1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
Advertisements

Prompts Consider the following questions as you build this slide:
NASA Commercial Crew Program COMSTAC May 2011 Page 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM COMSTAC May 2011 E. Mango Commercial.
NASA Mission Directorates. 0 NASA's mission is to pioneer future space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research. NASA’s Mission.
The Vision for Space Exploration – Challenge & Opportunity ISS Panel Report Robert D. Cabana ISS Panel Chair March 30, 2005.
Presentation Overview
International Space Station: National Laboratory Development Brad Carpenter Space Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters.
NASA AGENCY REPORT Dr. Eric J. Lindstrom Physical Oceanography Program Scientist Earth Science Division Science Mission Directorate MARCH 12, 2007.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 16 Sustainable Operations Management— Preparing for the Future McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status with a Focus on Insight / Oversight Approach to the COMSTAC.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee International and Interagency Sub-Committee.
Comprehend the Historical Benefits of Exploration Comprehend the US Strategic Plan to Explore Space Comprehend the Current Costs of Exploring Space Comprehend.
Attracting appropriate user funding in the context of declining public funding.
November 30, 2006 Space Telescope Science Institute Conference Scott “Doc” Horowitz Associate Administrator NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.
Astronomy in the President’s 2007 Budget David Trinkle, Amy Kaminski, and Joel Parriott February 13, 2006.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Summary Description of Previous Studies Study NameDateSummary Description Exploration Office Case Studies NASA's Office of Exploration did four.
FY Division of Human Resources Development Combined COV COV PRESENTATION TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 7, 2014.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Benefits of Research360 Catherine Pink Institutional Data.
A Perspective on the NASA Space Power and Energy Storage Roadmap National Research Council Panel Power Workshop March 21, 2011 H. Sterling Bailey, Ph.
AIAA’s Publications Business Publications New Initiatives Subcommittee Wednesday, 9 January 2008 Rodger Williams.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
© 2014 IBM Corporation Smarter Workforce Services Business Process Innovation.
AIAA Corporate Membership Advisory Committee Space & Astronautics CMAC Report June 7, 2013.
M A N U F A C T U R I N G E X T E N S I O N P A R T N E R S H I P March 25, 2009 – Advanced Manufacturing Summit NIST MEP MEP Growth Framework: Sustainability.
Lunar Colony Design Challenge January 14, 2004 Indeed it is the nature of humanity to explore beyond our horizons. Humanity explores in order to discover,
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
DRAFT V1 National Vaccine Supply Chain Innovations: Country Commitment to Ownership, Sustainability & Impact GAVI Partners’ Forum WHO – UNICEF – GAVI -
© 2008 IBM Corporation Challenges for Infrastructure Outsourcing July 29, 2011 Atul Gupta Vice President, Strategic Outsourcing, IBM.
Future Space Exploration A Summary of “The Global Exploration Roadmap”, International Space Exploration Coordination Group, August 2013 Summarized by:
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Now More Than Ever Why we should settle the solar system and what we can do about It National Space Society.
Commercial Space Vehicles Lessons Learned Needs Workshop Bette Siegel, Ph.D. ESMD Bette Siegel, Ph.D. ESMD September 18, 2006.
General Capacity Building Components for Non Profit and Faith Based Agencies Lakewood Resource and Referral Center nd Street, suite 204 Lakewood,
2014 Key Issues Review: Ensuring a Robust U.S. Human Spaceflight Program Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February 12, 19,
1 You Get to Go... NOW! Opening Space To The American People A Recommendation to the Augustine Review of US Human Space Flight Committee Bruce Pittman.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
1 Rita Sambruna Lia LaPiana NASA HQ NASA HQ The Science Definition Team for the astrophysics-focused use(s) of the Telescope Assets.
Probabilistic Technology Initiative for NASA Pam Caruso Technical Assistant to the Director, Engineering NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Presented to.
Copyright 2004 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 21 June 2004 Doug Young NG Lead Executive for Project Constellation Northrop Grumman Corporation Cooperating.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
The NEKIA Business Development Initiative Overview Annual Retreat Scottsdale, Arizona November 19-21, 2003.
NASA’s FY 2007 Budget Outlook February 23, 2006 | AIAA National Capital Section Brian Chase, Assistant Administrator for Legislative Affairs.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
Interaction Private Sector Working Group Discussion with USAID Global Partnerships January 30, 2014.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
1 June 10, 2004 Gary L. Wentz, Jr. Deputy Manager, MSFC Office of Exploration Systems MSFC Office for Exploration Systems.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
Jim Bell Cornell University The Planetary Society July 30, 2009 Mars Exploration : Rationale and Principles for a Strategic Program Preliminary.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
UNCLASSIFIED Lift the living standards and wellbeing of all Victorians by sustainably growing Victoria’s economy and employment and by working with the.
National Goals and Objectives
Visit Mendocino County: Strategic Direction 2017/ /20
SOAR Observatory Strategic Planning Initial Concept Presentation
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Propellant Depot Bernard Kutter United Launch Alliance
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
Jean-Eric Paquet.
Design 6 Classes 4th Quarter Lunar/Mars Rover Science Project
Where do we go from here? Goals of human exploration of Mars: Science, Outpost, Settlement NASA’s Plan: Earth Reliant è Proving Ground è Independence.
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
Presentation transcript:

1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009

2 Defining the Basis for Evaluation Major Drivers for defining the evaluation criteria HSF Commission 2009 Charter and Statement of Task –Expedite a new U.S. capability to support utilization of the International Space Station –Support missions to the Moon and other destinations beyond low Earth orbit –Stimulate commercial space flight capability –Fit within the current budget profile for NASA exploration activities Other Metrics defined by Panel Members Reviewed metrics and figures of merit used in previous studies Space Act of Synthesis Group 2004 Vision for Space Exploration Significant agreement on metrics and criteria Not all criteria will be weighted equally

3 Sustainability Science Knowledge Economic Expansion Technology Innovation Life Cycle Cost Public Engagement Exploration Preparation Schedule and Programmatic Risk Expanding Human Civilization Workforce Impact Safety Global Partnership Benefit to Stakeholders RISKS BUDGET REALITIES Evaluation Challenges

4 Exploration Preparation Promotes and enables exploration beyond LEO -2 Exploration is limited to LEO; No significant activity beyond ISS & SSP Supports ISS with the development of capability for beyond LEO 0Limited beyond LEO exploration 1 Provides exploration beyond LEO with ability to grow and evolve 2 Develops Operational Robustness to explore destinations beyond LEO

5 Science Knowledge Addresses critical research areas consistent with Decadal survey priorities -2No plan for science research Science research opportunity but is inconsistent with the priorities of the science community 0 Limited Opportunity for science research but no implementation plan 1 Addresses some priorities of the scientific community (astrophysics, planetary and lunar science, solar science and earth science) 2 Significantly addresses many critical priorities of the scientific community

6 Technology Innovation Enables technology maturation, new modes of exploration and national leadership in innovation -2Uses current or very near term technologies Uses near term technology with modest investment in maturation and transfer 0Technology maturation required to support exploration 1Provides opportunity for technology innovation 2Provides significant enabling technology innovation

7 Expanding Human Civilization Leads to a presence off planet and enables sustained human presence and/or bases -2Does not enable human presence Enables a visit beyond LEO 0 Leads to a presence off planet and supports research for crew effects (i.e. radiation, zero or low-g) 1 Addresses crew – oriented effects to enable sustained human presence off planet 2 Enables sustaining human presence off planet utilizing In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) or enhances protection of the Earth

8 Economic Expansion Growing, profitable Industrial Base; Commercial Engagement and US development and production capabilities increase -2 Diminishes technical capability industrial base. No opportunity for commercial participation Weakens industrial base. Limited opportunity for commercial goods and services 0Sustains US industrial base with some new opportunities 1Stimulates investment in new and existing capabilities 2Commercial systems form integral part of the architecture

9 Global Partnership Leverages and expands international partnerships (IP) -2Discourages further International Partnership Involvement Disrupts existing International Partnership 0Sustains existing International Partnership 1 Leverages and strengthens International Partnerships (including critical path) 2Expands International Partnerships to potential new partners

10 Public Engagement Motivate and Inspire current and future generations; Societal benefits -2Fails to capture /stimulate public interest at all Gains public interest, but, only focuses on LEO Exploration goals 0 Gains public interest and focuses on Beyond LEO Exploration 1 Significant public interest; Motivates STEM increase and includes broad program that directly benefits society 2 Galvanizes broad public interest in science and technology. Engages the public in exploration

11 Safety and Mission Success Probability of Loss of Crew (LOC) or Loss of Mission (LOM) -2Significantly Increased risk of LOC or loss of mission Increased risk of LOC 0LOC risk comparable to Shuttle (1/81) 1 Enhanced crew safety consistent with new human rating requirements 2 Significantly enhanced crew safety (10X) and high launch vehicle reliability

12 Life Cycle Cost Affordability through 2020; balanced approach given other national needs -2Greatly exceeds the President’s budget Exceeds the President’s budget 0Meets the President’s budget 1Under the President’s budget 2Significantly under the President’s budget

13 Schedule and Programmatic Risk Likelihood of delivering robust exploration capability on schedule -2Provides no exploration beyond LEO before 2030’s Provides sosme exploration beyond LEO early 2020’s 0 Delivers capability on a schedule consistent with the POR, Human Lunar Return in Delivers robust capability with schedule margin (low risk) 2Delivers robust capability with significant schedule margin

14 Programmatic Sustainability Likelihood of keeping the program sold, i.e., by meeting near term, and continuing, visible milestones -2Significant advocacy needed for out year funding Out year funding profile requires advocacy 0Sufficient public and congressional support 1 Plus broad support from industry and external agencies, i.e., DoD 2Plus broad support from International Partners

15 Critical Skills Workforce Impact Impact on nations’ critical skills -2Significant loss of critical skills and experience Some loss of critical skills and experience 0Maintains selected critical skills and expertise 1 Attracts and retains highly capable technical workforce and critical expertise 2 Enables strategic realignment of the workforce to ensure availability of critical skills

16 Workforce Impact (NASA and Industry) Near term total workforce impact -2> 10% Decrease < 10 % Decrease 0Maintains critical skills and expertise 1< 10% Increase 2> 10% Increase

17 Evaluation Measures Summary Evaluation MeasureCriteria Exploration PreparationRobust Growth Beyond LEO Science KnowledgeAligned with Scientific Community Technology InnovationEnable New Modes of Exploration Expanding Human CivilizationSustained Human Presence Economic ExpansionGrowing Profitable Industrial Base Global PartnershipLeverage & Expand Intl Partnerships

18 Evaluation Measures Summary (cont) Evaluation MeasureCriteria Public EngagementMotivate and Inspire; Societal Benefit Schedule & Programmatic RiskOperational Flexibility and Robustness Safety and Mission SuccessCrew Safety and Mission Success Programmatic Sustainability Credibility, Stability, Keeping the support Life Cycle CostTarget – President’s Budget Workforce ImpactsStrategic alignment; critical skills Panel to assess proposed options against each measure

19 Integrated Options Evaluation (Presented by ED) Metrics Baseline POR ISS Focused Dash Out of LEO Use Shuttle Systems Deep Space Lunar Global Mars First Option 8Option 9 Exploration Preparation Technology Innovation Science Knowledge Expanding Human Civilization Economic Expansion Public Engagement Global Partnership Schedule & Programmatic Risk Life Cycle Cost Programmatic Sustainability Safety and Mission Success Workforce Impact