front and back only Seating

Wheelchair spaces are filled with other chairs Seating, Cont.

Freight elevator, usably by public, does not have tones or braille controls Elevators

All elevators do not have speech- independent emergency intercoms installed; poor signs Elevators, Cont.

Usability of Restrooms in Kane Hall

Not tactile; poor placement Bathroom Signs

Awkward configuration and poor placement frustrate Entry Into Bathroom

Very poor door placement; it is only 34.5” wide Path to Fixtures

Poor design complicates sink use Fixture Placement

Rim too high, not enough clear space to floors Lavatories (not pictured - people were becoming cross)

Additional Access in Kane Hall

Spout too high at 43” & poor choice (in remodeled area) Drinking Fountains

Very poor spacing; too high (57”); no signs for phones Telephones

Poor placement in many areas Trash Receptacles

Missing; hope you do not need it Fire Suppression Equipment

Questions