Patient Outcomes Each patient will be evaluated at up to 4 time points (after 2, 4, 8 and 12 cycles) of therapy. Compared to the patient’s baseline evaluation,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Advertisements

Goede V et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 7004.
Advanced NSCLC Objective response rate -Well defined & widely accepted -Does not correlate well with OS -May be more useful if SD included -Higher RR correlates.
Lecture 9 Chapter 5. Non-Normal Populations. 5.1 Introduction  Throughout the course ( in Chapters 2, 3 and 4) we have focussed on data which we can.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Eastern cooperative oncology group E1496: ECOG and CALGB Cyclophosphamide/Fludarabine (CF) with or without Maintenance Rituximab (MR) in Advanced Indolent.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
SARC 005: Adjuvant treatment of high risk uterine LMS with gemcitabine/docetaxel followed by doxorubicin: a phase II multi-center trial PI: Martee.
Proposal to Delay the HCC Exception Score Assignment (Resolution 9) Liver and Intestine Committee David Mulligan, Chair November 12 and 13, 2014.
RECIST Overview.
Immune Related Response Criteria (irRC) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors Training Presentation v3.0.
Rituximab efficacy in other haematological malignancies Christian Buske.
Cancer Trials. Reading instructions 6.1: Introduction 6.2: General Considerations - read 6.3: Single stage phase I designs - read 6.4: Two stage phase.
Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.
Phase 2 study of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) in combination with bevacizumab (avastin) in patients with sporadic and neurofibromatosis type.
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation with a Single Dose of 90 Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin ® ) (Z) vs Maintenance with Rituximab (R)
The ACTIVE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 3 [Epub]
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
A phase III trial comparing R-CHOP 14 and R-CHOP 21 for the treatment of newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma Results from a UK NCRI Lymphoma.
Bortezomib (VELCADE), Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone (VRCD) combination therapy in front-line low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LG-NHL) is active.
MEASURING CLINICAL EFFICACY IN PHASE II TRIALS Response: Karnofsky, WHO, RECIST Event rate: progression free/survival Time to event: progression/survival.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO; CMC544), a CD22 Monoclonal Antibody Attached to Calicheamycin, Produces Complete Response (CR) plus Complete Marrow Response.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
A Phase 2 Study of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin for Front- Line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results Yasenchak.
Bortezomib (BTZ) and Panobinostat (PAN) Combination Is Effective in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) or NK/T-Cell Lymphoma.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
1 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Reduction of the Risk of Recurring Heart Failure.
Esophageal Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of Systemic Second-Line Therapy Christiane Maria Rosina Thallinger, Markus Raderer, and Michael Hejna J Clin Oncol.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of a Palliative Care Intervention on Clinical.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
GEM2005MAS65 Trial: Bortezomib-Based Maintenance Increases CR Rate and PFS in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Slideset on: Mateos.
CLINICAL PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
SARC003 Phase II Study of Gemcitabine & Docetaxel in Recurrent Ewing’s Sarcoma, Osteosarcoma, or Unresectable/Locally Recurrent Chondrosarcoma Elizabeth.
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
EQ: How do you solve probability questions in a binomial setting?
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Response to chemotherapy
Results: Patient details Results: QoL
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
EQ: How do you solve probability questions in a binomial setting?
Figure 7 Management algorithm for patients with ACLF
AP STAT MOCK EXAM Saturday, April 23, 2016
CTCL: INNOVATIVE TREATMENTS GEMCITABINE
Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease  Stephen B Hanauer, Carrie L Wagner,
Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Treating to Target in MS
Safety and Efficacy of Dacomitinib in Korean Patients with KRAS Wild-Type Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Refractory to Chemotherapy and Erlotinib.
What is the best frontline regimen for CLL patients
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Predicts Early and Late Outcomes of Cardiovascular Operations in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis  Naoto Morimoto,
Figure 6 Hypothetical effect of starting therapy for autosomal
(p = 0.32 for noninferiority)
Response to Carfilzomib Therapy
Mark K Ferguson, MD, Amy G Lehman, BA  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Figure A (online only) Flow diagram showing case recruitment, participation and follow up to the three year interview for the Prostate Cancer Care and.
Linear correlationa between TMB cutoff for ORb for CR/PR rates and HRc for PFS, and OS depending on TMB for patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy.
Genomic determinants of response to cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Survival, subsequent therapies, and response.
Presentation transcript:

Patient Outcomes Each patient will be evaluated at up to 4 time points (after 2, 4, 8 and 12 cycles) of therapy. Compared to the patient’s baseline evaluation, the patient’s disease will be categorizes as R = CR/PR (response), F = progressive disease or death (failure), or S (stable disease = neither R nor F) A patient with outcome R or F at any stage is scored as having that overall outcome A patient with outcome S is re-evaluated after subsequent cycles of therapy

Evaluation of Response Each patient will be assigned one of the following categories 1.Complete response 2.Partial response 3.Stable disease 4.Progressive disease 5.Early death for malignant disease 6.Early death from toxicity 7.Early death because of other causes 8.Unknown (not assessable insufficient data) Patients in response categories 4-9 should be considered as failing

Possible Patient Outcomes Eval 1Eval 2Eval 3Eval 4Overall Outcome 1RR 2FF 3SRR 4SFF 5SSRR 6SSFF 7SSSRR 8SSSFF 9SSSSR

Ewings – Current Data Eval 1Eval 2Eval 3Eval 4Number of Patients 1R0 2F7 3SR1 4SF1 5SSR0 6SSF1 7SSSR0 8SSSF0 9SSSS0 Pending patients: 1) S at Eval 1, Pending Eval 2 2) Pending Eval 1

Stopping Boundary How close are we in the Ewings subtype? Let  denote the overall response rate Accrual will be terminated if Pr(  > 0.35 | Data ) < That is, there is less than a 5% chance that we have reached the targeted 35% overall response rate Currently with 2 pending patients enrolled Pr(  > 0.35 | Data ) = 0.098

Possible Results For Pending Patients By 11/16/2006 both pending patients are scheduled to have scans. Hypothetical outcomes are in maroon. CasePend. Pat.Eval 1Eval 2 Pr(  > 0.35 | Data ) 11SF F 21SR F 31SF R 41SR R 51SS S

Pending Patients By 11/16/2006 both pending patients are scheduled to have scans. CasePend. Pat.Eval 1Eval 2 Pr(  > 0.35 | Data ) 11SF F 21SR F 31SF R 41SR R 51SS S

Calculating  Let  R,j and  S,j denote the probability of R and S at stage j respectively.  =  R,1 +  S,1  R,2 +  S,1  S,2  R,3 +  S,1  S,2  S,3  R,4 +  S,1  S,2  S,3  S,4