Evaluation of the absolute emission probability of 1077 keV  -ray for 68 Ga Huang Xiaolong 2013 ， 6 China Nuclear Data Center China Institute of Atomic.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Determination of experimental cross-sections by activation method

Advertisements

Measurement of 40 Ar(n,p) reaction and neutron capture on 40 Ar and 136 Xe TUNL and Duke Univ. Megha Bhike and Werner Tornow Duke University and Triangle.

 -Ray Emission Probabilities Edgardo Browne Decay Data Evaluation Project Workshop May 12 – 14, 2008 Bucharest, Romania.

Contributions to Nuclear Data by Radiochemistry Division, BARC

PIGE experience in IPPE Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia A.F. Gurbich.

The 12C+12C fusion reaction: a new opportunity at ATLAS Xiaodong Tang 1 & Chenglie Jiang 2 1) Univ. of Notre Dame 2) ANL.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy ENSDF Analysis and Utility Codes Presentation for the ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Structure and.

Types of Radiation and Unstable Nuclei. I. Chemical and Nuclear Reactions Chemical reactions only involve an atom’s electrons Nuclear reactions involve.

Experimental Determination of Neutron Cross Sections of Yttrium by Activation Method by Barbara Geier Supervisors: Assoc. Prof Dr. Wolfgang Sprengel RNDr.

Evaluation the relative emission probabilities for 56 Co and 66 Ga Yu Weixiang Lu Hanlin Huang Xiaolong China Nuclear Data Center China Institute of Atomic.

Radiation occurs in nature…the earth is ‘bathed’ in radiation from a variety of sources. Humans have evolved with these levels of radiation in the environment.

1Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel Decay data evaluation of Radium – 226 and its daughters V. Chisté, M. M. Bé, C. Dulieu.

Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Decay

Status Report of the Nuclear Structure and Decay Data evaluation activities at the Australian National University ( ) T. Kibèdi Tibor Kibèdi, Dep.

Joint IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies Student’s presentation Calculation of correction factors for neutron.

Jag Tuli NSDD, Vienna, 4/2015 ENSDF Policies 4/15 Jagdish Tuli* National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory * Brookhaven.

Data processing in the Activation technique experiment. Making stacked or sandwiched in the repeated order of Al-Cu-Mo. Irradiation of the samples Using.

Page 1 Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions studied by activation method Anne Larédo Supervisor: Dr. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear Physics Institute,

A=193 Mass Chain evaluation: A summary IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Structure and Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation, Trieste, Italy November

WHAT VALUES ARE BEST RECOMMENDED FOR ALPHA- AND GAMMA- ENERGIES IN DECAYS OF ACTINIDES? Valery Chechev V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, Saint Petersburg,

Experimental determination of (n,x) cross sections on germanium (Ge), terbium (Tb) and lutetium (Lu) Dzysiuk Nataliya and Kadenko Igor Taras Shevchenko.

Nuclear Chemistry “Bravo” Test 1954 – 15,000 kilotons.

139 Ba decay: precise half-life measurement and gamma-spectroscopy at BARC: an offshoot of ENSDF evaluation work. P.K.Joshi Homi Bhabha Centre for Science.

High-spin structures in the 159 Lu nucleus Jilin University, China Institute of Atomic Energy 李聪博 The 13th National Nuclear Structure Conference of China.

JAVA-GAMUT and V.AveLib Update Michael Birch – Presented by Balraj Singh McMaster University, Canada IAEA-NSDD Meeting, Vienna April 20-24, 2015.

Evaluating multipole mixing ratio from conversion electron data Tibor Kibèdi Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National University 28-Apr-2015,

Incomplete fusion studies near Coulomb barrier Pragya Das Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai, Mumbai , India.

Chapter 2 Some Quantitative Formalities ◎ Introduction ● The scale of nuclear physics and suitable units ◎ The radioactive decay law ● Multimodal decays.

National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY USA Evaluated nuclear Structure Data Base J. K. Tuli.

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) Jounghwa Lee 21st NSDD Meeting, Vienna, Austria, April 2015.

Studies of Deuteron and Neutron Cross-sections Important for ADS Research Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute of CAS, Řež, Czech Republic,

Breakup effects of weakly bound nuclei on the fusion reactions C.J. Lin, H.Q. Zhang, F. Yang, Z.H. Liu, X.K. Wu, P. Zhou, C.L. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, G.P.

Application Nuclear Data Needs

International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Data for the Production of Therapeutic Radioisotopes: Background, Objectives and Expected Outputs 1 st RCM,

Status Report of the Nuclear Structure and Decay Data evaluation activities at the Australian National University ( ) T. Kibèdi Tibor Kibèdi, Dep.

Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions Studied by Activation Method Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department.

NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES NEAR Z=50 FROM NEUTRON EVAPORATION SPECTRA IN (p,n) REACTION B.V.Zhuravlev, A.A.Lychagin, N.N.Titarenko State Scientific Center.

GAN Zaiguo Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Alpha decay of the neutron-deficient uranium isotopes.

Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.

Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars: the Role of the 18 O(p,  ) 15 N Reaction Marco La Cognata.

DDEP-2008 Workshop, 2008, May 12-14, Bucharest, Romania 1 EVALUATION OF 236 U NUCLEAR DECAY DATA Aurelian Luca “Horia Hulubei” National Institute of Physics.

Outline Introduction Description of experiments

Nuclear Reaction Questions 1.In 1909, what did Ernest Rutherford aim to discover? 2.Describe the equipment set-up he used to carry out his experiment.

Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics V.Varlamov, EMIN-2009 (21 – 26 September) 1 V.A. Chetvertkova, B.S. Ishkhanov,

Neutron Capture Cross Sections from 1 MeV to 2 MeV by Activation Measurements Korea Institutes of Geoscience and Mineral Resource G.D.Kim, T.K.Yang, Y.S.Kim,

PS-2.2 Illustrate the fact that the atoms of elements exist as stable or unstable isotopes.

HomeworkHomework Read section 4.4 Answer questions 26 & 27 on page 107.

SAGE: status and future SAGE: V.N. Gavrin Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.

LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY, SKOBELTSYN INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Multi-particle photodisintegration of heavy nuclei A.N. Ermakov, B.S. Ishkhanov,

Nuclear Chemistry 1989 D By: Stephanie Chen and Stephanie Ng.

Presentation for WPEC/SG39 meeting, 2015 Nov.30 th to Dec. 4 th Paris, France 1/20 A Stress Test on 235 U(n, f) in adjustment with HCI and HMI benchmarks.

Review of Fundamentals

Calibration of uniformity between LYSO crystals Zhigang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS The Third International Workshop on the High.

Neutron exposure at CERN Mitsu KIMURA 19 th July 2013.

Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,

ENSDF - NuDat Alejandro Sonzogni Needs and Links to ENSDF/NuDat Alejandro Sonzogni National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY.

EGAF Status 2015 Richard B. Firestone Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley, 94720, USA 21 st Technical Meeting.

Example of Evaluation: Decay of 177 Lu (6.647 d) Filip G. Kondev 2 nd Workshop for DDEP Evaluators, Bucharest, Romania May 12-15,2008.

Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.

Chemistry Chapter 4 Notes. What you need to know from Mendeleev organized the periodic table first and put the elements in order of increasing.

Decay scheme studies using radiochemical methods R. Tripathi, P. K. Pujari Radiochemistry Division A. K. Mohanty Nuclear Physics Division Bhabha Atomic.

“Energy & Transmutation of Radioactive Waste“ collaboration workshop Řež, from June 4 up to June 8 1 Nuclear Physics Institute Řež Methodical comments.

Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,

Transmutation of 129 I with high energy neutrons produced in spallation reactions induced by protons in massive target V.HENZL Nuclear Physics Institute.

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.

Transmutation of spent nuclear fuel

Transmutation of 129I with high energy neutrons produced in spallation reactions induced by protons in massive target V. HENZL1,*, D. HENZLOVA1, A. KUGLER1,

Various radio-nuclides that decay by positron emission

O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner

Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of the absolute emission probability of 1077 keV  -ray for 68 Ga Huang Xiaolong 2013 ， 6 China Nuclear Data Center China Institute of Atomic Energy, P.O. Box 275(41), Beijing , China

2 Status P  (511)P  (1077) Comments 1994Sc Absolute Exp. 2012Lu Absolute Exp. Jiang(2011) deduced Table of Isotope, 7th edition Eval. NDS Eval. DDEP Eval.

3 Background ++  1077keV,3~3.2%  +,  1077keV =2.56%,China

4 Reason ? a large difference between the cross section deduced with 511keV and 1077keV  -ray is up to ~30% Maybe the current decay data of 68 Ga, that’s the P  (1077keV), has a problem.

5 Jiang’s Measurement Cross section exp.: Irradiation of the samples(Ga 2 O 3 powder ) was carried out at Cockcraft-Walton accelerator in CIAE and lasted 40 min. The finial results of 69 Ga(n,2n) 68 Ga reaction c-s at En=14.9MeV was 1030  31(mb) with P  (1077keV)= 2.56  0.09%.

6 Exp. data status on relative  -ray intensities LRSW results are in good agreement with Jiang’s exp. and NDS eval. This means the present exp. data on relative  -ray intensities are good.

7 Eval. P  (1077keV)-1 The available measured I  + values are little changed: I  + =88  11%(1959Ra), 89.2%(1969Va16),  0.11% (1994Sc44 ) Assumed: I  + =  0.11%. From LOGFT,  /  +(1077keV level) =1.505,  /  +(ground state)=0.1017, and  -ray intensity balance, deduced P  (1077keV)=2.81  0.01% This value is obviously different from the absolute measuremed value:3.22  0.03%, or Jiang’s deduced value: 2.56  0.09%.

8 Eval. P  (1077keV)-2 In order to eval. the P  (1077keV), the measured ratio of the intensity for positrons(p ann ) and intensity for 1077keV(p 1077 ) are considered. The weighted average results are adopted as the measured values are discrepant.

9 Eval. P  (1077keV)-3 Consider: P ann /P 1077 =65.6  0.4 %. From LOGFT,  /  +(1077keV level) =1.505,  /  +(ground state)=0.1017, and  -ray intensity balance, deduced P  (1077keV)= 2.72  0.16 % I  + =89.2  0.2% Also, this value is different from the absolute measuremed value:3.22  0.03%, or Jiang’s deduced value: 2.56  0.09%.

10 Discussion -1 In order to verify the rationality of our eval., mainly C-S measurements ~14.8MeV are adjusted using present eval. It’s obvious that the good agreement is obtained. Thus, present evaluated P  (1077keV) is considered superior to other evaluations such as NDS/DDEP.

11 Discussion-2

12 谢谢！