UNITED NATIONS NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION UNITED NATIONS EVALUATION GROUP (UNEG) Maya Bachner WIPO IDEAS 1st BIENNIAL CONFERENCE, NEW DELHI, APRIL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Delivering as One Viet Nam Country-led Evaluation Kigali, 20 October 2009.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
UN Strategic Plan on HIV/AIDS Midterm Performance review (2001 – 2003) Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group 29 July 2003.
EPP-ED WORKSHOP ON RULES OF PARTICIPATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 7 th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME ( ) Viewpoint from the European University Association.
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
The Current Debate on the Post-2015 Development Agenda Assistant Secretary-General Thomas Gass December 2014.
1 7th Framework Programme Specific Programme “Ideas” European Commission Directorate B November 2005.
National Evaluation Capacity Development Key elements for a conceptual framework Marco Segone*, Systemic Management, UNICEF Evaluation Office, and former.
Purpose of the Standards
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
System-wide Action Plan for implementation of the CEB Policy on gender equality and the empowerment of women: briefing UN Women Coordination Division.
The role and responsibilities of the EITI Board Members Sydney, 24 May 2013 Christian Fr. Michelet.
Establishment and Development of the Internal Audit System for the Public Sector in Kyrgyz Republic INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ISTANBUL
Principles of good practice Jana Kunická Community Philanthropy Initiative Coordinator European Foundation Centre.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
International Federation of Accountants Organizational Overview and Update April 2002.
Republic of the Sudan The National Audit Chamber (NAC) Presentation to: INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee (CBC) Stockholm – September 8, 2015.
Global Task Team: Improving AIDS Coordination Among Multilateral Institutions and International Donors Briefing for Theme Group on HIV/AIDS 1 November.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
0 United Nations Capital Development Fund Summary of Strategic Partnership Between UNDP and UNCDF Moving Closer Together in the Context of the UNDP Strategic.
Kick-off Meeting Belgrade, 4-5 December 2008 Network of Centres for Project Development and Management.
Comments on the Proposed Thematic Project on Evaluation and Impact Assessment (recommendations 33,38,41) Viviana Muñoz Tellez Programme Officer, South.
AID EFFECTIVENESS A GLANCE FROM GLOBAL TO COUNTRY LEVELS Cao Manh Cuong Foreign Economic Relations Dept. Ministry of Planning and Investment.
CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
Developing Consensus Principles and Standards for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs) Progress Report to the Fifth Meeting of the.
EUROSAI Professional Standards – Goal Team 2 Brief introduction Cristina Breden Mária Kysucká Vilnius, September 2012.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Impact of Climate Change on Vector Borne Diseases, Kigali, RWanda, 29 March |1 | ADDRESSING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS TO HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOSYSTEM.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
Supporting Integrated and Comprehensive Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation in Africa AAP Country Conference “Celebrating our Successes” 12 th - 16.
2013 Report on the Evaluation Function of UN-Women Informal Executive Board Meeting June 2014 New York, NY Marco Segone Director, UN Women independent.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
BNAO ROLE FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC FINANCES Tzvetan Tzvetkov, CIA, CGAP, CRMA - President of the Bulgarian National Audit Office.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
CSTD Working Group on Improvements to the IGF Recommendations Peter Major, Chairman Special Advisor, Permanent Mission of Hungary to the UN, Geneva IGF.
Opportunities in evaluating Equitable and Sustainable Development in the context of SDGs Marco Segone Director, UN Women Independent Evaluation Office.
Project Management December 2008 Department of Planning and Follow-up (DPF) Secretary of Administration and Finance (SAF)
The role and responsibilities of the EITI Board Members Lima, 23 February 2016 Christian Fr. Michelet.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Action Points. SO1 Norms and Standards sub-group Immediate next steps: prepare preamble / copy edit and fact checking (EG) Develop and implement a dissemination.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
Rooting evaluation independence in the context of multilateral development organizations Oscar A. Garcia Director, Independent Office of Evaluation of.
Independent Evaluation Office EVALUATION THE ROLE OF UNDP IN ADVANCING THE SDGS Date: Dr. Indran A. Naidoo, Director.
Evaluation in the SDG era: lessons, challenges and opportunities for UNEG EPE, 26 April 2016, Geneva.
2016 UNEG Evaluation Week April 2016 Geneva, Switzerland Annual General Meeting.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Independent Evaluation Office NO ONE LEFT BEHIND March 2016 /ieoundp /UNDP_evaluation.
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Road map and outline of the revised evaluation policy of UNICEF
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Background to The Conference
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
THE independent evaluation office of Undp Independence, credibility and use IPDET, 30 June 2014 Indran A. Naidoo Director.
years of existence.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
GEF policies: progress and next steps
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
BIENNIAL SUPPORT BUDGET PROPOSAL An Overview
Presentation transcript:

UNITED NATIONS NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION UNITED NATIONS EVALUATION GROUP (UNEG) Maya Bachner WIPO IDEAS 1st BIENNIAL CONFERENCE, NEW DELHI, APRIL 2005

Why UN Norms and Standards? At present, only general regulations exist Evaluation functions respond to different organizational expectations Lack of common set of norms and standards that govern evaluation functions within the UN Greater need for harmonization “New” Results Based Management (RBM) environment with a focus on managing-for-results Greater expectations for the use of evaluation of higher quality, both internally and externally

OECD countries Why UN Norms and Standards different from those of other Organizations? Inter-governmental collaboration, multiple stakeholders, Governing Bodies’ oversight, complex accountability, international values and principles, universality and neutrality, egalitarian participation Accountability to taxpayers International financial institutions Governing Body’s oversight over the performance of the Organisation and its investments Associations Professionalization, code of conduct, methodological rigor, transparency and inclusiveness of all stakeholders UN System

Existing framework for evaluation in the UN The Secretary General’s Bulletin ST/SGB/2000/8 - September 19, 2000: Defines the general use of evaluation in the context of programme planning and budgeting process to be followed by each respective unit/organisation of the UN Provides broad minimal regulations for programme evaluation

The General Assembly Resolution A/RES/59/250 of Dec 2004: Linking evaluation to performance in the achievement of developmental goals Strengthen evaluation activities, with particular focus on development results, including through the systematic use of evaluation approaches at the system-wide level Promotion of collaborative approaches to evaluation UNEG to make further progress in system-wide collaboration on evaluation, in particular harmonization and simplification of methodologies, norms, standards and cycles of evaluation New framework for evaluation in the UN

Harmonizing, consolidating, simplifying and strengthening the system-wide collaboration on evaluation Ensuring that evaluation entities within the UN system operate following agreed upon basic principles Providing a platform for strengthening and professionalizing the evaluation function and improving the quality of evaluation Fostering a better understanding, practice and better use of evaluation, by UN evaluations functions, Organizations, Governing Bodies and stakeholders UN Norms and Standards for Evaluation Aim

All entities of the United Nations System, including Funds and Programs and Specialized Agencies Due account would be taken of the particular objectives for evaluation work established by the Governing Body of each Organization UN Norms and Standards for Evaluation Application

UN Norms and Standards for Evaluation Work in progress UNEG Working Group on Norms and Standards established in 2002 Comparative analysis of existing evaluation norms and standards in 2003 Survey of the situation of evaluation within the UN system in days Working Group drafting workshop 2004 March 2005: First draft submitted for comments April 2005: Second draft integrating comments submitted to UNEG for consideration during UNEG annual meeting in Rome, end of April 2005.

Draft Proposed Norms for Evaluation Contribution to Knowledge Building ResponsibilityDefinition Intentionality Impartiality Independence Evaluability Quality Competencies Consultations, Participation and Transparency Ethics Follow-up

Draft Proposed Standards for Evaluation 1.Institutional Framework and Management of the Evaluation Function 2.Competencies and Ethics 3.Conducting Evaluations (design, process, selection of team, implementation, reporting, follow-up) 4. Evaluation reports